Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: have you heard about TOAST projection?

2010-12-25 Thread Yuval Levy
On December 21, 2010 10:40:21 pm Tom Sharpless wrote:
 It never ceases to amaze me that up in Redmond they pay people good 
 money to do such work.

it happens everywhere where money is too easy.


 I keep suggesting that our primary stitching targets should include
 the cube, since so many of our panos end up that way.

agree.  I have floated this idea to the maker of a proprietary stitching tool 
more than five years ago and last time I used it / paid for an upgrade license 
it was not there.  But I heard it has been introduced since.

Yuv


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[hugin-ptx] Re: have you heard about TOAST projection?

2010-12-22 Thread kfj
On 22 Dez., 04:40, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I keep suggesting that our primary stitching targets should include
 the cube, since so many of our panos end up that way. It would be only
 a little extra work to make an engine for that do the TOAST and Pierce
 Quincuncial projections too.

This made me think of the 'panini perspective tool'. What became of
that? I found a debian package panini_0.71.104-0ubuntu1~lucid_i386.deb
which I installed on my Kubuntu 10.10 system, but somehow I can't get
it to work for me. Maybe it's a setting thing, in the top of the
window it says 'Panini at 0.00 Mpixels', as if it didn't have any
memory to work with, and when I try to load an image or even set a
projection, the thing plain freezes. I thought the concept was
promising, but it looks like it's not developed any further? The
package is from March this year.

Kay

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


[hugin-ptx] Re: have you heard about TOAST projection?

2010-12-21 Thread Tom Sharpless
Once again, Microsoft takes a poor idea and runs with it.  It never
ceases to amaze me that up in Redmond they pay people good money to do
such work.

Not that I have anything against tiled projections.  Printing
dodecahedral panoramas seems quite popular, there are several programs
for that.  On the flickr MathMap group you can see many beautiful
examples, many by Seb, of not just polyhedral tilings but all sorts of
curved tesselations of the sphere, displaying spherical images.

I keep suggesting that our primary stitching targets should include
the cube, since so many of our panos end up that way. It would be only
a little extra work to make an engine for that do the TOAST and Pierce
Quincuncial projections too.

-- Tom


On Dec 17, 8:18 am, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
 On 16 Dez., 15:50, Seb Perez-D sbprzd+...@gmail.com wrote:

  On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 15:48, Sebastien Perez-Duarte

  sebastien.perez-dua...@m4x.org wrote:
   A much better projection is the Peirce Quincuncial. It is also square,
   but is almost everywhere conformal.

  Sorry, I forgot the Wikipedia link!

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce_quincuncial_projection

 Hey, I really like this projection! You're right, it has more
 aesthetic appeal than TOAST.

 Kay

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


[hugin-ptx] Re: have you heard about TOAST projection?

2010-12-17 Thread kfj


On 16 Dez., 15:50, Seb Perez-D sbprzd+...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 15:48, Sebastien Perez-Duarte

 sebastien.perez-dua...@m4x.org wrote:
  A much better projection is the Peirce Quincuncial. It is also square,
  but is almost everywhere conformal.

 Sorry, I forgot the Wikipedia link!

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce_quincuncial_projection

Hey, I really like this projection! You're right, it has more
aesthetic appeal than TOAST.

Kay

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx