Re: [hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
It is a GOOD IDEA :-) i can't help thinking that all this debating, the feature could have been built by now ;-))) (not by me though) (not an excuse to simply build features instead of having a good debate, i fully realize.) Jeffrey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
On 31 March 2011 09:59, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote: It is a GOOD IDEA :-) i can't help thinking that all this debating, the feature could have been built by now ;-))) (not by me though) (not an excuse to simply build features instead of having a good debate, i fully realize.) Jeffrey Yeah, but it would have been of mediocre quality at best. RAW processing is out of scope of hugin and if it was implemented it would be something as simple as using dcraw to load an image. Nobody (hyperbole) uses dcraw to process their RAWs, because it's too simple to be useful alone. We couldn't compete with applications like Lightroom, Aperture or Rawtherapee. It would probably take a few man years to get there. Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
well, there are tons of raw developing programs that use dcraw. so what do you mean? no one uses dcraw command line? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
On 31 March 2011 20:57, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote: no one uses dcraw command line? That's what I meant. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: hello I used enfuse several times to compress dynamic range of a single RAW image. The algorithm was to produce at least two tiffs with different exposures, including one with correct highlights and one with good shadows (+EV in RAW processing software), and to use enfuse to blend the images into one picture. The result looks natural and most of the times better than the one from official HDR tonemapping algorithms. So the feature request is to implement internal tonemapping algorithm from one file for enfuse without the need to produce several input files with different exposures. The adjustment parameter can be a value of exposure compensation. This is nice, but perhaps a little outside enfuse domain. BTW, I would suggest ImageMagick's sigmoidal-contrast option as perhaps being suitable for preparing the light/id/dark frames for enfuse: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#sigmoidal-contrast I haven't tried it though. BugBear -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] enfuse for tonemapping of a single RAW
hello I used enfuse several times to compress dynamic range of a single RAW image. The algorithm was to produce at least two tiffs with different exposures, including one with correct highlights and one with good shadows (+EV in RAW processing software), and to use enfuse to blend the images into one picture. The result looks natural and most of the times better than the one from official HDR tonemapping algorithms. So the feature request is to implement internal tonemapping algorithm from one file for enfuse without the need to produce several input files with different exposures. The adjustment parameter can be a value of exposure compensation. With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
