Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
- "Chris Samuel" wrote:
> - "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
>
> > K. Clear for a final rc / release?
>
> Go for it, am just about to go run a training course
> now so won't be available until this arvo Melbourne
> time..
Seems fine with PGI, Intel and GCC on AMD64, so I
thought I'd give it a whirl on our old SLES9 PPC64
cluster with XLC, that whinges about the usual params
unused, but also says:
"topology-linux.c", line 146.33: 1506-280 (W) Function argument assignment
between types "unsigned int" and "struct {...}*" is not allowed.
cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > K. Clear for a final rc / release? Go for it, am just about to go run a training course now so won't be available until this arvo Melbourne time.. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
Brice Goglin, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 22:03:11 +0100, a écrit : > I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume > everything is ok now. Same for me. Samuel
[hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc4 is out
Please beat it up and look for problems! http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v0.9/ -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume everything is ok now. Brice Jeff Squyres wrote: > K. Clear for a final rc / release? > > (due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an > rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning) > > > On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit : >> > I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. >> >> Yes, these are mostly pedantism warnings which we do not need to fix for >> this release (would need tagging parameters as unused etc.) >> >> Samuel >> ___ >> hwloc-devel mailing list >> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel >> > >
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
K. Clear for a final rc / release? (due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning) On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit : > I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. Yes, these are mostly pedantism warnings which we do not need to fix for this release (would need tagging parameters as unused etc.) Samuel ___ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit : > I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. Yes, these are mostly pedantism warnings which we do not need to fix for this release (would need tagging parameters as unused etc.) Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > Thanks for your patience! Samuel just committed a > bunch more -- try the next one: That fixed up the PGI warnings, but I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. Output attached again. [csamuel@tango hwloc-0.9.1rc4r1282]$ icc -V Intel(R) C Intel(R) 64 Compiler Professional for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 11.1Build 20090827 Package ID: l_cproc_p_11.1.056 Copyright (C) 1985-2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency makelog-icc Description: Binary data
