Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
Sweet. :-) On May 13, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > > 1.0rc6 seems OK. Thanks! > > -- Pavan > > On 05/12/2010 11:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> Pavan -- >> I just posted rc6 with the fixes for this. Can you confirm that it works >> for you? It works for Open MPI, but we configure differently than you. >> Perhaps this can be the last rc... (gasp!) >> (sorry for the delays folks; I was at the MPI Forum last week and that >> heavily distracted me...) >> On May 10, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: >>> Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking >>> for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea. >>> >>> -- Pavan >>> >>> On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers that don't support C99, would you be willing to gracefully abort during configure instead of failing at make time? https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/changeset/6634 I agree that most compilers today probably support C99, but whether to drop C89-only support is a policy decision we are yet to make in MPICH2, and will need the above patch to get hwloc integrated cleanly in all our supported environments. Thanks, -- Pavan >>> -- >>> Pavan Balaji >>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji >>> ___ >>> hwloc-devel mailing list >>> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel >>> > > -- > Pavan Balaji > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji > ___ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
1.0rc6 seems OK. Thanks! -- Pavan On 05/12/2010 11:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Pavan -- I just posted rc6 with the fixes for this. Can you confirm that it works for you? It works for Open MPI, but we configure differently than you. Perhaps this can be the last rc... (gasp!) (sorry for the delays folks; I was at the MPI Forum last week and that heavily distracted me...) On May 10, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea. -- Pavan On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers that don't support C99, would you be willing to gracefully abort during configure instead of failing at make time? https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/changeset/6634 I agree that most compilers today probably support C99, but whether to drop C89-only support is a policy decision we are yet to make in MPICH2, and will need the above patch to get hwloc integrated cleanly in all our supported environments. Thanks, -- Pavan -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji ___ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
Cool. Let's aim for a Monday release, then (assuming everything works out ok on Leopard). On May 13, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 13 May 2010 06:34:37 -0500, a écrit : > > Is rc6 The One? > > I couldn't test on Leopard yet (the corresponding INRIA machines are > busy up to Saturday morning) > > Samuel > ___ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel > -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 13 May 2010 06:34:37 -0500, a écrit : > Is rc6 The One? I couldn't test on Leopard yet (the corresponding INRIA machines are busy up to Saturday morning) Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
Is rc6 The One? -jms Sent from my PDA. No type good. - Original Message - From: hwloc-devel-boun...@open-mpi.org To: Hardware locality development list Sent: Thu May 13 05:56:49 2010 Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers Jeff Squyres, le Wed 12 May 2010 12:52:01 -0400, a écrit : > I just posted rc6 with the fixes for this. I have built the windows binary, available on http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/hwloc-win32-build-1.0rc6.zip Samuel ___ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 12 May 2010 12:52:01 -0400, a écrit : > I just posted rc6 with the fixes for this. I have built the windows binary, available on http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/hwloc-win32-build-1.0rc6.zip Samuel
Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 1.0-rc5 cannot recreate hwloc.7 after make distclean
On 07/05/10 04:45, Christopher Samuel wrote: > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `hwloc.7', needed by `all-am'. Stop. Confirming fixed in rc6, thanks! -- Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computational Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/
