Re: [IAEP] [Announcement] Sugarizer v1.8 - 10th Anniversary edition - is available for your device

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Congratulations!!

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ib...@sugarlabs.org



On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:28 PM Martin Abente Lahaye 
wrote:

> Congratulations !!
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:11 PM Lionel Laské 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm proud to announce version 1.8 of Sugarizer (https://sugarizer.org),
>> the leading learning platform for children. It's the 10th Anniversary
>> edition: happy birthday Sugarizer!
>>
>> New in this version:
>>
>>- Chart Activity: Unleash your creativity and data prowess with the
>>new Chart Activity. Organize your information in a visually appealing way.
>>Choose the best chart for your data and make your presentation stand out.
>>Try it now!
>>
>>
>>- Word Puzzle in Exerciser:This new template in Exerciser activity
>>empowers educators to create engaging word puzzles on the fly during
>>lessons, providing a dynamic and interactive learning experience for
>>students. With the ability to incorporate text, images, sounds,
>>speech, or videos, the Word Puzzle template offers a new word experience
>>for learners.
>>
>>
>>- CSV file support: CSV format is now fully supported in Sugarizer.
>>Open it from the Journal, easily export Measurements and Stopwatch
>>activities data in CSV format. Plus, on Android and iOS, you can now
>>copy any file from your device. Harness the flexibility and convenience of
>>CSV today!
>>
>>
>>- Rewrite of Chat activity:Experience a whole new level of
>>interaction with our revamped Chat activity. It's simpler, more intuitive,
>>and faster than ever before. Dive into seamless communication and
>>enjoy the enhanced performance.
>>
>>
>>- Improved stability: more than 30 fix and update on Sugarizer and
>>activities.
>>
>>
>>
>> A short animation of these features is visible here:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m48JjH4EcPI
>>
>> A full description of Sugarizer activities with demo video, category and
>> recommended age is available on https://sugarizer.org/activities.html
>>
>>
>>
>> We need your help to improve Sugarizer user experience and make it
>> accessible to more users! Support Sugarizer on GitHub Sponsor [1] or
>> Liberapay [2].
>>
>>
>> Sugarizer 1.8  is available on your browser [3] but also for your
>> Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS or Windows device. Download it from : Google
>> Play [4], Amazon Store [5], Apple Store [6], F-droid [7], snapcraft [8]
>> and if you don't like stores, you could also install it by yourself using
>> instructions on the Sugarizer website [9].
>>
>> On Android, Sugarizer could also replace your launcher with Sugarizer OS
>> [10].
>>
>> And if you want to deploy Sugarizer Server for your school, follow
>> instructions here [11].
>>
>>
>>
>>Lionel Laské
>>
>>
>> P.S.: Special thanks for their contribution on this version to Utkarsh
>> Siddhpura and Vinayak Nayar. Many thanks also to all Google Summer of
>> Code students and mentors who made this release possible.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/sponsors/llaske
>>
>> [2] https://liberapay.com/llaske
>>
>> [3] http://try.sugarizer.org
>>
>> [4]
>> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>>
>> [5] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NKK7PZA
>>
>> [6] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sugarizer/id978495303
>>
>> [7] https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdid=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>>
>>
>> [8] https://snapcraft.io/sugarizer
>>
>> [9] https://sugarizer.org
>>
>> [10]
>> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.olpc_france.sugarizeros
>>
>>
>> [11] https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer-server
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Announcement] Sugarizer v1.7 is available for your device

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Yay! Congratulations!

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ib...@sugarlabs.org



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 9:28 PM Lionel Laské  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm proud to announce version 1.7 of Sugarizer, the leading learning
> platform for children.
>
> https://sugarizer.org
>
> New in this version:
>
>- Assignments: Receive assignments directly from Sugarizer, answer
>them and submit your answer while still in the application. Sugarizer
>becomes your school companion.
>- Evaluation mode in Exerciser:Exerciser becomes a skills assessment
>tool. Turn any exercise into an assessment in one click and give it to the
>class in real time or make it a homework assignment.
>- Better touch screen support: The new Sugarizer version has now been
>tested on different smart board and touch PC. Whatever its size is,
>Sugarizer will work on your touch screen.
>- New Tutorial UI:We've decided to change the tutorial library to
>provide a better user experience. Simpler, more intuitive and faster.
>You'll love it.
>- Improved stability: more than 40 fix and update on Sugarizer and
>activities.
>
>
>
> A short animation of these features is visible here:
> https://youtu.be/fkuC05ddW_U
>
> A full description of Sugarizer activities with demo video, category and
> recommended age is available on https://sugarizer.org/activities.html
>
>
>
> We need your help to improve Sugarizer user experience and make it
> accessible to more users! Support Sugarizer on GitHub Sponsor [1] or
> Liberapay [2].
>
>
>
> Sugarizer 1.7  is available on your browser [3] but also for your
> Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS or Windows device. Download it from : Google
> Play [4], Amazon Store [5], Apple Store [6], F-droid [7], snapcraft [8]
> and if you don't like stores, you could also install it by yourself using
> instructions on the Sugarizer website [9].
>
> On Android, Sugarizer could also replace your launcher with Sugarizer OS
> [10].
>
> And if you want to deploy Sugarizer Server for your school, follow
> instructions here [11].
>
>
>
>Lionel Laské
>
>
> P.S.: Special thanks for their contribution on this version to Rohan Kumar
> (Assignment feature), Divyansh Agarwal (Exerciser activity) and Saumya
> Kushwaha (new tutorial). Many thanks also to all Google Summer of Code
> students and mentors who made this release possible.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/sponsors/llaske
>
> [2] https://liberapay.com/llaske
>
> [3] http://try.sugarizer.org
>
> [4]
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>
> [5] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NKK7PZA
>
> [6] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sugarizer/id978495303
>
> [7] https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdid=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>
> [8] https://snapcraft.io/sugarizer
>
> [9] https://sugarizer.org
>
> [10]
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.olpc_france.sugarizeros
>
> [11] https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer-server
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Updated invitation: Call for Design meeting @ Monthly from 08:00 to 09:00 on the second Friday from Fri 2019-09-13 to Thu 2022-04-07 (EDT) (iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org)

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Just seeing this, did the meeting change as I'm seeing that it changed from
today to yesterday.



On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 12:54 pm ,  wrote:

> *This event has been changed.*
> Call for Design meeting
>
> *When*
> *Changed: *Monthly from 08:00 to 09:00 on the second Friday from Fri
> 2019-09-13 to Thu 2022-04-07 Eastern Time - New York
> *Calendar*
> iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> *Who*
> •
> Walter Bender - organizer
> •
> perriefide...@gmail.com
> •
> Ojemeh Peace Ozioma
> •
> d...@lab6.com
> •
> Dave Crossland
> •
> Jaskirat Singh
> •
> Samson Goddy
> •
> qu...@laptop.org
> •
> iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> •
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> more details »
> 
> Hello,
>
> I created an agenda for the meeting today.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 23:33, James Cameron wrote:
> >
> > G'day,
> >
> > Yes, I'm fine with 12pm UTC, thanks for adjusting.
> >
> > Just to help communicate the needs; in our history at Sugar Labs;
> >
> > - web site and branding were Marketing Team responsibilities,
> >
> > - consistency of icons inside Sugar, and user interface, were Design
> > Team responsibilities,
> >
> > - the Design Team was composed from self-selected Sugar and core
> > activity developers.
> >
> > I'll be on the lookout for anything that, for want of a better word,
> > we would call "requirements", or "functionality", and ask that t...
>
> Going (iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org)?   All events in this series:   *Yes
> 
> - Maybe
> 
> - No
> *
> more options »
> 
>
> Invitation from Google Calendar 
>
> You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
> iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org because you are an attendee of this event.
>
> To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event.
> Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification
> settings for your entire calendar.
>
> Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to
> the organizer and be added to the guest list, or invite others regardless
> of their own invitation status, or to modify your RSVP. Learn More
> .
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] meeting reminder

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone, apologies for not making it to the meeting. Had some power
issues, I've gone through the logs.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ib...@sugarlabs.org



On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:31 AM Walter Bender 
wrote:

> We have a Sugar Labs oversight meeting on Wednesday, 23 June at 19:30
> UTC (3:30 PM on the US East Coast). Hope you can join us (on #sugar in
> matrix.org)
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOB meeting reminder

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

I apologize for not attending today's meeting - had some connection issues
-, can someone
share the minutes. Thanks.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:54 PM Walter Bender 
wrote:

> The next meeting of the Sugar Labs oversight board is on Wednesday, 17
> February at 19:30 UTC (2:30 PM on the US East Coast).
>
> We agreed to meet in the #sugar room of matrix.org so please be sure
> to have a matrix client available. (I use element, which is available
> at element.io.)
>
> Please contact me if you have any questions.
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> ___
> SLOBs mailing list
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] 2021-01-03 meeting minutes

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

I apologize for not making it to today's meeting, my vote on both motions
is +1.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 9:23 PM Peace Ojemeh  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m sorry I missed the meeting. I’m in support of both motions:
>
> 1. Alex Perez fill the seat left empty by Devin's withdrawal until the
> next board election. and
> 2. Use Matrix.org for the next few meetings
>
> Regards.
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 9:18 pm Walter Bender 
> wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2021-02-03
>>
>> Please see the two motions in the minutes.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> ___
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
> --
> Peace Ojemeh(Perrie)
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/Peace_Ojemeh
> Website: www.peaceojemeh.com
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] meeting reminder

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,


I'll try making it to the meeting but I doubt I'll make it as I'm currently
in an area with bad internet access so I'll read the logs. Thanks.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 2:47 PM Walter Bender  wrote:

> The next Sugar Labs oversight board meeting is Wednesday, 2021-01-06
> at 19:30 UTC (2:30 PM on the US East Coast).
>
> There will be a finance report and we will be discussing Claudia's
> idea of monthly virtual workshops.
>
> Please join us on Jitsi [1].
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> [1] https://meet.jit.si/sugarlabs
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> ___
> SLOBs mailing list
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Thanks Devin; some comments.

"Composition and Meetings. The Corporation shall have an Advisory Board
whose members shall be appointed by corporate sponsors who pay annual fee
to be determined by the Board of Directors. The Advisory Board may meet at
any time and place its members choose."

I thought that the advisory board wasn't reserved for any sponsor.




On Tue, Nov 3, 2020, 10:19 PM  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> This is the latest bylaws which impacts all members and board of
> directors.
>
> As everyone has had sufficient time to review the last draft and this is
> only slightly modified, I plan to give the lawyer the green light
> tomorrow morning.
>
> Thank you all!
>
> Best,
> Devin
>
> On 2020-10-28 14:53, devin@ulibarri.website wrote:
> > Attached is current draft. It was drafted from the SugarLabs Wiki by
> > Aaron Williamson, Sugar Labs Inc.'s lawyer. (https://www.akwlc.com/)
> >
> > (sending this separately as sometimes mailing lists send attachments
> > later)
> >
> > On 2020-10-28 14:52, devin@ulibarri.website wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> If you would like to look over a draft of the bylaws for a future
> >> Sugarlabs Inc. and can make it at 20:00 UTC today (SLOB's usual time,
> >> every other Weds), please reply.
> >>
> >> Devin
> >>
> >> On 2020-10-14 10:45, devin@ulibarri.website wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Just a friendly reminder that today is the next SLOBs Meeting.
> >>>
> >>> The proposed agenda is
> >>>
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-10-14
> >>>
> >>> As always, if any community members would like to join and do not
> >>> already know the link for the meeting, please reply to
> >>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Devin
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Music Blocks was made to run from a browser and it currently fails to start
in sugar, there's an open issue for it
https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks/issues/2579.

When you say "Couldn't make Develop do anything useful" I'm guessing you
mean you couldn't use the activity, the activity helps you create your own
activity or edit existing ones.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020, 2:16 PM Martin Guy  wrote:

> On 03/11/2020, Chihurumnaya Ibiam  wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 11:20 AM Martin Guy 
> wrote:
> >> > the included activities are:
> >> >
> >> > abacus
> >> > analyzejournal
> >> > browse
> >> > calculate
> >> > ...
> >>
> >> I've been looking at what activities to include in a Sugar Live
> >> Everything i386 release, but it looks like you've made my task easier.
> >> Shall I call it Sugar Live Trisqel in honour of the Activity selection
> >> or do you think that would confuse things?
> >
> > I think it can be called Trisquel Sugar TOAST live, just to keep with the
> > trisquel convention.
>
> OK. I've been vacillating between sugar-live-trisquel and
> sugar-live-etiona (lack of imagination!) so thanks for that. PS I love
> trisqeul as a distro - didn't know about it.
>
> I notice that Music Blocks isn't in the Trisquel Etiona set, and it
> seems a prime candidate for inclusion. Of the other activities, I
> couldn't make Develop do anything useful, but I couldn't with Trisquel
> Live Sugar Toast either, so I assume it's just me.
>
> > I see that you've done it manually and I'd love to know what you did.
>
> Nothing special. Just searching each activity on github.com/sugarlabs
> and filling in the fields
>
> M
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 11:20 AM Martin Guy  wrote:

> > the included activities are:
> >
> > abacus
> > analyzejournal
> > browse
> > calculate
> > ...
>
> I've been looking at what activities to include in a Sugar Live
> Everything i386 release, but it looks like you've made my task easier.
> Shall I call it Sugar Live Trisqel in honour of the Activity selection
> or do you think that would confuse things?
>

I think it can be called Trisquel Sugar TOAST live, just to keep with the
trisquel convention.


>
> Also, if you're OK with me lifting your Acvivity selection, I see I
> need to include lines like
>
>   clone https://github.com/sugarlabs/somethingSomething.activity
>
> in Sugar Live Build's auto/config file, where "something" is usually
> "something-activity" but not all actiivies follow this convention, so
> do you have to hand a list of the github-name activity-name pairs for
> the Trisqel list, to save me having to pore over github/sugarlabs'
> many pages of activities by hand?
>

The Sugar Live Build followed the convention of the creator and most of the
activities
are the fructose set, you can also follow the same convention as it's
straightforward and easy.
I see that you've done it manually and I'd love to know what you did.


> I see that sugarlabs-calculator (named in SLB' sucrose set) on github
> redirects to calculator-activity (I guess it was renamed at some
> point). If all activities were to do this (e.g. pippy-activity->Pippy)
> it would be easier to reduce package choices to a succint list.
>

Yeah I'm guessing the redirect is a github convention as the repo the
activity was forked from was named
sugarlabs-calculate but the forked repo is calculate-activity.


> M
>
> Thanks again
>
> M
>


-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Yes the metadistro still provides i386.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:06 AM Martin Guy  wrote:

> Does the metadistro it's based on still provide i386?
> If so, making a 32-bit image should be a doddle. If not...
>
>M
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Second Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversight Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Good day everyone,

They're five(5) seats now available for candidates, the candidates wiki
submission deadline is on the
4th of November, 2020.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:29 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam <
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a second call for candidates from the Sugar Labs Membership and
> Elections Committee for four (4) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights Board
> for the period of 2020-2022.
>
> This is a second call for candidates!
>
> *All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
> * Board* <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board>* and therefore
> are invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period 
> **elections
> until January 4th, 2020, as follows:*
>
> *Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
> their vision and motivation.*
> >>To add your candidacy visit:
> *https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates>
>
> To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
> address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*
>
> Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide
>
> Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages
>
>
> If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process,
> please send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*
>
>
> *Remember**!!!*
> *Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Elections_2017#Candidates>
>  *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Nov/2020*
>
> Welcome candidates!
>
>
>
> *Membership and Elections Comittee*
>
> *Sugar Labs Project*
>
> --
>
> Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

The 64bit seems to be just amd64.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:38 PM Martin Guy  wrote:

> Excellent! Only amd64? :)
>
>M
>
> On 29/10/2020, Chihurumnaya Ibiam  wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > The sugar trisquel image has been released
> > <
> https://trisquel.info/en/trisquel-90-etiona-release-announcement-and-100-plans
> >
> > by Ruben and it needs to be tested.
> >
> > He'd said this earlier;
> >
> > It took me a while to find a gap to work on the project, but I
> > got go a good point this week:
> >
> https://trisquel.info/en/trisquel-90-etiona-release-announcement-and-100-plans
> >
> > That includes the "Trisquel On a Sugar Toast" v9 release, which comes
> > with Sugar 117 and further commits up to this weekend. I also packaged a
> > list of activities and included them in the image. I could only give it
> > basic testing (it took a lot of work to remove integration bugs and
> > dependencies), so I just know that they all run, but I don't know if
> > they work properly. I also found a bug in the panel, when you click on
> > the icons on the bottom right the ones to the left of the one clicked
> > disappear (I didn't consider it a release-blocker).
> >
> > Please give this image a test:
> >
> https://cdimage.trisquel.info/trisquel-images/trisquel-sugar_9.0_amd64.iso
> >
> > After testing we may need to produce another image. This also depends on
> > whether we want to change the list of included activities, or add any
> > other features to the image.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ruben
> > PS: the included activities are:
> >
> > abacus
> > analyzejournal
> > browse
> > calculate
> > chat
> > clock
> > deducto
> > develop
> > flip
> > flipsticks
> > fractionbounce
> > gcompris
> > iknowmyabcs
> > imageviewer
> > implode
> > iq
> > irc
> > jukebox
> > jumble
> > lettermatch
> > locosugar
> > log
> > maze
> > memorize
> > moon
> > musickeyboard
> > napier
> > nutrition
> > paint
> > periodictable
> > pippy
> > poll
> > portfolio
> > pukllanapac
> > read
> > recall
> > record
> > reflection
> > simplegnuchess
> > speak
> > stopwatch
> > story
> > terminal
> > turtleblocks
> > typingturtle
> > wordcloud
> > words
> > write
> >
> > --
> >
> > Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> > ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
> >
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

The sugar trisquel image has been released

by Ruben and it needs to be tested.

He'd said this earlier;

It took me a while to find a gap to work on the project, but I
got go a good point this week:
https://trisquel.info/en/trisquel-90-etiona-release-announcement-and-100-plans

That includes the "Trisquel On a Sugar Toast" v9 release, which comes
with Sugar 117 and further commits up to this weekend. I also packaged a
list of activities and included them in the image. I could only give it
basic testing (it took a lot of work to remove integration bugs and
dependencies), so I just know that they all run, but I don't know if
they work properly. I also found a bug in the panel, when you click on
the icons on the bottom right the ones to the left of the one clicked
disappear (I didn't consider it a release-blocker).

Please give this image a test:
https://cdimage.trisquel.info/trisquel-images/trisquel-sugar_9.0_amd64.iso

After testing we may need to produce another image. This also depends on
whether we want to change the list of included activities, or add any
other features to the image.

Cheers,
Ruben
PS: the included activities are:

abacus
analyzejournal
browse
calculate
chat
clock
deducto
develop
flip
flipsticks
fractionbounce
gcompris
iknowmyabcs
imageviewer
implode
iq
irc
jukebox
jumble
lettermatch
locosugar
log
maze
memorize
moon
musickeyboard
napier
nutrition
paint
periodictable
pippy
poll
portfolio
pukllanapac
read
recall
record
reflection
simplegnuchess
speak
stopwatch
story
terminal
turtleblocks
typingturtle
wordcloud
words
write

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Second Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversight Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

This is a second call for candidates from the Sugar Labs Membership and
Elections Committee for four (4) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights Board
for the period of 2020-2022.

This is a second call for candidates!

*All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
* Board* * and therefore are
invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period
**elections
until January 4th, 2020, as follows:*

*Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
their vision and motivation.*
>>To add your candidacy visit:
*https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*


To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*

Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide

Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages


If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process, please
send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*


*Remember**!!!*
*Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*

 *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Nov/2020*

Welcome candidates!



*Membership and Elections Comittee*

*Sugar Labs Project*

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversights Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

The link in the previous email goes to the wrong page, this is the right
link <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates>.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 7:54 AM Chihurumnaya Ibiam <
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a call for Candidacies from the Sugar Labs Membership and
> Elections Committee for four (4) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights Board
> for the period of 2020-2022.
>
> This is a first call for candidates!
>
> *All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
> * Board* <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board>* and therefore
> are invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period 
> **elections
> until November 4th, 2020, as follows:*
>
> *Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
> their vision and motivation.*
> >>To add your candidacy visit:
> *https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates>
>
> To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
> address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*
>
> Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide
>
> Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages
>
>
> If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process,
> please send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*
>
>
> *Remember**!!!*
> *Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Elections_2017#Candidates>
>  *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Nov/2020*
>
> Welcome candidates!
>
>
>
> *Elections Comittee*
>
> *Sugar Labs Project*
>
> --
>
> Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversights Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

This is a call for Candidacies from the Sugar Labs Membership and Elections
Committee for four (4) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights Board for the
period of 2020-2022.

This is a first call for candidates!

*All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
* Board* * and therefore are
invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period
**elections
until November 4th, 2020, as follows:*

*Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
their vision and motivation.*
>>To add your candidacy visit:
*https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*


To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*

Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide

Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages


If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process, please
send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*


*Remember**!!!*
*Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*

 *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Nov/2020*

Welcome candidates!



*Elections Comittee*

*Sugar Labs Project*

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi,

I apologize for not attending today's meeting, I had an engagement and
couldn't get home early.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 9:03 PM Claudia Urrea  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I won’t be able to attend today’s meeting. I will if I return home from an
> appointment. Sorry!
>
> Claudia Urrea, Ph.D
>
>
> > On Oct 14, 2020, at 10:46 AM, devin@ulibarri.website wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just a friendly reminder that today is the next SLOBs Meeting.
> >
> > The proposed agenda is
> > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-10-14
> >
> > As always, if any community members would like to join and do not
> > already know the link for the meeting, please reply to
> > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link.
> >
> > Best,
> > Devin
> > ___
> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] Oversight Board Elections 2019-21 has begun!

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Harshith,

Only members of the Sugar Labs community are able to cast a vote.

You can read about applying for membership here
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members.

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 4:44 AM Harshith Pvs  wrote:

> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm new to sugar labs community, though I've been following this
> forum/mailing list from over a month. I've not received any mail with slob
> election link yet. I've checked thoroughly all my inboxes (spam too) and
> searched for it as suggested in above mail.
> Do I need to contribute anything to be eligible to cast my vote? I hope I
> could cast a vote too! Thanks in advance!
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan, 2020, 4:05 AM Samson Goddy,  wrote:
>
>> Same here too
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:34 PM Martin Abente <
>> martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems to work fine :)
>>>
>>> In case someone has an unmanageable inbox like myself, just search for
>>> "sugar labs election" and you should find it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:24 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam <
>>> ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed, I didn't make the suggestion earlier as I'm part of the people
>>>> who have access to the alias, kindly remove every one who's a candidate
>>>> from the alias.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 10:53 PM James Cameron  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Vipul.
>>>>>
>>>>> It works, I voted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please add memb...@sugarlabs.org and sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org to the
>>>>> election results destination?  This will be more transparent.  We had
>>>>> memb...@sugarlabs.org on the results destination in previous years.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:21:13PM +0530, Vipul Gupta wrote:
>>>>> > Hello folks,
>>>>> > The Oversight Board election 2019-21 is upon us. In your inboxes,
>>>>> you would
>>>>> > have received a unique email from CIVS or [1]c...@cs.cornell.edu
>>>>> with the
>>>>> > options to poll for the candidates.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The poll is open from 15th January 2020 to 31st January 2020. You
>>>>> can find more
>>>>> > information on the candidates here [2]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/
>>>>> > Oversight_Board/2019-2021-candidates.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please check your spam folders or promotions if you can't find it.
>>>>> Add the
>>>>> > email address to your contact list and mark as not spam when you
>>>>> find it.
>>>>> > As always, looking forward to hearing any questions you all would
>>>>> have. Do cast
>>>>> > your vote!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best,
>>>>> > Vipul Gupta
>>>>> > [3]Mixster | [4]Github
>>>>> >
>>>>> > References:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1] mailto:c...@cs.cornell.edu
>>>>> > [2]
>>>>> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2019-2021-candidates
>>>>> > [3] https://mixstersite.wordpress.com/
>>>>> > [4] https://github.com/vipulgupta2048
>>>>>
>>>>> > ___
>>>>> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> James Cameron
>>>>> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Samson Goddy
>>
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/samson_goddy
>> Email: samsongo...@sugarlabs.org
>> samsongo...@gmail.com
>>
>> Website: https://samsongoddy.me/  <https://www.sugarlabs.org/>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Oversight Board Elections 2019-21 has begun!

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Agreed, I didn't make the suggestion earlier as I'm part of the people who
have access to the alias, kindly remove every one who's a candidate from
the alias.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 10:53 PM James Cameron  wrote:

> Thanks Vipul.
>
> It works, I voted.
>
> Please add memb...@sugarlabs.org and sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org to the
> election results destination?  This will be more transparent.  We had
> memb...@sugarlabs.org on the results destination in previous years.
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:21:13PM +0530, Vipul Gupta wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > The Oversight Board election 2019-21 is upon us. In your inboxes, you
> would
> > have received a unique email from CIVS or [1]c...@cs.cornell.edu with
> the
> > options to poll for the candidates.
> >
> > The poll is open from 15th January 2020 to 31st January 2020. You can
> find more
> > information on the candidates here [2]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/
> > Oversight_Board/2019-2021-candidates.
> >
> > Please check your spam folders or promotions if you can't find it. Add
> the
> > email address to your contact list and mark as not spam when you find
> it.
> > As always, looking forward to hearing any questions you all would have.
> Do cast
> > your vote!
> >
> > Best,
> > Vipul Gupta
> > [3]Mixster | [4]Github
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:c...@cs.cornell.edu
> > [2] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2019-2021-candidates
> > [3] https://mixstersite.wordpress.com/
> > [4] https://github.com/vipulgupta2048
>
> > ___
> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Announcing Candidates for the Upcoming SLOB Elections!

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 10:48 PM James Cameron  wrote:

> G'day Vipul,
>
> Thanks for taking over responsibility for running the election.
>
> There's three problems with the Wiki page you link to;
>
> 1.  there was no "resignation of James Cameron"; please remove that,
>
> 2.  this election to be named 2019-2021, not 2020-2022; let me
> know if you need help moving the page,
>
> 3.  there should be at least three seats vacating to comply with our
> governance rule "positions on the board will be on a two-year
> staggered basis".
>
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates
>
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 10:04:08PM +0530, Vipul Gupta wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > I will be taking over the election of the open seats for the oversight
> board
> > (SLOB) as an independent administrator. Ibiam being a candidate in the
> upcoming
> > elections, will be stepping down as the administrator. Thanks to Walter
> and
> > Ibiam's help and guidance, I will be looking over the election's
> proceedings,
> > announcements and make sure everything runs smoothly and that the
> integrity of
> > the election is maintained.
> >
> > The deadline for the call of candidates is now over. There are five(5)
> > candidates for the three(3) seats on the oversight board (SLOB). The
> candidates
> > are as follows:
> > 1. Claudia Urrea
> > 2. Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> > 3. Peace Ojemeh
> > 4. Rahul Bothra
> > 5. Samson Goddy
> >
> > More details about the candidates and their vision is available
> here [1]https:/
> > /wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates
> > I will be announcing the dates of the election soon and will be happy to
> answer
> > all queries and questions you have. Looking forward to a fair election
> and good
> > luck to all the candidates.
> >
> > Best,
> > Vipul Gupta
> > [2]Wiki | [3]Github
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates
> > [2] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Vipulgupta2048
> > [3] https://github.com/vipulgupta2048
>
> > ___
> > SLOBs mailing list
> > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Announcement of the Candidacy of Ibiam Chihurumnaya

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

I hereby announce my candidacy for the upcoming SLOBs elections.
Please ask any questions you may have and read more here

.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Second Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversights Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

This is a second call for Candidacies from the Sugar Labs Membership and
Elections Committee for three (3) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights
Board for the period of 2020-2022.

This is a first call for candidates!

*All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
* Board* * and therefore are
invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period
**elections
until January 4th, 2020, as follows:*

*Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
their vision and motivation.*
>>To add your candidacy visit:
*https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*


To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*

Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide

Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages


If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process, please
send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*


*Remember**!!!*
*Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*

 *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Jan/2020*

Welcome candidates!



*Membership and Elections Comittee*

*Sugar Labs Project*
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversights Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi All,

The link I sent earlier goes to an old page,
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates the page
to add your candidacy. Thanks.

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 10:46 PM Lionel Laské  wrote:

> Hi Chihurumnaya,
>
> The current SLOB have 7 seats.
> Could you detail which 3 seats will be available?
>
> Regards.
>
>   Lionel.
>
>
> Le sam. 21 déc. 2019 à 17:22, Chihurumnaya Ibiam 
> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> This is a call for Candidacies from the Sugar Labs Membership and
>> Elections Committee for three (3) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights
>> Board for the period of 2020-2022.
>>
>> This is a first call for candidates!
>>
>> *All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
>> * Board* <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board>* and therefore
>> are invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 *
>> *period **elections until January 4th, 2020, as follows:*
>>
>> *Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
>> their vision and motivation.*
>> >>To add your candidacy visit:
>> *https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*
>> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates>
>>
>> To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
>> address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*
>>
>> Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
>> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide
>>
>> Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
>> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages
>>
>>
>> If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process,
>> please send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*
>>
>>
>> *Remember**!!!*
>> *Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*
>> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Elections_2017#Candidates>
>>  *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Jan/2020*
>>
>> Welcome candidates!
>>
>>
>>
>> *Membership and Elections Comittee*
>>
>> *Sugar Labs Project*
>> ___
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversights Board Elections 2020-2022

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Everyone,

This is a call for Candidacies from the Sugar Labs Membership and Elections
Committee for three (3) members of the Sugar Labs Oversights Board for the
period of 2020-2022.

This is a first call for candidates!

*All members of Sugar Labs can be part of the **Sugar Labs **Over**sight*
* Board* * and therefore are
invited to submit their candida**cy** for **the** 2020-2022 **period
**elections
until January 4th, 2020, as follows:*

*Each candidate shall create one (1) Entry in the Sugar Labs wiki sharing
their vision and motivation.*
>>To add your candidacy visit:
*https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2020-2022-candidates*


To request a Sugar Labs Wiki account, please send a user name and email
address to the Systems team: *systems @ lists dot sugarlabs dot org*

Here is the complete Wiki Guide:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide

Here is the link for the specific case of adding and Entry:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Wiki_Team/Guide/Editing_Pages


If you are not a member yet or need help in any step of the process, please
send your request to *members @ sugarlabs dot org*


*Remember**!!!*
*Deadline for **publi**shing** candida**cies*

 *i**n **the* *Sugar Labs **Wiki **is: 04/Jan/2020*

Welcome candidates!



*Membership and Elections Comittee*

*Sugar Labs Project*
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] IAEP Digest, Vol 131, Issue 2

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi AB,

For you to be a mentor of a project, you must have made contributions to
the project.
You can visit the Ideas page
 to look at
the ideas.

Here's a list by James that you should look at

New to Sugar Labs?  Unlock these achievements in any order;

1.  Use Sugar or Sugarizer,


https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/how-can-i-help.md

* by using Sugar or Sugarizer you will learn how it works, and
  what can be improved.

* mandatory,

2.  Read our Code of Conduct,


https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

* mandatory,

3.  Join the developer mailing list,

https://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

* for asking questions and helping others,

* don't use digest mode if you plan to post messages or replies,
  as it breaks threads, and please try to keep discussions public,

* mandatory,

4.  Get a GitHub account,

https://github.com/

* for reporting issues, and fixing problems in source code,

* recommended,

5.  Join the Sugar Labs GitHub organisation,

https://github.com/sugarlabs

* for regular source code contributors, and reviewers, by
  invitation, contact one of the existing members,

* helpful for mail notification of GitHub activity,

* optional,

6.  Join as a Member of Sugar Labs,

https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members

* requires some contribution; code, documentation, translations,
  maintenance, running a Sugar deployment, or any other
  non-trivial activities which benefit Sugar Labs,

* reviewed by committee,

* optional,

7.  Get a wiki.sugarlabs.org account,

https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/

* needed for maintaining Wiki content,

* needed as part of moving Wiki content to GitHub,

* for subscribing to edit notifications.

* optional,

8.  Get an activities.sugarlabs.org account,

https://activities.sugarlabs.org/

* needed for releasing new versions of Sugar activities,

* optional,

9.  Get a shell.sugarlabs.org account,

https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/shell#Requesting_a_shell_account

* requires a justification,

* may also provide @sugarlabs.org mail address,

* for releasing new versions of Sugar components, test builds,
  large data sets, or public git hosting,

* for limited experimentation with non-root network services, such
  as bots or IRC proxies,

* optional,

10. Get a translate.sugarlabs.org account,

https://translate.sugarlabs.org/

* if you are bi- or multi-lingual, use your skills,

* especially if you can test Sugar activities and components, as
  this will inform your translations,

* optional,

11. Get a bugs.sugarlabs.org account,

https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/

* only if you must maintain old bug reports,

* new issues may be reported via GitHub,

* optional,

12. Join Sugar on Fedora live system mailing list,

https://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas

* download, test, report bugs, fix bugs, package,

* share your experience with others who focus on this
  distribution,

* optional,

13. Join Sugar on Debian mailing lists,

https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/debian.md#packaging

* download, test, report bugs, fix bugs, package,

* share your experience with others who focus on this distribution,

* optional,

14. Join the Internet Relay Chat channel #sugar

irc://irc.freenode.net/#sugar

* for synchronous chat with others,

* requires registration with freenode.net,

* optional,

15. Join the Internet Relay Chat channel #sugar-meeting

irc://irc.freenode.net/#sugar-meeting
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/

* for meetings, but keep your own transcripts and minutes,

* requires registration with freenode.net,

* optional,

16. Maintain an Activity


https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/contributing.md#checklist---maintainer

* many learner focused activities (apps) need simple maintenance,

* adopt an activity you like as your focus.

Hope that helps!

Looking forward to your contributions

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com



On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:46 PM EBIKIENMO BIO-IBOGOMO 
wrote:

> Hi I'm AB,
> I would like to apply for the position of an assisting mentor.
>
> On Wednesday, February 6, 2019,  wrote:
> > Send IAEP mailing list submissions to
> > iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > iaep-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of IAEP 

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] Meeting Reminder

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi Caryl,

There's one here
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Google_Code_In_2018/background. Thanks.

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 5:54 AM Caryl Bigenho  wrote:

> I was unable to sign on last month. It would be helpful to have complete
> instructions along with a link available in a prominent location well in
> advance of the meeting time.
>
> Thanks!
> Caryl
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 8:38 PM, James Cameron  wrote:
>
> It has nothing to do with soas, f28 or f29; you will see the same failure
> on every system. You must register to test.
>
> On 5 Oct 2018, at 08:40, Thomas Gilliard  wrote:
>
> It is impssible to login to sugar irc on f28 and f29 soas due to these
> registration requrements
>
>
> On 10/4/18 3:33 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>
> At the moment the issue with Freenode requires all of us to register
> before we can speak.
>
> This impacts new people.  It makes their joining as complicated as any
> other service with registration requirements.
>
> As D. Joe has observed, if we had our people watching, we could notice new
> people to let them speak.  We would need to enable this, and somehow cover
> the different time zones.  As we don’t have enough coverage now to answer
> the simplest questions from the people we have, we would need some
> commitment.  That would be the next step in that plan.
>
> I don’t know of any other service we could use that doesn’t require some
> sort of registration.
>
> We might set up an IRC server ourselves, but then we take on the defence
> problem that Freenode does for us.
>
> We do have a Jabber server, but I don’t know if it has been attacked in
> the same way.
>
> On 5 Oct 2018, at 07:38, Walter Bender  wrote:
>
> We will be meeting tomorrow (Friday, 5 October) at 20UTC [1] (4PM in
> Boston) on irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting (See [2]).
>
> Note that there has been a SPAM issue on Freenode of late (See the email
> from James I have forwarded below). We should discuss potential solutions.
>
> Also on the agenda:
>
> * GSoC travel
> * GCI 2018
> * [your topic here]
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> [1] https://www.worldtimeserver.com/convert_time_in_UTC.aspx
> [2] https://webchat.freenode.net/
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing 
> listSugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] A pending donation to Sugar Labs

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Really great!!!.

-- 

Ibiam Chihurumnaya 


On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

> Awesome!!
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] MOTION to budget professional services for a Yoruba-Igbo XO build WAS [Re: Yoruba localization contract completed

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

I think we can also work on Efik, because from what i know that's where
there's a high number of XO's still in use in schools -- i think over a
thousand --, so it can also be included in the build.

*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Laura Vargas 
wrote:

>
>
> 2017-06-13 15:13 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But is it okay if we have both build for Sugar on Stick and XO? Laura?
>>>
>>
>
> I do hope there is someone interested on releasing a SOAS build that
> includes all translations available for Sugar.
>
> Still, this is out of the scope of this motion.
>
>>
>> No reason why not, now that CJL confirms that the appropriate strings are
>> in place.
>>
>>
> (Not sure why we need a motion for it.)
>>
>
> If SLOBs does not make this decision, Nigerian learners won't have access
> to an updated XO build that includes Igbo and Yoruba translations.
>
> Now that the motion has been seconded by Samson, SLOBS can start voting.
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Regards and blessings,
>
> Laura V
>
>
>>
>>> Samson G
>>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2017 3:06 PM, "Chris Leonard" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM, David Ally 
 wrote:
 > Dear All,
 > I  once requested for the handle on these Nigerian translations and
 was told
 > it was not yet in the main build, so I guess this is the main
 obstacle in
 > the way of learners accessing the contents, it is important if we can
 have
 > those two translations all possible publicly available builds, so that
 > people like us can make case for their use in many fora in Nigeria.
 >
 > I support any effort in this direction. +1
 >
 > Regards!
 > David


 Our current holdings in Nigerian localization can be found on our
 Pootle server.

 Yoruba
 https://translate.sugarlabs.org/yo/

 Igbo
 https://translate.sugarlabs.org/ibo/

 The vast majority of these translations have been committed to their
 respective Github repos,  to the extent that new versions of those
 activities have been released since those commits, the translations
 are now present in ASLO.

 The core UI strings (sugar, sugar-toolkit-gtk3, OLPC_switch_laptop)
 have also been committed, but to get them visible to users a new build
 will be required.  That would either be a new SOAS build or possibly a
 custom build as proposed by Laura.

 cjl
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> 
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Laura V.
> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>
> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
> ~ Laura Victoria
>
> Happy Learning!
> #LearningByDoing
> #Projects4good
> #IDesignATSugarLabs
> #WeCanDoBetter
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hey Ty, we are attending as "Invited Speakers", there's a group of African
representatives attending and representing the continent and we're part of
that group, we are sharing our story -- what role scratch played in leading
us this far -- and Sugar Labs is part of that story, it'll be nice and good
to have guys from France attend to cut costs but we have the stage and they
don't, and we also have the opportunity to conduct an after event mini
workshop for people who want to know more about Sugar.

*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Tymon Radzik  wrote:

> wt., 23 maj 2017 o 00:37 użytkownik Samson Goddy <
> samsongo...@sugarlabs.org> napisał:
>
>> Thanks for your input Tymon,
>>
>> However i perfectly understand that Sugar Labs is NGO.. And also getting
>> a Schengen visa is also hard too. But also, bare in mind that before
>> leaving any country, you have to show prove of paying for your flight and
>> stay in the arrival country which in this case is france. I also made calls
>> with the french embassy, we know what we are facing. We already reached out
>> to the people inviting us from france about some documentations and bank
>> statements since we are invited. Even the 30,000 euros health insurance is
>> been taken care of by the team in France.
>>
>>
> If $2,800 is alot of money for the community as most people said. It is
>> fine, i just wish you can come stay in Nigeria for a week then make travel
>> arrangement.
>>
>
> Money we have deserves respect, it is shared and we take responsibility
> for it. Also legal responsibility. Our reputation and well-being requires
> us to be transparent and make wise financial decisions - minimum cost,
> maximum benefit.
>
> And with all the respect to you and with no prejudice, I need to underline
> we are not in real need to send people who face problems traveling
> internatioanlly to represent us on Scratch conference taking place on the
> other hemisphere, if we can send someone who lives much closer and
> therefore for much less cost. It is nothing personal, just a rational
> thought.
>
> BTW, in case something bad happens while you're in EU, 30,000 euro health
> insurance may not be sufficient. Medical services are really expensive
> there.
>
>
>> I will keep reaching and helping this community in the best way i can,
>> after all i went to Nairobi without Sugar Labs support. which i happen to
>> spend more than i expected before of the foreign exchange rate.
>>
>>
> I make no accusations about your community involvement. IMO we just don't
> need you traveling to France. Money should be spent to reach organization's
> goals.
>
>
>> I hate repeating myself.. So i will stop replying any questions that is
>> already answered concerning this motion.
>>
>> Like i said, it is up to the community to decide how Sugar Labs runs.
>>
>> i want to thank everyone who voted and made some comments but now, i
>> think i am done talking.
>>
>
> Sure, it's your right. As my right is to express my own opinion about this
> case.
>
>
>>
>> FYI, i am not mad or angry, but somehow surprise but not totally not
>> surprised.
>>
>
> I am sorry, I don't understand this statement at all.
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Samson G
>>
>>
> Best,
> Tymon
>
>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Tymon Radzik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am not anyhow permitted to vote, I'd like to share my mind with you,
>>> though. I completely support Lionel's opinion.
>>>
>>> I think Sugar Labs, as every NGO, should be really careful and strict
>>> while making financial decisions, especially these related to spending
>>> money we collected. Costs to benefits calculation ought to be always made
>>> and well considered. I do not see this high expense ($2800 is a lot of
>>> money) as something necessary and possibly more rewarding for our community
>>> than having OLPC representation. With all respect to Samson and Ibiam and
>>> the great work they do - I think it is not it our interest to fund such
>>> journeys. Private and more public matters need to be distinguished.
>>>
>>> As a EU citizen, who has already helped some foreigners to get through
>>> arrival process to Europe, I can confirm getting Schengen visa nowadays due
>>> to the refugee crisis seems to be definitely not easy.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tymon
>>>
>>> pt., 19 maj 2017 o 21:13 użytkownik Lionel Laské 
>>> napisał:
>>>

 I'm not for the idea:
 - It's possible than some OLPC France guys will be present there. They
 could present Sugar/Sugarizer to the conference as well. And if they do,
 the come from France - compared to Nigeria.
 - Are you sure to obtain a Visa for the conference ? French government
 is sometimes hard about Visa delivery to avoid illegal immigration.

Lionel.


 2017-05-19 18:10 GMT+02:00 Ignacio Rodríguez :

> I still don't know the difference of "seconded" or +1 to be 

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

>
>
>
> You need to establish evidence that the visa will be approved.  A single
> applicant (rather than two) confirmed by a high-level contact in the French
> government might be the best way.
>

We'll talk with the organizer and see if he has any contact with the French
government, aside that we know there is no guarantee that it will be
granted neither is there any that it'll not be granted.


> Speak to them about the above legal question too -- it is possible they
> have high-level contacts within the French govt, to provide the highest
> level of assurance that a particular visa will be approved.
>

We'll talk with the organizer and see if he has any contact with the French
government.


> How specifically will attendee(s) document their contributions, in a more
> permanent/global way -- whether via published photos, videos, ASLO,
> http://scratch.mit.edu and/or a formal report?
>
> (Most grant proposals of almost any kind require the applicant to specify
> what kinds of community documentation will result from the trip...not just
> social media, but that could be one part of it!)
>

This was in an email i received from the Scratch2017bdx committee

*HAL*
If your proposal has an accompanying paper or poster that you wish to add
to the academic archives, our partner INRIA can publish it in a
Scratch2017BDX section at HAL. HAL is an open archive where authors can
deposit scholarly documents from all academic fields. For this, please fill
out the form at scratch2017bdx.org/en/hal

If that helps.


> Can you provide a rough estimate for this in USD?
>

They want to share the responsibility with Sugar Labs, they already have a
budget for the event but every money is virtual at the moment, they are
working it out. So they'd love to pay half of the bill that's an estimated
1500euros($1681.12), but working the figures out the bill goes past that.


>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>



Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hello Laura

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Laura Vargas  wrote:

> Walter,
>
> I just want to point out there is a US$ 1,000 difference among Walter's
> motion (US $2,800) and Samson's proposal (US $1,851).
>
> Samson,
>
> I think it was a mistake, nothing more to it and Samson answered
correctly.

You state several times you were invited to the Conference, still your
> budget includes US $44,37 as "Conference Fee" this is contradictory.
>
It is mandatory that everyone attending the Conference pay the "Conference
Fee"
http://www.scratch2017bdx.org/en/register/


> Regards
>
> Laura V.
>
> Regards
*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*


2017-05-19 22:43 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>
>>  Sure.
>>
>> 3 votes in favour, 1 vote against, 1 Abstain. Since i cannot vote, that
>> means we are waiting for Adam Holt to give his vote.
>>
>> Regards
>> Samson
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Laura Vargas 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Samson,
>>>
>>> 2017-05-19 22:31 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>>>
 Hello laura,

 Sorry laura, i still don't understand your comment too.

>>>
>>>
>>> I Abstain.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blessing and regards!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laura V.
>>> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>>
>>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>>> ~ Laura Victoria
>>>
>>> Happy Learning!
>>> #LearningByDoing
>>> #Projects4good
>>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Laura V.
> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>
> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
> ~ Laura Victoria
>
> Happy Learning!
> #LearningByDoing
> #Projects4good
> #IDesignATSugarLabs
> #WeCanDoBetter
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

I'm using 13.2.7 . I would use the workaround. Thanks.

*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:58 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:

> Thanks.  Are you using 13.2.8?
>
> The Fedora repositories for Fedora 18 moved, and this was fixed in
> 13.2.8, see here;
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/13.2.7#Fedora_Repositories_Missing
>
> If you are using 13.2.7 or earlier, please use the workaround on that
> page.
>
> I've just tested "sudo yum install vlc" on XO-1.5 with 13.2.8 and no
> problem seen, just "No package vlc available.", so I'm not sure how
> your system is configured; if the above workaround does not fix,
> please show me your changed yum.repos.d files.
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:48:54PM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote:
> > Hey James, since you're still maintaining fedora18, "sudo yum vlc" - any
> > activity- returns this error "Error cannot retrieve metalink for
> repository
> > fedora18/i386" , editing the *fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ and
> > changing
> > all "https" to "http" solves the problem.
> >
> > Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> >
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:58 AM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Composite reply to several posts, in context, see below;
> >
> > Samson wrote:
> > > I think we should really join the trend so that we can get more
> > > people using Sugar for Learning.  So what are your thought on this
> > > development?
> >
> > I don't think it will work, as we don't have developers interested in
> > it.  If you're interested in it and are happy to commit fully without
> > relying on others, go for it.  But don't expect other resources to
> get
> > involved; as the argument from numbers is not compelling enough.
> >
> > There are more learning tools available for Windows.
> >
> > But the numbers are not the only reason why our customers choose
> > Linux.
> >
> > Sebastian wrote:
> > > Sugar barely runs [...]
> >
> > Yes, you're right.
> >
> > > committed releasing Sugar every six months [...] we have no release
> > > schedule.
> >
> > Yes, you're right.
> >
> > A new release of Sugar with the bug fixes since 0.110 would help
> solve
> > the "barely runs" problem.
> >
> > (also a release of the critical activities, not just the core;
> > newcomers to our community should note the term Sucrose has been in
> > our Taxonomy for many years, see the Wiki if you don't know what it
> > means.)
> >
> > [2]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy
> > [3]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Glossary
> >
> > > I don't see Sugar Labs organization as capable of strategically
> > > funding Sugar development in any direction. Of course, volunteers
> > > can work in whatever they like, if it fits their principles.
> >
> > I agree, and that's the basis of my engagement; subject to also
> > stabilising Sugar for OLPC OS on Fedora 18 and Ubuntu 16.04 for
> > delivery to OLPC customers; as a custom system with all obvious (to
> > me) bugs fixed.
> >
> > Sugar Labs is heavily benefiting from my work for OLPC, and OLPC is
> > benefiting from other volunteers at Sugar Labs.
> >
> > Dave wrote:
> > > codebase could be returned to OLPC
> >
> > No thanks.  Where would the Sugar Labs volunteers go who are focused
> > on this codebase?
> >
> > OLPC already maintains a fork with the fixes, and the changes that
> > Sugar Labs has not accepted.  All fixes have been pushed back to
> Sugar
> > Labs, but there has been no release, hence the exceedingly low
> quality
> > of the Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu experience at the moment.
> >
> > OLPC fork version numbers are like 0.110.0.olpc.12
> >
> > > Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
> >
> > Sugarizer isn't integrated into Sugar Labs; the repositories are
> > split, cooperation is minimal, and the code for activities isn't
> > portable to execution environments other than Sugarizer; such as
> > sugar-web-activity.
> >
> > So I'm certainly not inclined to support any activity development on
> > Sugarizer; because that development won't pay back for OLPC.
> >
> > I'm probably going to have to port the Moon activi

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hey James, since you're still maintaining fedora18, "sudo yum vlc" - any
activity- returns this error "Error cannot retrieve metalink for repository
fedora18/i386" , editing the *fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ and
changing
all "https" to "http" solves the problem.

*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:58 AM, James Cameron  wrote:

> Composite reply to several posts, in context, see below;
>
> Samson wrote:
> > I think we should really join the trend so that we can get more
> > people using Sugar for Learning.  So what are your thought on this
> > development?
>
> I don't think it will work, as we don't have developers interested in
> it.  If you're interested in it and are happy to commit fully without
> relying on others, go for it.  But don't expect other resources to get
> involved; as the argument from numbers is not compelling enough.
>
> There are more learning tools available for Windows.
>
> But the numbers are not the only reason why our customers choose
> Linux.
>
> Sebastian wrote:
> > Sugar barely runs [...]
>
> Yes, you're right.
>
> > committed releasing Sugar every six months [...] we have no release
> > schedule.
>
> Yes, you're right.
>
> A new release of Sugar with the bug fixes since 0.110 would help solve
> the "barely runs" problem.
>
> (also a release of the critical activities, not just the core;
> newcomers to our community should note the term Sucrose has been in
> our Taxonomy for many years, see the Wiki if you don't know what it
> means.)
>
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Glossary
>
> > I don't see Sugar Labs organization as capable of strategically
> > funding Sugar development in any direction. Of course, volunteers
> > can work in whatever they like, if it fits their principles.
>
> I agree, and that's the basis of my engagement; subject to also
> stabilising Sugar for OLPC OS on Fedora 18 and Ubuntu 16.04 for
> delivery to OLPC customers; as a custom system with all obvious (to
> me) bugs fixed.
>
> Sugar Labs is heavily benefiting from my work for OLPC, and OLPC is
> benefiting from other volunteers at Sugar Labs.
>
> Dave wrote:
> > codebase could be returned to OLPC
>
> No thanks.  Where would the Sugar Labs volunteers go who are focused
> on this codebase?
>
> OLPC already maintains a fork with the fixes, and the changes that
> Sugar Labs has not accepted.  All fixes have been pushed back to Sugar
> Labs, but there has been no release, hence the exceedingly low quality
> of the Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu experience at the moment.
>
> OLPC fork version numbers are like 0.110.0.olpc.12
>
> > Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
>
> Sugarizer isn't integrated into Sugar Labs; the repositories are
> split, cooperation is minimal, and the code for activities isn't
> portable to execution environments other than Sugarizer; such as
> sugar-web-activity.
>
> So I'm certainly not inclined to support any activity development on
> Sugarizer; because that development won't pay back for OLPC.
>
> I'm probably going to have to port the Moon activity from GTK+ 2 to
> GTK+ 3 unless someone can make the JavaScript version work on desktop.
> ;-)  I did get half way through.
>
> Zeeshan Khan also has the task for GsoC, so we might do it together.
>
> I'd like to hear from Ignacio, Sam Parkinson and Abhijit what they
> think of the port of Moon vs the JavaScript port; it may be simpler to
> port the JavaScript version back to Sugar.
>
> Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > We should work to find out a new release manager [...]
>
> Ignacio is the release manager at the moment, but my guess is that
> he'd welcome someone else taking the job.  Hopefully he'll speak up.
>
> Dave wrote:
> > Do those xo run the latest release?
>
> For mass deployment in Paraguay, they can run Sugar 0.110 plus all bug
> fixes from OLPC by using our 13.2.8 as-is or by using it as basis of
> custom build.
>
> For individuals in Paraguay, they might run "yum update" to get Sugar
> 0.110 plus fixes, unless there's some problem with clock, proxy, or
> yum.repos.d induced by environment of my bugs.
>
> Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease
> > activities management, for both image builders and developers.
>
> Please also consider Sugar Network, which Sebastian knows about, and
> is used heavily, judging by the hit counts on the Sugar Labs servers.
> Laura recently asked asking Sugar Labs for assistance with Sugar
> Network and bringing a new deployment onto it may be helpful.
>
> German wrote:
> > At Dominican Republic, ~750 XO are running latest version of Sugar.
>
> Good to get such positive feedback!  ;-)
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
IAEP -- 

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

The motion re membership committee.

*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender 
wrote:

> We have a Sugar Labs advisory board meeting at 19 UTC (14 EST) on Friday,
> 3 March. We will be meeting on irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting.
>
> Among other topics, we will be discussing:
>
> (1) status of Outreachy and Google Summer of Code programs;
> (2) "Badges" proposal'
> (3) plans, goals, aspirations
> (4) [your topic here]
>
> Hope to see you there.
>
> regards.
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as
we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and
mobile devices with xo being considered as one of the supported
environments".

I think we limited ourselves to an extent on OLPC deployments, we've tried
so far in making sugar available for different devices. Those companies are
not limited because canonical doesn't provide hardware devices neither does
redhat, but they've partnered with different companies that do.

Tony, if you've any plan as to expanding our reach apart from the one's
already listed, it'll be great if you tell us.

Best regards

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Tony Anderson  wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am
> disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive
> Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as the
> software that comes on an XO. I believe Sugar Labs and Sugar should be
> perceived as in a similar relationship as Red Hat is to Fedora and
> Canonical is to Ubuntu.
>
> We need to have releases of Sugar: Long-term-support, latest stable, and
> developer. These releases should be downloadable as a single image which
> can be installed from a livecd usb stick generated by a dd command. The
> starting point is probably SOAS - which is not now installable without a
> technically difficult use of livecd tools in a Fedora 24 installation
> (which is difficult since Fedora provides Fedora 25).
>
> As an evaluation of Sugar Lab's success is that the Mexican deployment
> presented in the OLPC SF Summit chooses to use Sugar instead of UberMix.
> (http://www.ubermix.org/).
>
> We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as we now speak about
> OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and mobile devices with
> xo being considered as one of the supported environments.
>
> If no action is taken except to discuss future academic papers about Sugar
> Labs and SLOB elections, I think both will become totally irrelevant.
> Current OLPC deployments will choose new hardware to replace XOs and
> install on this hardware Windows, Raspbian, Chrome OS, UberMix or other
> readily available and supported alternatives. Sugar will join APL and Cobol
> in computer history.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 12/02/2016 07:16 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> There is a IAEP thread "Preparing for the 2017 SLOB Election" in early
> August that has more details about all this.
>
> First, I want to note that while an 'election committee' has been
> mentioned, Walter said in that earlier thread:
>
> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-vis committees is to
> appoint a representative. So I don't think we need a motion.
>
>
> As Caryl and Seb have reiterated on this thread: while they both helped
> run the election last year, they both said a few months ago that they are
> unable to volunteer for this year.
>
> At that time I offered to volunteer, as did Samson; and I found a possible
> web app to run the election and suggested Samuel Cantero could set it up,
> and he graciously did set it up.
>
> However, by September, (a) the GSOC project to make a font editor activity
> wound up, and (b)  Sameer offered to lead the vision thing, and until that
> is done I am not confident about taking any other actions, and (c) I
> accepted an employment offer by Google and have had less free time since
> then compared to when I was working as a consultant, so I haven't done more
> of the things I said I would do. I wrote on August 5:
>
>
> So, I volunteer to do the following before the next SLOB meeting:
>
> - I will ask Sam C to set up a new sugar-annou...@lists.sugarlabs.org mailing
> list with himself, myself, samson, caryl and seb as list admins.
>
> - I will complete the review of all accounts on the wiki to mark the ones
> that look like spammers
>
> - I will make a final 'all possible members' email list
>
> - I will draft the email that asks people to join the announce list and
> explains why I am asking them to do this, and a motion to approve the
> election email, and share it on the IAEP list for community review
>
> - I will ask SLOBs to post and second the motion
>
> Then in early September I can send the email, and prepare a report with
> the new list of members and similarly to before another draft email
> soliciting board applications for SLOB to review and approve in the October
> meeting.
>
> Then in early October I can send that email, perhaps also with the
> donation request, and then prepare a final email calling for votes that
> SLOB can review and approve in the November meeting.
>
> Then in early November the call for votes can go out, votes can come in,
> and in early December the results can be announced.
>
>
> I still think this process is a good one, but regretfully I am not going
> to 

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

+1.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Tony Anderson  wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am
> disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive
> Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as the
> software that comes on an XO. I believe Sugar Labs and Sugar should be
> perceived as in a similar relationship as Red Hat is to Fedora and
> Canonical is to Ubuntu.
>
> We need to have releases of Sugar: Long-term-support, latest stable, and
> developer. These releases should be downloadable as a single image which
> can be installed from a livecd usb stick generated by a dd command. The
> starting point is probably SOAS - which is not now installable without a
> technically difficult use of livecd tools in a Fedora 24 installation
> (which is difficult since Fedora provides Fedora 25).
>
> As an evaluation of Sugar Lab's success is that the Mexican deployment
> presented in the OLPC SF Summit chooses to use Sugar instead of UberMix.
> (http://www.ubermix.org/).
>
> We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as we now speak about
> OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and mobile devices with
> xo being considered as one of the supported environments.
>
> If no action is taken except to discuss future academic papers about Sugar
> Labs and SLOB elections, I think both will become totally irrelevant.
> Current OLPC deployments will choose new hardware to replace XOs and
> install on this hardware Windows, Raspbian, Chrome OS, UberMix or other
> readily available and supported alternatives. Sugar will join APL and Cobol
> in computer history.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 12/02/2016 07:16 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> There is a IAEP thread "Preparing for the 2017 SLOB Election" in early
> August that has more details about all this.
>
> First, I want to note that while an 'election committee' has been
> mentioned, Walter said in that earlier thread:
>
> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-vis committees is to
> appoint a representative. So I don't think we need a motion.
>
>
> As Caryl and Seb have reiterated on this thread: while they both helped
> run the election last year, they both said a few months ago that they are
> unable to volunteer for this year.
>
> At that time I offered to volunteer, as did Samson; and I found a possible
> web app to run the election and suggested Samuel Cantero could set it up,
> and he graciously did set it up.
>
> However, by September, (a) the GSOC project to make a font editor activity
> wound up, and (b)  Sameer offered to lead the vision thing, and until that
> is done I am not confident about taking any other actions, and (c) I
> accepted an employment offer by Google and have had less free time since
> then compared to when I was working as a consultant, so I haven't done more
> of the things I said I would do. I wrote on August 5:
>
>
> So, I volunteer to do the following before the next SLOB meeting:
>
> - I will ask Sam C to set up a new sugar-annou...@lists.sugarlabs.org mailing
> list with himself, myself, samson, caryl and seb as list admins.
>
> - I will complete the review of all accounts on the wiki to mark the ones
> that look like spammers
>
> - I will make a final 'all possible members' email list
>
> - I will draft the email that asks people to join the announce list and
> explains why I am asking them to do this, and a motion to approve the
> election email, and share it on the IAEP list for community review
>
> - I will ask SLOBs to post and second the motion
>
> Then in early September I can send the email, and prepare a report with
> the new list of members and similarly to before another draft email
> soliciting board applications for SLOB to review and approve in the October
> meeting.
>
> Then in early October I can send that email, perhaps also with the
> donation request, and then prepare a final email calling for votes that
> SLOB can review and approve in the November meeting.
>
> Then in early November the call for votes can go out, votes can come in,
> and in early December the results can be announced.
>
>
> I still think this process is a good one, but regretfully I am not going
> to be able to put much effort into this until January at the earliest.
>
> So, I suggest that Samson and anyone who wants to volunteer to run the
> election take a look at that web app with Sam C and see if it really will
> work for Sugar Labs in 2016.
>
> If not, http://civs.cs.cornell.edu was used last year and should be a
> suitable mechanism for people to cast votes.
>
> Finally, I think the very next step is for whoever volunteers to run the
> election to come up with a list of members emails to solicit votes from.
> (Where the discussions last trailed off was in discussing who should be on
> this 'final members list' - I think we agreed to 

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi dave, my thoughts exactly, we are still expecting a word regarding it.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:45 AM, samson goddy 
wrote:

> I don't know why i did not receive the confirmation code yet for the IAEP.
> I didn't even receive this mail officially, it was forwarded to me by
> ibiam.
>
> I have nothing to say because i am tired and sad, because its over a month
>  after the motion passed. what is going on?
>
> Samson Goddy
>
> --
> From: ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:39:34 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project
> To: samsongo...@hotmail.com
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *Dave Crossland* 
> Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:52 AM
> Subject: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project
> To: iaep , SLOBs 
>
>
> Hi
>
> I'd like to request a brief update report on the status of Samson's
> project; its been about 6 weeks since the motion to fund the project
> was passed, but I haven't heard anything about it as I expected to
>
> --
> Cheers
> Dave
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] 172 XO-1s for $24 each (+ freight) $4,000 total

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Hi, i think this is a good idea, but i don't think buying and selling to
make profit is part of SL's agenda. I'm i wrong?

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Qty-172-OLPC-One-Laptop-Per-Child-XO-1-w-7-5-TFT-256MB-RAM-1024KB-ROM-/262478690514
>
> I propose that Sugar Labs buy these, image them with the 0.110
> release, and sale them to raise funds; individual units regularly
> clear $100 each, so this will raise around $13,000
>
> --
> Cheers
> Dave
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Why do you contribute to Sugar?

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Sugar has made me see things differently, it has given me an oppurtunity to
learn and to grow, not everyone in my area know about sugar and I'm lucky
to, this area of my life has never been the same since i met some persons
in sugar, i strive to learn more one of the reasons being to contribute to
sugar, sugar has given a platform where you can create whatever you want to
see(via sugar activities). Sugar has made learning interactive, i remember
back then in junior high, we used to learn french with the sugar platform
on our XO's. I love being part of sugar and I'll always be part of this
great organization.

 Thanks

  Ibiam
Chihurumnaya

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Sam Parkinson 
wrote:

> Here is my reflection too:
>
> I contribute to Sugar because the current EduTech used in ACT schools is
> so boring.  Sugar shows that we can make awesome software for schools,
> rather than the meh software like managebac or google classrrom.  We can
> best integrate collaboration, journalling, reflection and creation -
> tailoring the whole experience to education.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:33 PM, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote:
>
> Good to hear what others have to say .. here is my own reflection: I
> worked with Sugar till today as I have personally tested it with children
> from the gifted to the developmentally delay; and made many
> video-recordings of children using it over the years under many different
> circumstances. It works - Sugar simplicity and flexibility makes it my best
> choice as a clinical or educational tools, to help children be empowered in
> their learning. T.K Kang
>
> -Original Message- From: Walter Bender [
> mailto:walter.ben...@gmail.com ] Sent: Monday,
> June 6, 2016 07:28 AM To: 'Dave Crossland' Cc: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] Why do you contribute to Sugar? On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at
> 7:20 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:
>
> In thread "A Better Idea..." on 5 June 2016 at 16:41, Sean DALY <
> sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps trying to thrash out texts is not the best approach - maybe we
> should start with why we the volunteers are convinced about Sugar, and
> think about distilling our Vision from that.
>
> I like this suggestion! I request that everyone subscribed to this list
> reply to this thread with a short message about why they are convinced
> about Sugar. I'll go first :) I am convinced about Sugar because I believe
> learning through self-discovery is a powerful way for young people to
> become good people, good citizens, and to find some particular talents to
> develop to the maximum; and I believe Sugar is software that encourages
> such learning. ___ IAEP -- It's
> An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> See [1 and 2]. But to gist: At Sugar Labs we make a collection of
> Free/Libre Software tools that learners use to *explore*, *discover*,
> *create*, and *reflect*. We distribute these tools freely and encourage our
> users to appropriate them, taking ownership and responsibility for their
> learning. To me, one important goal at Sugar Labs is to have our user
> community engage in the development process. Towards this end, we have
> provided scaffolding to support our users in their exploration of the tools
> themselves and how the tools are built. This has not been just an
> intellectual exercise. We design for end-user contributions, and we have
> seen learners taking ownership and the responsibility that comes with
> ownership. Sugar users, even when they don’t made contributions to the
> code, are active learners, who are immersed in a culture where they are
> encouraged to create as well as consume. [1]
> http://people.sugarlabs.org/walter/docs/Learning-to-Change-the-World-Chapter-4.pdf
> [2]
> http://sites.ed.gov/oese/2016/04/open-discussion-on-the-role-of-education-technologies-in-early-childhood-stem-education/
> --
> Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <
> http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
> ___ IAEP -- It's An Education
> Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Request for partnership from a Kenyan sugar user

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

A Kenyan sugar user sent a message to the sugarlabs facebook page, this is
the message

"Hello,I have been using your Sugar for a while now close to 3 years and I
would like if we can partner with you to develop/Twerk it more to Fit
Kenyan education system.I also have a company and AM A BIG FUN of
Linux.Kindly contact me on itsondi...@gmail.com or itsondi...@occupy.co.ke"
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep