Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs in GSoC 2013

2013-04-11 Thread John Tierney
Hi Sean,

do you mean something like, Sugar Labs Seeks Students For Google Summer of 
Code Program ?

Yes I was thinking something along those lines.

I don't see why not, but we need to hear from mentors - i understand there 
can be a steep learning curve for students new to Sugar.

Sean.

I see what your saying after I posted I read Bastien's post that raised this 
concern. Will wait to see
what mentors and others say about recruiting for GSOC and if it is wise to try 
to send out PR for
purpose.

Best!
John Tierney









On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:33 AM, John Tierney jtis4...@hotmail.com wrote:





This is great news and an opportunity to grow the community. Should we 
take the opportunity to do PR to recruit students? Sean Daly what 
are your thoughts? Others?

Would need to act quickly if this is a desired path to follow.




Timeline is:
April 9 - 21 

Would-be student participants discuss application ideas with 


mentoring organizations.


April 22 Student application period opens.


May 3 

Student application deadline.

Best!


John Tierney


From: walter.ben...@gmail.com
To: ma...@laptop.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org


CC: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; callka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs in GSoC 2013



Sugar Labs has been accepted in Google Summer of Code 2013. Thanks to everyone 
in the community who contributed to our application. Now it is time to recruit 
students. More details coming your way soon.




regards.

-walter


On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:



2013/4/9 Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com:

 Hi all,



 I am really happy and impressed to see Sugar Labs listed in accepted

 organizations for Google Code of Summer 2013.



Great news! This comunity is giving a boost :)



--

.. manuq ..

___

Sugar-devel mailing list

sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org



___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
  

___

IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs in GSoC 2013

2013-04-10 Thread John Tierney
This is great news and an opportunity to grow the community. Should we 
take the opportunity to do PR to recruit students? Sean Daly what 
are your thoughts? Others?

Would need to act quickly if this is a desired path to follow.

Timeline is:
April 9 - 21 Would-be student participants discuss application ideas with 
mentoring organizations.
April 22 Student application period opens.
May 3 Student application deadline.
Best!
John Tierney


From: walter.ben...@gmail.com
To: ma...@laptop.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
CC: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; callka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs in GSoC 2013

Sugar Labs has been accepted in Google Summer of Code 2013. Thanks to everyone 
in the community who contributed to our application. Now it is time to recruit 
students. More details coming your way soon.


regards.

-walter


On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:

2013/4/9 Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com:

 Hi all,



 I am really happy and impressed to see Sugar Labs listed in accepted

 organizations for Google Code of Summer 2013.



Great news! This comunity is giving a boost :)



--

.. manuq ..

___

Sugar-devel mailing list

sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org



___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] GCI Mentor?

2012-11-23 Thread John Tierney

Hello All,

I am looking sign up as mentor for GCI.

On Register as a Mentor
profile page what is being put in for:

URL ID*

Im network

Home page url

Thanks!
John Tierney
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Introduction: teacher interested in SOAS

2012-11-20 Thread John Tierney




Hi John,

I would say your summary is pretty well on target 
taking into account Peter's comments and the continued 
improvements he has been making with each SoaS release. 
I would be happy to have a conversation with you on Skype 
or phone and give you some ideas on how you might want to 
approach the local Universities to establish relationships in Computer 
Science and Education schools to build up a support system. I think
you mentioned your in Philadelphia so Temple and Drexel would be 
great options as well as the other smaller schools.

I have been collaborating with Dr. Kevin Brooks and his Great Fargo 
project since its inception. I met Kevin at the Computers and Writing 
Conference at Purdue in 2010, where I helped put on a Sugar  Workshop 
with Dr. Gerald Ardito, and Walter Bender who joined via Skype. In turn I 
joined Kevin and his graduate student Chris Lindgren at the University of 
Michigan at ComputersWriting 2011 for another Sugar Workshop.

I think this would be a great place for you to talk about the education 
portions of the project,for the technical questions/issues and updates 
on that front the Soas list would be best.

It's Great to see you trying to help out your learners in this manner.
Let me know if I can be of assistance.

Best!
John Tierney
Skype: jt4sugar
#248-613-7392

 From: j...@johnlandis.net
 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:10:41 -0500
 To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Subject: Re: [IAEP] Introduction: teacher interested in SOAS
 
 Thanks so much for the warm welcome.  Particularly to Patricio,
 Harriet, and Kevin for sharing such fascinating links.
 
 If it's okay, I'm going to use this list as a sounding board for my
 thoughts as I explore Sugar.  Again, if there's a better place for
 this type of thing, please let me know!
 
 So far, I'm getting the impression that Sugar on A Stick is more or
 less limited to experimental university-school partnerships, and
 hasn't yet reached a phase of wide deployment in the hands of schools.
  Is this an accurate assessment?
 
 The reason I'm interested in SOAS is that I work in the traditional
 computer lab setting that is so familiar in K12 schools in the US.
 This setting has a lot of restrictions and drawbacks.  A big one is
 that, even though the students are surrounded by computers in my lab,
 and to varying degrees at home, they have no opportunity to take
 ownership of these devices.  They can't monkey about with the precious
 computers that we adults see as far to precious to fully hand over to
 children.  A very basic symptom of this is that the students simply
 can't save their work.  A save dialog box on most computers is very
 difficult to learn for the uninitiated.  Add to this that all files
 which don't make it onto a shared network or USB drive are basically
 instantly lost given the shared nature of school computers.  If the
 kids can't do something as simple as save a piece of writing, the
 computer is far less useful than a notebook.
 
 In this light, SOAS looks very appealing.  The promise of handing a
 student their own _persistant_ computer where they are free to explore
 is exactly what I've been looking for. (to say nothing of sugar's
 Journal which I think is a brilliant answer to the above problem).
 
 I'm curious, how do my motivations match up with how you guys think about 
 sugar?
 
 -John
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Local Labs motion

2012-05-30 Thread John Tierney

Hello,

Not meaning to get in the way of the motion but after reading the log and the 
back and forth, may I suggest 
the following wording that I believe takes care of the legal, honors the 
concerns voiced, makes it more inviting, 
and suggests an informal non-legal association. 

Present:
  Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with 
Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy.

Revised:

  Sugar Labs Local Labs, although vital to the Sugar Labs community ecosystem, 
are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software 
Freedom Conservancy.

Hope it may help move the process forward.

Best!
John Tierney

 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:13:26 -0400
 From: walter.ben...@gmail.com
 To: h...@laptop.org; gerald.ard...@gmail.com; c...@laptop.org
 CC: t...@sfconservancy.org; bk...@sfconservancy.org; 
 iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Subject: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Local Labs motion
 
 Buried in the meeting log [1] is a motion [5] to adopt three changes
 [2, 3, 4] to the Trademark [6] and Local Labs [7] pages in the wiki.
 The motion was seconded and we began a vote, but whereas it seemed to
 be a controversial decision, I though it prudent to ask those who were
 not able to attend today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting to also
 vote.
 
 So far,
 
 walter +1
 cjl +1
 
 icarito -1
 
 alsroot has not voted yet.
 
 cjb, canoeberry, and geralda were not present.
 
 Please respond to this email with your vote.
 
 Also, there was motion [8], not yet seconded, to ask Tony if he was OK
 with a change in the wording of [4]. There was not consensus on the
 wording, but there was consensus on asking for Tony's input.
 
 Tony, could you please chime in?
 
 thanks.
 
 -walter
 
 -- 
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org
 
 
 [1] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10
 [2] 
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739410
 [3] 
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739421
 [4] 
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739445
 [5] 
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739570
 [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trademark
 [7] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Local_Labs
 [8] 
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739707
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Sugar Labs Website Revamp IRC Mtg 1-8-12 11:00amEST(16:00UTC)

2012-01-05 Thread John Tierney







Hello All,

Happy New Year! As the New Year starts we are making another effort to restart 
the
Sugar Labs Website Revamp. 

Designer and community member Christian Marc Schmidt has put together a Design 
Template along with a 
Sugar Labs Website Refresh: Content Document. These two documents along with 
the work and content 
gathering done by RIT Co-op students Mike Devine and JT Mengel last year will 
hopefully give us solid basis 
to start from.

Our Kick-off IRC meeting will take place this Sunday Jan. 8th on#sugar-meeting 
at 11:00amEST(16:00UTC),
after the Design Meeting surrounding Write To Journal Anytime taking place at 
10:00amEST.

Please join us if you are available-our key shortcoming last year in our 
attempt was a lack of content to effectively
create the new site. All help is Welcome and needed.

Because this is in the Building and Design stage please email me at: 
jtis4...@hotmail.com to get links to the preview 
documents if you are interested in being part of the process.

Our First Step is to give Christian the Thumbs Up/Make Enhancements to the 
Design.

Our Second Step will look to get individual community members to take 
responsibility in Content Gathering Areas that flow out of
the documents Christian has prepared.

Our Third Step is to execute Content Gathering

Upon receiving enough content Christian will then commence the build phase.

We hope you can join us on Sunday and look forward to working with the 
community to do this important
work. Please let us know of your interest in taking part in this important 
endeavor.

Appreciate the Collaboration!
John Tierney

P.S. Please get into the hands of those who will be best able to assist-Thank 
You!


  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Contemplating Your SLOBS Vote

2011-11-18 Thread John Tierney

Hello All,

To focus our thoughts on the intent of my original post I offer this simple 
statement:

Having a Teacher on the Sugar Labs Oversight Board would be a Great Step
Forward for Sugar, this is only achievable by the community exercising the
power of their vote

Best!
John Tierney



Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:22:16 -0300
From: gonz...@laptop.org
To: car...@mac.com
CC: olpc-...@lists.laptop.org; argent...@lists.laptop.org; 
somosazu...@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpc-boli...@lists.laptop.org; 
iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpcp...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Argentina]  Contemplating Your SLOBS Vote


I believe Sugar is doing serious damage to Plan Ceibal,  to the uruguayan 
teachers, children, and to us all.


This is the point. You are not trying to contribute to the project, because you 
think is a waste of time.
Of course, I think different. 


 
As Mr. Bender expressed in one of his presentations Sugar is software under 
construction.

Many people don't understood what Walter said here.

It's not about a half finished project, is about a project with open doors, 
extensible, and free.


 
You cannot ask teachers and children to start using their new computers by 
figuring out how to deal with this software under construction which,  being so 
closely related to the operating system,  happens to affect all uses of their 
laptops.

My suggestion was and still is that after some years of trying the free 
software / volunteers route,  with unacceptable results,  get paid professional 
developers to swiftly work on correcting a good percentage of the problems,  
delivering working computers to the users.  Some of those developers might well 
be some of the same working today as volunteers.
 
Unacceptable results? Ok, go to use Windows Vista :)


Gonzalo


___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Contemplating Your SLOBS Vote

2011-11-16 Thread John Tierney

Hello All,

I write this email so all of our Sugar Labs community members may reflect a 
little on what their SLOBs
vote this year will mean. I first want to say that all seven candidates are 
very qualified and all in their
own ways have contributed in substantial way to try and make Sugar better.

As I engage in Educational Outreach work for Sugar Labs, I often find myself as 
a facilitator between the
technical/developer portion of the community and the not so technical Teacher 
and Educators who are using 
Sugar or who would like to. In this role I often see the gap between how these 
two different groups see things.
The best way for me to describe this would be to say our developers/technical 
leaning portion of the community
believe It's an Education Project as the mailing list states. In working with 
teachers and educators they tend to 
see things as It's a Technical Project. On the mailing lists, on IRC, and at 
community meet ups this theme of Sugar
Labs needing to be more inclusive of teachers is a consistent theme.

To remedy this situation I believe it is very important for Sugar Labs to have 
representation from a Teacher as part of SLOBS
for two key reasons. 

-The first is the direction of Sugar Labs and the Sugar Learning Platform can 
never be as close to our
end users Teachers and Students without it. 

-Second is the loud and clear message it sends out to all the teachers and 
educators who use or hope to use Sugar that their 
concerns and issues are truly cared about. Once again without a Teacher on 
SlLOBs this may be true in word, but for the best
 outcome for Sugar and it's use in the classroom,this must be true in action.

In this years election there is only one candidate that fits that bill and that 
is Dr. Gerald Ardito, if there was additional teachers I would
be lobbying for them as well. Understand this is not about the individual 
candidates, they are all great! This is about a decision about the 
direction of Sugar. Those who already may have a favorite candidate because of 
personally working with them or they may have like minded
technical views. I ask you to just take a moment to consider that decision and 
ask yourself if the SLOBs election results ends again 
with no Teacher in place can we truly have Sugar become the Learn How to 
Learn Learning Platform we all desire.

All I hope is that when community members are making their selection they will 
contemplate these thoughts and then make what they believe is
the best decision for the future of Sugar.

Thank You for Your Time!
John Tierney

P.S. If anyone believes this should be posted to other lists because not 
everyone will see it here, I would appreciate if you would
pass it along.

  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] for today's meeting: certificate program proposal

2011-08-05 Thread John Tierney

Hello,

I think the title you may be looking for is Sugar Facilitator or Sugar 
Ambassador.

Best!
John Tierney

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:12:22 -0300
From: edujam2...@ceibaljam.org
To: sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; 
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] for today's meeting: certificate program proposal

I wonder if there shouldn't be a certification for Sugar Animators or 
something like this (actually I'd like to find a better word than animator). 
I'm thinking on the people that contributes keeping the community or a local 
lab moving on: Organizing events, coordinating teams of programmers or 
educators, making public Sugar advocacy, doing bureaucratic stuff needed to 
keep Sugar Labs or a local lab working, looking for resources, etc.

It's not that I want a certification that fits me ;-) IMHO they're important 
actors that should be recognized.

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:

Following up on a thread begun in mid July

(http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2011-July/013736.html) I

would like to discuss the following proposal this morning:



Sugar Labs will award certificates to developers to acknowledge and

celebrate their contributions to the Sugar Learning Platform. Several

certificates will be made available: Sugar X Contributor; Sugar

Activity Developer; and Sugar Core Developer.



The Sugar X Contributor certificate will be given to an individual who

over the course of a sustained effort of at least 6 months contributes

to some Sugar community team, e.g., Sugar Translation Contributor.

(The teams are listed on the wiki). The specific criteria for

certification will be determined by the team coordinators, but in

general, it would involve a repeated effort on behalf of the team's

goals at a high level of quality (e.g., of quality sufficient to be

incorportated into our offerings).



The Sugar Activity Developer certificate will be given to an

individual who develops at least one Sugar activity that is

subsequently posted on the Sugar activity portal and be of sufficient

quality to be approved for public release. The activity must also

include internationalization, including the submission of a POT file

to the Translation Team, and documentation, including the creation of

a page in the wiki under the Activity category. As will the

Contributor certificates, sign off will be made by the associated team

coordinators, in this case the Activity team.



The Sugar Core Developer certificate will be given to an individual

who over the course of one year makes significant contributions to the

Sugar core libraries, e.g., sugar-toolkit or sugar. Sign off will be

made by the Developer team coordinators.



-walter



--

Walter Bender

Sugar Labs

http://www.sugarlabs.org

___

IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Sugar Labs Website Revamp IRC Meeting Notes 4-20-11

2011-04-21 Thread John Tierney











 Hello Community, 

Below are notes from IRC meeting about Sugar Website Revamp last Night-
This should bring community up to date on our progress.

Our Co-op students from RIT Mike Devine and JT Mengel could use community
help. They are in charge of collecting content for our lead designer Christian
Marc Schmidt to put in place.

We are looking for all Content Sugar-Videos, Tutorials, How To's, Case Studies,
Sugar Tips and Tricks, Anecdotes from Teachers in the Field, Sugar Research,
and any other cool things Sugar!!! Upon assessing what we have in place we
will be asking for the communities help(During month of May) in helping to make
some of these resources less technical in nature and classroom ready for 
Teachers.

Please send all content and resources with attachments to: mod1...@rit.edu

Thank You in Advance!
John Tierney

P.S. Please make us aware of any Teacher's who might like to help Beta-test new 
site.

IRC #sugar-meeting Wed April 20th 2011
christianmarcsch hi everyone

* mikedevine 
(~ad...@province-wireless-173-84-27-172.dr02.roch.ny.frontiernet.net) has 
joined #sugar-meeting

JT4sugar Hi Christian  Mike

mikedevine hey John

JT4sugar christianmarcsch, I think we are waiting on JT, Bernie, and Dogi 
although Dogi may be on

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: sounds good, i'll stand by

mikedevine JT texted me saying he's running a bit late

JT4sugar I spoke with Prof McEneaney today about Beta-testing site his PHD 
class begins May 3rd runs to June 16th he would like to make this part of class 
when do you think we could have site ready for some testing or get test 
materials into his hands?

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: i think that really depends largely on the 
content. the design is coming along, but i'm at a point where i really need to 
start working with some actual materials for placement.

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: in theory, june 16th sounds realistic though

mikedevine christian: i've slowly been adding content as i get it on the 
google docs. mostly images

JT4sugar christianmarcsch, June 16th is when his class ends-starts May 3rd. 
Do we think we will have anything to show community at Uruguay Summit May 5-8

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: again i'd need to turn to JT and Mike. we could 
certainly have design comps to show, but right now i'm still using lorem ipsum 
for placeholder and we don't yet have any imagery or other content

christianmarcsch i'll send out a link to the latest work

JT4sugar christianmarcsch, If content is coming in to slowly and will take 
longer to put in place I will let him know it looks like their would be chance 
to work with him in Fall

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: so far i actually don't have any content besides 
the images that mike sent two weeks ago

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: it's not important that we have everything now, 
but i was hoping at least for a few sample materials (case studies, etc.), as 
well as copy that needs to be written for the individual sections

mikedevine christian: yeah i haven't gotten any of that really

christianmarcsch mikedevine: i know you two were busy last week with the 
microsite

JT4sugar mikedevine, Any luck with content from pinging people through OLPC 
Map approach?

mikedevine yeah that's where io've gotten the most responses

mikedevine it's just tedious because it means emailing each marker on the map 
1 by 1 lol

mikedevine most of the replies are offers to help rather than actual content, 
but i've gotten a bit

* dogi is cocking and locking only from time to time in the chat

christianmarcsch mikedevine: that's a good start... could i suggest that we 
create a dropbox folder to store all the assets?

christianmarcsch mikedevine: we can create subfolders for each content type

mikedevine well the google docs has that

mikedevine in the call for content section

christianmarcsch mikedevine: i think we should move the assets to dropbox, it 
will make it a lot easier to work

christianmarcsch mikedevine: do you have an account?

mikedevine no not yet

christianmarcsch mikedevine: why don't you go ahead and set one up--it's a 
great tool to have access to!

christianmarcsch mikedevine: i'll send out an invitation to a folder we can 
all use

mikedevine ok

christianmarcsch by the way, the latest comps are here:

christianmarcsch http://christianmarcschmidt.com/projects/sugarlabs/

christianmarcsch i've cleaned them up a bit, still not 100% but getting there

JT4sugar christianmarcsch, What I think would be helpful would to see what we 
can put in place and come up with list of things we feel are missing. I can 
make that as part of my mission in Uruguay to tap community. I'm about 80% sure 
I'm going

christianmarcsch the templates are mostly worked out, though i'm missing the 
press page and the homepage, as well as any other unique pagetypes

* m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk

* m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish

christianmarcsch JT4sugar: that sounds good. JT had a list of content types 
already

[IAEP] One-to-one research

2010-10-12 Thread John Tierney




Hi Beth,

You should find this very useful:

The Volume 9 Special Edition Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 
Computing settings
of The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment is completely devoted to 
the subject: 

http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/

Best!

John Tierney

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:59:13 -0400
From: Beth Santos b...@waveplace.org
To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org, Maho 2010 m...@realness.org
Subject: [IAEP] One-to-one research
Message-ID:
aanlktimfklwhhqwitqs8lxxkewi1m7t6chpaoeki4...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
Hi all, looking for any research/documentation directly addressing the
efficacy of one-to-one laptop programs and Papert-like instruction. Any help
would be great. Thanks much!
 
Beth
 
---
*Beth Santos*
Outreach Coordinator
Waveplace Foundation
 
Tel: +1 610 797 3100 x 44
Fax: +1 610 797 3199
Cell: +1 603 661 1273
http://www.waveplace.org
 
Waveplace on 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Waveplace/270512992335?ref=ts
Twitter: @waveplace http://twitter.com/waveplace  
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Requesting Feedback MarketLab Opportunity

2010-08-17 Thread John Tierney




Hello Everyone,

We have an opportunity this Fall to be part of a MarketLab Student Project,

http://web.mit.edu/marketingclub/marketlab/

We have been asked to submit a proposal for the marketing needs of Sugar Labs 
on Friday, August
20th. I have sent this to the multiple lists because I believe all parts of 
Sugar Labs should weigh-in and
let us know how Sugar Labs Marketing in collaboration with MarketLab Team 
members can help in your efforts.

This is an excerpt from IRC Chat this morning discussing the MarketLab project 
possibilities:

JT4sugar walterbender, I guess question is do we want them to work on certain 
areas or do we want them to come up with a marketing straegy for us
JT4sugar Strategy
walterbender JT4sugar: I think the more focused, the more likely we will get 
something useful/actionable from them
JT4sugar walterbender, I think then Public Awareness, Teacher Awareness 
Participation, Fundraising-Mostly for Teacher Events? Your thoughts/ideas
walterbender JT4sugar: I've got pretty limited time for writing this week -- 
a competing deadline -- so perhaps we can come up with a specific plan of 
action for getting this proposal out the door?
walterbender JT4sugar: I'd like to fund more developer and 
developer/deployment face-to-face time as well
walterbender JT4sugar: we are lacking a 1-page this-is-what-we-are 
here-is-how-you-can-help pamphlet as well
JT4sugar walterbender, I will put it together. I will send email to list 
about opportunity to gather feedback. Will add developer needs to fundrasing 
part
walterbender JT4sugar: if there is some specific writing you'd like me to do, 
let me know
JT4sugar walterbender, I will plan to get you a draft by Thursday so you can 
make additions/changes
walterbender JT4sugar: +1

Please take a few minutes to reflect on your area of Sugar Labs.

Please identify the areas/subjects you believe this student team at MIT Sloan 
MarketLab can help Sugar Labs with.

Appreciate Your Time, Thoughts, and Ideas!

John Tierney

  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] [SLOBS] Notes SLOBS Trademark Discussion 4-12-10

2010-04-18 Thread John Tierney



Typed Copy of John Tierney written Notes of Key Points from 

SLOBs Trademark Discussion Monday night April 12th 2010 at 

OLPC Offices-Cambridge, MA. 


I believe I have cc'd everyone who was at meeting

plus Bernie, sorry if I missed someone.
(Please understand these were not minutes but personal notes, 

so please add comments or clarifications) 

 

Sean Daly

-Tech PR
-Build Brand



Logo/Symbol-Meaning
What Does it Stand For
Values
Discrimination/Exclusion-Means this, not that
-Platform


Ecosystem Activities
-Example


Adobe Labeling Program
Intel Labeling Program
-Which Allows for


Revenue Stream From OEM
Control Shaping of Brand
Chris Ball
-Agreement


Label O.K.
Revenue O.K.
Smaller Set
-Distribution of Code


Unmodified Sugar Code Being Used By Someone-O.K.
Unmodified Sugar Code with Slight Modifications-Translation, etc.-O.K.
Modified Code-Must Ask
-Example


Ziff.org-Write Codecs
GPL-Mention License Author Source
Areas of Agreement on Cases where potential partner must ask for Trademark use


0. Encouraging Phrases**
1. Websites-Must Ask

2. Modified Versions-Must Ask
3. Reserved Names(Sugar on a Stick)-Must Ask
4. Logo Program-Must Ask
5. Mostly Unmodified-Must Ask
**(This zero point was mentioned by Chris Ball actually last I didn't record 
what he might of actually titled this, this was the words I was using)

A few themes I took away from the meeting are as follows: 



Encourage vs. Discourage

Unmodified vs. Modified

Logo Program-With Gradations of involvement(Possibly 3 to 4 Different Logos for 
Partners depending on
level of involvement. Possible to have one Logo to show partners with 
Modified Sugar Code)

My thought would be if we can focus on the Encourage and Logo Program Themes, I 
think it will help us come 
up with final wording that displays Sugar Labs as a Proactive/ 
Inclusive/Collaborative Partner.

A suggestion to achieve this would be to:


 Quickly come up with the names for the labeling program along
with what level of involvement and/or unmodified/modified Sugar Code that 
involves.
We in turn need to work on Logo's but are not necessary to written copy
**Sean can you post a draft outline of Labeling Program to begin discussion**
 

With a Labeling/Logo Description in place by default those definitions will 
answer many of the use cases. We can then take
the January 15 2010 Draft and build that language around Labeling Program with 
an aim to use encouraging/inclusive
and clearer language. 

 

These two portions in particular seem somewhat contradictory in language after 
reading them and

comparing them to notes and meeting discussion. Hopefully Labeling Program can 
absorb these two

parts and allow for a clear differentiation in use cases and proper interaction 
with Sugar Labs to

benefit the parties involved.

 

2a.

To refer to the Sugar Labs software in substantially unmodified form 
substantially unmodified means built from 

the source code provided by the Sugar Labs project, possibly with minor 
modifications including but not limited to: 

the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, translations into 
other languages, changes required for 

compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, or the inclusion 
of bug-fix patches). All such minor 

modifications must be released under an approved license.

 

**It seems to say you can use with some minor modifications but then says all 
minor modifications must be

released with approved license***

 

3.

You may use the Sugar Labs Marks as part of the name of a product designed to 
work with Sugar Labs, so long 

as the name as a whole (via its other components) clearly and unambiguously 
distinguishes the product from Sugar 

Labs software itself, and the general presentation of the product does not 
imply any official association or identity 

with Sugar Labs. Because it would be awkward to attach a trademark symbol to a 
portion of a larger name whose 

other portions might themselves be trademarked, the requirement to display the 
symbol is waived for this circumstance. 

 

***It would seem if the Sugar Labs Marks were part of the name of a product 
that would indicate that there is a

perceived official relationship or identity to Sugar Labs which then 
contradicts with the next statement***

 

Example: If I trademark JT Linux and then sell a product JT Linux with Sugar 
on Board from the reading above

I'm confused if I could do that or not. From the meeting my understanding is 
that I could.

 

Since many of the individuals who end up redistributing Sugar may very well be 
of the non-technical nature(in a writing/

coding/distributing Software sense) we must try to use language that encourages 
them and shy away from technical/legal 

language that may discourage/intimidate a potential deployer of the Sugar 
Learning Platform.

 

Again please fill in areas of importance that I have missed.

 

Appreciate the Chance to Participate!

 

John Tierney

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Monday evening dinner meeting

2010-04-10 Thread John Tierney

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 17:43, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
 It has been suggested that we meet over dinner on Monday evening,
 April 11. We can use Tuesday for some face-to-face working sessions as
 well. Would this schedule work for everyone?

 

I wll also be available to attend and look forward to the opportunity.

 

Regards!

 

John Tierney
 

  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] SoaS change of direction: heads-up on convos in other lists

2010-03-22 Thread John Tierney

Hello All,

 

In wanting to have Teachers and Developers try Sugar are best bet may be to 
attack 

this with a two-fold approach. The idea would be to give the prospective 
Teacher/Deployer

Two SoaS-A stable version-say Strawberry explaining exactly what Sugar Labs 
means

by Stable. Then the Newer Developer edition Mirabelle that allows them to test 
and be

part of the Future Research and Development portion of Sugar. This would seem to

get around many of the issues and draw support for stable and cutting edge 
versions.

Sugar Today-Sugar Tomorrow 2Pack-Add in SoaS Creation Kit with both images and 
Instructions

and we could have something very helpful to all participants.

 

If this route is chosen then the Developer release of Mirabelle should have 
many of the broken

activities. These broken activities would seem to be a perfect place for many 
new community

members to get acquainted with Sugar(Testing, Learning the Bug reporting 
system, Fixing activities). 

Activities are at the core of the Learning How To Learn portion of the Sugar 
Learning Platform so the 

appropriate level of resources making sure the communication is in place to 
keep them maintained 

should be of key focus, since it will be one the largest keys to our success in 
the classroom.

 

Best!

 

John Tierney  
 
 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:35:14 +0100
 From: to...@tomeuvizoso.net
 To: pbrobin...@gmail.com
 CC: martin.langh...@gmail.com; m...@melchua.com; 
 market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; walter.ben...@gmail.com; 
 iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; s...@sugarlabs.org
 Subject: Re: [Marketing] [IAEP] SoaS change of direction: heads-up on convos 
 in other lists
 
 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 15:24, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 15:11, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is where you start is definitely the message that should be
  pushed. Also a Install and update Activities control panel which
  uses PackageKit would make it much easier to automatically find and
  install Activities as well as update them at a later stage.
 
  There is a lot of discussion about this and other approaches to
  packaging... some movement as well. It will get better. The problem is
  that there is only a partial overlap between what is currently well
  maintained and what is needed by the end users and since there is
  often a issue with network access for our end users, an install and
  update model will often fail, regardless of the packaging system
  used. This is why I think it is important to still offer an
  experimental build that trades reliability and support for variety
  and inclusiveness. Again, how this is communicated is paramount.
 
  WRT to packagekit. The advantage that it has is that it supports .deb
  and .rpm so what ever the underlying distro is it will work and in the
  case of the rpm support at least (I don't know enough about the deb
  integration) you can use locally hosted repos in the case of a school
  server, and it even support static media such as optical and usb
  sticks. So it covers a lot more options than just being connected to
  the internet.
 
  WRT the experimental with lots of variety vs the stable with not so
  much I personally believe there's pros and cons to both approaches.
  The former is what we've done with previous SOAS releases but we've
  had the SOAS SUCKS because Activity X doesn't work remarks which
  isn't good or constructive and its much harder to support for a small
  core team. The later approach will have I wish there was Activity Y
  but at least the included Activities should be more stable. In the
  short term for SOAS-3 there will be the SOAS-3 sucks because previous
  releases came with Z as well. Basically in the short term we're
  screwed which ever way. But on the plus side it should give Activity
  developers incentive to better support their Activities and make them
  more stable so they'll be considered for inclusion in a later release.
 
  The move to Fedora is also intended to help reduce the workload for
  all involved. Like the merger of Moblin and Maemo there is a lot of
  cross over between Sugar and other Fedora projects with very similar
  underlying core platforms. Gnome/Sugar/Moblin/Meego are all based on
  telepathy/gstreamer/xulrunner etc and the last 3 are all designed for
  small platforms (and if you take gnome-mobile into that as well they
  all are) so they all meld together and the difference ends up being
  the GUI on top so to be able to utilise all the associated engineering
  resources to reduce overall load it helps everyone, especially the
  smaller projects like SOAS.
 
  The good news is that Collabora is helping Tomeu with a migration of
  the Sugar Telephany work, so we should be better aligned with the
  mainstream there come 0.90. We are also working to better leverage
  gstreamer in order to phase out a dependence on alsa

Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Sugar Labs GSoC 2010 Flyer - please review

2010-03-16 Thread John Tierney

Hi Tim,

 

Like the content!

My Suggestion-same content slightly different order and

add Sugar Labs Logo.

 

Top Line: Google Summer of Code 2010

Next: Enhance Your Skills While Assisting Children's Education

Picture:

Next: Apply To Be Student for

Next: Insert Sugar Labs Logo

Next:http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/summer_of_code

 

Best!

 

John Tierney
 


Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:04:24 +1300
From: paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz
To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; 
market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: [Marketing] Sugar Labs GSoC 2010 Flyer - please review

Hi all,


If you have 30 seconds free, please review  
http://issuu.com/timclicks/docs/sugarlabs_gsoc_2010. I've gone for simplicity 
over . My main consideration was tying together growth  children's learning. I 
think you'll smile when you see the result.


If people are relatively happy with it, we can start forwarding it around. I've 
used a web-based solution to avoid clogging up people's inboxes. If you would 
like the PDF or raw SVG, do let me know.




Tim
@timClicks





  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] FW: Tutorius Meeting minutes - 2009/11/19

2009-11-25 Thread John Tierney

JujJust wanted to mention my admiration for the Tutorious team: they have
pushed forward a big feature that affects shell and activities, have
set up their instance of AMO for tutorials, have pinged periodically
the community for feedback, have made a spin of SoaS so others can
more easily test their work, have contacted the testing team at NZ for
feedback, etc. And not because that's a lot of work, but because it's
the _right_ work to do.

Kudos to them and whoever is mentoring!

Regards,

Tomeu
 
Hello All,
 
Myself and Gerald Ardito had a Skype meeting with Erick Lavoie and Michael 
Montclam from the Tutorius Project last
Thursday Nov. 19th, the notes from that session are below. Since the 
comments/suggestions from Gerald and
I are U.S. based, I am in the process of trying to set up a second meeting 
between Tutorious and Enhanced Learning
Strategy-Ron Canuel had a Team that went down to Uruguay recently and visited 
18 schools. This will give the Tutorius Team
an additional view to incorporate into the project and allow for the 
internationalization of Tutorious, which is one of their
objectives.
 
They are due to finalize the Project and give a Final Presentation in early 
December to complete this class project. They
have indicated an interest to merge Tutorius ability into Sugar when it is at a 
stable state. I indicated to them I would
reach out to the Sugar Developer community-Tomeu,Walter, and others to see if 
there can be some joint planning or conversations
that would lead to this possibilty. Please let me know how we can proceed on 
this front.
 
I look forward to trying to facilitate these initiatives, which I believe will 
be very valuable for students, teachers, and activity developers alike.
 
Best!
 
John Tierney


Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:17:23 +
Subject: Meeting minute - 2009/11/19
From: michael.jmontc...@gmail.com
To: jtis4...@hotmail.com; gerald.ard...@gmail.com

Hi guys!

Here are the notes for today's meeting. Feel free to add precisions and 
comments if anything was missed.

You can access the document right here : 
https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVT_nzmWT2B2ZGN3dDd2MzRfNTF0dzMyNGdnaghl=en

Thank you for your time and the great ideas!
Michael


Meeting minute 2009/11//19


Attendees : John
Gerald
Érick
Michael


Minute : 


Introduction

Gerald's tests


5 XO classrooms since January in middle school 
Doctoral thesis on Sugar 
Focus on curricular needs with teachers 

Ex : Using etoys to do an interactive story book 
Pre-testing with Test Team students in class, then attempting with the whole 
class 

Works really well and adds much more depth to the teaching

Gerald's view of Tutorius 

Offer assistance on learning the platform (journal, using write activity, 
etc...)

Using the platform is one of the hurdles to getting the most out of activities 
To have Tutorius to walk them through those skills would be incredibly useful

Gerald's perception


Tutorius would be immediately useful in teaching the basic Sugar skills 
But not so much for the specifics of the activity 
John's suggestion 

It would be great to have tutorials on how to do tutorials

Technical details


How can we deploy Tutorius on the XOs? 

Is it an activity? Can it be easily installed? 

No, it's a direct integration with the Sugar OS

Questions from John 

What are the details for the merging? 

Tutorius would need to stabilize its code base 
The activities are not all consistent (e.g. save_state function) 
A screencast utility for Sugar 

Make a tutorial inside a screencast 
Dump the screencast on the web 
Point the students to the web 
Gerald is concerned on application on the XO 

Re-flashing the XOs is not hard but would wipe all data

Could we have an automatic upload to YouTube? 
The XO is a great computer for kids because of its form factor 

It is slower, but the kids relate to the device differently 
Akin to the way they use their iPhones and MP3 players 
Re-flashing would be ok, providing a way to save data and restore it 
A screencast would be a backup plan 
Erick's question 

What does a tutorial adds to a screencast? 
Gerald : Having a label is for actions is great information 
John 

The important first step is to get a screencast tool out there with Tutorius 
First steps 

John : Short term is more important than long term 
Erick's question :


Is internationalization important? We could offer it in an easy way or a 
complete support. 

John : Support for this would be awesome, but sounds a bit more on the long 
term approach. 
Walter and Tomeu could point us better 
Error case support : if students click on the wrong button, how do we address 
this? 

Gerald : We could inspire ourselves from an Adobe product that does interactive 
screencast? Adobe Captivé 
Sharing : we have a basic, non-secure prototype. We do not have a full-fledged 
sharing platform. 
Gerald : 

There are no really good way to share things in Sugar yet. 
You can collaborate, but you cannot share products easily

[IAEP] FW: Texas Tech University work with XO/Sugar

2009-07-06 Thread John Tierney

























Hi Sean,

Prof. Rich Rice from Texas Tech University did some revisions on their XO/Sugar
video from Science Spectrum in Lubbock, TX and it is now ready to go on the
Daily Motion site. (See below). 

http://richrice.com/5365/iplay-short.mov

I have also sent Prof. Rice and 13 of his colleagues in the Computers and 
Writing Community
Sugar on a Stick. 
http://writingprogram.ucdavis.edu/cw2009/

Three of the colleagues are on the Committee on Computers in Composition and 
Communication (March 2012)
http://www.ncte.org//committees/7cs

Pay attention to Point 2]... Include in these activities attention to open 
source and community
source projects 
and software, calling attention to best practices, when
possible, and providing guidelines on issues and strategies...  


Douglas
Eyman, Assistant Professor of English, George Mason University, and
Senior Editor of Kairos: Rhetoric, Technology, Pedagogy

Robert “Bob”
Whipple, Associate Professor of English and A.F. Jacobson Endowed
Chair in Communication, Creighton University

Tammy S. Conard-Salvo Associate Director, Writing Lab Purdue University

Many of these professors are on Summer Break so the feedback from them on 
Sugar on a Stick will probably 
trickle in over the next month and a half and should pick up in the later part 
of August as their perspective 
Universities go back into session.

I will be looking to engage these Professors along with their students in 
projects that will embed the writing
process and command of language skills into the Sugar Learning Platform. In the 
University World this would
be described as Writing Across the Curriculum, in the world of Sugar-Writing 
Across the Activities is something
we should strive for.

Any and All ideas on how we might accomplish this would be appreciated.

Best,

JT

 From: rich.r...@ttu.edu
 To: jtis4...@hotmail.com
 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:28:17 -0500
 Subject: RE: [IAEP] Texas Tech University work with XO/Sugar
 
 John,
 
 I re-edited to shorten the video some and to put in music that is not 
 copyrighted. If you like, you could put up the file 
 http://richrice.com/5365/iplay-short.mov on dailymotion/sugarlabs. The video 
 would now be able to fall under CC. Playing with sugar sticks now.
 
 Rich
 
 Dr. Rich Rice, Associate Professor
 TTU Department of English
 http://richrice.com
 
 
 From: John Tierney [jtis4...@hotmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:33 PM
 To: Rice, Rich
 Subject: FW: [IAEP] Texas Tech University work with XO/Sugar
 
 Hi Rich,
 
 I had forwarded an email with the link to the Science Spectrum video:
 http://media.English.TTU.edu/faculty/rice/5365/iplay.wmv
 
 Sugar Labs Marketing Coordinator Sean Daly was interested in trans-coding the
 video to an Open Source format and was wondering if it has a Creative Commons
 designation so it could be put up with other Sugar Labs videos on the
 Daily Motion site:
 http://www.dailymotion.com/sugarlabs
 
 Your guidance on this would be appreciated.
 
 Thanks!
 John Tierney
 
 P.S. Tammy should have a Sugar on A Stick for you
 at CW if the logistics work-out.
 
  Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:56:22 +0200
  Subject: Re: [IAEP] Texas Tech University work with XO/Sugar
  From: sdaly...@gmail.com
  To: jtis4...@hotmail.com
  CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; 
  sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 
  Wow I can't wait to see that (can't on this machine)
 
  I'm interested in transcoding this to Ogg Theora, do you think we
  could ask him for a higher-quality source version I could transcode?
 
  is it CC, could we put it up on the Dailymotion site?
 
  Texas is Dell Foundation country. Hmmm...
 
  Sean
 
 

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Texas Tech University work with XO/Sugar

2009-06-09 Thread John Tierney

Hello All,
Just wanted to pass along this email and video to everyone to show
others like ourselves our hard at work trying to highlight and increase
the effectiveness of Sugar and the XO.
 
Video is about 35min in length-well done and inspires like minded work
to be done.
 
Best,
John Tierney
 
Subject: TTU's work with XO
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:47:08 -0400
From: tcsa...@purdue.edu
To: rich.r...@ttu.edu; jtis4...@hotmail.com

Dear John,
 
I’ve mentioned to you that Rich Rice at Texas Tech University has been using 
XO laptops for outreach with k-12 students, and recently, he and his graduate 
students completed a project with the Science Spectrum in Lubbock, TX.  
Science Spectrum is the local science museum.  As you can see from the 
following movie, they developed some innovative activities and documented 
their work with children who stopped by the Science Spectrum.  They’ve had 
quite a bit of success using the drawing and chat .software, among others.
 
http://media.English.TTU.edu/faculty/rice/5365/iplay.wmv
 
Rich is also a member of the Computers and Writing community and is interested 
in exploring other ways that CW can do outreach with k-12 schools using the 
XO and the Sugar platform.  I’ve copied him on this message, so we can 
continue to talk about options for immediate and long-term projects like 
working with the National Writing Project.
 
Tammy
 
--
Tammy S. Conard-Salvo
Associate Director, Writing Lab 
Purdue University

 ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] How Can We Showcase Turtle Art Portfolio

2009-05-12 Thread John Tierney













Hello All,

Would like commentary from the community on how we can try and showcase the 
abilities of Turtle art Portfolio 
along with the things each of us are working on. The email below came from my 
inability(due to my confusing question)
to start the thread in our IRC marketing meeting today. I hope those of you 
going to Paris get a chance to spend some time 
on this subject. This is an important piece of our Educational Outreach and a 
capability that all community members
can showcase. Therefore, I have cross-posted to IAEP, Developer, and 
Marketing-please pass along to
others who can be of help to the conversation.

Thanks,
John Tierney
Hi Walter,Sorry I wasn't so clear in my question was just trying to start 
thread about importance of Showcasing
TA Portfolio-The Journal and TA Portfolio combination for Teachers ability to 
see child's work and progression is one
of the themes we should push. 

The idea that every activity integrates
with the Portfolio is great selling point for teachers. When
developers
and activity designers discuss and describe their work
mentioning it integrates with TA portfolio reinforces
key concepts of
reflection and critique and allows for children to showcase their creativity 
for Parents, Teachers, Peers
and Community. 

From the non-technical/developer world I am not sure if it works with all 
activities. Showcasing and featuring the 
TA Portfolio as an additional assessment source which allows children to let 
their creativity shine is an important 
thing to get across. Allowing all community members to market this 
ability(Helps or Works with TA Portfolio) will 
help bring many more Teachers and others into the fold. 

Having a little session with the members at Sugar Camp Paris and with OLPC 
France about TA Portfolio and its ability
to help Teachers and Students and the Programs ability would be very 
beneficial, even more so if it was recorded.

Much like Evangeline's and your presentation at Sugar Camp it was one of the 
most instructive pieces on how this
ability can make a true difference in the classroom. Now that the TA
Portfolio activity has been realized, putting forth 
it's usability seems advantageous.Just an idea-Spot on. The reason why I give 
all my talks using Turtle Art is
exactly to make this point of closing the loop.
 
-walter___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Wanted: Videos of Sugar and XOs in action

2009-05-11 Thread John Tierney

Hi Christoph,

This is from the deployment in Birmingham, Alabama.
The engagement of the children involved tells the story!

http://olpc.tv/category/country/usa-country/

On the same site there are many others to choose from as well.

Hope you find one that fits your purpose.

Have An Outstanding Day!

John Tierney
 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:50:31 +0200
 From: e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at
 To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
 CC: market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; tano.bojan...@olpc.at; 
 grassro...@lists.laptop.org
 Subject: [Marketing] Wanted: Videos of Sugar and XOs in action
 
 Hi all,
 
 for a presentation here in Vienna that's coming up at the end of the 
 week Tano (in CC) and myself are looking for videos (in English or with 
 English subtitles) of Sugar and XO in action.
 
 Preferably we would want to see more than just smiling faces when being 
 handed a laptop by government officials and rather focus on usage in or 
 outside the classroom.
 
 Did a quick search on the mailing-lists and wiki and couldn't find 
 anything suitable so far...
 
 Any pointers and advice are much appreciated!
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Christoph
 
 -- 
 Christoph Derndorfer
 co-editor, olpcnews
 url: www.olpcnews.com
 e-mail: christ...@olpcnews.com
 ___
 Marketing mailing list
 market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Laptops build bridge to Ireland (from Chicago)

2009-03-23 Thread John Tierney













Hi Sean,

 But, Teachers are still developing ways to make the most of the
 partnership in their lessons.
This is a site to look at that you may suggest to both schools to use to work
with each other and other classrooms throughout the world:
TakingITGlobal-www.tigweb.org

When I attended Enhanced Learning Strategy-Literacy and Technology Showcase 
February 20th, 2009,
I saw a talk on the use of TakingITGlobal:The Canadian students were working 
with a class in Uganda
and the learning opportunity created was very powerful. Eastern Township School 
District Magog,Quebec Canada 
has been running a 1:1 with Apple MacBooks for the last 6 years.

Ron Canuel-Director General Eastern Township School District gave a 
presentation at XOCamp2 in January.
I have emailed Ron Canuel about the availability of Sugar through VirtualBox on 
Mac OS and he will be passing
information onto his Educational technology staff to pilot. We have call 
scheduled for later this week. 

Enhanced Learning Strategy
http://www.etsb.qc.ca/en/Home/default.shtm


JT






 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:25:53 +0100
 From: sdaly...@gmail.com
 To: carol...@solutiongrove.com
 CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Subject: Re: [Marketing] Laptops build bridge to Ireland (from Chicago)
 
 I'll be following up for more information!
 
 
 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Caroline Meeks
 carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
  It would be interesting to know if they are using a computer lab or laptop
  cart, in which case they would probably want Sugar on a Stick, or if they
  have individual laptops in which case they probably want to emulate.
 
  On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi Caroline, no we don't but it's a sure bet they are not XO-1s
 
 
  On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Caroline Meeks
  carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
   Do we know what kind of computers the kids in Ireland are using?
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Caroline Meeks
  Solution Grove
  carol...@solutiongrove.com
 
  617-500-3488 - Office
  505-213-3268 - Fax
 
 ___
 Marketing mailing list
 market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Marketing tag line

2009-01-13 Thread John Tierney

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:56:47 +
From: Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com
Subject: Re: [IAEP] Marketing tag line
To: David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: iaep iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Message-ID: 89c30760-9a9f-44a5-a6b1-bd72db531...@garycmartin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
 
David, oh please, get it right...
 
On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:53, David Farning wrote:
 
 Sugar - emacs for a new generation
 
Sugar - vi for a new generation
 
:-b
 
--G

How about:

Sugar- The Intellectual Playground Where Kids Learn How To Learn
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep