Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Quake Catcher Network

2010-04-19 Thread Nicholas Doiron

I do appreciate your response and thoughts on how it would be difficult to
collect data regularly.  I am hoping to install an XO-accessible weather
station in Uganda this summer. A device will monitor the sensor and
students can collect and post the data on their own schedule.

A large-scale project could start by choosing a simpler project where
students send reports about what they see.  Last December I was on a call
with DigiLiteracy.org and Cornell's volunteer science program.  Cornell is
interested in bird counts from OLPC schools in the US, India, and Latin
America. They also have a bilingual Celebrate Urban Birds program for city
schools. Here is a report about their work with a school in Costa Rica:
http://www.birds.cornell.edu/netcommunity/Page.aspx?pid=1693

I would be happy to help in bringing this program back to life.  We have
put digital graphs, cameras, maps, and networks in schools around the
world; it would be amazing if we can connect them with practical science
projects.

Regards,
Nick Doiron

On Sun, April 18, 2010 11:44 pm, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
 Provincia San Luis in Argentina is doing an amazing project of
 calculating the carbon footprint of every community in the Provincia, the
 kids go house byhouse interviewing the families on what kind of appliances
 they have, number of lightbulbs, etc.  Classmates running winnows, alas.


 Please disregard the rest of my response below - I'm into nonsense, no
 need to take any of that seriously, I just find it somewhat quaint I fell
 into that, so I'm leaving it there

 as to massive data gathering, something on the lines of weather projects
 could be fascinating, with adequate sensors.  Anyway, so far we haven't
 even been able to figure out even what it is that kids use their computers
 for, which simply would require to see / spider / datamine the Journals.
 To assume that we will be able to have kids regularly upload
 information, and also somehow will we manage to get them previously the
 proper sensors...

 Now, with *adequate* data processing, having weather data moving across
 a locality with a couple hundred sensors *accurately* located would be
 terrific, especially cross referencing that with satellite data and doing
 it over a significant span of time.

 Same difficulty with anything of this kind.  It's cute this was
 originally sold as something that would use accelerometers in computers,
 but, oh, it turns out you need separate sensors.

 I've seen a few very clever Science Fair seismic sensors, but even the
 cheapest ones can run beyond what is practical to consider as individual
 expenses.  And don't forget calibrating them, etc. I would be surprised a
 sensor that actually can give useful information would cost less than an
 XO!


 On 04/18/2010 09:39 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:

 Hi Nick,


 Thanks for the link to the Science For Citizens site.  Sounds like
 most of these projects are for the US only.  I wonder if there are
 similar projects in other countries? Some really nice lessons could be
 developed for students to do with their XOs with web access.  Does
 anyone know of others?

 Caryl

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Quake Catcher Network

2010-04-19 Thread Roland Gesthuizen
I have some contact with http://www.globe.gov and had the chance to show off
two OLPC XO-1 laptops a couple of years ago at their office in Denver. I am
still a current GLOBE trainer in Melbourne.

Would you like me to make contact with them regarding membership of GLOBE?
It would be great for your Uganda data to become part of our global weather
data-set.

Regards Roland

On 20 April 2010 07:49, Nicholas Doiron ndoi...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:


 I do appreciate your response and thoughts on how it would be difficult to
 collect data regularly.  I am hoping to install an XO-accessible weather
 station in Uganda this summer. A device will monitor the sensor and
 students can collect and post the data on their own schedule.

 A large-scale project could start by choosing a simpler project where
 students send reports about what they see.  Last December I was on a call
 with DigiLiteracy.org and Cornell's volunteer science program.  Cornell is
 interested in bird counts from OLPC schools in the US, India, and Latin
 America. They also have a bilingual Celebrate Urban Birds program for city
 schools. Here is a report about their work with a school in Costa Rica:
 http://www.birds.cornell.edu/netcommunity/Page.aspx?pid=1693

 I would be happy to help in bringing this program back to life.  We have
 put digital graphs, cameras, maps, and networks in schools around the
 world; it would be amazing if we can connect them with practical science
 projects.

 Regards,
 Nick Doiron

 On Sun, April 18, 2010 11:44 pm, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
  Provincia San Luis in Argentina is doing an amazing project of
  calculating the carbon footprint of every community in the Provincia, the
  kids go house byhouse interviewing the families on what kind of
 appliances
  they have, number of lightbulbs, etc.  Classmates running winnows, alas.
 
 
  Please disregard the rest of my response below - I'm into nonsense, no
  need to take any of that seriously, I just find it somewhat quaint I fell
  into that, so I'm leaving it there
 
  as to massive data gathering, something on the lines of weather projects
  could be fascinating, with adequate sensors.  Anyway, so far we haven't
  even been able to figure out even what it is that kids use their
 computers
  for, which simply would require to see / spider / datamine the Journals.
  To assume that we will be able to have kids regularly upload
  information, and also somehow will we manage to get them previously the
  proper sensors...
 
  Now, with *adequate* data processing, having weather data moving across
  a locality with a couple hundred sensors *accurately* located would be
  terrific, especially cross referencing that with satellite data and doing
  it over a significant span of time.
 
  Same difficulty with anything of this kind.  It's cute this was
  originally sold as something that would use accelerometers in computers,
  but, oh, it turns out you need separate sensors.
 
  I've seen a few very clever Science Fair seismic sensors, but even the
  cheapest ones can run beyond what is practical to consider as individual
  expenses.  And don't forget calibrating them, etc. I would be surprised a
  sensor that actually can give useful information would cost less than an
  XO!
 
 
  On 04/18/2010 09:39 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
 
  Hi Nick,
 
 
  Thanks for the link to the Science For Citizens site.  Sounds like
  most of these projects are for the US only.  I wonder if there are
  similar projects in other countries? Some really nice lessons could be
  developed for students to do with their XOs with web access.  Does
  anyone know of others?
 
  Caryl

 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




-- 
Roland Gesthuizen - ICT Coordinator - Westall Secondary College
http://www.westallsc.vic.edu.au

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change
the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has. --Margaret Mead
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Quake Catcher Network

2010-04-19 Thread Caryl Bigenho

Hi Nick and All,

Yes, Cornell's Ornithology Lab has some wonderful citizen science programs. I 
have enjoyed participating in their annual Great Backyard Bird Count a couple 
of times. 

The CoCoRaHS project, based at Colorado State University is also a nice 
activity for children (and adults like me) in the United States.  I bought and 
installed their rain gauge and report regularly during the months I live in 
Montana (usually June through September).  

http://www.cocorahs.org/

I see no reason why this sort of project couldn't be adapted for children in 
developing countries by having them make rain gauges from materials on hand 
such as empty food containers.  An Activity could be written that would include 
instructions for making a gauge and calibrating it (area of a circle and other 
calculations needed), a chart for recording data, mapping, making graphs. and 
other things.  Simple, inexpensive thermometers could be purchased and they 
could also make a simple anemometer.  There are lots of web sites with 
instructions for making both a rain gauge and an anemometer. There are even 
directions for a barometer (but I wonder how effective it would be?).

Each child could have his/her own weather station or groups living in the same 
neighborhood could make and share one. Data could be collected just on a 
community  basis (it is amazing how much difference there can be between places 
just a few hundred yards or meters apart).  If a central data gathering station 
could be set up on a county or provence wide basis, children in many schools 
could share data and research it.  Maps could be online similar to the ones on 
CoCoRaHS. Children could try their hand at weather forecasting, . oh,my! I 
could go on and on!  This could be a very fun, educational, and useful activity!

Any developers want to collaborate on an Weather Activity?  I'd love to be the 
educational consultant on it!

Caryl  (who in a former life taught both middle school and high school science 
and math)

 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:49:47 -0400
 Subject: Re: [IAEP] [support-gang]  Quake Catcher Network
 From: ndoi...@andrew.cmu.edu
 To: yamap...@gmail.com
 CC: cbige...@hotmail.com; s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; 
 support-g...@lists.laptop.org
 
 
 I do appreciate your response and thoughts on how it would be difficult to
 collect data regularly.  I am hoping to install an XO-accessible weather
 station in Uganda this summer. A device will monitor the sensor and
 students can collect and post the data on their own schedule.
 
 A large-scale project could start by choosing a simpler project where
 students send reports about what they see.  Last December I was on a call
 with DigiLiteracy.org and Cornell's volunteer science program.  Cornell is
 interested in bird counts from OLPC schools in the US, India, and Latin
 America. They also have a bilingual Celebrate Urban Birds program for city
 schools. Here is a report about their work with a school in Costa Rica:
 http://www.birds.cornell.edu/netcommunity/Page.aspx?pid=1693
 
 I would be happy to help in bringing this program back to life.  We have
 put digital graphs, cameras, maps, and networks in schools around the
 world; it would be amazing if we can connect them with practical science
 projects.
 
 Regards,
 Nick Doiron
 
 On Sun, April 18, 2010 11:44 pm, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
  Provincia San Luis in Argentina is doing an amazing project of
  calculating the carbon footprint of every community in the Provincia, the
  kids go house byhouse interviewing the families on what kind of appliances
  they have, number of lightbulbs, etc.  Classmates running winnows, alas.
 
 
  Please disregard the rest of my response below - I'm into nonsense, no
  need to take any of that seriously, I just find it somewhat quaint I fell
  into that, so I'm leaving it there
 
  as to massive data gathering, something on the lines of weather projects
  could be fascinating, with adequate sensors.  Anyway, so far we haven't
  even been able to figure out even what it is that kids use their computers
  for, which simply would require to see / spider / datamine the Journals.
  To assume that we will be able to have kids regularly upload
  information, and also somehow will we manage to get them previously the
  proper sensors...
 
  Now, with *adequate* data processing, having weather data moving across
  a locality with a couple hundred sensors *accurately* located would be
  terrific, especially cross referencing that with satellite data and doing
  it over a significant span of time.
 
  Same difficulty with anything of this kind.  It's cute this was
  originally sold as something that would use accelerometers in computers,
  but, oh, it turns out you need separate sensors.
 
  I've seen a few very clever Science Fair seismic sensors, but even the
  cheapest ones can run beyond what is practical to consider as individual
  expenses.  And don't forget calibrating them, etc

Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Quake Catcher Network

2010-04-18 Thread Caryl Bigenho

Hi Nick,

Thanks for the link to the Science For Citizens site.  Sounds like most of 
these projects are for the US only.  I wonder if there are similar projects in 
other countries? Some really nice lessons could be developed for students to do 
with their XOs with web access.  Does anyone know of others?

Caryl

 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:18:15 -0400
 From: ndoi...@andrew.cmu.edu
 To: support-g...@lists.laptop.org
 CC: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Subject: Re: [support-gang] [IAEP] Quake Catcher Network
 
 The accuracy of an individual sensor, yes, is suspect.  But that's why
 Stanford is asking for many sensors to be registered -- a thousand or
 laptops moving simultaneously (or in outgoing waves) could triangulate the
 location of an earthquake before the waves even register at the main USGS
 seismometers.
 
 These projects also connect the kids to science in a direct way.  Most
 volunteer science projects are a bit more hands-on and a little less
 hardware-intensive.  I've been interested for awhile in seeing the laptops
 connected to a project such as this -- see
 http://www.scienceforcitizens.net/ for some more examples =)
 
 Regards,
 Nick Doiron
 
 On Sun, April 18, 2010 8:04 pm, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
  Caryl,
 
 
  I think it is wonderful you do share about this.  It is always
  interesting to see how some idea can have unreached effects and become a
  wish for more
 
  I have been quite involved in seismic monitoring in my day, and to
  imagine personal computers could be used for that, beats everything else
  this week as to wishful thinking turned into vaporware, even though I
  spent a lot of time reading so called evaluations of ICT for education,
  and there was that revival of the crank...
 
  Now, if you can, and abusing a lot on your patience, please do not see
  what I said as a criticism to you, or that you should not share with us
  this kind of stuff.
 
  Actually, for someone like me it is extremely valuable to be aware of
  what is going on out there, and in the absence of things that make sense
  completely, it does help me hugely to, well, hear about this kind of
  things, because at some level these do reflect real dreams and desires
  which are perfectly true and valid, even though their put into effect is
  not.
 
  I guess I could go into detail, but the basic reason this cannot work is
  separating real seismic data from any other, from steps close to the
  machine, to a car rolling outside...  This of course will not stop a
  skilled grantwriter, who would offer to prepare software that can
  discriminate data.  However, the nearly mathematically unsolvable problem
  is in separating *overlapping* data, which is the real reason they forbid
  cellphones on planes.
 
  That is why real seismeters are set underground, as far away from human
  activity as possible.
 
 
  On 04/18/2010 05:31 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
 
  Hi...
 
 
  Here is something intriguing I heard about on NPR yesterday.  It is a
  Seismic Monitoring program that can run in the background on computers
  that have built-in accelerometers (newer Macs) or PCs with an external
  one with usb connection.  The hope is to have a world wide network of
  computers sensing quakes, especially in places where there are many
  quakes.
 
  It is designed to be an educational project with schools involved
  doing citizen science (sort of like CoCoRaHS).  They have
  interactive/educational software and seismic monitoring software.
 
  Disclaimer... I haven't tried the software yet so I can't recommend it
  one way or the other until I do.
 
  Does the XO have an accelerometer? No matter if it doesn't because it
  has usb ports to spare.  Any chance of someone getting a version of the
  software to work on the XOs?  Maybe one of our developers who knows what
  would have to be done to get it to work on the XO could contact the
  Quake Catcher Network and ask it they could do it?
 
 
  Here is a link to the site:
 
 
  http://qcn.stanford.edu/downloads/
 
 
  Looks like it is based at Stanford.
 
 
  Caryl
 
 
 
  ___
  IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
  IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
 
  ___
  support-gang mailing list support-g...@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
 
 
 
 
 ___
 support-gang mailing list
 support-g...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
  ___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Quake Catcher Network

2010-04-18 Thread Yamandu Ploskonka
Provincia San Luis in Argentina is doing an amazing project of 
calculating the carbon footprint of every community in the Provincia, 
the kids go house byhouse interviewing the families on what kind of 
appliances they have, number of lightbulbs, etc.  Classmates running 
winnows, alas.




Please disregard the rest of my response below - I'm into nonsense, no 
need to take any of that seriously, I just find it somewhat quaint I 
fell into that, so I'm leaving it there



as to massive data gathering, something on the lines of weather projects 
could be fascinating, with adequate sensors.  Anyway, so far we haven't 
even been able to figure out even what it is that kids use their 
computers for, which simply would require to see / spider / datamine the 
Journals.  To assume that we will be able to have kids regularly upload 
information, and also somehow will we manage to get them previously the 
proper sensors...


Now, with *adequate* data processing, having weather data moving across 
a locality with a couple hundred sensors *accurately* located would be 
terrific, especially cross referencing that with satellite data and 
doing it over a significant span of time.


Same difficulty with anything of this kind.  It's cute this was 
originally sold as something that would use accelerometers in computers, 
but, oh, it turns out you need separate sensors.


I've seen a few very clever Science Fair seismic sensors, but even the 
cheapest ones can run beyond what is practical to consider as individual 
expenses.  And don't forget calibrating them, etc. I would be surprised 
a sensor that actually can give useful information would cost less than 
an XO!




On 04/18/2010 09:39 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:

Hi Nick,

Thanks for the link to the Science For Citizens site.  Sounds like 
most of these projects are for the US only.  I wonder if there are 
similar projects in other countries? Some really nice lessons could be 
developed for students to do with their XOs with web access.  Does 
anyone know of others?


Caryl

 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:18:15 -0400
 From: ndoi...@andrew.cmu.edu
 To: support-g...@lists.laptop.org
 CC: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
 Subject: Re: [support-gang] [IAEP] Quake Catcher Network

 The accuracy of an individual sensor, yes, is suspect. But that's why
 Stanford is asking for many sensors to be registered -- a thousand or
 laptops moving simultaneously (or in outgoing waves) could 
triangulate the
 location of an earthquake before the waves even register at the main 
USGS

 seismometers.

 These projects also connect the kids to science in a direct way. Most
 volunteer science projects are a bit more hands-on and a little less
 hardware-intensive. I've been interested for awhile in seeing the 
laptops

 connected to a project such as this -- see
 http://www.scienceforcitizens.net/ for some more examples =)

 Regards,
 Nick Doiron

 On Sun, April 18, 2010 8:04 pm, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
  Caryl,
 
 
  I think it is wonderful you do share about this. It is always
  interesting to see how some idea can have unreached effects and 
become a

  wish for more
 
  I have been quite involved in seismic monitoring in my day, and to
  imagine personal computers could be used for that, beats 
everything else

  this week as to wishful thinking turned into vaporware, even though I
  spent a lot of time reading so called evaluations of ICT for 
education,

  and there was that revival of the crank...
 
  Now, if you can, and abusing a lot on your patience, please do not see
  what I said as a criticism to you, or that you should not share 
with us

  this kind of stuff.
 
  Actually, for someone like me it is extremely valuable to be aware of
  what is going on out there, and in the absence of things that make 
sense

  completely, it does help me hugely to, well, hear about this kind of
  things, because at some level these do reflect real dreams and desires
  which are perfectly true and valid, even though their put into 
effect is

  not.
 
  I guess I could go into detail, but the basic reason this cannot 
work is

  separating real seismic data from any other, from steps close to the
  machine, to a car rolling outside... This of course will not stop a
  skilled grantwriter, who would offer to prepare software that can
  discriminate data. However, the nearly mathematically unsolvable 
problem
  is in separating *overlapping* data, which is the real reason they 
forbid

  cellphones on planes.
 
  That is why real seismeters are set underground, as far away from 
human

  activity as possible.
 
 
  On 04/18/2010 05:31 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
 
  Hi...
 
 
  Here is something intriguing I heard about on NPR yesterday. It is a
  Seismic Monitoring program that can run in the background on 
computers
  that have built-in accelerometers (newer Macs) or PCs with an 
external

  one with usb connection. The hope is to have a world wide network of
  computers sensing quakes,