Re: [IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a, member

[Tony Anderson]

Sebastian,

Please identify a motion proposed by a member which has not been 
considered.


Naturally, consideration of a proposal is not necessarily approval.

Tony

On 06/04/2016 06:00 PM, iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org wrote:

Send IAEP mailing list submissions to
iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
iaep-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of IAEP digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member
   (Sebastian Silva)
2. Re: Sugar/OLPC Relations (Dave Crossland)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 10:39:39 -0500
From: Sebastian Silva 
To: Dave Crossland , SLOBs ,
iaep 
Subject: Re: [IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a
member
Message-ID: <9ff0e258-8e0b-9a0e-f375-f038172b8...@fuentelibre.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I too would support this motion. If people want to be SLOBs they should
consider community proposals not just their own ideas.


El 03/06/16 a las 17:59, Dave Crossland escribió:

Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member, dropping the
current practice of requiring a seconding before moving to a vote.


___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 


--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:53:36 -0600
From: Dave Crossland 
To: Samuel Greenfeld 
Cc: IAEP SugarLabs 
Subject: Re: [IAEP] Sugar/OLPC Relations
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On 4 June 2016 at 09:35, Samuel Greenfeld  wrote:


when I was discussing this with Peter a while back


Peter who? :)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 


--

Subject: Digest Footer

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

--

End of IAEP Digest, Vol 99, Issue 20



___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member

[Sebastian Silva]

I too would support this motion. If people want to be SLOBs they should
consider community proposals not just their own ideas.


El 03/06/16 a las 17:59, Dave Crossland escribió:
> Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member, dropping the
> current practice of requiring a seconding before moving to a vote.
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member

[Dave Crossland]

Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member, dropping the current
practice of requiring a seconding before moving to a vote.
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep