Re: [IAEP] kids building Re: activities (games) recommended age

2012-11-29 Thread James Simmons
Yama,

I know a proud father (not affiliated with OLPC in any way, nor is his
daughter) whose daughter likes telling stories.  She's too young to write
them down, so her father helps with that.  He has enough of her stories
that he's going to publish a collection on Create Space.  I've read one of
her stories.  It wasn't bad.  I doubt that the father could do as well
without his daughter's assistance.

I have two smart nieces.  One went to the Illinois Math And Science
Academy.  The other went to Thomas Jefferson High School in Virginia.  In
both schools there are no textbooks.  The teachers are responsible for
creating the materials the students study.  I helped my niece with her Java
homework, so I got to see the texts she was studying from.  They were quite
good, and they had a CC license so other schools could use them if they
wanted to.  I don't know how much effort the teachers put into making that
happen.  I imagine if they tried too hard they could get into trouble.

Going from consumers of education (or even just textbooks) to producers is
a big step.  Children and teachers alike need some encouragement to make
that step.  They can't be punished for doing it wrong, or for doing it at
all.

I'm a big believer in constructionism because as a kid I was always trying
to poke around and learn things on my own.  I watched Mr. Wizard on TV and
my mom bought me his book and I did experiments from the book on my own.  I
learned about amateur radio and I had a friend whose dad was a Ham who
built his own equipment.  The antenna in their back yard was almost bigger
than their house.  Their garage was full of radio parts.

So you could say that we have only a handful of students writing code for
Sugar and Activities, but they didn't develop in isolation.  They're all in
the same club.  So maybe that's one possibility.  You need an environment
outside of normal school where a kid can learn stuff he wants to learn
without getting punished for his failures, with adults available to offer
guidance.

James Simmons


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote:

 James,

 impressive work! congrats!

 On 11/28/2012 04:19 PM, James Simmons wrote:
 snip
 http://www.flossmanuals.net/e-**book-enlightenment/http://www.flossmanuals.net/e-book-enlightenment/

 eate books too.  Just as we have students writing Sugar Activities and
 even contributing code to Sugar itself we will also soon have students
 writing and publishing textbooks and other materials.


 in a few words, what do you think is the key elements that are stopping
 kids from doing that?
 As you present them so well, it is not because of lack of tools and
 resources.
 I would assume there would be a ramp up, a few at first, then a deluge. So
 far apparently really not much...

 Something must be missing. After 5 years and couple million XO's in the
 wild, it's not happening (yet?), to the point that maybe it will never
 happen?

 BTW, you know that the kids contributing code, they can be counted with
 the fingers of one hand... Which makes them all the more important, but,
 again, why not more? why not teachers, hundreds of them?
 Maybe it's something to do with construct***sm? Evolution?




 __**_
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/**listinfo/iaephttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] kids building Re: activities (games) recommended age

2012-11-28 Thread Yama Ploskonka

James,

impressive work! congrats!

On 11/28/2012 04:19 PM, James Simmons wrote:
snip
http://www.flossmanuals.net/e-book-enlightenment/
eate books too.  Just as we have students writing Sugar Activities and 
even contributing code to Sugar itself we will also soon have students 
writing and publishing textbooks and other materials.


in a few words, what do you think is the key elements that are stopping 
kids from doing that?
As you present them so well, it is not because of lack of tools and 
resources.
I would assume there would be a ramp up, a few at first, then a deluge. 
So far apparently really not much...


Something must be missing. After 5 years and couple million XO's in the 
wild, it's not happening (yet?), to the point that maybe it will never 
happen?


BTW, you know that the kids contributing code, they can be counted with 
the fingers of one hand... Which makes them all the more important, but, 
again, why not more? why not teachers, hundreds of them?

Maybe it's something to do with construct***sm? Evolution?




___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] kids building Re: activities (games) recommended age

2012-11-28 Thread STEPHEN JACOBS
Howdy folks,

just a reminder that to get some other folks involved from outside of the IAEP 
group looking at your educational games questions/comments/research you should 
think about joining the International Game Developers Association Special 
Interest group on Learning, Education and Games

 (https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/igdaleg)

We've got 112 members from Industry and Academia and it's a great way to find 
like minded folks
On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Yama Ploskonka wrote:

 James,
 
 impressive work! congrats!
 
 On 11/28/2012 04:19 PM, James Simmons wrote:
 snip
 http://www.flossmanuals.net/e-book-enlightenment/
 eate books too.  Just as we have students writing Sugar Activities and even 
 contributing code to Sugar itself we will also soon have students writing 
 and publishing textbooks and other materials.
 
 in a few words, what do you think is the key elements that are stopping kids 
 from doing that?
 As you present them so well, it is not because of lack of tools and resources.
 I would assume there would be a ramp up, a few at first, then a deluge. So 
 far apparently really not much...
 
 Something must be missing. After 5 years and couple million XO's in the wild, 
 it's not happening (yet?), to the point that maybe it will never happen?
 
 BTW, you know that the kids contributing code, they can be counted with the 
 fingers of one hand... Which makes them all the more important, but, again, 
 why not more? why not teachers, hundreds of them?
 Maybe it's something to do with construct***sm? Evolution?
 
 
 
 
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] kids building Re: activities (games) recommended age

2012-11-28 Thread S. Daniel Francis
Hi Yama,

2012/11/28 Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com:
 why not more? why not teachers, hundreds of them?

Few is better then Nothing

Projecting a possible situation:
If you are a student, you must study and you have the responsibility
to conserve your qualifications. If you are teacher, you work and you
get money teaching a school program, not contributing to Sugar.

Now, I think:
If you like history, you are good writing and the author of your
history book makes a new edition every year, you may contact the
author and contribute to the next edition. But if not; you may wait
the content come to you without any interest in participate in its
creation and then read it or only take a look at the cover and the
table of contents.

Cheers,
Daniel.
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] kids building Re: activities (games) recommended age

2012-11-28 Thread Yama Ploskonka

yes sir, 4 is a gazillion-times increase on the statu quo ante! :-)

I have been reflecting on how much world open source owes to the 
subsidies given by European and US university research programs and the 
ensuing ecosystem of paid grad students and those who want to grow up to 
become such. And uni professors that get paid couple hundred grand per 
year or more.


Yes, it would seem that to do good *scalably* you do need lots of 
available time, and someone has to pay for that. Otherwise you're a 
quijote - we have at least Sebastian and Laura...


Now, if what we call education would value and recognize contribution 
to open source - if having a track record in Communities did give you 
extra points...


If it gave points to the meritos for the teachers (instead of getting 
them in trouble for being different)


Otherwise, as I found out in this diplomado de software libre that was 
taught in Bolivia, it turns out you're an expert in software libre if 
you know the history of open source, its advantages, etc. It didn't have 
a single taller that would be /contributing/ to open source, /living/ it.


With 1/2 million XOs in Uruguay, you would expect the Wikipedia articles 
in UY to be really advanced.


Not quite, but better than I thought. Though users seem to have gone 
down, while they have grown in Pero

http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportPageEditsPerCountryBreakdown.htm

Let's not forget the no te metás, and el clavo que levanta la cabeza 
recibe martillo. Quite a difference from the 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homebrew_Computer_Club , 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tech_Model_Railroad_Club


In a country that does not allow its kids to use sudo, well, very hard 
to nation build...
That simple thing is symptomatic of the view that the Powers That Be 
have of those who want to do something different than the officially 
mandated, one-size-fits-all construct***sm.


Things might change. They better. I have high hopes for you guys. 
Especially that you be hundreds, and thousands, very soon!


Have you seen this?
Self-taught African Teen Wows M.I.T. - YouTube 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOLOLrUBRBYnoredirect=1
14-Year-old is America's Top Young Scientist: Her Solar-Powered Jug 
Purifies Water - YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71c95-LoBok


On 11/28/2012 07:52 PM, S. Daniel Francis wrote:

Hi Yama,

2012/11/28 Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com:

why not more? why not teachers, hundreds of them?

Few is better then Nothing

Projecting a possible situation:
If you are a student, you must study and you have the responsibility
to conserve your qualifications. If you are teacher, you work and you
get money teaching a school program, not contributing to Sugar.

Now, I think:
If you like history, you are good writing and the author of your
history book makes a new edition every year, you may contact the
author and contribute to the next edition. But if not; you may wait
the content come to you without any interest in participate in its
creation and then read it or only take a look at the cover and the
table of contents.

Cheers,
Daniel.


___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep