Re: Why CLOSE gets rc=4

2006-07-29 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Oh, the hazards of working without coding examples and manuals at hand! 
 Obviously I've suffered a memory parity error and the peculiar 
failures in the past that I'm thinking of must have been from using 
CLOSE (R3) rather than CLOSE ((R3)), which I confirmed does indeed pass 
the contents of R3.


Perhaps your failure is for the same reason that the system is getting 
what we like to call the "I've Gotcha" error on autoclose.  The IEC999I 
basically says the system can't find a valid DCB where he thinks there 
ought to be one to CLOSE the open file at step termination.  Have you by 
any chance freed the storage containing the DCB before you do the CLOSE? 
 If the storage is still allocated and R3 still contains the correct 
address, then another possibility to consider is that your program has 
somehow overwritten the DCB with garbage.



Steve Myers wrote:

OPEN ((R3))

and

CLOSE ((R3))

produce the same result.  That part of the code is correct.

Joel C. Ewing wrote:
I have been burned in the past by the syntax for OPEN and CLOSE not 
being identical.  You have an extra pair of parentheses in your CLOSE 
which I believe is causing the macro to interpret your DCB address as 
being an expression "(R3)" rather than a register reference, which 
would mean it would be looking at absolute location "3" rather than 
using the contents of register 3 as the DCB pointer.  Needless to say 
it won't find a valid DCB there.  I believe you want instead

  CLOSE (R3),MODE=31

In contexts where a DCB auto close at step termination succeeds, some 
programs may run with this kind of bug for years with no ill effects 
other than the mysterious error message from attempting to do a CLOSE 
on a bad DCB with a strange DDNAME.  Your IFGOTCOA error indicates 
that auto-close is not succeeding, so there could be other undesirable 
side effects if the problem is not fixed.



Paul Schuster wrote:

Hello:

I have a AMODE 31 RMODE ANY program that dynamically allocates an 
existing

PDS with DISP=SHR and NDISP=KEEP.

I create a DCB in 24bit storage, and issue OPEN like this:

OPEN  ((R3),INPUT),MODE=31

The OPEN completes RC=0.

With very little intervening code (a WTO, but no READ of the data set)
I issue this:

CLOSE ((R3)),MODE=31

R3 does point to the DCB, but the CLOSE gets RC=4.

I get messages like this:

IEC223I 04,IFG0200V,INIT,,UNKNOWN IEC999I IFG0TC0A,IFG0TC0B,INIT
,,DEB ADDR = 7BDD94,DSN = thedsnthatwasopened


Any idea on what is wrong?  I don'tspecify a DCBE,  as that is 
supposed

to be optional??

Thank you.

Paul

...





--
Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, AR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Edward Jaffe

Ed Gould wrote:
While your statement is true it would seem to me JES2 (JES3?) still 
sends out source and as long as it does then statement sequence 
numbers are needed. I vaguely remember that IBM at one time said they 
were going to stop sending out source for the JES's. They have done 
this with new function modules (at least JES2) I don't know if there 
is a specific date for the rest of the source.


I believe this is planned for the year after the 64-bit TOD clock wraps.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Ed Gould

John,

While your statement is true it would seem to me JES2 (JES3?) still  
sends out source and as long as it does then statement sequence  
numbers are needed. I vaguely remember that IBM at one time said they  
were going to stop sending out source for the JES's. They have done  
this with new function modules (at least JES2) I don't know if there  
is a specific date for the rest of the source.


Ed

On Jul 29, 2006, at 8:21 PM, john gilmore wrote:


Ted MacNeil WRITES:


 REPEAT AFTER ME!
 SMP is your friend!
 SMP NEEDS statement numbers.


SMP certainly uses SNs and IEBUPDTE in some contexts.  Equally, it  
omits to use them in others where it could do so.


It never needs to use them, and it would be well if it had stopped  
doing so long ago.  Affection for obsolete technology is  
understandable, even beguiling; but it is counter-productive.


John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today -  
it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/ 
direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread john gilmore

Ted MacNeil WRITES:


 REPEAT AFTER ME!
 SMP is your friend!
 SMP NEEDS statement numbers.


SMP certainly uses SNs and IEBUPDTE in some contexts.  Equally, it omits to 
use them in others where it could do so.


It never needs to use them, and it would be well if it had stopped doing so 
long ago.  Affection for obsolete technology is understandable, even 
beguiling; but it is counter-productive.


John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Their current uses are exiguous; they are of only antiquarian interest; and 
>even that interest has, it seems to me, been exhausted.

REPEAT AFTER ME!
SMP is your friend!
SMP NEEDS statement numbers.

When in doubt.
PANIC!!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: APF Authorized Code/Libraries.

2006-07-29 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:16:44 -0400 Wayne Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

:>While that is true, since non-reentrent code loaded out of an APF
:>authorized library is loaded into KEY 8 storage, there is an integrity
:>exposure if said code is loaded into a multi-user address space, since
:>it is open to being modified (by accident or by intent) by a
:>non-authorized program.  Since a reentrant program loaded from an APF
:>authorized library is loaded into KEY 0 storage, only another authorized
:>program could switch to PSW key 0 and modify the storage.  

That is among the minor worries of trying to directly execute APF code in a
multiuser address space.

Besides the program itself, there is the data areas and the save areas used by
the program.

Such code would be best served by being executed via SVC/PC or by stopping the
other tasks in the address space (as done by TSO).

--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Why CLOSE gets rc=4

2006-07-29 Thread Joel C. Ewing
I have been burned in the past by the syntax for OPEN and CLOSE not 
being identical.  You have an extra pair of parentheses in your CLOSE 
which I believe is causing the macro to interpret your DCB address as 
being an expression "(R3)" rather than a register reference, which would 
mean it would be looking at absolute location "3" rather than using the 
contents of register 3 as the DCB pointer.  Needless to say it won't 
find a valid DCB there.  I believe you want instead

  CLOSE (R3),MODE=31

In contexts where a DCB auto close at step termination succeeds, some 
programs may run with this kind of bug for years with no ill effects 
other than the mysterious error message from attempting to do a CLOSE on 
a bad DCB with a strange DDNAME.  Your IFGOTCOA error indicates that 
auto-close is not succeeding, so there could be other undesirable side 
effects if the problem is not fixed.



Paul Schuster wrote:

Hello:

I have a AMODE 31 RMODE ANY program that dynamically allocates an existing
PDS with DISP=SHR and NDISP=KEEP.

I create a DCB in 24bit storage, and issue OPEN like this:

OPEN  ((R3),INPUT),MODE=31 



The OPEN completes RC=0.

With very little intervening code (a WTO, but no READ of the data set)
I issue this:

CLOSE ((R3)),MODE=31 



R3 does point to the DCB, but the CLOSE gets RC=4.

I get messages like this:

IEC223I 04,IFG0200V,INIT,,UNKNOWN 
IEC999I IFG0TC0A,IFG0TC0B,INIT,,DEB ADDR = 7BDD94,DSN = 
thedsnthatwasopened


Any idea on what is wrong?  I don'tspecify a DCBE,  as that is supposed
to be optional??

Thank you.

Paul

...


--
Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, AR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Gerhard Postpischil

john gilmore wrote:
SNs were useful when cataloged procedures and source programs were 
maintained using such batch edit utilities as IEBUPDTE and IEBUPDAT.


Their current uses are exiguous; they are of only antiquarian interest; 
and even that interest has, it seems to me, been exhausted.


That's an interesting statement; are there data to support your position 
that this is the case for most installations? I find sequence numbers to 
be handy when restricting searches, especially when using editors 
outside of SPF's. They can also be useful to detect omissions in CUT and 
PASTE operations, and they are extremely useful to disambiguate similar 
stretches of code. And I still use Cornell's IEBUPDTX to maintain 
versions of programs.


Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


New Mainframe Installations & Education

2006-07-29 Thread Eric N. Bielefeld
Several hours ago, I had entered a nice email on this topic that was running 
under the subject of:  Re: IBM Redbook: "Introduction to the New Mainframe: 
z/OS Basics"  .  Since I spent about 10 minutes composing it, the *&*^% web 
site that I use to read IBM-Main on my laptop timed out.  Usually, I can cut 
and paste the reply into a new email, but somehow I didn't get it cut,  so 
when I tried to paste it into a new email, there was nothing there.  That's 
our lousy Wisconsin Roadrunner webmail site.  Sometimes, I think it times 
out in 5 minutes, and other times I swear it takes over a half hour.  This 
email is from my desktop, using the usually reliable Outlook Express.  I'll 
try to remember what I said before.


I have a friend who is the Dean of the IT program at the Waukesha Community 
Technical College (WCTC).  He also used to be the president of the WASM 
(Wisconsin Association of Systems Management), a Naspa group.  He has pretty 
much the same thing to say about new programs, such as the mainframe 
training that IBM is trying to get more colleges to offer.  He says there 
has to be a market for it.  Unfortunately, in the greater Milwaukee area, 
that market is diminishing more each year.  Obviously, as I have told you in 
the past, the MVS mainframe is no longer in P&H Mining Equipment, where I 
used to work.  I know of 2 more mainframes going away in the area, one in 
September, and one I think in about a year, although it may  be 2 years. 
(CRS).


I estimate 10 to 12 mainframe data centers in the Milwaukee area at this 
time.  When I started at P&H, I think there was more like 30 to 40.  I know 
I had at least 10 interviews at companies in the area before I got my job at 
P&H.  Now, there is only one job that I have heard of in the area for the 
last year and a half for a sysprog.  Unfortunately I didn't get it.


I go to a group at our church that meets monthly to encourage and help 
people who are out of work, or underemployed.  The leader of the group, who 
has worked in personal in the area most of his life, made the comment that 
southeast Wisconsin is the graveyard of IBM mainframes.  It was really 
interesting, because at that meeting, a friend of mine who I used to work 
with about 25 years ago who was also a sysprog, gave his testimony of how he 
was out of work for over a year, and then finally got back into work in 
mainframe computers.  I think he now is an application programmer, but I 
don't know for sure.  I do know that now he has to drive 50 or 60 miles one 
way to northern Illinois every day.


By the way, I have a good lead on a job in Milwaukee, but as a Data Center 
Technical Analyst, not a sysprog.  I would rather stay in Milwaukee doing 
that than make more money elsewhere as a sysprog.


Someone made the comment recently that they thought there were more postings 
on job boards for sysprogs.  I have noticed that also, since I apply for 
most of the jobs that I qualify for.  I especially noticed more and more 
jobs being offered by headhunters on the job boards.  I don't think there 
was a lot of IT placement by headhunters in our profession for a while.  I 
talked to one recruiter who still is in business in Milwaukee, but they do 
none of the previous placement where they get 30% or so of the persons first 
year of salary.  Now he does things like screening resumes for companies 
when their personel department is too busy.


I think this email was a lot longer than my original, but then I didn't have 
to worry about my webmail site timing out.


Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: wd4z JES job Monitor

2006-07-29 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.

Mary Kay Tubello wrote:

I just installed wd4z 6.01. Having trouble starting the JES Jmonitor on the
default port of 6715 on a zos 1.6 system.  It works on a test 1.7 system.
It starts ok if the port number is 3 digits, but not when it is 4 digits.
Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,
Mary Kay



Do you get any errors?  Could port 6715 be reserved on your 1.6 system?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 7/29/2006 5:42:36 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

AFAIK  the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays. It was used 
for  punched card sorter. Is there any other application  ?




>>
Your PARMLIB and a few others are maintained by SMP/E with IEBUDTE via  
sequence numbers. Some of the vendors too, CA-1 comes to  mind.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


wd4z JES job Monitor

2006-07-29 Thread Mary Kay Tubello
I just installed wd4z 6.01. Having trouble starting the JES Jmonitor on the
default port of 6715 on a zos 1.6 system.  It works on a test 1.7 system.
It starts ok if the port number is 3 digits, but not when it is 4 digits.
Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,
Mary Kay

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread john gilmore
SNs were useful when cataloged procedures and source programs were 
maintained using such batch edit utilities as IEBUPDTE and IEBUPDAT.


Their current uses are exiguous; they are of only antiquarian interest; and 
even that interest has, it seems to me, been exhausted.


John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Sequence Numbers

2006-07-29 Thread Keith E. Moe
> AFAIK the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays. It was used
> for punched card sorter. Is there any other application ?


OK.  Anyone who agree with the above statement is no longer allowed to use 
++MACUPT or ++SRCUPD in SMP or to ever use IEBUPDTE.

Granted, these are very special, somewhat limited use functions, but how many 
Systems Programmers would be happy to have IBM strip all of 
the sequence numbers from every Macro or Source member that they still 
distribute?




Keith E. Moe
Laid Back Software, Inc.
http://www.laidbacksoftware.com
(408) 749-0655

Creator of the TSO Environment and Administration Manager Product.
Seeking employment and consulting opportunities with MVS.
Located in Silicon Valley.
Willing to Travel.
Over 35 years in the industry (26 with one company).
Resume: http://www.laidbacksoftware.com/resume.html
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, R.S. said:

> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:42:19 +0200
> 
> > Perhaps you feel that all utilities, on all platforms, should
> > process only columns 1-72 of their input data.  Ain't gonna
> > happen.
> 
> Even some mainframe programs interpret it as data, with funny effects
> somtimes. For example SYSIN DD * for FTP program cannot contain the
> numbers. AFAIK some TCPIP config files as well.
> 
ITYM "INPUT DD *".  (Feels like Pascal, doesn't it?)

Perhaps the access methods should strip off the sequence numbers
so utilities and user programs need never be concerned with them.

> AFAIK the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays. It was used
> for punched card sorter. Is there any other application ?
> 
No longer.  The 700/7000 series had a card reader (407 variant?)
that read cards in row binary, two 36-bit words per row (software
converted to BCD) , so there were always 8 columns you couldn't
read.  You could select which 8 with a plugboard.  This likely
contributed to the convention of 8-character sequence numbers.

The PDP-6/10/20 stored 5 ASCII characters per 36-bit word (sometimes),
so 5-character sequence numbers were conventional.  It used bit 35
as a flag to indicate that the word contained a sequence number
that the programmer might chose to ignore.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: 2105 to 2107 Migration Question

2006-07-29 Thread Joel C. Ewing
When IBM migrated our DASD from 2105 to 2107 1st Q this year (on a 
2064-106), FDRPAS is the tool they brought with them.  CPU use by FDRPAS 
was not an issue - device activity and channel activity could be, 
especially if you have any specific devices that are already showing up 
as a performance bottleneck (and having a faster processor actually 
increases your exposure for DASD bottlenecks).


Do you depend on PAV support for performance on the 2105?  One of the 
limitations of FDRPAS 6 months ago was that it had to disable PAVs on 
the source and target DASD volumes while it was migrating it from 2105 
to the 2107.  If you did the migration on a "hot" device at a time when 
its workload required PAVs for acceptable performance, then applications 
could see significant response degradation on the device for several 
minutes, even if the DASD subsystems themselves had plenty of reserve 
capacity.  If FDRPAS still has this limitation and you depend on PAVs, 
be forewarned and either chose slack periods for migrating critical 
high-activity devices or monitor response closely during the migration.


We also did the migration without significant impact on the users.

Howard Rifkind wrote:

Hal,
  I just went thru this 2 weeks ago.
  Can you get your hands on FDRPAS?  Worth every cent you pay for it.
  We used it in prime time on an MP300/H-50, which is much slower then the box 
you have.
  I did it in prime time and it was a piece of cake, no one even know I was 
doing it.

Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  We are on a countdown to move from a 2105-800 Shark to a 2107-921
DS8100. The motor is a z/890 2066-0A4. We are a 7x24 online shop with
some tight SLA's. All of our slack for years was consumed by a generator
failure. 


We have four FICON paths to the Shark and two to the DS8100. The thought
is to swing one of the FICONs to the DS8100 making three each for the
transition. 

The transition will be 'hot' using IBM services and the FDR product. 


Question: are the channels faster in the DS8100? Should we stay with the
4-2 split until after the migration is complete?

Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thanks all. 

...
--
Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, AR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Data set ENQueues and DEQueues in Jobs

2006-07-29 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
On Friday 28 July 2006 23:47, Steve Myers wrote:

>>> At step end, the initiator will DEQ any DSNs that are no longer
>>> needed, i.e. those which are not referenced on a DD in any later
>>> step.
 
> This change was fairly recent.  Originally, the data set ENQ lasted
> for the life of the job.  I do not recall when the data set ENQ was
> released when the last step that referenced the data set in JCL
> terminated.

I don't think it was "fairly recent". In fact, I'm quite sure MVS has 
behaved like this since the beginning, over 30 years ago.  

The allocation routines keep a table in SWA called the DSNAME Table 
(DSNT) which contains an entry for each dsname in the job along with 
the 1-byte number of the last step that references it. At the end of 
each step, the table is scanned for matching step numbers and DEQs are 
issued accordingly.  The SVA of the DSNT is in field SCTADSTB.  
The IEFDSNT macro describes the DSNT. The RECALL module in file 183 of 
the CBT tape scans the DSNT.

I don't recall if DYNALLOC creates entries in the DSNT.  My guess is 
that it doesn't, but I don't really know.

-- 

 Gilbert Saint-Flour
 GSF Software
 http://gsf-soft.com/
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Steve Comstock

R.S. wrote:

Paul Gilmartin wrote:


In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:



Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:57:30 -0300

That said, others have told you about UNNUM; that will indeed delete
those sequence numbers, which in fact are not annoying.



It appeared to me that the OP, perhaps using ISPF as the editor-
of-choice, was composing data to be exported as input to a desktop
program.  Many such programs treat all available columns as data,
in which case those sequence numbers are, in fact, annoying.

Perhaps you feel that all utilities, on all platforms, should
process only columns 1-72 of their input data.  Ain't gonna
happen.



Even some mainframe programs interpret it as data, with funny effects 
somtimes. For example SYSIN DD * for FTP program cannot contain the 
numbers. AFAIK some TCPIP config files as well.


AFAIK the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays. It was used 
for punched card sorter. Is there any other application ?




Well, the last two digits are a level number, so you can tell which
lines have changed at different levels. I don't care so much about
that, but I can see that some people might.

Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HSA Estimate

2006-07-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>> These days, I would plan for a minimum of 1GB HSA, and a minimum of 3 per 
>> LPAR.
>> More if it's doing real work (DB2, IMS, or CICS).

>Wrong plans IMHO. HSA size strongly depends on CPC generation. Before 
>z/990 (that means 9672, z/900, z/800) HSA size was related to IODF size 
>- number of devices, number of LPARs.
>On z/990 HSA size grew up significantly and took approx. 1GB. 

It's not a 'wrong' plan.
It's a minimum.

Most are still on a z/990 or smaller, so it's a good starting point.
But, my point was: why worry about something as small as 128MB?
Memory is cheap, and with today's memory-intensive workloads, it's cheaper than 
the paging overhead.

When in doubt.
PANIC!!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Calm down, it is not worth to worry about.

Actually, I was calm!
It just seems that some people can't take a hint,
so I raised the tone of my response.

Schmeul, nobody wants to hear it!

BTW, I'm taking the kill file route, too.

So, respond if you like, I won't see it!


When in doubt.
PANIC!!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread R.S.

Paul Gilmartin wrote:


In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:



Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:57:30 -0300

That said, others have told you about UNNUM; that will indeed delete
those sequence numbers, which in fact are not annoying.



It appeared to me that the OP, perhaps using ISPF as the editor-
of-choice, was composing data to be exported as input to a desktop
program.  Many such programs treat all available columns as data,
in which case those sequence numbers are, in fact, annoying.

Perhaps you feel that all utilities, on all platforms, should
process only columns 1-72 of their input data.  Ain't gonna
happen.


Even some mainframe programs interpret it as data, with funny effects 
somtimes. For example SYSIN DD * for FTP program cannot contain the 
numbers. AFAIK some TCPIP config files as well.


AFAIK the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays. It was used 
for punched card sorter. Is there any other application ?


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IOCDS with VM and zOS LPARS

2006-07-29 Thread R.S.

Marc Holiwell wrote:


I am currently running two LPARs (with zOS 1.4 as OSes)
on a IBM 2086 model A04(220), and would like to know
if it is possible to create an IOCDS that will support
an LPAR with VM as the OS, and another LPAR with
zOS as the OS...???


As other already mentioned, LPAR definition is the same for z/OS and 
z/VM (the distinction is between OS nad CF).

OS config contains distinction between MVS and VM type.

However, especially when using Linux under VM, it is worth to mention 
how to "isolate" MVS devices from VM. It can be done via "Explicite 
device list" - at LPAR level, while z/OS is usually filtered at OS 
config level. First method is at IOS level, while OS config can be 
changed on operating system (and Linux does not honor it).


My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HSA Estimate

2006-07-29 Thread R.S.

Ted MacNEIL wrote:

HSA is currently at 128mb. All main is allocated, no slop anywhere. If HSA grows, then I'll lose an LPAR. 



128MB is nothing for HSA, these days.
If you are so tight that an increase to such a small HSA is an issue, you have 
a bigger problem than the size of HSA!

At $10K/GiB, what are you waiting for.

These days, I would plan for a minimum of 1GB HSA, and a minimum of 3 per LPAR.
More if it's doing real work (DB2, IMS, or CICS).


Wrong plans IMHO. HSA size strongly depends on CPC generation. Before 
z/990 (that means 9672, z/900, z/800) HSA size was related to IODF size 
- number of devices, number of LPARs.
On z/990 HSA size grew up significantly and took approx. 1GB. 
Relationship between IODF content and HSA size was greatly reduced.

On z9 HSA grew up again, now it's approx. 1.9GB. I did some tests:
minimal config (2 or 3 LPARs, 7000 devices, single CSS) took approx. 
300MB less than "max. config" (18 LPARs, 2 CSSes max. # of devices each).

YMMV, but the dependence on CPC model is unquestionable.

BTW: minimum memory size on z9 (and z/990) is 16GB. Even with HSA of 2GB 
it's not bad to have 14GB for the beginning ! 


Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OSA SF and IOACMD

2006-07-29 Thread R.S.

Ted MacNEIL wrote:

Did it ever occur to you that the same is true for using USS when you don't 
mean USS?



Give it a rest!

Even IBM calls it USS.

The weight of the world must not be on your shoulders if you have nothing to 
worry about besides a silly anacronym.


Ted,
Calm down, it is not worth to worry about.

Since I noticed that vast majority (or even all) of Shmuel's mails 
contains only "no, you're wrong" or "USS is not unix" I stopped 
responding him. I put his e-mail in kill-file, so his mails are 
filtered. That's good: no more badgering. I don't loose anything 
valuable, cause usually Shmuel's mails does not contain any help, rather 
malice and badgering instead.


Soemtimes, when browsing archives through web interface (no filter on 
Shmuel) I read his mails  - that convices me it was good decision to 
make a filter.


Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Redbook: "Introduction to the New Mainframe: z/OS Basics"

2006-07-29 Thread Shane
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 00:40 -0500, Bill Seubert wrote:

> When we can connect customers who have
> skill issues to the universities from which they hire students, ...

Excuse my sceptocity, but such "customers" exist ???
>From my perspective, seems that customers are more willing to hire
expertise than assist its growth. Whilst good for me and others with the
requisite experience/expertise, it is a stone wall for those attempting
to enter the industry.
Bloody short sighted.
Then there is the issue of off-shoring the whole kit and caboodle ...

At one site we even spend almost two years training a customers employee
as a sysprog. Only for said customer to decide they didn't see a future
for their technical people in MVS, and they moved him elsewhere. Years
later I still provide MVS services to this customer, and that trainee
has left - but the training has been wasted as he now does "toy-box"
support.

Good luck, but I empathise with the earlier comment about turning (such)
a big boat.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-07-29 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello John,

I have been reading my digest copy of yesterday's posts and found a bunch 
of similar replies.

I will not assume that you can actually access ISPF EDIT on your mainframe.

If you do and you edit the JCL you most likely wont know that in columns 73-
80 there may be line numbers. The editor will put them there if your edit 
session has NUM(ON) set in the current edit profile (ref PROFILE primary 
EDIT command).

If you cannot see them you may need to scroll your edit session "RIGHT" to 
see these columns.

So all the posts I have read so far assume you can edit these JCL files in 
ISPF.

Please confirm that the numbers you are seeingt are 8 digit numbers in 
columns 73-80.

If they are not then something else may be generating them.

On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:11:55 +1000, John Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

>I noticed that when I perform a FTP function from Mainframe (I am using 
FTP to retrieve jcls) to my pc I notice that sequence numbers appear on the 
file.
>
>  How can I prevent these annoying sequence numbers from appearing on the 
output?
>
>  Thanks
>


Regards
Bruce Hewson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html