Solaris on z
Just minor correction: Sun and IBM are collaborating with Sine Noimine to get Solaris on Z. Neither company is doing the work. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Listing HIPERS
On 16 Aug 2007 14:28:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:44:03 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: Does the report ERROR SYSMODS tell you if you have an error against a function or PTF that has been ACCEPTED? Many years ago if the sysmod was ACCEPTED the PE wouldn't show. AFAIK it works fine. Did you weren't running the REPORT ERRSYSMODS against the global zone after doing a REJECT of what was accepted? I'd expect those not to show up, since they are no longer in RECIEVE status. IMO, the REPORT ERRSYSMODS of the global zone isn't very interesting. The last time that I would have done active SMP work was 1991 and probably earlier than that. Subsequent time has been spent on the bench or in applications. I was on a year 2000 project and did applications support and wrote a library inventory matching system using IDRDATA and other load module information, parsed source and copy library information and other interesting things to support conversion to LE and maintaining synchronization between Y2K source and production source. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Solaris on z
Is there any prediction about date that first version of Solaris on Z will release? Thanks David Boyes wrote: Just minor correction: Sun and IBM are collaborating with Sine Noimine to get Solaris on Z. Neither company is doing the work. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing loosing steam?
---snip-- I would not dignify anything to do with fluid dynamics as *physics* which my schooling taught me dealt with topics to which some theoretical explanations can be applied. unsnip Since my background is, in part, in physics, I have to disagree, Chris. While it may seem that fluid dynamics is all empirical, there's good theoretical background as well. Look at Brownian motion, which is the basis for properties like fluid density, temperature and pressure. The calculations are numbing, to say the least, but the basis is there. Thankfully, the practical results can be expressed empirically, to a fair degree of accuracy, with much simpler calculations. Most of those calculations are distillations of some rather tedious partial differential equations. Rick -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Distance between primary and DR site
== Ed Gould == wrote2007-08-17 22:48: On Aug 17, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/05/2007 at 08:42 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I take it that you have not considered the possibility of a supernova. The Sun is a yellow dwarf; going supernova is not an option. However, much less significant misbehavior could still put paid to us. Agreed. I saw a science show and was informed that in 4.5 Billion years our galaxy was going to collide with Andromida galaxy (Sp?) .. Talk about long term positioning. I think there was also some indication that was just about the same time the sun would die. So take your pick ... To add to this slightly OT headed thread: the sun will slowly increase it's output of energy and after 500 million years make the life on earth impossible due to the increased temperature. Thomas Berg -- __ Mundus Vult Decipi __ They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin Military justice is to justice what military music is to music. - Groucho Marx -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMS Question - Urgent
** DON'T PANIC ** take several deep breaths ... and think ... your 3.2 screen shows: Storage class . . . : PRODVSAM Organization . . . : PS Record format . . . : VB as Tom pointed out, wrong DSORG - should show up as VS (at least). from the ISMF test screen Lizette has wonderfully captured, test your ACS script with additional info: DSN (DSN/Collection Name) . . REFPROD.REF.DNO Dsorg . . . . VS Recorg . . . KS Dsntype . . . . . EXT If Ext . . . . Y to get SMS-managed, the dataset has to have a STORCLAS assigned first; STORGRUP MGMTCLAS follow thereafter (DATACLAS is generally optional). DATACLAS can be assigned to both SMS non-SMS datasets ... let's start tracing from your STORCLAS ACS routine. - ravi. ps: i take it your site does not have ACC/SRS, or StopX37/II ... so the source of the problem is confined only to your ACS routines. Dean Montevago wrote: I just did a 3.2 allocate Data Set Name . . . . : REFPROD.REF.DNO General Data Current Allocation Management class . . : **None**Allocated blocks . : 15 Storage class . . . : PRODVSAMAllocated extents . : 1 Volume serial . . . : VSAM02 Device type . . . . : 3390 Data class . . . . . : PRODVSAM Current Utilization Organization . . . : PS Used blocks . . . . : 0 Record format . . . : VB Used extents . . . : 0 Record length . . . : 251 Block size . . . . : 3120 1st extent blocks . : 15 Secondary blocks . : 2 Data set name type : EXTENDEDSMS Compressible : NO Creation date . . . : 2007/08/17 Referenced date . . : ***None*** Expiration date . . : ***None*** both write statements hit as well. don't know what's going on here, only had 2 hours sleep last night because if this, fading fast. someone please enlighten me -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 4331 weight
I have a 4341 shrink-wrapped in my garage, but that won't really help since I think the 4331's were a little smaller. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 4331 weight
OK, I give. What are you going to do with it?That's not a small machine. I used to fix them when I worked for IBM in the early 80's. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 8:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 4331 weight I have a 4341 shrink-wrapped in my garage, but that won't really help since I think the 4331's were a little smaller. Brian No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/960 - Release Date: 8/18/2007 3:48 PM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
List of Withdrawn products from IBM
The list of withdrawn products at http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH10451 was a pleasant surprise to me. I do not want to disagree with IBM (at all) in their announcement. I think that this list was a long time in coming. I just wish there was a better way to get the information out to sysprogs and management. I have not been to SHARE it a few years, I would hope that IBM is doing their job in disseminating this type of information. Is the SHARE MVS group getting this type of information out? I am just afraid that someone is going to be surprised upon installation of a servpac. I have thought about this and because SE's no longer exist there doesn't seem to me anyway IBM can communicate any longer to the sysprogs. Has anyone come up with a sure fire way of getting this type of information out to the right people? Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 4331 weight
I have several machines now, a 9672 a 4381, a 4341, a 4321, a NAS AS700 a 3081D and a System/3 and a 370/145. I also have a string of 3330's, 3340's, 3350's and 3380's and a 2305 with several replacement parts and several printers from a 1403 up and some telecom equipment from several vendors and a bunch of odds and ends. At the time I shrink wrapped them they all worked fine, although I'm not sure about the 370 because I had a problem when I moved it into the garage. When I bought my house, it came with a detached 5 car garage, and a local university was getting rid of their old computer room (they had long since disposed of their mainframe) so I offered to dismantle and cart off their raised floor. So now about 1/2 of the garage has a raised floor, although I'm not sure about moving the big iron on to it because of the weight. At some point I'm hoping to be able to donate the equipment like I did when I lived back east, but in the mean time it's just a hobby. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
