Re: Data Encryption Product Limits: 300 Datasets per month
Guys, I am looking into RACF certificates to handle Key Management, early stages looks doable. Kevin From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ed Gould Sent: Sun 1/18/2009 12:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Data Encryption Product Limits: 300 Datasets per month --- On Sat, 1/17/09, Jim Marshall jim.marsh...@opm.gov wrote: SNIP-- As a footnote it does all present some interesting challenges as far as Key Management, exchanging files with our Windows/Unix/Linux Brethren, and espically the Translation issues which happen (remember this back in the 20th Century). If you want to chat about any of this, contact me offlist. This e-mail message and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of its authorized recipient(s). If you are not an intended or authorized recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this message in error or are not authorized to receive it, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original message and all copies of it from your computer. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Anthony Fletcher/New Zealand/IBM is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 19/01/2009 and will not return until 20/01/2009. 20090119 is Wellington Anniversay Public Holiday. I will intermittently have access to Email. I may be able to answer my Mobile 021 464 864 if the matter is urgent. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Non-reentrant code question
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:59:19 + Tom Quarendon tom.quaren...@teamwpc.co.uk wrote: :I've got an issue trying to make use of a piece of assembler code that's :coded in a non-reentrant style. Specifically the code doesn't allocate a :save area dynamically, it just allocates space in the CSECT for it. I've :got a driver program in C that's trying to call the code and when it :does I get a segmentation violation at the point that it tries to write :to the save area. The assembler code is as follows: : USING FRED,15 :FRED CSECT : B SAVE-*(15) : L 15,0(1) : B RETURN :SAVE DS 0H : STM 14,12,12(13) : BALR 11,0 : LA 0,*-FRED : SLR 11,0 : LA 2,SAVEAREA : ST 2,8(13) : ST 13,4(2) :* LR 13,2 : B4(15) :* :RETURN DS 0S :* L 13,SAVEAREA+4 :L 14,12(13) :LM 0,12,20(13) :BR 14 : LTORG : :SAVEAREA DS 18F : END :As it stands above, I can call the code fine. Uncomment the LR 13,2 and :the program crashes at that point. :Can anyone help my understand why this doesn't work (other that the fact :that the code is clearly loaded into read-only storage) and what I'd :need to do to make it work? Clearly this kind of style is allowable in :the right environment, I'm just struggling slightly to understand how I :set up that environment. I have complete freedom in all things, except :the above assembler code -- I can't change that. Otherwise I can do :anything, compile options, link/bind options, driver program etc etc. If :the only solution is changing the code above, I'd like to know that too, :and what's required, but that has to be the absolute last resort. All :other possibilities exhausted. Final option. :I hope I've been (relatively) clear in what I'm trying to do here. :Thanks in advance for any assistance. If the only r/w area is the savearea, change the code to use the linkage stack. BAKR R14,0 * leave R13 as it is at the end PR, -- Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Sue Chiam is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 19/01/2009 and will not return until 07/02/2009. Please email to IT Mainframe Systems for all work related issues. Thank you. - IMPORTANT NOTICE : The information in this email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any use or dissemination of the information and any disclosure or copying of this email is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please promptly inform us by reply email or telephone. You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: C without LE
Peter, Systems Programming C (SPC) has been available as part of the regular IBM C compiler for a long time now. You give up access to all LE functions and limit yourself to a defined subset of C library functions. The startup code is not dynamic and requires static links (so does LE startup code...), but SPC is quite functional for some purposes. thanks for that explanation. I am confessing my ignorance to all things C: If this has been around 'forever', why is there being made such a 'big deal' about MetalC? What exactly is the difference? Ed, what you describe doesn't really sound like any Beta product that I am familiar with. They do use SMPE (how well is another question), and I never really had to relink anything (other than my own exits). To be fair to them, this wasn't really their bug, it was IBMs. As for: I can only remember it was from Europe and had a dickens of a time because their doc was in A4 (page size) format and it was hell getting it converted to the US size. Forgive me for saying that, but do you think the rest of the world likes to be forced to use some strange format that doesn't fit any paper we have available? It is actually nice for a change to speak my own language with them. :-) Regards, Barbara Nitz -- Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
