Re: You are now subscribed to the IBM-MAIN list

2009-05-10 Thread Shane
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 23:52 -0400, Dave Salt wrote:
  
 Did this happen to anyone else?

No yet ...
Maybe subscription probes have been bounced, so you got dropped.
Come to think of it, I see a lot more probes at my work address then I
do on this one   :(

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Validating Addrees

2009-05-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:29:19 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
wrote:

:I think VSMLIST or VSMLOC is for getmain or storage

:However if I am looking at address e.g. 0X10 PSA address dont know if
:those macros
:will help

Why do you want to know?

What kind of processing do you wish to do?

Also, you should be aware that just because it is allocated right now with
some attributes does not mean that it will have the same attributes when used
later. 

:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
:Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
:Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:54 PM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
:
:
:Joe Reichman wrote:
: Hi
:
:  would anyone know if you have a stroage address to determine its nature
:
: e.g. CSA SQA etc.
:
:
:You might get what you're looking for from VSMLOC or VSMLIST.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How to display Stars for Password in ISPF

2009-05-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:18:50 -0400 Tony Harminc tz...@attglobal.net wrote:

:2009/5/8 Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com:
: I am trying to create a panel that has something like a password field.  
When you enter the password, it replaces the characters as they are typed from 
source to stars.

: Is this possible?  Or is INTENS(NON) my only option?

:Surely even if the hardware was capable, 

The hardware is capable (if direct attached). Of course one would need some
lower level I/O to constantly read the screen buffer and write out the *s at
the correct location.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Validating Addrees

2009-05-10 Thread Joe Reichman
Honestly the Only thing that I am intrested in initially is whether the
Address is in CSA

or Not

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Validating Addrees


On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:29:19 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
wrote:

:I think VSMLIST or VSMLOC is for getmain or storage

:However if I am looking at address e.g. 0X10 PSA address dont know if
:those macros
:will help

Why do you want to know?

What kind of processing do you wish to do?

Also, you should be aware that just because it is allocated right now with
some attributes does not mean that it will have the same attributes when
used
later.

:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
:Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
:Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:54 PM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
:
:
:Joe Reichman wrote:
: Hi
:
:  would anyone know if you have a stroage address to determine its nature
:
: e.g. CSA SQA etc.
:
:
:You might get what you're looking for from VSMLOC or VSMLIST.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Validating Addrees

2009-05-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sun, 10 May 2009 08:11:10 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
wrote:

:Honestly the Only thing that I am intrested in initially is whether the
:Address is in CSA

VSMLOC CSA will show if it currently allocated.

You can use the GDA pointers to see if the address is in the CSA range.

:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
:Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:31 AM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
:
:
:On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:29:19 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
:wrote:
:
::I think VSMLIST or VSMLOC is for getmain or storage
:
::However if I am looking at address e.g. 0X10 PSA address dont know if
::those macros
::will help
:
:Why do you want to know?
:
:What kind of processing do you wish to do?
:
:Also, you should be aware that just because it is allocated right now with
:some attributes does not mean that it will have the same attributes when
:used
:later.
:
::-Original Message-
::From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
::Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
::Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:54 PM
::To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
::Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
::
::
::Joe Reichman wrote:
:: Hi
::
::  would anyone know if you have a stroage address to determine its nature
::
:: e.g. CSA SQA etc.
::
::
::You might get what you're looking for from VSMLOC or VSMLIST.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Validating Addrees

2009-05-10 Thread Joe Reichman
thank

 BTW Hope to make Alieyh In the near future

 In Isreal though Unlike US  many Co work on Sunday becuase they dont on
Friday

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Validating Addrees


On Sun, 10 May 2009 08:11:10 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
wrote:

:Honestly the Only thing that I am intrested in initially is whether the
:Address is in CSA

VSMLOC CSA will show if it currently allocated.

You can use the GDA pointers to see if the address is in the CSA range.

:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
:Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:31 AM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
:
:
:On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:29:19 -0400 Joe Reichman joereich...@optonline.net
:wrote:
:
::I think VSMLIST or VSMLOC is for getmain or storage
:
::However if I am looking at address e.g. 0X10 PSA address dont know
if
::those macros
::will help
:
:Why do you want to know?
:
:What kind of processing do you wish to do?
:
:Also, you should be aware that just because it is allocated right now with
:some attributes does not mean that it will have the same attributes when
:used
:later.
:
::-Original Message-
::From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
::Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
::Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:54 PM
::To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
::Subject: Re: Validating Addrees
::
::
::Joe Reichman wrote:
:: Hi
::
::  would anyone know if you have a stroage address to determine its
nature
::
:: e.g. CSA SQA etc.
::
::
::You might get what you're looking for from VSMLOC or VSMLIST.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


[no subject]

2009-05-10 Thread Larry Israel
help

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: You are now subscribed to the IBM-MAIN list

2009-05-10 Thread Darren Evans-Young
On Sat, 9 May 2009, Dave Salt wrote:

I just received a message from IBM-MAIN saying I had been unsubscribed from 
the list. I hadn't asked to be unsubscribed, and when I tried sending a 
message to IBM-MAIN it was rejected. So, I had to subscribe again before I 
could send this message.

Did this happen to anyone else?


Dave Salt

You probably received the error threshold for your email address and
Listserv automatically unsubscribed you. If it was a hotmail.com address,
I'm not surprised.

Darren
IBM-MAIN List Owner...still

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMF LOGGER - Not Ready for Prime Time

2009-05-10 Thread Jim Marshall
We are still at 1.8, but I had intended to use this functionality as soon as we
have migrated to 1.10. We are loosing SMF data regularly during shutdown of
*one* system at a time, because of all the SMF30 termination records that
get written at DB2 and IMS shutdown. We cannot increase the SMF buffers
any further and we are at the end of any tuning for the SMF data sets. We
are at the point where we stagger the DB2/IMS shutdown in hopes that the
dumping of SMF records is through when the next comes.

I had wondered how LOGGER would handle offload of a huge amount of SMF
data right during shutdown. Do you also see this problem if you only shut 
down
one system? Or only when there is no system left that can do the actual
offload from the CF?

And may I enquire why you regularly do sysplex-wide IPLs?

Back when our auditors press us to turn on UAUDIT for RACF, we found during 
some times when so many RACF records were being sent to SMF it could not 
keep up; even though the MANx data sets were empty. Thus SMF said data 
was lost but did not tell us whose (was RACF). Auditors were not pleased 
about this and therefore IBM's solution was the LOGGER. So for our journey 
into the SWAMP. I know my guys have created a bunch of REXX routines to 
cover some of the sortcomings of how the process should work. 

Our present challenge in the swamp was at shutdown when Z EOD is entered 
there is no communication to the LOGGER to wait for him/her/it to complete 
what has to be done so when OPS re'ipls, then nothing is lost. IBM gave us a 
bunch of commands to have the operator enter although so far these have 
not worked. Plus even though the LOGGER says it is done, it is actually still 
off 
doing its thing with no indication when it honestly is completed. Level 2 
agrees 
with us whole heartily but needed us to open a marketing request which I 
understand forces different parts of IBM to take notice and communicate with 
each other. I think this kinda assigns a referee who can get the attention of 
all parties on behalf of the customer. So in general, shutting down any LPAR 
can get you in trouble with the hosing up LOG files for that system. The way 
I am told is each system in a SYSLPLEX does its own thing with its LOG files 
(am by no means the expert for the techies are more into this than I). 

We have been having some building power upgrades and without a generator, 
then indeed we have to put everything to bed when it happens. Then some 
EMC DASD upgrades with multiple BIN file changes over a number of weekends 
caused some more total down time. 

When the swamp has been turned into something manageable, then I will give 
an update of how things can work. I understand the rationale to change the 
way SMF was offloaded which goes back my days in OS/MVT. But I think IBM 
was remiss in not understanding the full ramifications of how they have sites 
implement the LOGGER. If they would have talked to some savy users, then 
could have made the journey much smoother. So now, we do it the taumatic 
way which keeps life interesting here. 

jim  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


FW: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

2009-05-10 Thread David Logan
Hi guys. Sorry, but I am not very well versed in IMS, and I sure am missing
something. I want to run an IMS transaction, but no matter what I do, all I
get is:

 

DFS064 11:46:46 DESTINATION CAN NOT BE FOUND OR CREATED

 

I've looked this message up in various places, but I have found nothing at
all useful to resolving it. What am I missing? This is IMS V9 under z/OS
1.8. It's got default security, which means it won't let me do hardly
anything via terminal commands, I have to do everything via message replies
on the master console. I have done a /START DC, although I don't know how
to tell if it was successful.

 

OK, I've provided the information I can think of to provide. Any
suggestions?

 

Thanks!

 

David Logan

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-10 Thread Rick Fochtman
That's nice to know, but I keep the old SPF/PC for one very important 
(to me, at least) reason: REXX support. I can develop a REXX exec at 
home and xfer it immediately to my mainframe ISPF environment and know 
that it will work identically in both locations. And that's saved me a 
LOT of time.


--
Rick
--
Remember that if you’re not the lead dog, the view never changes.




William Smith wrote:

Command Technology and its current product SPF/SE (not SPF/PC) is alive and well.  The company has relocated from Alameda, CA, to Sun City West, AZ.  I still have my copy of SPF/PC 4.07 along with all of the service disks - now archived on a CD.  I have the complete set of manuals, too, in pristine condition.  As a San Francisco resident, I always loved the beautiful picture of the Golden Gate Bridge and Tiburon Hills that graced the cover of the hard box case in which the product was packaged.  A legendary product that I used as an IBM OS/2 developer in Boca Raton and Austin with genuine quality documentation.  


Although I have Vista Home Premium, I doubt it will execute.  If anyone knows, 
please advise.  Note that SPF/PC was sunset more than a decade ago (along with 
its predecessor, SPF/2) and replaced by successor products.

Tim Tetiva is still the President of Command Technology and the web site is 
still active.  As a matter of fact, and by coincidence, I got an email reply 
from him just last week about an upgrade, which he will still honor from SPF/PC 
4.07.

See his email reply to me below:

Bill Smith
z/OS Principal Software Engineer

Here is Tim's reply to me of May 4, 2009:

SPF/SE is actively supported and has been under continuous development
since 1997.  V 6.0 released Sept 2006.  Since that time many
additional enhancements have been incorporated without going to a new version
(6.5).  At this point SPF/SE is so feature rich and trouble free that we
get few requests for enhancement.  Continuous refinement is the
norm.  See HELP, item README, item CHANGES for changes from V 5.0 to V 6.0.


We of course provide support for each new Windows version as it
releases.

You do qualify for upgrade pricing.  Have your old Serial Number handy
when you place your online order.

1) Log on to our web site:  www.commandtechnology.com

2) Click on tab Products at top center of home page.

3) There are three text hot spots to the right of product description for
Graphic Edition. There are also three text hot spots to the right of 
product description for Standard Edition.


4) Click on Price to see prices.

5) Click on Try to download demo.

6) Click on Buy to purchase.

Tim Tetiva
CTC Sales 



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

 



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

2009-05-10 Thread Jim Thomas
Not into IMS either but ... 

I think you'd need an MPR / MPP available first... (start an MPR / MPP and 
then issue a /DIS A)

First off ... assuming that the transaction was call TEST01, clear your
screen and key in TEST01_ where the '_' is meant to be a space. 

If that does not work, you're likely missing an /ASS TRANS TEST01 CLASS ??
where the '??' would be class available on the MPR / MPP and defined to the
TEST01 transaction. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of David Logan
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FW: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

Hi guys. Sorry, but I am not very well versed in IMS, and I sure am missing
something. I want to run an IMS transaction, but no matter what I do, all I
get is:

 

DFS064 11:46:46 DESTINATION CAN NOT BE FOUND OR CREATED

 

I've looked this message up in various places, but I have found nothing at
all useful to resolving it. What am I missing? This is IMS V9 under z/OS
1.8. It's got default security, which means it won't let me do hardly
anything via terminal commands, I have to do everything via message replies
on the master console. I have done a /START DC, although I don't know how
to tell if it was successful.

 

OK, I've provided the information I can think of to provide. Any
suggestions?

 

Thanks!

 

David Logan

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.23/2106 - Release Date: 05/10/09
07:02:00

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.23/2106 - Release Date: 05/10/09
07:02:00

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.24/2107 - Release Date: 05/10/09 
07:02:00

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Validating Addrees

2009-05-10 Thread Edward Jaffe

Joe Reichman wrote:

BTW Hows the Wheather in My Old Neigborhood Pico Roberstson
  

http://www.accuweather.com/us/ca/los%20angeles/90035/forecast.asp?partner=forecastfoxtraveler=0zipChg=1metric=0

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


UK - GSE Large Systems Meeting

2009-05-10 Thread Mark Wilson
Hi,

For all those interested the next GSE Large Systems meeting will be held on
the 17th June 2009 in London.

Details of the event and how to register can be found at
http://lsx.gse.org.uk/future.html

I have one 60 minute speaking slot left if anyone out there is prepared to
present. Feel free to drop me a note if you are interested.

Regards

Mark

 
___
Mark Wilson
  
Chairman GSE Large Systems Working Group.
Large Systems Web Site is:
http://lsx.gse.org.uk/
___



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-10 Thread Graham Hobbs
I too complained about the switch from REXX to C - got me nowhere. Was not 
happy but the constant hangups in V4 forced me to V6 and a rudimentary learning 
of C. There's a couple of other not so pleasant things in V6 too, e.g. in 3.4 
putting a 'b'rowse on multiple members and it presents from the bottom up.
All in all though, a topnotch product.
Graham Hobbs

That's nice to know, but I keep the old SPF/PC for one very important 
(to me, at least) reason: REXX support. I can develop a REXX exec at 
home and xfer it immediately to my mainframe ISPF environment and know 
that it will work identically in both locations. And that's saved me a 
LOT of time.

-- 
Rick
--
Remember that if you’re not the lead dog, the view never changes.





William Smith wrote:

Command Technology and its current product SPF/SE (not SPF/PC) is alive and 
well.  The company has relocated from Alameda, CA, to Sun City West, AZ.  I 
still have my copy of SPF/PC 4.07 along with all of the service disks - now 
archived on a CD.  I have the complete set of manuals, too, in pristine 
condition.  As a San Francisco resident, I always loved the beautiful picture 
of the Golden Gate Bridge and Tiburon Hills that graced the cover of the hard 
box case in which the product was packaged.  A legendary product that I used as 
an IBM OS/2 developer in Boca Raton and Austin with genuine quality 
documentation.  

Although I have Vista Home Premium, I doubt it will execute.  If anyone knows, 
please advise.  Note that SPF/PC was sunset more than a decade ago (along with 
its predecessor, SPF/2) and replaced by successor products.

Tim Tetiva is still the President of Command Technology and the web site is 
still active.  As a matter of fact, and by coincidence, I got an email reply 
from him just last week about an upgrade, which he will still honor from SPF/PC 
4.07.

See his email reply to me below:

Bill Smith
z/OS Principal Software Engineer

Here is Tim's reply to me of May 4, 2009:

SPF/SE is actively supported and has been under continuous development
since 1997.  V 6.0 released Sept 2006.  Since that time many
additional enhancements have been incorporated without going to a new version
(6.5).  At this point SPF/SE is so feature rich and trouble free that we
get few requests for enhancement.  Continuous refinement is the
norm.  See HELP, item README, item CHANGES for changes from V 5.0 to V 6.0.

 
We of course provide support for each new Windows version as it
releases.
 
You do qualify for upgrade pricing.  Have your old Serial Number handy
when you place your online order.
 
1) Log on to our web site:  www.commandtechnology.com
 
2) Click on tab Products at top center of home page.
 
3) There are three text hot spots to the right of product description for
Graphic Edition. There are also three text hot spots to the right of 
product description for Standard Edition.
 
4) Click on Price to see prices.
 
5) Click on Try to download demo.
 
6) Click on Buy to purchase.
 
Tim Tetiva
CTC Sales 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

2009-05-10 Thread David Logan
OK, yes, I am remembering now. Man, I hate IMS :)  I really need to get
better versed in it.

Anyway, what's happening is that IMS isn't automatically starting any of my
MPP regions. When I try to start them with /START REGION xxx, I get a whole
bunch of MPP regions that all say:

DFS690A IMS91M11.REGION.IMS91M11 - CTL PGM NOT ACTIVE, REPLY 'WAIT',
'CANCEL' OR 'ALT-ID'

And yet again, the message manual explains the obvious (such as if a
control region is going to come up soon, reply wait.) It doesn't explain
what I should be doing to figure out why it's not seeing a control region
that is *supposed* to be running.

So what are the MPP regions looking for that it doesn't have? The IMS ID
seems to be fine. The MPP regions have IMSID=IMS1, and the IMS control
region has IMS1 in it's operator reply, so it *looks* like the IMS IDs
match.

David Logan

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

Not into IMS either but ... 

I think you'd need an MPR / MPP available first... (start an MPR / MPP and
then issue a /DIS A)

First off ... assuming that the transaction was call TEST01, clear your
screen and key in TEST01_ where the '_' is meant to be a space. 

If that does not work, you're likely missing an /ASS TRANS TEST01 CLASS ??
where the '??' would be class available on the MPR / MPP and defined to the
TEST01 transaction. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of David Logan
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FW: IMS - how do I run an interactive transaction?

Hi guys. Sorry, but I am not very well versed in IMS, and I sure am missing
something. I want to run an IMS transaction, but no matter what I do, all I
get is:

 

DFS064 11:46:46 DESTINATION CAN NOT BE FOUND OR CREATED

 

I've looked this message up in various places, but I have found nothing at
all useful to resolving it. What am I missing? This is IMS V9 under z/OS
1.8. It's got default security, which means it won't let me do hardly
anything via terminal commands, I have to do everything via message replies
on the master console. I have done a /START DC, although I don't know how
to tell if it was successful.

 

OK, I've provided the information I can think of to provide. Any
suggestions?

 

Thanks!

 

David Logan

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.23/2106 - Release Date: 05/10/09
07:02:00

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.23/2106 - Release Date: 05/10/09
07:02:00

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


AUTO: Andrew Bates is away from the Shanghai office on business travel - details in mail (returning 25/05/2009)

2009-05-10 Thread Andrew Bates
I am out of the office until 25/05/2009.

I am travelling on business until 25th May.  I will try to reply to mails
in the evenings but responses may be delayed.


Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 8 May
2009 to 9 May 2009 (#2009-129) sent on 5/10/09 12:00:03.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Servicelink and ActiveX controls

2009-05-10 Thread Barbara Nitz
On Friday afternoon IBM had corrected the coding error that caused activeX 
to be executed in the first place and that then terminated the browser (no 
matter what type of browser). After deleting temp files and the history, the 
annoying prompts (when set to prompt) and pop-ups that an activeX control 
did not execute are gone.

As far as that goes, I can now pester IBM again with the 'real' problems :-)

Marty,
I am not supposed to install too many things on the company PC that the 
company hasn't approved. In too many cases this causes problems down the 
line when some update (via netinstall) doesn't work. Otherwise I would have 
tried to upgrade to the newest IE version.

Besides, all the browsers I tried terminated. Not surprising given that it was 
bug.

Thanks to all, Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html