Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY
Well CEE.SCEERUN and RUN2 are in the linklist while CEE.SCEELPA is in the lpalist. I'm still confused about this statement in the FM. Mark Jacobs On 05/16/11 19:46, John McKown wrote: Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run. On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; If the runtime library is in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COPY). If the runtime library is not in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COW). Which runtime library is it referring to? -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL Some people are electrifying, they light up a room when they leave. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY
Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run. On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; If the runtime library is in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COPY). If the runtime library is not in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COW). Which runtime library is it referring to? -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL In Language Environment the only runtime libraries I know of are the SCEERUN and SCEERUN2. In the Unix Services manual it indicates that the FORKCOPY parameter in BPXPRMxx prevents the fork from using IARVSERV function The LE Customization manual (SA22-7564) will list each LE library and what/where it functions. According to this the SCEELPA (Subset of SCEERUN modules which reside above the line) SCEERUN2 runtime library that contains modules for application execution and those required to live in a PDS/E SCEERUN runtime library needed during execution of C/C++, PL/I, Cobol and Fortran. From a brief scan of the remaining libraries they are for compiling/lked I find that usually when IBM is ambiguous, then there is a reliance of other manuals to talk more specifically what the information is needed. I would prefer at least a link or notation as to what manual I need to reference to get the details. HTH Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY
In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; If the runtime library is in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COPY). If the runtime library is not in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COW). Which runtime library is it referring to? -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL Some people are electrifying, they light up a room when they leave. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY
Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run. On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; If the runtime library is in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COPY). If the runtime library is not in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COW). Which runtime library is it referring to? -- John McKown Maranatha! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
