Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-20 Thread Jim Marshall

Google for DOD Orange Book.

You can forget about the Orange Book of the famous National Security 
Agency Rainbow series of security books as having the current answer. They 
are good reference but are outdated. Back in the 1990s when Air Force 
MajGen Hayden took over NSA (4-Star now heads the CIA), he transferred 
most all the security work done by the National Computer Security Center 
(NCSC) over to what is now known as NIST in the Dept. of  Commerce. The 
jist was to get NSA out of the security business for non-DOD agencies. Now a 
days it is called selling off your non-core businesses. 

So now for the non-DOD agencies, NIST is the one to make the rules for 
unclassified which can include Sensitive, For Official Use Only, Privacy Data, 
etc. The one gets into the PII (Personally Identifiable Information) which we 
are all getting introduced to for identity issues.  It is not clear if the 
classified 
designations (Confidental, Secret, and TopSecret) used in DOD have moved 
over to the Defense Security Service, OSD's Information System Office of 
Oversight, or even the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) itself. 

The Rainbow series is still referenced today by many vendors and quoted 
widely. NSA did a great job when they had the work and most of it still applies 
today. I have seen that it all depends on what the auditors will accept.   
 
Jim

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-19 Thread Jim Marshall
Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) 
connections.

US Government seemly imposed rules are confusing. What I know it comes 
from the NIST 800-53 document under the category of AC-12; www.nist.gov 
and search on sp 800-53.  Depending on the level you choose, all they say is 
you must have some session timeout. Once you conform to this, then each 
agency puts forth their own security policy to show they conform to NIST 800-
53. For example, here is one I know about 

All  'Agency X' workstations must use password-protected screensavers.  
Your workstation screensaver activates if you don’t use your keyboard or 
mouse for 15 minutes, and you must reenter your password to be able to use 
your workstation.  This prevents unauthorized access to your workstation and 
the network while your workstation is unattended. If you are going to leave 
your mainframe terminal session unattended for any period of time, you should 
log off of the system.  If you don’t use your keyboard for more than 30 
minutes, the system will automatically log you off. 

So is the 15 minutes a given - no.  But within the policy made, some 
applications may want to apply 10 minutes to some and 30 to others. I leave 
that to the application owner to mandate. So whatever passes the auditors 
comes out OK. Saying one does not timeout anybody (just locking the 
keyboard) did not fly and some definite timeout period needed to be 
implemented. 

Jim

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-19 Thread Tim Hare
Don't know about DOD but our security folks were satisfied that the 
multi-session product (Supersession in our case) timed out and locked its 
session with the physical terminal while allowing the virtual terminal 
sessions to remain live. This allows a timed out user to resume where 
they left off, preventing the productivity loss.

Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-19 Thread Staller, Allan
snip
Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes)
connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to
continue.
/snip

Google for DOD Orange Book.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-19 Thread Chris Mason

David

I'm paying attention here mainly because VTAM is mentioned.

I wonder exactly what the concern of your VTAM guy is. I don't believe 
there are any timing specifications under VTAM control which can affect 
established sessions[1]. There is only one which can affect idle 
connections, the DISCNT operand of the PU statement.


Thus you are going to have to resolve this problem application by 
application.


If your VTAM guy is concerned about the number of resources tied up 
supporting your CICS and TSO applications, he - or she I guess - could be 
sure only to define resources when they are needed. If the SSCP-dependent 
LUs are supported on platforms which connect over media which requires the 
use of switched procedures in VTAM, the VTAM exit which supports the dynamic 
definition of adjacent link stations along with the SSCP-dependent PU can be 
used. This is the ISTEXCCS, the so-called configuration services, exit. 
Then, in order to support only active SSCP-dependent LUs and assuming the 
platform supports the function, the ISTEXCSD, the dynamic definition of 
dependent LUs exit, can be used.


That's the best I can do. I can't help if the sessions are there but the 
keyboard is untroubled.


Chris Mason

[1] Unless they are LU type 6.2 sessions where it's *conversations* which 
count rather than sessions and so there is an operand, LIMQSINT, of the APPL 
statement with APPC=YES (that is, *not* CICS, note)  which can be used to 
terminate sessions which are not supporting conversations after a delay - 
assuming the sessions pass over at least one link which has indicated it 
would like not to be kept active when idle, normally indicated with the 
LIMRES=YES operand of the PU statement or equivalent on SNA platforms other 
than VTAM.


- Original Message - 
From: David Speake [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:20 PM
Subject: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements



Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) 
connections.

There are two interpretations here:
   1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
   2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to
continue.

The first may be difficult/expensive machine/software wise.
The second is monstrously disruptive to the session user.
Have these issues been addressed with IBM - CICS/TSO?

My VTAM guy tells me idle LU's are also a concern.
My concern is productivity of 4 or 5 hundred TSO users and several 
thousand

CICS users.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread David Speake
Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to
continue.

The first may be difficult/expensive machine/software wise.
The second is monstrously disruptive to the session user.
Have these issues been addressed with IBM - CICS/TSO?

My VTAM guy tells me idle LU's are also a concern.
My concern is productivity of 4 or 5 hundred TSO users and several thousand
CICS users.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread Clark, Kevin
Steve, 

I didn't think that it (maybe AR39 - check DISA) was that detail to
logoff with 15 minutes of inactivity.  I though it just stated to lock
the terminals and have the users be revalidated. 

Checking my memory backs for the documents now.  Maybe GAO..
Kevin 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Speake
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes)
connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to
continue.

The first may be difficult/expensive machine/software wise.
The second is monstrously disruptive to the session user.
Have these issues been addressed with IBM - CICS/TSO?

My VTAM guy tells me idle LU's are also a concern.
My concern is productivity of 4 or 5 hundred TSO users and several
thousand
CICS users.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread Tom Schmidt
David,
 
You know where to find the DISA STIGs, right?  If not:
 
  http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/stig/index.html
 
Curiously, the Network Infrastructure STIG says this:
(NET1453: CAT III) The IAO/NSO will ensure that a session that exceeds 30 
minutes of inactivity is disconnected.
 
While the MQ section of the OS/390 STIG (there is no z/OS STIG yet) says:
4.3.1.7 Userid Timeouts
Userids signed on to a queue manager will be logged off after 15 minutes of 
inactivity. This timeout process will be implemented by including the ALTER 
SECURITY command in the CSQINP1 data set. The format of the command will 
be specified as follows:
ALTER SECURITY INTERVAL(5) TIMEOUT(15)
• (ZWMQ0020: CAT II) The systems programmer responsible for supporting
MQSeries/WebSphere MQ will ensure that the timeout is set to 15 and the 
interval is set to 5.
 
Farther into that same STIG: 
The TELNETPARMS INACTIVE statement defines the terminal inactivity 
timeout value.  When there has been no client-VTAM activity for the specified 
number of seconds, the session will be dropped. Note that the value of the 
INACTIVE parameter can impact the values of the PRTINACTIVE and 
KEEPINACTIVE (OS/390 Release 2.10) statements. The STIG
requirement recommends that user sessions be terminated or locked out after 
15 minutes of inactivity. Documentation must be maintained with the IAM 
when this guideline is not followed.  
 
The OS/390 STIG vol. 2 also says this about CICS:
 
(12) Enforce a CICS time-out time limit, which is implemented based on 15 
minutes of user inactivity.
• (ZCIC0042: CAT II) The IAO will ensure that all CICS users have a 15 minute 
time-out limit specified. 
 
So there is incomplete agreement among the various STIGs regarding the 
exact amount of time (15 vs. 30 in those four sections of 2.5 different 
STIGs).  They generally say 15 but at least one says 30.  (I didn't produce an 
exhaustive list.)  
 
Much of this will depend upon just how secure you are required to become 
(Secret, Top Secret, etc.).  
 
-- 
Tom Schmidt 
Madison, WI

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread David Speake
Tom,

Thanks much.

I think I'm going to be physically ill. 

They impose specific mandates on each choke point regardless of
 actual need. So a product that simply locks the session.
and accomplishes just as much without killing the productivity of the poor
slob at the keyboard will not help.
Will pull them up and read the full dictas later. Just been pushed in a good bit
more urgent direction  

Thanks again

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread Rick Fochtman

-snip-


Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) connections.
There are two interpretations here:
   1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
   2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to
continue.

The first may be difficult/expensive machine/software wise.
The second is monstrously disruptive to the session user.
Have these issues been addressed with IBM - CICS/TSO?

My VTAM guy tells me idle LU's are also a concern.
My concern is productivity of 4 or 5 hundred TSO users and several thousand
CICS users.
 


--unsnip
Down around the Futures Exchange (CBOT), we used a product called TPX, 
though I forget the vendor's name. After 15 minutes, we disconnected him 
from all sessions; after 60 minutes, we terminated the sessions.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

2007-06-18 Thread Stocker, Herman
TPX is from CA.

Regards,

Herman Stocker
Technical Specialist
Data Center Operations 
avis budget group
Phone:  1973-496-4847
fax:  1973-496-8201
E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS/DOD idle connection requirements

-snip-

Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD) 
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes)
connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) password to 
continue.

The first may be difficult/expensive machine/software wise.
The second is monstrously disruptive to the session user.
Have these issues been addressed with IBM - CICS/TSO?

My VTAM guy tells me idle LU's are also a concern.
My concern is productivity of 4 or 5 hundred TSO users and several 
thousand CICS users.
  

--unsnip
Down around the Futures Exchange (CBOT), we used a product called TPX,
though I forget the vendor's name. After 15 minutes, we disconnected him
from all sessions; after 60 minutes, we terminated the sessions.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any
virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and
its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
arising in any way from this message or its attachments.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html