Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-08-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/31/2008
   at 05:59 PM, Anne  Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

the above title says *train* and then description talks about *chain*

The original 1403 definitely used a chain; I just wasn't sure whether
*every* 1403 before the Nancy One did. The 1403N1 definitely used a
train.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-31 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/24/2008
   at 10:31 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

When you say UCS, are you referring to the 3800/3900 page-printer
Universal Character Set buffer?  I.E., the character set one loads to
the printer to output text to actual paper?  Or do you mean something to
do with this new-fangled Unicode system?

No, I'm referring to the 1403 line-printer Universal Character Set buffer,
since the context was the 1416. That was a wrapper around an array of code
points the same size as the band[1], chain[2] or train.

The 3800 and 3900 were very different, because you could actually define
the pixel layout of each character.

[1] Not applicable to the 1403

[2] I don't recall whether there was an S/360 model of the 1403 that
used a chain
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-31 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel Metz  , Seymour J.) writes:
 No, I'm referring to the 1403 line-printer Universal Character Set buffer,
 since the context was the 1416. That was a wrapper around an array of code
 points the same size as the band[1], chain[2] or train.

 The 3800 and 3900 were very different, because you could actually define
 the pixel layout of each character.

 [1] Not applicable to the 1403

 [2] I don't recall whether there was an S/360 model of the 1403 that
 used a chain

i saw both 1403-7 (600lpm) and 1403-N1 (1100lpm) in use on 360-30.

IBM 1403 Printer train
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/attic3/attic3_024.html

from above:

The chain printer for computers was introduced with the IBM 1401
computer in 1959. Improving both speed and reliability, the IBM 1403
printer's chain-loop of characters traveled horizontally at 90 inches
a second and printed 600 lines a minute as it was struck by 132 hammers
positioned across the paper. The last IBM 1403 -- of more than 23,000
shipped to U.S. customers -- was delivered in 1983

... snip ...

the above title says *train* and then description talks about *chain*

1403-2  1403-7 printers
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/supplies/supplies_5404PH09.html

i think should be chain printers (600lpm) ... above says -7 was 120
print positions and could be used with 360s  370s; -2 was 132 print
positions and could be used with 360, 370,  s/3 model 10

This reference:

The evolution of printers and displays
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/253/ibmsj2503a4N.pdf

says that 1403 used chains with train introduced in later 1403N1

-- 
40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar70

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-24 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
 Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:18 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion
 
 What they don't tell you is that they relate to the IBM-supplied UCS
 images rather than to the TN and T11 print trains themselves.

When you say UCS, are you referring to the 3800/3900 page-printer
Universal Character Set buffer?  I.E., the character set one loads to
the printer to output text to actual paper?  Or do you mean something to
do with this new-fangled Unicode system?
 
 Google for CECP. Don't blame me; I didn't coin the term.

Googling for CECP +IBM yielded better results than just CECP.  The
acronym CECP is apparently also used by various types of organizations
around the globe.  The very first hit with CECP +IBM led to here:

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/cp/cp_cpgid.jsp

And the parent page of that one is even more helpful:

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/g11n-res.jsp

That last one is now in my IBM favorites folder.

Shmuel, thanks very much for the keyword recommendation.  Very helpful.

For the archives, what Shmuel didn't say was that CECP stands for
Country Extended Code Page.

Peter
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of 
the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-23 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/08/2008
   at 10:45 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Two columns of EBCDIC graphics are shown.  The first gives IBM standard
U.S. bit pattern assignments.  The second shows the T-11 and TN text
printing chains (120 graphics).

What they don't tell you is that they relate to the IBM-supplied UCS
images rather than to the TN and T11 print trains themselves.

P.P.S -- Ed, would you please, please enlighten us with where info on
this stuff can be mined -- I would happily RTFM if I know which FM(s)
was(were) the right ones...

Google for CECP. Don't blame me; I didn't coin the term.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-08 Thread David Cole

At 7/7/2008 12:15 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
They [code pages 1047 and 037] are not the same. [snip] People still 
using the old code page 037 probably see funny looking garbage 
characters in IBM-provided macros and other code. [...]




On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:01:02 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
I haven't used code page 037 since the mid-1990s. I think just about 
everyone here uses 1047.


So what I'm hearing is that code page 1047 is somehow better than 
037, and for all I know that may well be true. BUT have you (anyone) 
looked at the green card in recent years?


In SA22-7871-00 (SEP01) and SA22-7871-01 (JUN03), the Code 
Assignments table shows 5 EBCDIC charts titled 81C 94C 037 500 and 
1047. (That's cool, I thought.)


But starting with SA22-7871-02 (SEP05) and continuing to this day 
(SA22-7871-04 [FEB08]), the dorks threw out 81C 94C 500 and 1047, and 
kept only 037. Well, that leads to two questions:


(1) If 037 is better than 1047, then why did IBM drop it from the green card?

(2) But more importantly, why on earth did IBM drop 81C 94C 500 and 
1047 from the green card in the first place? That was damn useful information!




On a related note...

At 7/8/2008 08:53 AM, McKown, John wrote:
I don't know the code page involved, but the GX20-0157-2 (System/370 
Extended Architecture Reference Summary) has a section entitled 
CODE ASSIGNMENTS which put { at 0x8b and } at 0x9b.


SHESSS!


Dave

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion

2008-07-08 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of David Cole
 Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:15 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Code Page 1047 vs 037 - Green card confusion
Snipped 
 On a related note...
 
 At 7/8/2008 08:53 AM, McKown, John wrote:
 I don't know the code page involved, but the GX20-0157-2 (System/370
 Extended Architecture Reference Summary) has a section entitled
 CODE ASSIGNMENTS which put { at 0x8b and } at 0x9b.
 
 SHESSS!

And my several copies of the System /370 Reference Summary GX20-1850
(-5, -6 and -7) also show those code points for curly braces WITH A
FOOTNOTE in the column heading (perhaps they removed the footnote for
XA?):

Two columns of EBCDIC graphics are shown.  The first gives IBM standard
U.S. bit pattern assignments.  The second shows the T-11 and TN text
printing chains (120 graphics).

The X'8B' and X'9B' assignments are those for the text-printing column.
The IBM standard column assignment for curly braces is X'C0' and
X'D0', which we dinos all know to be the One True and Only Way.

v.b.g  g.d.r.

Peter

P.S. -- Ed's suggestion of ISPF terminal #6 works a charm -- the
strange characters in front are box-drawing characters, so maybe 3278T
means 3278 with text-printing graphics?

P.P.S -- Ed, would you please, please enlighten us with where info on
this stuff can be mined -- I would happily RTFM if I know which FM(s)
was(were) the right ones...


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of 
the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html