Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-16 Thread Mike Wood
Bob, There are multiple reasons why a pending release volume will not be set 
to scratch status, including:
- expected to be in TCDB, but is not
- system managed, but library not available
- CDS and catalogs are synched but you have not run EXPROC on the correct 
system
- volume is neither in a library nor its home location 
- .
See info apar II09162 which has soem details and check lists.

Mike Wood  RMM Development
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:21:42 -0600, Hale, Bob bob.h...@roundys.com 
wrote:

Most of our tapes move to the scratch pool correctly but I have a few
that will not move and stay in the Pending Release mode. I have tried
numerous options like Confirm Action, Confirm Scratch and resetting the
Expiration Date.

All of the tapes are not cataloged and Expiration Dates have past. If
the tape has multiple files on it I verified that all the files are not
cataloged.

I must be missing something, anybody got any ideas as to why they will
not move to the scratch pool?

Y last resort is to delete and re-add them to RMM.



Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-10 Thread Hale, Bob
No they do not.

Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kathleen McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

Hello Bob,

Do any of these volumes have the Initialize Volume = YES or Replace 
Volume = YES in the Actions pending?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-10 Thread Greg Shirey
Bob,

Are any of the volumes in question chained?  I could be wrong about
this, but I believe that if you have multiple data sets on chained
tapes, and RETAINBY(S) is in Parmlib, then one or more of the volumes in
the chain can be in a scratch pending status but will not scratch until
all the data sets in the chained set have expired or are uncataloged.


Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hale, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 

All of the tapes are not cataloged and Expiration Dates have past. If
the tape has multiple files on it I verified that all the files are not
cataloged.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-10 Thread Hale, Bob
No they are not chained, no movement, no loan location or VRS entry to
govern the volume.
Thanks
Bob

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

Bob,

Are any of the volumes in question chained?  I could be wrong about
this, but I believe that if you have multiple data sets on chained
tapes, and RETAINBY(S) is in Parmlib, then one or more of the volumes in
the chain can be in a scratch pending status but will not scratch until
all the data sets in the chained set have expired or are uncataloged.


Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hale, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 

All of the tapes are not cataloged and Expiration Dates have past. If
the tape has multiple files on it I verified that all the files are not
cataloged.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-09 Thread Hale, Bob
Most of our tapes move to the scratch pool correctly but I have a few
that will not move and stay in the Pending Release mode. I have tried
numerous options like Confirm Action, Confirm Scratch and resetting the
Expiration Date.

All of the tapes are not cataloged and Expiration Dates have past. If
the tape has multiple files on it I verified that all the files are not
cataloged.



Current status is:



Availability . . . : PENDING RELEASE

Release actions:

  Return to SCRATCH pool . : YES

Actions pending:

  Return to SCRATCH pool . : YES

 Expiration date  . . . . . : 2008/339



I must be missing something, anybody got any ideas as to why they will
not move to the scratch pool?

Y last resort is to delete and re-add them to RMM.



Bob


This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-09 Thread Kathleen McLaughlin
Hello Bob,

Do any of these volumes have the Initialize Volume = YES or Replace 
Volume = YES in the Actions pending?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFRMM return to Scratch Pool

2008-12-09 Thread Ernie Takeuchi
Hale, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]...

Most of our tapes move to the scratch pool correctly but I have a few

that will not move and stay in the Pending Release mode. I have tried

numerous options like Confirm Action, Confirm Scratch and resetting the

Expiration Date.

 

All of the tapes are not cataloged and Expiration Dates have past. If

the tape has multiple files on it I verified that all the files are not

cataloged.

=

Take a look at the loan location on the display of the volume and also check to 
see if there are any movement activity pending.  Also, you may want to check to 
see what VRS governs the volume.

Ernie.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html