Re: HFS access changes
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/09/2005 at 06:17 PM, Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Did I miss something? Failoure messages from OPEN? Now all four programs abend (one SEC6, 2 S0C7s, one S0C4). The SEC6 might be legitimate (I don't recall what it is; the S0C4 and S0C7 might be the results of doing a GET after the OPEN failed; the code should be testing DCBOFOPN. The S0C7 sounds strange. In all cases, including the S322, I'd suggested taking a look at the code where it is failing. Any clues, insights, etc. appreciated. Look at R1 and R14. The IPCS WHERE command is your friend. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
HFS access changes
Did I miss something? I had four programs (one each in Assembler, COBOL, C, and PL/I) that access a sequential file in a classic, traditional way. When I changed the JCL to point to the same file copied over into the HFS (use PATH and PATHOPTS, remove DSN and DISP), it used to work the same. Now all four programs abend (one SEC6, 2 S0C7s, one S0C4). The difference: last time tested under z/OS 1.4, today under z/OS 1.6. Has something changed? Or is it my imagination they worked before? Any clues, insights, etc. appreciated. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HFS access changes
Steve Comstock wrote: Did I miss something? I had four programs (one each in Assembler, COBOL, C, and PL/I) that access a sequential file in a classic, traditional way. When I changed the JCL to point to the same file copied over into the HFS (use PATH and PATHOPTS, remove DSN and DISP), it used to work the same. Now all four programs abend (one SEC6, 2 S0C7s, one S0C4). The difference: last time tested under z/OS 1.4, today under z/OS 1.6. Has something changed? Or is it my imagination they worked before? Any clues, insights, etc. appreciated. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock Further information after further experiments: In fact, the problem goes away if I include all the parameters FILEDATA=BINARY,LRECL=nn,RECFM=F,BLKSIZE=nn except for PL/I; that still fails; OPEN seems to go OK, but the data is never really accessed; I get an infinite loop until a S322. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
