I would have to try it to be sure, but I don't believe it matters in
regards to your concern for totally messing things up.
If IEASYMXY is specified in LOADxx, but not present in parmlib I would
expect the following:
IEA013E ERROR DETECTED PROCESSING IEASYMxx:...
IEA011A RESPECIFY ENTIRE IEASYMXX SUFFIX LIST OR U TO BYPASS
If specified in LOADxx and merely present in parmlib with comments I
would expect the following without any further problems:
IEA009I SYMBOLIC DEFINITIONS WILL BE READ FROM:...
I would create a new LOADxx member for trying this out. Note in LOADxx
IEASYM suffixes are read from left to right where duplicate definitions
override previous definitions.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LOADxx IEASYM parms
What happens if the IEASYM parm in LOADxx specifies an used sufix; that
is, specifies (00,XY) but IEASYMXY does not exist? Is there just an
error message? A WTOR? Something worse?
What if IEASYMXY exists but is empty or contains just comments?
I've just asked for a new IEASYMxx member, and am trying to determine
what damage I might do if I screw up.
Thanks.
Pat O'Keefe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
