Re: SDSF DA in sysplex

2008-03-11 Thread Diehl, Gary (MVSSupport)
You could also use the SYSNAME * and then have them enter two filter
lines for SYSNAME EQ xxyy where just those two systems are included in
the list.

Can't say if it'll perform any better, but it's worth a try!

HTH,

Gary Diehl
MVS Support
The glass is neither half full or half empty; the engineer who designed
the glass simply allowed for a 100% increase in fluid storage.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Beesley, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF DA in sysplex

Thanks Mark, that's what I thought. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF DA in sysplex

2008-03-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:55:03 +0100, Beesley, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A customer currently uses RMF to provide DA information in SDSF; with
sysplex scope.
They are now joing another sysplex which will have up to 13 members, and
SDSF DA command is performing badly due to slow response from other systems.
Is there some way to retain sysplex DA capability while restricting the
scope to just the customer's 2 LPARs ?


I don't think there is.  But you can restrict the use of the SYSNAME command
or force it to default to the current system in the ISFUSER exit for all but 
privileged users.

I still force LOG S (syslog) if someone issues the LOG command due to
past performance problems with the OPERLOG (because the LOG preference
is saved in the profile).  If someone wants the operlog they have to 
specify LOG O.We also protect the operlog logstream, but that is a 
different issue.  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF DA in sysplex

2008-03-05 Thread Beesley, Paul
Thanks Mark, that's what I thought. 
Pity the LPARs don't start with the same characters, I could have forced
SYSNAME XX* or whatever... 


Paul

-Original Message-

I don't think there is.  But you can restrict the use of the SYSNAME
command or force it to default to the current system in the ISFUSER exit
for all but privileged users.

I still force LOG S (syslog) if someone issues the LOG command due to
past performance problems with the OPERLOG (because the LOG preference
is saved in the profile).  If someone wants the operlog they have to 
specify LOG O.We also protect the operlog logstream, but that is a

different issue.  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America
/ Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF DA in sysplex

2008-03-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:51:29 +0100, Beesley, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks Mark, that's what I thought.
Pity the LPARs don't start with the same characters, I could have forced
SYSNAME XX* or whatever...



Even with 13 or more systems, I don't know why sysplex DA would be
performing badly due to slow response from other systems.   RMF
should be running in SYSSTC and access to the data is from the
sysplex data server.  

Also, looking at the doc... perhaps you could prevent access from the
other systems using the ERBSDS.MON2DATA RACF profile in the
FACILITY class.   I've never done this, but it looks like it would be defined
on all the other systems you don't want to see in the DA display.  Since
it would still make the RACF call on the other system, I don't know what
this would do in your scenario in regards to performance.  But if the
userids don't match on the other systems or aren't defined, then even 
a SYSNAME * should allow just a subset of just the systems you are adding 
to the sysplex to be displayed.

See the RMF and SDSF manuals for more information.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html