Re: SDSF authorizing - AUTH(ALL)

2005-10-05 Thread Brian France

Mark,
  No, we missed that too. AND, I see there is now an AUTH=(ALLOPER) and an 
AUTH=(ALLUSER), which I now need to investigate and see what's under them.


At 03:53 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote:

Speaking of SDSF authorizations...

Did anyone using ISFPRMxx or ISFPARMS notice that you can now
specify AUTH(ALL) as of z/OS 1.5 instead of listing all of the
individual commands?  I didn't until the SDSF PTF was applied
to support the new CK (Health Checker) command and I went to
add the new authority.  Missed this when we upgraded from z/OS
1.4 to z/OS 1.6.  Adding new SDSF commands (for sysprogs) was
always part of our OS upgrade check list and we don't have to
worry about that now - at least for the SDSF super users.

Of course if you use SAF and have your sysprogs authorized to
a default profile of ISFCMD.** then you don't need to worry
about it either.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/Sysarc
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing - AUTH(ALL)

2005-10-04 Thread Mark Zelden
Speaking of SDSF authorizations...

Did anyone using ISFPRMxx or ISFPARMS notice that you can now
specify AUTH(ALL) as of z/OS 1.5 instead of listing all of the
individual commands?  I didn't until the SDSF PTF was applied
to support the new CK (Health Checker) command and I went to
add the new authority.  Missed this when we upgraded from z/OS
1.4 to z/OS 1.6.  Adding new SDSF commands (for sysprogs) was
always part of our OS upgrade check list and we don't have to
worry about that now - at least for the SDSF super users.

Of course if you use SAF and have your sysprogs authorized to
a default profile of ISFCMD.** then you don't need to worry
about it either.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html