Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-20 Thread Jerry Fuchs
OOPS!

You are correct. PSYNCH is from 

M-TECH MERCURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY





David Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
10/20/2008 04:09 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List 


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )






I think the Vanguard product is called ez/Signon.  We don't use it, so I 
can't 
comment on it.

Dave Long

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:43 -0500, Mark Zelden 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:50:49 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Marv,
>>
>>We use Vanguard PSYNCH.
>
>I thought it was from M-Tech?
>
>I just googled it and it looks like it is now  Hitachi ID Systems, not
>M-Tech Information Technology.
>
>Does Vanguard also have a product called PSYNC?
>
>Mark
>--
>Mark Zelden
>Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
>Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>z/OS Systems Programming expert at 
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
>Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-20 Thread David Long
I think the Vanguard product is called ez/Signon.  We don't use it, so I can't 
comment on it.

Dave Long

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:43 -0500, Mark Zelden 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:50:49 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Marv,
>>
>>We use Vanguard PSYNCH.
>
>I thought it was from M-Tech?
>
>I just googled it and it looks like it is now  Hitachi ID Systems, not
>M-Tech Information Technology.
>
>Does Vanguard also have a product called PSYNC?
>
>Mark
>--
>Mark Zelden
>Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
>Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>z/OS Systems Programming expert at 
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
>Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-18 Thread Timothy Sipples
John Giltner writes:
>In addition to politics you may also run into password
>length problems. Our distributed guys want 16 character
>passwords at a minimum. They feel that 6 characters is
>too short (our current RACF minumum), even with a 4 tries
>and your revoked.

RACF (and the z/OS LDAP Server) have supported long passphrases for quite
some time now, though (since 1.8 at least). And z/OS 1.10 probably closes
any remaining gaps (such as passphrase support for TSO/E logon if you need
that). So I don't think this is a problem any more.

To the original poster

If you can get everything using the z/OS LDAP Server, that's wonderful and
neatly solves the problem. Well worth doing as much as you can. (Let's call
that "directory consolidation.") The reality is that a lot of companies are
going to have more than one authentication/authorization repository in
their organization, unfortunately. Now, there are several ways to address
this, and you might apply more than one weapon. In no particular order here
are some solution categories:

0. Directory consolidation (as mentioned). Just point everything to the
z/OS LDAP Server, basically. IBM did a lot of directory consolidation
internally, and it's worked very well for us. (It's not 100%, but it's a
very high percentage.)

1. You can sync directories with each other. Example product: Tivoli
Directory Integrator (available for both z/OS and Linux on z, and other
platforms).,

2. You can manage identities in multiple directories through a common
identity provisioning/management/revocation service. Example product:
Tivoli Identity Manager (available for both z/OS and Linux on z, and other
platforms).

3. You can keep separate directories and identities but manage single
sign-on through a front-end service (Web, client OS, etc.) which handles
your different credentials on your behalf. Example product: Tivoli Access
Manager (available for Linux on z, and other platforms; TAM supports z/OS
LDAP and RACF).

Other vendors in some or all of these solution categories include, in no
particular order, CA, Novell, Cisco, RSA, Entrust, BMC, Vanguard, Sun,
Oracle, and several others. HP just exited the market. You are correct that
not all of them support z/OS, although some do.

I agree that "politics" (or, more charitably, security policies) are a big
part of the discussion. And this works both ways. There's a school of
thought that RACF is sacred, and it should be its own security "zone,"
separated from those awful/evil/vulnerable other platforms, because our
company applications and data on the mainframe are just so darn sensitive.
I'm sympathetic to that argument, although it's oversimplified. (People are
accessing mainframes from vulnerable clients, after all.) What I really
think it means is that there's high value to extending RACF and z/OS
LDAP-related services across the enterprise, making the mainframe the
"security hub" in order to help protect and secure even more company
assets, to get at least partial benefit even if these assets aren't lucky
enough to be hosted on the mainframe.

Note that there is enormous value in having security services hosted on the
mainframe simply for availability reasons. Just as with encryption (if you
lose the keys, you lose the data), if you lose your
authentication/authorization services you lose access to the applications
and data. So authentication/authorization (in particular) is one of those
mission critical services in most organizations. I think this is probably a
reason why some non-mainframe single sign-on implementations flounder.

By the way, one of the lessons we learned is that you need the application
developers to participate in the common security regime. Inside IBM there's
a lot of "marketing" to line-of-business and other application development
teams to use our common directory services, including an internal Web site
describing how to do it, with environment-specific examples (such as code
examples and downloadable kits). Otherwise security is an afterthought with
many application designers and programmers. And, as the "single sign-on"
universe grew within our company, employees themselves became some of the
best marketers because they wouldn't tolerate that odd application that
didn't participate. (That's called a "network effect."),

Hope all that helps.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan / Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread John Giltner
As Rich Smrcina said, this can be accomplished by using LDAP.  For OS 
that support using NIS servers (Unix/Linux), you can even use LDAP on 
z/OS as a NIS server, thus you don't even have to add users to the local 
security database.


In addition to politics you may also run into password length problems. 
 Our distributed guys want 16 character passwords at a minimum.  They 
feel that 6 characters is too short (our current RACF minumum), even 
with a 4 tries and your revoked.




Marvin Lukasik wrote:

In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft & Unix servers, each having different
security and hence, different passwords. We have reviewed many offerings
from vendors and most ( if not all ) completely ignore the mainframe and
are ENORMOUSLY expensive. Also, their performance was disappointing
and their systems were buggy. I would be interested in hearing comments
about anyone who has heard of a RACF-based product or written something
of their own to accomplish this. Also comments about the general feasability
and difficulty of such an endeavor would be welcome. To do this relatively
inexpensively on the mainframe would be quite a coup for an 'obsolete' 
platform.

Marv Lukasik
Systems Programmer
Carle Clinic Association  



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:50:49 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Marv,
>
>We use Vanguard PSYNCH. 

I thought it was from M-Tech? 

I just googled it and it looks like it is now  Hitachi ID Systems, not 
M-Tech Information Technology.   

Does Vanguard also have a product called PSYNC?  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Jerry Fuchs
Oops I forgot. Here is Vanguard's contact info

VANGUARD Integrity Professionals
Enterprise Security Software
6625 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Phone: (702)794.0014 | Fax: (702)794.0023

We also use their RIOVISON product to maintain RACF.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Field, Alan C.
This is must not an easy project. 

I believe we are on our third attempt to do single signon. The first two
failed and I think I heard this one isn't going so well either. 

I also think we've tried three different solution providers. None of the
implementations are mainframe based.

Alan  


Subject: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that
came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single
password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft & Unix servers, each having different
security and hence, different passwords. We have reviewed many offerings
from vendors and most ( if not all ) completely ignore the mainframe and
are ENORMOUSLY expensive. Also, their performance was disappointing
and their systems were buggy. I would be interested in hearing comments
about anyone who has heard of a RACF-based product or written something
of their own to accomplish this. Also comments about the general
feasability
and difficulty of such an endeavor would be welcome. To do this
relatively
inexpensively on the mainframe would be quite a coup for an 'obsolete' 
platform.
Marv Lukasik
Systems Programmer
Carle Clinic Association  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Jerry Fuchs
Marv,

We use Vanguard PSYNCH. All ID's and passwords are maintained in RACF and 
are propagated to other platforms when a password changes. I can't really 
address cost, but it interfaces with just about everything and our 
security people are very happy with it. 

Jerry 



Marvin Lukasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
10/17/2008 12:44 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List 


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )






In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came 
to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single 
password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft & Unix servers, each having different
security and hence, different passwords. We have reviewed many offerings
from vendors and most ( if not all ) completely ignore the mainframe and
are ENORMOUSLY expensive. Also, their performance was disappointing
and their systems were buggy. I would be interested in hearing comments
about anyone who has heard of a RACF-based product or written something
of their own to accomplish this. Also comments about the general 
feasability
and difficulty of such an endeavor would be welcome. To do this relatively
inexpensively on the mainframe would be quite a coup for an 'obsolete' 
platform.
Marv Lukasik
Systems Programmer
Carle Clinic Association 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Rich Smrcina

Marvin Lukasik wrote:

In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft & Unix servers, each having different
security and hence, different passwords. We have reviewed many offerings
from vendors and most ( if not all ) completely ignore the mainframe and
are ENORMOUSLY expensive. Also, their performance was disappointing
and their systems were buggy. I would be interested in hearing comments
about anyone who has heard of a RACF-based product or written something
of their own to accomplish this. Also comments about the general feasability
and difficulty of such an endeavor would be welcome. To do this relatively
inexpensively on the mainframe would be quite a coup for an 'obsolete' 
platform.

Marv Lukasik
Systems Programmer
Carle Clinic Association  


With the LDAP server on z/OS this is certainly possible.  But implementing it may go far 
beyond technology.  There may be political battles between your mainframe and 
distributed people that only management decree can solve.


There is a redbook published on the subject, see the redbooks site for the technical 
details.  It can't help you with the politics. :)


--

Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service:  360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Using RACF for Single Signon ( logon )

2008-10-17 Thread Marvin Lukasik
In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft & Unix servers, each having different
security and hence, different passwords. We have reviewed many offerings
from vendors and most ( if not all ) completely ignore the mainframe and
are ENORMOUSLY expensive. Also, their performance was disappointing
and their systems were buggy. I would be interested in hearing comments
about anyone who has heard of a RACF-based product or written something
of their own to accomplish this. Also comments about the general feasability
and difficulty of such an endeavor would be welcome. To do this relatively
inexpensively on the mainframe would be quite a coup for an 'obsolete' 
platform.
Marv Lukasik
Systems Programmer
Carle Clinic Association  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html