Re: How to determine how a dataset got deleted

2015-08-13 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
gsg wrote:

Is there a way to determine how a specific dataset was deleted from the 
system?  

Many ways as long you have enabled the recording/storing of SMF records BEFORE 
that event!

As others said:

DAF or any other such tools.

SMF 17- Non-VSAM
SMF 60:69 - VSAM

RACF SMF 83 - as long you have AUDIT(ALL(READ)) set for the covering profile 
and DATASET is in LOGOPTIONS ALWAYS.

Then you get SMF 18 if your dataset was RENAMED instead of deleted.

You could check if the Catalog entry was deleted while the Non-SMS dataset was 
still there.

Oh, you'll have to check ALL LPARs SMF records.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Firewall under z/OS 2.1

2015-08-13 Thread Munif Sadek
I have to block my Host z/OS 2.1 one port for all access except than coming 
from one single server.  
We do have SERVAUTH, Port SAF protection, NETACCESS but I think to achieve this 
I got to activate IP Filtering. 

RTFM tells me that as soon as I activate IPSECURITY and IPSEC static statement 
(no PAGENT at this time) by default it blocks all traffic.. Can some one PLEASE 
provide me IPSEC control statements to let through all inbound / outbound 
packet except than coming to an specific port and the sender is not in  fix IP 
addresses IPSEC list.

any pointers in that direction..
regards Munif

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Problem with FTP into a PDS

2015-08-13 Thread Bill Ashton
I found that it was easier to get a directory listing and run it through a
quick little program to generate the individual FTP commands - then I
didn't have to worry about anything and could more easily control the
outcome. This has been a good discussion, and I am so glad for all your
contributions. I will try the OGETX later, just for my knowledge, as I had
not thought of that before.

Thanks again, everybody!
B

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch wrote:

 I'm not a big fan of the Irisch commands (OEDIT, OGET, etc.), but for
 the problem at hand, OGETX  with the SUFFIX() operand might be useful. All
 suffices must be the same, and the remaining name must be a valid member
 name.
 --
 Peter Hunkeler



 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
Thank you and best regards,
*Billy Ashton*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Calendars and political parties was Re: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program)

2015-08-13 Thread Staller, Allan
Would you guys stop PUNishing us!


 Original message 
From: Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
Date: 08/12/2015  6:05 PM  (GMT-05:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Calendars and political parties was Re: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 
Program) 

On 12 Aug 2015 11:08:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Leave it to the Republicans!

In the case below, the issue has nothing to do with any branch of the United 
States of America Republican Party being French.

Clark Morris

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program)

(Please don't post (or reply) with Subject: ... Digest)

On 2015-08-12, at 08:42, Charles Mills wrote:
 
 Why not 360? Or 512?
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Republican_Calendar

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Firewall under z/OS 2.1

2015-08-13 Thread Jake Anderson
Hi,

Take look at the TCPIP communication server Guide(Redbook) and that Should
tell you the various control statement about the IPSEC.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Munif Sadek munif.sa...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have to block my Host z/OS 2.1 one port for all access except than
 coming from one single server.
 We do have SERVAUTH, Port SAF protection, NETACCESS but I think to achieve
 this I got to activate IP Filtering.

 RTFM tells me that as soon as I activate IPSECURITY and IPSEC static
 statement (no PAGENT at this time) by default it blocks all traffic.. Can
 some one PLEASE provide me IPSEC control statements to let through all
 inbound / outbound packet except than coming to an specific port and the
 sender is not in  fix IP addresses IPSEC list.

 any pointers in that direction..
 regards Munif

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Firewall under z/OS 2.1

2015-08-13 Thread Lizette Koehler
If you are not aware, there is a TCPIP list that could also help.  If you have 
not joined, you can do so here

TCPIP   To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu  with the 
command (paste it!) in the e-mail message body: 
   SUBSCRIBE IBMTCP-L

Or this url and go to the bottom of the webpage:  
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?IBMTCP-L

Lizette

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Munif Sadek
 Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:21 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Firewall under z/OS 2.1
 
 I have to block my Host z/OS 2.1 one port for all access except than coming
 from one single server.
 We do have SERVAUTH, Port SAF protection, NETACCESS but I think to
 achieve this I got to activate IP Filtering.
 
 RTFM tells me that as soon as I activate IPSECURITY and IPSEC static
 statement (no PAGENT at this time) by default it blocks all traffic.. Can some
 one PLEASE provide me IPSEC control statements to let through all inbound /
 outbound packet except than coming to an specific port and the sender is
 not in  fix IP addresses IPSEC list.
 
 any pointers in that direction..
 regards Munif
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Staller, Allan
And PI should equal 3.0

snip

snip

Paul Gilmartin wrote:

If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

Emperor! Your majesty, my precious, but you will be stopped by Darth Vader, 
because he is the Force.

If not stopped, you'll also have these problems within a year or leap-year:

1. Define 'year' and 'leap year'. Each planet, dwarf planet, astro, etc. have 
their own definition of their equivalent of day, month, year.

2. Above definitions are heavily subject to the unit based on. For example, 
meter (on planet earth) was defined over the years by: specific pendulum, 
meridional length, prototype meter bar, number of wave-length of a specific 
element, distance of light in x seconds.

3. Due to some planets are 'Tidal locked' to their star, some residents don't 
have a definition of day or year, since they either see the star full 
day/month/year or not. Some lucky residents may see the star at one point and 
had to define another way of year/day.

4. Planets like Tatooine have a binary star system. Now, trying to convince 
those ruthless bickering population to agree at what star should they base 
their planet rotation so they can work out their year length.

5. Some residents may choose a particular star to base their year by 
observation. Now which star?

6. Some planets may have laws prohibiting usage of 'day', 'year', etc. Don't 
ask. No, don't try to think about that.

7. Technology! Other planets have better technology and can discard 
day/month/year. Simply. No problem.
It is a probability they have better machines, z/OS is too prehistoric to 
them.

8. Now here on crazy earth you have different measurement standards, like 
centimetre or inch. Which one will prevail?
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Bill Ashton
Elardus, Friday or not (how do we measure days to know when Friday is,
anyway??), I appreciate the good laugh - thanks!

Billy

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht 
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:

 Paul Gilmartin wrote:

 If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
 Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

 Emperor! Your majesty, my precious, but you will be stopped by Darth
 Vader, because he is the Force.

 If not stopped, you'll also have these problems within a year or leap-year:

 1. Define 'year' and 'leap year'. Each planet, dwarf planet, astro, etc.
 have their own definition of their equivalent of day, month, year.

 2. Above definitions are heavily subject to the unit based on. For
 example, meter (on planet earth) was defined over the years by: specific
 pendulum, meridional length, prototype meter bar, number of wave-length of
 a specific element, distance of light in x seconds.

 3. Due to some planets are 'Tidal locked' to their star, some residents
 don't have a definition of day or year, since they either see the star full
 day/month/year or not. Some lucky residents may see the star at one point
 and had to define another way of year/day.

 4. Planets like Tatooine have a binary star system. Now, trying to
 convince those ruthless bickering population to agree at what star should
 they base their planet rotation so they can work out their year length.

 5. Some residents may choose a particular star to base their year by
 observation. Now which star?

 6. Some planets may have laws prohibiting usage of 'day', 'year', etc.
 Don't ask. No, don't try to think about that.

 7. Technology! Other planets have better technology and can discard
 day/month/year. Simply. No problem.
 It is a probability they have better machines, z/OS is too prehistoric
 to them.

 8. Now here on crazy earth you have different measurement standards, like
 centimetre or inch. Which one will prevail?

 Now imagine how you will try to convince all residents of all planets to
 have ONE year easily divide-able by whatever number you use in any base
 (decimal, hexadecimal, etc.)

 Ok, enough, is it Friday today... or so? ;-)

 Sorry for above mumblings - Most IBM-MAIN members are at SHARE, and I have
 nothing useful to SHARE...

 Groete / Greetings
 Elardus Engelbrecht

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
Thank you and best regards,
*Billy Ashton*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

2015-08-13 Thread Peter
Hello All,

Is it possible to delete a catalog entry using a first HLQ alone ?

Like deleting all entry of ZOS21.** instead of specifying each and every
qualified dataset  ?

Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

2015-08-13 Thread Norbert Friemel
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:50:29 +0530, Peter wrote:

Hello All,

Is it possible to delete a catalog entry using a first HLQ alone ?

Like deleting all entry of ZOS21.** instead of specifying each and every
qualified dataset  ?


delete zos21.** mask 

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2i2a1/20.1.1.1

Norbert Friemel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Paul Gilmartin wrote:

If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

Emperor! Your majesty, my precious, but you will be stopped by Darth Vader, 
because he is the Force.

If not stopped, you'll also have these problems within a year or leap-year:

1. Define 'year' and 'leap year'. Each planet, dwarf planet, astro, etc. have 
their own definition of their equivalent of day, month, year.

2. Above definitions are heavily subject to the unit based on. For example, 
meter (on planet earth) was defined over the years by: specific pendulum, 
meridional length, prototype meter bar, number of wave-length of a specific 
element, distance of light in x seconds.

3. Due to some planets are 'Tidal locked' to their star, some residents don't 
have a definition of day or year, since they either see the star full 
day/month/year or not. Some lucky residents may see the star at one point and 
had to define another way of year/day.

4. Planets like Tatooine have a binary star system. Now, trying to convince 
those ruthless bickering population to agree at what star should they base 
their planet rotation so they can work out their year length.

5. Some residents may choose a particular star to base their year by 
observation. Now which star?

6. Some planets may have laws prohibiting usage of 'day', 'year', etc. Don't 
ask. No, don't try to think about that.

7. Technology! Other planets have better technology and can discard 
day/month/year. Simply. No problem.
It is a probability they have better machines, z/OS is too prehistoric to 
them.

8. Now here on crazy earth you have different measurement standards, like 
centimetre or inch. Which one will prevail?

Now imagine how you will try to convince all residents of all planets to have 
ONE year easily divide-able by whatever number you use in any base (decimal, 
hexadecimal, etc.)

Ok, enough, is it Friday today... or so? ;-)

Sorry for above mumblings - Most IBM-MAIN members are at SHARE, and I have 
nothing useful to SHARE...

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

2015-08-13 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter wrote:

Is it possible to delete a catalog entry using a first HLQ alone ?
Like deleting all entry of ZOS21.** instead of specifying each and every 
qualified dataset  ?

Yes. Use IDCAMS. Please RTFM on IDCAMS.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: How to determine how a dataset got deleted

2015-08-13 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 3761940565410886.wa.gsg808yahoo@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/12/2015
   at 04:52 PM, gsg 0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
said:

Is there a way to determine how a specific dataset was deleted from
the system?

DAF?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 3380 was actually FBA?

2015-08-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:21:45 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:

 My strong impression was that the erased IBG  between physical blocks was a
requirement for proper sensing of beginning of a block.  The requirement
that some 32-byte increments must be left unused for IBGs indicates
these 32-byte groupings do not play the same role as fixed data blocks
in FBA architecture devices.
 
left unused? or marked as unused?  (although this may be a distinction
without a difference).  And it may depend on choice of encoding technique:
NRZI?  MFM?  GCR: (0,2) RLL?  The last is interesting because it has 17
encodings available to represent a 4-bit nybble.  Some systems use the
extra code point to signal control information, which might be a logical IBG.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run-length_limited#GCR:_.280.2C2.29_RLL

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:23:06 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)  wrote:

 on 08/11/2015 at 03:13 PM, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com said:

since obviously you can't simulate overstrike on a display.

Not obvious and not true, but the 3270 display stream doesn't support
it. However, it does support high intensity, which is a reasonable
substitute.
 
Depends.  For highlighting, yes.  Not for synthesizing characters as APL
did with a Selectric typewriter.

And think of the line printer halftone posters that programmers (used to)
hang on their office walls.  (Does anyone have a sample?)

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

2015-08-13 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
I would add; since you asked about deleting a  catalog entry, I think you 
will also want to add the option, NOSCRATCH to the delete command to only 
remove the catalog entry and not the data set on the physical volume.

Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
Information Technology
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Norbert Friemel
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:50:29 +0530, Peter wrote:

Hello All,

Is it possible to delete a catalog entry using a first HLQ alone ?

Like deleting all entry of ZOS21.** instead of specifying each and 
every qualified dataset  ?


delete zos21.** mask 

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2i2a1/20.1.1.1

Norbert Friemel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NOTE/POINT issue with spanned BSAM datasets

2015-08-13 Thread Mark Hammack
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:26:34 -0400, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 The overt issue I am having is a S0C1 after doing a POINT macro when the
 data is on the second volume of a multi-volume (BSAM) dataset.  When I
 first started looking at the issue, I read that an EXTENDED striped
dataset
 would act as though it were on a single volume to the program.  I would
 have to add BLOCKSIZE=LARGE to my DCBE and handle the NOTE/POINT data
 correctly, but that was about it as far as changes went.

 However, when I started looking at the data returned from NOTE, I am
 getting values of 1, 2, 3, etc. which doesn't quite jive with the
 documentation (I can't believe everything is on track 0).  However, when
it
 (apparently) goes to the second volume, the return value from NOTE
starts
 over at 1.

 I'm at a loss.  Everything I read says this is supposed to work and I am
 sure I have something missing, I just can't figure out what.

  With BLOCKTOKENSIZE=LARGE on the DCBE, the tokens are not TTRs.  They
are
simple a relative block number.

  A striped extended format dataset (i.e. stripe count  1) appears to
a BSAM user as if it was a single volume.  The note values are
sequential regardless of which physical volume contains the block.

 For a non-striped multi-volume extended format data set (i.e. stripe
count = 1),
the NOTE values start over for each volume.  The program is responsible
for positioning to the correct volume.


Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Thanks Jim, that answers a number of questions.  However, I have not been able 
to find information on specifying a specific volume on an SMS managed dataset.  
The things I have tried fail telling me basically you can't do that on SMS.

Regards,

Mark Hammack
mark.hamm...@gmail.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Ed Finnell
Some of these .txt are recognizable on big screen. Haven't tried to print.  
Probably a PG rating
 
_www.testfiles.com/art/DECUS/_ (http://www.testfiles.com/art/DECUS/) 
 
 
In a message dated 8/13/2015 11:34:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:

And  think of the line printer halftone posters that programmers (used to)
hang  on their office walls.  (Does anyone have a  sample?)



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Peter Hunkeler

IOF does and has for at least 14 years support carriage control emulated
display (both RECFM=A or M), except for overprinting.




Pardon my ignorance, but what is IOF?


--
Peter Hunkeler



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread John McKown
IOF is a SPOOL display product from Fischer International
http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive Output Facility according
to the site. I have a vague memory of it. It is not an SDSF work-alike but,
back when I used it, it had some good features.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch wrote:


 IOF does and has for at least 14 years support carriage control emulated
 display (both RECFM=A or M), except for overprinting.




 Pardon my ignorance, but what is IOF?


 --
 Peter Hunkeler



 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 

Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
restore is attempted.

Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be.

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Tony Harminc
On 13 August 2015 at 11:49, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
 If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the 
 universe.

 -- Carl Sagan

xkcd.com/1123

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits

2015-08-13 Thread Charles Mills
Save area back-chaining?

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Stevet
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits

It is possible. However, the client exit does not get control before the
PARM= values have been processed into an IP address. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits

2015-08-13 Thread Stevet
It is possible. However, the client exit does not get control before the PARM= 
values have been processed into an IP address. 

Never underestimate the power of an annoyed developer. There is a way to get to 
FTP's PARM= value. 

Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.

 On Aug 13, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch wrote:
 
 
 I've been asked to find a way to check FTP usage in our z/OS  
 environment (2.1 at this point) to see if users are specifying IP  
 addresses or names to be resolved.
 
 
 
 
 IP packets contain IP addresses and ports, not DNS names. The receiver cannot 
 tell whether the user behind the client specified a hostname (to be resolved 
 by a DNS lookup) or an IP address directly. If the former, then the client 
 software must resolve the hostname via DNS lookup in order to start a TCP 
 session via IP address.
 
 
 With HTTP, the client sends how the server was addressed to the server. So 
 the web server knows whether the user entered an IP address or a hostname. 
 This is the basis for multihoming, aka. VirtualHosts in web servers.
 
 
 I don't know but doubt that this information is part of the FTP protocol. If 
 not, what you desire seems not possible to me.
 
 
 --
 Peter Hunkeler
 
 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Sam Siegel
What a wonderful quote.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:

 If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the
 universe.

 -- Carl Sagan

 Charles

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
 Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:12 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

 Paul Gilmartin wrote:

 If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
 Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

 Emperor! Your majesty, my precious, but you will be stopped by Darth
 Vader, because he is the Force.

 If not stopped, you'll also have these problems within a year or leap-year:

 1. Define 'year' and 'leap year'. Each planet, dwarf planet, astro, etc.
 have their own definition of their equivalent of day, month, year.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits

2015-08-13 Thread Stevet
Probably. I'll know with the first S0C3 that I examine w/ IPCS. 

Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.

 On Aug 13, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
 
 Save area back-chaining?
 
 Charles
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Stevet
 Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:07 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits
 
 It is possible. However, the client exit does not get control before the
 PARM= values have been processed into an IP address. 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Don Williams
IOF does and has for at least 14 years support carriage control emulated
display (both RECFM=A or M), except for overprinting.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:26 PM Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch wrote:

 Ah!  Here it is!: asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
 But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't support the - (space 3
 lines) ASA CC.


 --
 Peter Hunkeler





 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Aug 2015 to 11 Aug 2015 (#2015-223)

2015-08-13 Thread Stevet
At what time would you reverse this for when the sun starts expanding?  There's 
gonna be some gravity balancing to be done

Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.

 On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 If I had the ability to adjust the Earth's orbit, I would be very
 slowly increasing the diameter about 10% per billion years to balance
 out the warming of the sun.
 
 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Gary Weinhold weinh...@dkl.com wrote:
 And if I were Emperor of the universe, I'd adjust the earth's orbit to make
 sure it competed a revolution in exactly 365 days.
 
 gary
 
 On 2015-08-12 00:00, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
 
 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:19:38 -0500 From: Paul Gilmartin
 paulgboul...@aim.com Subject: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program) On
 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:37:30 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:
 
 
 Encyclopedia Britannica is complicit in the confusion to this day by
 incorrectly implying in their Leap Year entry that in addition to the
 divisible by 4, 100, 400 rules there either is or should be a 4000-year
 exception rule:
 ...For still more precise reckoning, every year evenly divisible by
 4,000 (i.e., 16,000, 24,000, etc.) may be a common (not leap) year,
 
 Over 18 years ago (Nov 1996) EB acknowledged that no such rule exists:
 it was an un-adopted and sub-optimal suggestion by Sir John Herschel
 around 1820.  EB has apparently not yet followed their own internal
 recommendation in 1996 to reword this statement in the future.
 
 If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
 
 Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.
 
 365 31/128 is within one second of the mean tropical year; closer even
 than the 4000-year rule.
 
 The unpredictable secular increase in the length of the day makes a
 4000-year rule pointless.
 
 -- gil
 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 -- 
 Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
 Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NOTE/POINT issue with spanned BSAM datasets

2015-08-13 Thread Jim Mulder
 Thanks Jim, that answers a number of questions.  However, I have not
 been able to find information on specifying a specific volume on an 
 SMS managed dataset.  The things I have tried fail telling me 
 basically you can't do that on SMS.

  IPCS does an OPEN TYPE=J after setting JFCBVLSQ to the 
desired volume sequence number.

Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 3380 was actually FBA?

2015-08-13 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
l...@garlic.com (Anne  Lynn Wheeler) writes:
 hardware speed and error correction was going to fixed-sized blocks. You
 can see this in 3380 track capacity calculations where record sizes have
 to be rounded up, sort of compromise hack given that MVS wasn't going to
 support real FBA.  The 3380 was smaller fixed-sized blocks ... but not
 true IBM FBA like 3310  3370. 3375 was the first CKD emulated on top
 of an IBM FBA (3370) device. 512-byte blocks have prevailed for a couple
 decades (IBM 3310  3370 and follow-ons ... but also all the other
 industry standard disks). There is currently inudstry move to 4096-byte
 fixed blocks for improved error correction and track capacity.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format
 http://www.seagate.com/tech-insights/advanced-format-4k-sector-hard-drives-master-ti/

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2015g.html#4 3380 was actually FBA?
and 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/3QSdKeko604


IBM journal articles are behind IEEE membership wall ...  have found
this detailed description at Google Books (3380 error correcting)
https://books.google.com/books?id=cG4Zgb8OqwECpg=PA495lpg=PA495dq=ibm+3380+error+correctingsource=blots=lMaYN_d94Fsig=o-R202AspjC1Ox09YNcZDb9Ljgchl=ensa=Xved=0CDgQ6AEwBGoVChMIxpHRg-KmxwIVVluICh1twgJy#v=onepageq=ibm%203380%20error%20correctingf=false

which has each subblock consists of 96 data bytes and six first-level
check bytes are appended in the form of two interleaved codewords

after discussing details of 3380, it moves into RAID  Reed-Solomon
codes ... trivia, I worked with somebody in bldg14 that was awarded the
original RAID patent.

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Q: FTP Exits

2015-08-13 Thread Peter Hunkeler

I've been asked to find a way to check FTP usage in our z/OS
environment (2.1 at this point) to see if users are specifying IP
addresses or names to be resolved.




IP packets contain IP addresses and ports, not DNS names. The receiver cannot 
tell whether the user behind the client specified a hostname (to be resolved by 
a DNS lookup) or an IP address directly. If the former, then the client 
software must resolve the hostname via DNS lookup in order to start a TCP 
session via IP address.


With HTTP, the client sends how the server was addressed to the server. So the 
web server knows whether the user entered an IP address or a hostname. This is 
the basis for multihoming, aka. VirtualHosts in web servers.


I don't know but doubt that this information is part of the FTP protocol. If 
not, what you desire seems not possible to me.


--
Peter Hunkeler



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Aug 2015 to 11 Aug 2015 (#2015-223)

2015-08-13 Thread Mike Schwab
If I had the ability to adjust the Earth's orbit, I would be very
slowly increasing the diameter about 10% per billion years to balance
out the warming of the sun.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Gary Weinhold weinh...@dkl.com wrote:
 And if I were Emperor of the universe, I'd adjust the earth's orbit to make
 sure it competed a revolution in exactly 365 days.

 gary

 On 2015-08-12 00:00, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:

 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:19:38 -0500 From: Paul Gilmartin
 paulgboul...@aim.com Subject: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program) On
 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:37:30 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:

 
 Encyclopedia Britannica is complicit in the confusion to this day by
 incorrectly implying in their Leap Year entry that in addition to the
 divisible by 4, 100, 400 rules there either is or should be a 4000-year
 exception rule:
 ...For still more precise reckoning, every year evenly divisible by
 4,000 (i.e., 16,000, 24,000, etc.) may be a common (not leap) year,
 
 Over 18 years ago (Nov 1996) EB acknowledged that no such rule exists:
 it was an un-adopted and sub-optimal suggestion by Sir John Herschel
 around 1820.  EB has apparently not yet followed their own internal
 recommendation in 1996 to reword this statement in the future.
 

 If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:

  Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

 365 31/128 is within one second of the mean tropical year; closer even
 than the 4000-year rule.

 The unpredictable secular increase in the length of the day makes a
 4000-year rule pointless.

 -- gil


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Ed Finnell
Now I are confused.
 
http://www.triangle-systems.com/ioftech.shtml
 
The contact is for the same person at same number. Christine  Carfgnoni
 
 
In a message dated 8/13/2015 3:04:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com writes:

http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive Output Facility  according
to the site. I have a vague memory of it. It is not an SDSF  work-alike but,
back when I used it, it had some good  features.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AW: Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:26:11 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:

Ah!  Here it is!: asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't support the - (space 3 lines) 
ASA CC.
 
Is - part of the ASA standard or is it an IBMism?

It's pretty hard to find a definitive document.  I'd have greater trust in one
that wasn't published by IBM.

You can fix it with the sed filter:

sed '/^-/i\

s/^-/0/'

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:03:44 -0500, John McKown wrote:

IOF is a SPOOL display product from Fischer International
http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive Output Facility according
to the site. I have a vague memory of it. It is not an SDSF work-alike but,
back when I used it, it had some good features.
 
How does it compare to (E)JES.  We can no longer afford (E)JES.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: AW: Q: FTP Exits

2015-08-13 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Never underestimate the power of an annoyed developer. There is a way to get 
to FTP's PARM= value.


I'd never dare to.


My point was that if it is not part of the protocol definition, a client may or 
may not send additional information. However clever a developer might be, it 
would only help if user had no way but to use his invention. That surely is not 
given for FTP.


I'm gonna have a look at some Wireshark traces, and at the FTP RFC(s).


--
Peter Hunkeler




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String

2015-08-13 Thread Lizette Koehler
Yes.  As others stated, look at the HELP DELETE under TSO. 

I always back up what I am going to delete just in-case there is something in 
there I want to keep.

You can also use DFDSS to DUMP DELETE as well.

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Peter
 Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 8:20 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Catalog Entry Deletion using a String
 
 Hello All,
 
 Is it possible to delete a catalog entry using a first HLQ alone ?
 
 Like deleting all entry of ZOS21.** instead of specifying each and every
 qualified dataset  ?
 
 Peter
 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 1867294601655777.wa.mitchdanagmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/11/2015
   at 03:13 PM, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com said:

since obviously you can't simulate overstrike on a display. 

Not obvious and not true, but the 3270 display stream doesn't support
it. However, it does support high intensity, which is a reasonable
substitute.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: SDSF and Carriage Control

2015-08-13 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Ah!  Here it is!: asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't support the - (space 3 lines) 
ASA CC.


--
Peter Hunkeler





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
wrote:

 And PI should equal 3.0


​Which will immediately cause all law abiding wheels to become hexagonal.
Better have really _GOOD_ shocks! Or upgrade to a hover car.

-- 

Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
restore is attempted.

Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be.

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

2015-08-13 Thread Charles Mills
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the 
universe.

-- Carl Sagan

Charles

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Emperor (Was Calendars ... and Leap ... etc.)

Paul Gilmartin wrote:

If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.

Emperor! Your majesty, my precious, but you will be stopped by Darth Vader, 
because he is the Force.

If not stopped, you'll also have these problems within a year or leap-year:

1. Define 'year' and 'leap year'. Each planet, dwarf planet, astro, etc. have 
their own definition of their equivalent of day, month, year.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN