Re: Can I sense the LIBDEF status?

2021-06-12 Thread Jeremy Nicoll
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021, at 20:53, Bob Bridges wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what's the advantage?

Possibly none, but I thought that if an allocate was going to fail for 
some reason handling that before I started using libdefs would be
easier.  Otherwise I'd have to take more care which libdefs were 
then reversed.

Having said that, for simple dialogs I only allocated a single pds
then altlibbed/libdeffed that for each of the types of file within 
it, eg naming rexx execs Rxxx, skeletons Sxxx, panels 
Pxx etc.

I probably assumed that all the libdefs/altlibs would work,  if the 
alloc had worked.  

 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
> Jeremy Nicoll
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 18:19
> 
> Twenty+ years ago I always used ALLOC to allocate the datasets
> concerned, and only if that worked then issued LIBDEF/ALTLIB via their
> ddname interfaces.


-- 
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Can I sense the LIBDEF status?

2021-06-12 Thread Bob Bridges
Out of curiosity, what's the advantage?

---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313

/* If you are not being criticized, you may not be doing much.  -Donald
Rumsfeld */

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of
Jeremy Nicoll
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 18:19

Twenty+ years ago I always used ALLOC to allocate the datasets
concerned, and only if that worked then issued LIBDEF/ALTLIB via their
ddname interfaces.

--- On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, at 21:02, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> Do LIBDEF/ALTLIB immediately ALLOCATE the data sets named?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN