Re: RoCE Express Features on z15-T02

2021-07-03 Thread Mark Jacobs
Yes I know that, but the question I posed was whether those cards support V1 or 
V2 of the RoCE standard.

Mark Jacobs

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Saturday, July 3rd, 2021 at 7:32 AM, P H  wrote:

> A new build z15 Model T02 supports the following features:
>
> 10 GbE RoCE Express 2.1 (Feature Code 0432)
>
> 25 GbE RoCE Express 2.1 (Feature Code 0450)
>
> However, if upgrading from a prior generation of z to z15 and it has the 
> following features:
>
> 10 GbE RoCE Express (Feature Code 0411)
>
> 10 GbE RoCE Express 2 (Feature Code 412)
>
> 25 GbE RoCE Express 2 (Feature Code 430)
>
> these can be carried forward to the z15 as part of the 'upgrade' process.
>
> Regards
>
> Parwez Hamid
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU on behalf of 
> Mark Jacobs 0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
>
> Sent: 02 July 2021 16:13
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: RoCE Express Features on z15-T02
>
> Does anyone know what level of RoCE those features support V1 or V2?
>
> Mark Jacobs
>
> Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
>
> GPG Public Key - 
> https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
>
> 
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> 
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: RoCE Express Features on z15-T02

2021-07-03 Thread P H
A new build z15 Model T02 supports the following features:

10 GbE RoCE Express 2.1 (Feature Code 0432)
25 GbE RoCE Express 2.1 (Feature Code 0450)

However, if upgrading from a prior generation of z to z15 and it has the 
following features:

10 GbE RoCE Express (Feature Code 0411)
10 GbE RoCE Express 2 (Feature Code 412)

25 GbE RoCE Express 2 (Feature Code 430)

these can be carried forward to the z15 as part of the 'upgrade' process.

Regards

Parwez Hamid​


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: 02 July 2021 16:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: RoCE Express Features on z15-T02

Does anyone know what level of RoCE those features support V1 or V2?

Mark Jacobs

Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Unix Permissions Display Question

2021-07-03 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
HI Fred,

ACLs are kept in the File Security Packet (FSP) for each individual file in the 
Unix file system. They are not stored in RACF.

The ACL you show would allow these two users to write (w) to the file but not 
read (r) or execute(x) it. You might need to add read (r) authority if they are 
having difficulty accessing the file. Check for ICH408I violation messages as 
they will show INTENT and ALLOWED.

The file ACL should not have effect your ability to rename the file. Rename is 
controlled by access to the parent directory, and write (w) is required to 
rename it. Check your permissions to the directory. It, too, might have an ACL. 
Again, check for ICH408I messages.

BTW, the owner appears as a UID and not a RACF ID. Either there is no RACF ID 
with this UID, or the default group for the RACF ID with this UID doesn't have 
a GID. I recommend you remediate this.

Regards, Bob

Robert S. Hansel2021 #IBMChampion
Lead RACF Specialist
RSH Consulting, Inc.
617-969-8211
www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel
www.twitter.com/RSH_RACF
www.rshconsulting.com
---
Upcoming RSH RACF Training - WebEx
- RACF Audit & Compliance Roadmap - OCT 18-22, 2021
- RACF Level I Administration - DEC 6-10, 2021
- RACF Level II Administration - NOV 15-19, 2021
- RACF Level III Admin, Audit, & Compliance - NOV 1-5, 2021
- RACF - Securing z/OS UNIX  - SEPT 20-24, 2021
---

-Original Message-
Date:Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:10:32 +
From:fred glenlake 
Subject: Re: Unix Permissions Display Question

Hi List,

Amazing response by so many members, very much appreciated.   Just to close the 
loop, I don't have Vista so that's out.   The Unix display that I re-typed was 
with the + in front of the 755.   From the follow-on copy and pastes below of 
your suggested commands it shows I have 2 USER ACL's defined somewhere in RACF 
that are likely the cause of my access issues when I try to rename this file in 
a simulated DR test scenario.

I issued the GETFACL command as suggested and that display is copied and pasted 
below.

$ getfacl SYSTEM/etc/pagent_TTLS.conf
#file:  SYSTEM/etc/pagent_TTLS.conf
#owner: 30456
#group: SYS1
user::rwx
group::r-x
other::r-x
user:DRTSTCPY:-w-
user:DREVTCPY:-w-



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN