EXCP question

[Tony Thigpen]

I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to 
z/OS to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is 
reading the label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and 
within the correct initiator for BLP.


The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:

SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313

Thoughts?

One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the 
program, not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT


Some of the areas:
CCB001_ECB DSA(0)
CCB001 DS0F   IORB
CCB001_IOB  DS0F
CCB001_IOBFLAGS DCXL2'4300'
CCB001_IOBSENSE DCXL2''
CCB001_IOBECBAD DCA(CCB001_ECB)
CCB001_IOBCSW   DCA(0)
CCB001_IOBCSWFL DCXL2''
CCB001_IOBRESDL DCH'00'
CCB001_IOBCCWAD DCA(CCW00101)
CCB001_IOBDCBAD DCA(SYS020)
DC2A(0)
CCB001_IOBSEEK  DCXL3'00'   MBB
CCB001_IOBSRCH  DCXL5'00'   CCHHR

CCW00101 CCW   CCWC_RD,DATA0102,CCWF_SLI,RECL0102

DATA0102 DS0D
 DC1024XL32'00'
RECL0102 EQU   *-DATA0102

Tony Thigpen

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: EXCP question

[Seymour J Metz]

Please show your code. the S200-313 indicates a page translation error for the 
DEB, which should not occur unless you are attempting to provide your own DEB. 
What are the associated error messages? What is pointed to by field TCBEXCPD at 
offset X'C0' in the task control block (TCB)?


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Tony Thigpen 
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXCP question

I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to
z/OS to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is
reading the label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and
within the correct initiator for BLP.

The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:

SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313

Thoughts?

One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the
program, not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT

Some of the areas:
CCB001_ECB DSA(0)
CCB001 DS0F   IORB
CCB001_IOB  DS0F
CCB001_IOBFLAGS DCXL2'4300'
CCB001_IOBSENSE DCXL2''
CCB001_IOBECBAD DCA(CCB001_ECB)
CCB001_IOBCSW   DCA(0)
CCB001_IOBCSWFL DCXL2''
CCB001_IOBRESDL DCH'00'
CCB001_IOBCCWAD DCA(CCW00101)
CCB001_IOBDCBAD DCA(SYS020)
 DC2A(0)
CCB001_IOBSEEK  DCXL3'00'   MBB
CCB001_IOBSRCH  DCXL5'00'   CCHHR

CCW00101 CCW   CCWC_RD,DATA0102,CCWF_SLI,RECL0102

DATA0102 DS0D
  DC1024XL32'00'
RECL0102 EQU   *-DATA0102

Tony Thigpen

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: EXCP question

[Michael Stein]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:49:53AM -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to z/OS
> to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is reading the
> label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and within the
> correct initiator for BLP.
> 
> The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:
> 
> SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313

abend S200 reason 313 

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=scc-200#m015062

3nn Page translation error. 
n1n EXCP encountered an error during the front end processing.
nn3 Data extent block (DEB)

Sounds like EXCP didn't like things when it was first issued, possibly
the first EXCP issued (ie: none worked).

I'd suggest looking at a dump and seeing if the IOB->DCB->DEB pointers
look ok.
 
> One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the program,
> not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT

What is the RMODE?  I don't remember but perhaps the IOB & DCB addresses
have to fit in 24 bits...

I'd look at the dump.  Does it show the DCB is open (DEB exists?)?

Does the IOB look ok in the dump? 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: EXCP question

[Seymour J Metz]

Yes, they have to be below the line.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Michael Stein 
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXCP question

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:49:53AM -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to z/OS
> to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is reading the
> label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and within the
> correct initiator for BLP.
>
> The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:
>
> SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313

abend S200 reason 313

https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Fzos%2F2.1.0%3Ftopic%3Dscc-200%23m015062&data=05%7C01%7Csmetz3%40gmu.edu%7Ce86ad4640ba4406fae9808dac27036fe%7C9e857255df574c47a0c00546460380cb%7C0%7C0%7C638036084463199866%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gh30mQWm9Ge8%2BXoLOTM7ZSi467Zm2hYctYgnNU%2FCUXM%3D&reserved=0

3nn Page translation error.
n1n EXCP encountered an error during the front end processing.
nn3 Data extent block (DEB)

Sounds like EXCP didn't like things when it was first issued, possibly
the first EXCP issued (ie: none worked).

I'd suggest looking at a dump and seeing if the IOB->DCB->DEB pointers
look ok.

> One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the program,
> not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT

What is the RMODE?  I don't remember but perhaps the IOB & DCB addresses
have to fit in 24 bits...

I'd look at the dump.  Does it show the DCB is open (DEB exists?)?

Does the IOB look ok in the dump?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: EXCP question

[Tony Thigpen]

The program is 24/24.

Tony Thigpen

Seymour J Metz wrote on 11/9/22 13:31:

Yes, they have to be below the line.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of Michael 
Stein 
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXCP question

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:49:53AM -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:

I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to z/OS
to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is reading the
label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and within the
correct initiator for BLP.

The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:

SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313


abend S200 reason 313

https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Fzos%2F2.1.0%3Ftopic%3Dscc-200%23m015062&data=05%7C01%7Csmetz3%40gmu.edu%7Ce86ad4640ba4406fae9808dac27036fe%7C9e857255df574c47a0c00546460380cb%7C0%7C0%7C638036084463199866%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gh30mQWm9Ge8%2BXoLOTM7ZSi467Zm2hYctYgnNU%2FCUXM%3D&reserved=0

3nn Page translation error.
n1n EXCP encountered an error during the front end processing.
nn3 Data extent block (DEB)

Sounds like EXCP didn't like things when it was first issued, possibly
the first EXCP issued (ie: none worked).

I'd suggest looking at a dump and seeing if the IOB->DCB->DEB pointers
look ok.


One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the program,
not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT


What is the RMODE?  I don't remember but perhaps the IOB & DCB addresses
have to fit in 24 bits...

I'd look at the dump.  Does it show the DCB is open (DEB exists?)?

Does the IOB look ok in the dump?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: EXCP question

[Tony Thigpen]

Thanks to Michael,

Who found my stupid coding error. The OPEN used the wrong label. sigh!

Tony Thigpen

Michael Stein wrote on 11/9/22 11:33:

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:49:53AM -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:

I am trying to migrate a simple CCW to tape test program from zVSE to z/OS
to help a customer. EXCP on z/OS is new to me. The program is reading the
label so I have BLP in the JCL and am running authorized and within the
correct initiator for BLP.

The OPEN and CLOSE using BLP works, but when I try a simple read, I get:

SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=200  REASON CODE=0313


abend S200 reason 313

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=scc-200#m015062

3nn Page translation error.
n1n EXCP encountered an error during the front end processing.
nn3 Data extent block (DEB)

Sounds like EXCP didn't like things when it was first issued, possibly
the first EXCP issued (ie: none worked).

I'd suggest looking at a dump and seeing if the IOB->DCB->DEB pointers
look ok.
  

One think I am worried about is that I read into an area within the program,
not a GETMAINed area, but I compiled with NORENT


What is the RMODE?  I don't remember but perhaps the IOB & DCB addresses
have to fit in 24 bits...

I'd look at the dump.  Does it show the DCB is open (DEB exists?)?

Does the IOB look ok in the dump?
  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GTTERM assistance

[Brian Chapman]

Thanks everyone. I went back to my session initialization process and
reviewed my logic for the OPNDST macro. Originally, I did not use the AAREA
or AAREALN parameters on this macro. I added these parameters and set the
NIBNDAR accordingly, but now I'm getting a 084E sense code.

*09.04.47 JOB21339  +PRT103E VTAM OPNDST request failed for netname
SACTV017. Return = 0004 Sense = 084E.*

I reviewed the documentation for this sense code. It seems that VTAM is
expecting certain bind fields to be populated, but I'm not sure which
fields.

Sense code 084E

Session parameters not valid—PRI: A positive response to an activation
request (for example, BIND) was received and was changed to a negative
response because session parameters that were not valid were carried in the
response. The services manager receiving the response sends a deactivation
request for the corresponding session. This error can occur if NETIDs are
coded incorrectly on any NETWORK statements in CDRM definitions. See z/OS
Communications Server: SNA Resource Definition Reference
 for
more information.
Sense code 084E - IBM Documentation


I also reviewed Table 2 on this page, BIND image and response - IBM
Documentation
,
and most of the fields that I thought to update are listed as 'VTAM ignores
or overrides application program's setting.'

Here is the program that's establishing the session. It acquires the user
control blocks necessary for terminal based tasks, and then executes the
OPNDST macro. Again, any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

**-**
** PROGRAM : PORTDSPI  **
** AUTHOR  : BRIAN CHAPMAN **
** WRITTEN ON  : 23 AUGUST 2017**
** MODIFIED ON :   **
** ASM OPTIONS : RENT,REUS AMODE=31 RMODE=31 AC=0  **
** DESCRIPTION : TASK INITIALIZATION ROUTINE   **
** : THIS PROGRAM BUILDS THE INITIAL TASK RELATED  **
** : CONTROL BLOCKS FOR A NEW TASK TO BE DISPATCHED.   **
**-**
** *
* REGEQU   *
**  *
* COPY  PORTKERN   *
* COPY  PORTDMH*
* COPY  TASKANCH   *
* COPY  SESSVTAM   *
* COPY  SESSSOKT   *
** *
* EJECT *
* IFGRPL AM=VTAM  *
* EJECT*
* ISTUSFBC   *
* EJECT  *
* IFGACB AM=VTAM *
* EJECT  *
* IFGEXLST AM=VTAM*
* EJECT  *
* ISTDNIB*
* ISTDBIND   *
**   *
*WORKAREA DSECT  *
*WORKNAME DSCL8  *
*SAVEAREA DS18F  *
*SAVERC   DSF *
*SAVEANCH DSF*
**   *
*VTAMRETC DSF *
***
*CALLPLST DS0F*
*CALLPRM1 DSF *
*CALLPRM2 DSF *
*CALLPRM3 DSF *
*CALLPRM4 DSF *
*CALLPRM5 DSF *
**   *
*WORKLEN  EQU   *-WORKAREA*
**   *
*WORKREG  EQU   R3   *
*KERNREG  EQU   R4   *
*ANCHREG  EQU   R5*
*DMHREG   EQU   R6  *
*VTAMREG  EQU   R6  *
*RPLREG   EQU   R7  *
*NIBREG   EQU   R8  *
*ACBREG   EQU   R9  *
**  *
*PORTDSPI CSECT *
*PORTDSPI AMODE 31  *
*PORTDSPI RMODE ANY *
* STM   R14,R12,12(R13) SAVE REGISTERS  *
* LRR12,R15 ESTABLISH BASE  *
* USING PORTDSPI,R12SET ADDRESSIBILITY  *
* B START   *
**  *
* DCCL9'PORTDSPI' 

Re: GTTERM assistance

[Brian Chapman]

I should also add another comment.

I was hoping I could just leave the bind area empty and let the SLU (the
user's emulator is the SLU in this scenario, right?) populate the bind
image with whatever it sends.



Thank you,

Brian Chapman


On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:59 PM Brian Chapman  wrote:

>
> Thanks everyone. I went back to my session initialization process and
> reviewed my logic for the OPNDST macro. Originally, I did not use the AAREA
> or AAREALN parameters on this macro. I added these parameters and set the
> NIBNDAR accordingly, but now I'm getting a 084E sense code.
>
> *09.04.47 JOB21339  +PRT103E VTAM OPNDST request failed for netname
> SACTV017. Return = 0004 Sense = 084E.*
>
> I reviewed the documentation for this sense code. It seems that VTAM is
> expecting certain bind fields to be populated, but I'm not sure which
> fields.
>
> Sense code 084E
>
> Session parameters not valid—PRI: A positive response to an activation
> request (for example, BIND) was received and was changed to a negative
> response because session parameters that were not valid were carried in the
> response. The services manager receiving the response sends a deactivation
> request for the corresponding session. This error can occur if NETIDs are
> coded incorrectly on any NETWORK statements in CDRM definitions. See z/OS
> Communications Server: SNA Resource Definition Reference
>  
> for
> more information.
> Sense code 084E - IBM Documentation
> 
>
> I also reviewed Table 2 on this page, BIND image and response - IBM
> Documentation
> ,
> and most of the fields that I thought to update are listed as 'VTAM
> ignores or overrides application program's setting.'
>
> Here is the program that's establishing the session. It acquires the user
> control blocks necessary for terminal based tasks, and then executes the
> OPNDST macro. Again, any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>
> **-**
> ** PROGRAM : PORTDSPI  **
> ** AUTHOR  : BRIAN CHAPMAN **
> ** WRITTEN ON  : 23 AUGUST 2017**
> ** MODIFIED ON :   **
> ** ASM OPTIONS : RENT,REUS AMODE=31 RMODE=31 AC=0  **
> ** DESCRIPTION : TASK INITIALIZATION ROUTINE   **
> ** : THIS PROGRAM BUILDS THE INITIAL TASK RELATED  **
> ** : CONTROL BLOCKS FOR A NEW TASK TO BE DISPATCHED.   **
> **-**
> ** *
> * REGEQU   *
> **  *
> * COPY  PORTKERN   *
> * COPY  PORTDMH*
> * COPY  TASKANCH   *
> * COPY  SESSVTAM   *
> * COPY  SESSSOKT   *
> ** *
> * EJECT *
> * IFGRPL AM=VTAM  *
> * EJECT*
> * ISTUSFBC   *
> * EJECT  *
> * IFGACB AM=VTAM *
> * EJECT  *
> * IFGEXLST AM=VTAM*
> * EJECT  *
> * ISTDNIB*
> * ISTDBIND   *
> **   *
> *WORKAREA DSECT  *
> *WORKNAME DSCL8  *
> *SAVEAREA DS18F  *
> *SAVERC   DSF *
> *SAVEANCH DSF*
> **   *
> *VTAMRETC DSF *
> ***
> *CALLPLST DS0F*
> *CALLPRM1 DSF *
> *CALLPRM2 DSF *
> *CALLPRM3 DSF *
> *CALLPRM4 DSF *
> *CALLPRM5 DSF *
> **   *
> *WORKLEN  EQU   *-WORKAREA*
> **   *
> *WORKREG  EQU   R3   *
> *KERNREG  EQU   R4   *
> *ANCHREG  EQU   R5*
> *DMHREG   EQU   R6  *
> *VTAMREG  EQU   R6  *
> *RPLREG   EQU   R7  *
> *NIBREG   EQU   R8  *
> *ACBREG   EQU   R9  *
> **  *
> *PORTDSPI CSECT *
> *

Re: GTTERM assistance

[Seymour J Metz]

The TN3270 server is the SLU.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Brian Chapman 
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 3:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GTTERM assistance

I should also add another comment.

I was hoping I could just leave the bind area empty and let the SLU (the
user's emulator is the SLU in this scenario, right?) populate the bind
image with whatever it sends.



Thank you,

Brian Chapman


On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:59 PM Brian Chapman  wrote:

>
> Thanks everyone. I went back to my session initialization process and
> reviewed my logic for the OPNDST macro. Originally, I did not use the AAREA
> or AAREALN parameters on this macro. I added these parameters and set the
> NIBNDAR accordingly, but now I'm getting a 084E sense code.
>
> *09.04.47 JOB21339  +PRT103E VTAM OPNDST request failed for netname
> SACTV017. Return = 0004 Sense = 084E.*
>
> I reviewed the documentation for this sense code. It seems that VTAM is
> expecting certain bind fields to be populated, but I'm not sure which
> fields.
>
> Sense code 084E
>
> Session parameters not valid—PRI: A positive response to an activation
> request (for example, BIND) was received and was changed to a negative
> response because session parameters that were not valid were carried in the
> response. The services manager receiving the response sends a deactivation
> request for the corresponding session. This error can occur if NETIDs are
> coded incorrectly on any NETWORK statements in CDRM definitions. See z/OS
> Communications Server: SNA Resource Definition Reference
> 
>  for
> more information.
> Sense code 084E - IBM Documentation
> 
>
> I also reviewed Table 2 on this page, BIND image and response - IBM
> Documentation
> ,
> and most of the fields that I thought to update are listed as 'VTAM
> ignores or overrides application program's setting.'
>
> Here is the program that's establishing the session. It acquires the user
> control blocks necessary for terminal based tasks, and then executes the
> OPNDST macro. Again, any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>
> **-**
> ** PROGRAM : PORTDSPI  **
> ** AUTHOR  : BRIAN CHAPMAN **
> ** WRITTEN ON  : 23 AUGUST 2017**
> ** MODIFIED ON :   **
> ** ASM OPTIONS : RENT,REUS AMODE=31 RMODE=31 AC=0  **
> ** DESCRIPTION : TASK INITIALIZATION ROUTINE   **
> ** : THIS PROGRAM BUILDS THE INITIAL TASK RELATED  **
> ** : CONTROL BLOCKS FOR A NEW TASK TO BE DISPATCHED.   **
> **-**
> ** *
> * REGEQU   *
> **  *
> * COPY  PORTKERN   *
> * COPY  PORTDMH*
> * COPY  TASKANCH   *
> * COPY  SESSVTAM   *
> * COPY  SESSSOKT   *
> ** *
> * EJECT *
> * IFGRPL AM=VTAM  *
> * 

JES2 z22 model privileged resources

[rpinion865]

For z/OS 2.4, according to the SDSF JRI display, I see the following.

PREFIX=* DEST=(ALL) OWNER=* SYSNAME=

NP NAME NPrivMax NPrivUse NPrivUse% NPrivExhaust NPrivWarn% PrivSup ResPrivSup 
PrivMax PrivUse PrivUse%

BERT 20095 459 2 NO 80 ON ON 405 405 100

JOE 25257 1126 4 NO 80 ON ON 243 243 100

JQE 20308 1287 6 NO 80 ON ON 192 192 100

Spool 199932 7759 4 NO 80 ON ON 400 400 100

Which I interpret as saying the reserved resources are at 100%. Yet, the JES2 
command $DLIMITS displays the following.

Am I reading the SDSF JRI panel incorrectly?

-$DLIMITS

$HASP1490 LIMITS(1)

LIMITS(1)

PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

SPOOL PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

SPOOL UTILIZATION ON 9 NOV 2022 AT 15:06:44

-- NON-PRIVILEGED ---|--- PRIVILEGED

--

MAXIMUM WARN% IN-USE %| MAX AVAILABLE

199,932 80 7,758 4| 400 400

SPOOL EXHAUST: 12 MAY 2023 AT 22:17



$HASP1490 LIMITS(2)

LIMITS(2)

PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

JQE PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

JQE UTILIZATION ON 9 NOV 2022 AT 15:06:44

-- NON-PRIVILEGED ---|--- PRIVILEGED

--

MAXIMUM WARN% IN-USE %| MAX AVAILABLE

20,308 80 1,286 6| 192 192

JQE EXHAUST: 15 FEB 2023 AT 17:17



$HASP1490 LIMITS(3)

LIMITS(3)

PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

JOE PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

JOE UTILIZATION ON 9 NOV 2022 AT 15:06:44

-- NON-PRIVILEGED ---|--- PRIVILEGED

--

MAXIMUM WARN% IN-USE %| MAX AVAILABLE

25,257 80 1,126 4| 243 243

JOE EXHAUST: 20 FEB 2023 AT 01:13



$HASP1490 LIMITS(4)

LIMITS(4)

PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

BERT PRIVILEGE SUPPORT IS ON

BERT UTILIZATION ON 9 NOV 2022 AT 15:06:44

-- NON-PRIVILEGED --|--- PRIVILEGED

MAXIMUM WARN% IN-USE %| MAX AVAILABLE

20,095 80 458 2| 405 405

BERT EXHAUST: 21 SEP 2024 AT 16:16



Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Dcollect to Splunk

[James Cradesh]

Is it possible and any vendors supporting it?  Would like to get rid of SAS.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Dcollect to Splunk

[Andrew Rowley]

On 10/11/2022 8:27 am, James Cradesh wrote:

Is it possible and any vendors supporting it?  Would like to get rid of SAS.



It's not a released feature yet, but EasySMF:JE can convert Dcollect 
records to JSON for reporting with e.g. Splunk. Contact me direct if you 
would like to try it out.


--
Andrew Rowley
Black Hill Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Dcollect to Splunk

[Scott Barry]

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:27:21 -0600, James Cradesh  wrote:

>Is it possible and any vendors supporting it?  Would like to get rid of SAS.
>

To your last sentence, it will be most important to gain accurate insight about 
just how much SAS is being used, what component(s), features, 
functions/capabilities - very powerful to say the least.

One technique for "who is using SAS z/OS software" is to analyze SMF 14 
(DATASET OPEN FOR INPUT) data looking for allocations with DDNAME "SASHELP" and 
then go find the associated job, TSO-session owner, to learn more about their 
SAS scripts.

Scott Barry
SBBTech LLC

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Limiting quantity of tape drives used by user

[Mark Zelden]

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 05:42:56 -0600, Dave Jousma  wrote:

>I appreciate all the comments.   What I need though is an external control, 
>like thruput manager.   The developer that did this didnt even know they were 
>tape files.   So to expect them to code something is nice, and this person is 
>now in the know on the subject, and will be going forward.
>

And Thruput Manager is a bunch of JES2 exits with dynamic settings controlled
with JAL/DAL etc.   So one could code a JES2 exit / exits to address just this 
issue 
without purchasing ThruPut Manager. 

Best Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
mailto:m...@mzelden.com
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN