Re: Mainframer Lunch

2024-03-12 Thread Mike Schwab
https://community.ibm.com/community/user/integration/communities/globalgrouphome?CommunityKey=e22492ad-a425-4d88-b8af-19d978e58af5

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:41 PMwrote:
>
> Hey,
> I would like to have a LUNCH get together with any mainframer's in the 
> Indianapolis Indiana area.
> Maybe once a month?  If interested, let me know  ming...@prodigy.net
> David Mingee
> 317 903-9455
> Thanks
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Mainframer Lunch

2024-03-12 Thread
Hey,
I would like to have a LUNCH get together with any mainframer's in the 
Indianapolis Indiana area.
Maybe once a month?  If interested, let me know  ming...@prodigy.net 
David Mingee
317 903-9455
Thanks

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Rupert Reynolds
Worth checking DIGITS after function calls--I forget the exact
circumstances, but I remember a surprise return to defaults happened at
times.

Roops

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, 00:14 Charles Mills,  wrote:

> Well sure enough, a Say right after the NUMERIC DIGITS 15 works as
> expected.
>
> There are no other NUMERIC instructions in the program.
>
> What else could be messing me up?
>
> The program is not unusual. The most interesting thing is an EXECIO DISKR
> 1.
>
> Charles
>
>
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Sri Hari Kolusu
Charles,

Can you display the form just before you display the multiplied value?

say 'numeric form is : ' form()
say 8947 * 864


Thanks,
Kolusu



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Charles Mills
Well sure enough, a Say right after the NUMERIC DIGITS 15 works as expected.

There are no other NUMERIC instructions in the program.

What else could be messing me up?

The program is not unusual. The most interesting thing is an EXECIO DISKR 1.

Charles


On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:39:21 +0200, Itschak Mugzach 
 wrote:

>Charles,
>
>Tried it with 20, 12 and 11 numeric digits. All returned the correct number
>(7730208). Your problem may be related to numeric FORM.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:29:16 -0500, Charles Mills  wrote:
>
>(Why do I care? I am subsequently going to add a relatively small number to 
>the product and don't want to lose low-order digits.)
> 
Set DIGITS to (FSVO) enough.

>I tried using FORMAT but unless I use it in every subsequent calculation Rexx 
>goes back to scientific notation and I lose low order digits.
> 
Then use FORMAT() (only) to format output for display;

-- 
gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
Thanks, I think I see the issue now. Our BPXPRMXX member was not processed 
correctly at IPL time, leaving the "Address Family" settings incorrectly 
configured.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Charles,

Tried it with 20, 12 and 11 numeric digits. All returned the correct number
(7730208). Your problem may be related to numeric FORM.

Best,
ITschak

*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **|  *

*|* *Email**: i_mugz...@securiteam.co.il **|* *Mob**: +972 522 986404 **|*
*Skype**: ItschakMugzach **|* *Web**: www.Securiteam.co.il  **|*





On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 7:29 PM Charles Mills  wrote:

> In a Rexx program I start out by executing NUMERIC DIGITS 15 (and I have
> also tried 11 and 13 and gotten the same result).
>
> For 8947 * 864 I am getting a result of 7.73020800E+10 rather than the
> desired 7730208.
>
> Is this to be expected? I interpret the Rexx documentation as saying that
> a result is only converted to scientific notation when it exceeds NUMERIC
> DIGITS.
>
> Where am I going wrong? Or more to the point, how do I get the desired
> result?
>
> (Why do I care? I am subsequently going to add a relatively small number
> to the product and don't want to lose low-order digits.)
>
> I tried using FORMAT but unless I use it in every subsequent calculation
> Rexx goes back to scientific notation and I lose low order digits.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Sv: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Lars Höglund
Hmmm

 7 *-* NUMERIC DIGITS 11   
   >>>   "11"  
 8 *-* say digits()
   >>>   "11"  
11 
 9 *-* say 8947 * 864  
   >>>   "7730208" 
7730208
//Lasse

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  För Charles Mills
Skickat: den 12 mars 2024 18:29
Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ämne: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

In a Rexx program I start out by executing NUMERIC DIGITS 15 (and I have also 
tried 11 and 13 and gotten the same result).

For 8947 * 864 I am getting a result of 7.73020800E+10 rather than the 
desired 7730208.

Is this to be expected? I interpret the Rexx documentation as saying that a 
result is only converted to scientific notation when it exceeds NUMERIC DIGITS.

Where am I going wrong? Or more to the point, how do I get the desired result?

(Why do I care? I am subsequently going to add a relatively small number to the 
product and don't want to lose low-order digits.)

I tried using FORMAT but unless I use it in every subsequent calculation Rexx 
goes back to scientific notation and I lose low order digits.

Thanks,
Charles

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Charles Mills
In a Rexx program I start out by executing NUMERIC DIGITS 15 (and I have also 
tried 11 and 13 and gotten the same result).

For 8947 * 864 I am getting a result of 7.73020800E+10 rather than the 
desired 7730208.

Is this to be expected? I interpret the Rexx documentation as saying that a 
result is only converted to scientific notation when it exceeds NUMERIC DIGITS.

Where am I going wrong? Or more to the point, how do I get the desired result?

(Why do I care? I am subsequently going to add a relatively small number to the 
product and don't want to lose low-order digits.)

I tried using FORMAT but unless I use it in every subsequent calculation Rexx 
goes back to scientific notation and I lose low order digits.

Thanks,
Charles

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=errnojrs-description-location-information
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=errnojrs-zos-unix-reason-codes

For this one, the  part means JrOK, see return code (no additional 
information).

You can also use the bpxmtext program, which is available in both TSO and the 
Unix environment.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Peter Ten Eyck <04d3761a18a7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 8:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: EDC8114I Address family not supported

I am looking in https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/pdf/bpxa800_v2r4.pdf 
for information on this message:

EDC8114I Address family not supported. Errno/Rsn=1114/112B

I only see information for: 1114 EAFNOSUPPORT The address family is not 
supported. Where can I find out more, in particular about 112B?

Note: This message was created when attempting to start SYSLOGD.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Colin Paice
See https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/edc8114i-error-cause-concern

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/isklm-zos-will-not-start-correctly may be
relevant

Have you configured something with IPV6 and IP V6 is not enabled?

Colin

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 14:05, Peter Ten Eyck <
04d3761a18a7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> I am looking in
> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/pdf/bpxa800_v2r4.pdf for
> information on this message:
>
> EDC8114I Address family not supported. Errno/Rsn=1114/112B
>
> I only see information for: 1114 EAFNOSUPPORT The address family is not
> supported. Where can I find out more, in particular about 112B?
>
> Note: This message was created when attempting to start SYSLOGD.
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
I am looking in https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/pdf/bpxa800_v2r4.pdf 
for information on this message:

EDC8114I Address family not supported. Errno/Rsn=1114/112B  

I only see information for: 1114 EAFNOSUPPORT The address family is not 
supported. Where can I find out more, in particular about 112B?

Note: This message was created when attempting to start SYSLOGD.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN