FW: Syncsort TPF 2.1 with zPSaver problems

2016-01-29 Thread Klein, Kenneth E
From: Klein, Kenneth E
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Syncsort TPF 2.1 with zPSaver problems

We upgraded Syncsort to 2.1 late last year and have applied TPF 2.1 (what 
Syncsort calls a bundle of PTFs at a maintenance level). That comes with 
zPSaver but not enabled. In December we enabled it with a license key. We 
started having problems so more PTF's had to be applied. We recently tried 
again, and again had problems and need more PTF's. When it was running well on 
a Development LPAR it was offloading well over half of CPU cycles to zIIP!
Is any other shop out there having similar difficulties? They tell me the 
feature has been GA for over a year but I get conflicting answers when I try to 
find out how many shops have put it into production.

Kenneth (Ken) Klein
Technical Consultant II   Mainframe Governance



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SRB And Enclave SRB

2015-12-22 Thread Klein, Kenneth E
We just enabled zPSaver Suite on an LPAR on a z12 z/os 2.1 as a POC. We're 
getting 72.1 percent offloaded to zIIP on that LPAR. There's a little savings 
in IEBGENER, too, but too little to matter.

What I can't figure out is where the CPU time went, because I did NOT see the 
72.1 percent show up in the zIIP column. I know the specialty engines are not 
hamstrung like the 2827-H43-407 general purpose engines, but it looks the 1 
zIIP on the CEC is 4 times faster! Can that be true? Any form of reality check 
would be welcome here.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SRB And Enclave SRB

Go to http://www.syncsort.com/en/Products/Mainframe/ZPSaverSuite and see what 
we can do on z/IIP engines.  In a nutshell, we can offload about 90% of our 
normal TCB workload to a z/IIP engine, your mileage may vary depending on a 
number of things, but we can do an awful lot.  This has been a multi-year 
project by a number of very talented people.

Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Software Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SRB And Enclave SRB

On 6 Nov 2015 08:11:52 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>SRB's were not meant for general application code.  Also, I hope nobody builds 
>a quick and dirty SRB routine.  Those should be carefully constructed and 
>tested.
>If by quick and dirty you mean short lived, then yes, that was their original 
>use case.  Some SRB routines today are much more robust and can do significant 
>work, but that is what the z/IIP engines are for.

What is the work done on a Ziip engine?  As I understand other postings 
(possibly incorrectly) the work runs under an enclave SRB.
Java and XML parsing to my mind are application code.  I can't speak as to what 
type of code DF/Sort and Syncsort are running on Ziip and Zaap.

Clark Morris
>
>
>Chris Blaicher
>Technical Architect
>Software Development
>Syncsort Incorporated
>50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
>P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
>E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
>





ATTENTION: -

The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted with 
this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other confidential 
and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information contained in 
this message or in any files transmitted with this message is always 
confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior written 
approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
message in your possession, custody or control.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


supervisor state vs. problem state

2014-05-14 Thread Klein, Kenneth E
What is the general opinion out there on what portion of CPU cycles should be 
spent in supervisor state?
Is more than 50% a bad thing?
Could having a logical processor to physical processor ratio of greater than 2 
(e.g. 8 logicals in a 3 CP cec) be bad?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


supervisor state vs. problem state

2014-05-14 Thread Klein, Kenneth E
What is the general opinion out there on what portion of CPU cycles should be 
spent in supervisor state?
Is more than 50% a bad thing?
Could having a logical processor to physical processor ratio of greater than 2 
(e.g. 8 logicals in a 3 CP cec) be bad?
What is a reasonable rate for SIGP (Signal processor) instructions? Our rate is 
in the thousands.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Beyond the EC12

2014-04-25 Thread Klein, Kenneth E
Has anyone heard any good rumors about what will be coming out next year as the 
latest and greatest model?
z296?
Ec14?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN