AW: Re: CEEDUMP possible following 'new' failure
>Fault Analyzer showed that the last thing that happened in the address space >was trying to load some z/OS routines for termination (if it was not memory >termination then it must have been task termination) and failed to load those >routines because of an out of storage condition. I have in mind that, at least in earlier times, it was recommended *not* to code REGION=0M? With REGION=0M the code can to eat up all storage in the address space. Of course, authorized software may easily overcome any REGION setting (I guess). -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AW: Re: CEEDUMP possible following 'new' failure
>From some internal discussion after this issue was raised today, our intention is that LE will move the CEEDUMP modules to SCEELPA in the next release of z/OS. Didn't look up and didn't care so far, but now that you mention it, I'm astonished those modules are not currrently part of LE's LPA library. Could you please have another internal discussion :-) and provide list of the the LE recovery and dump modules which are not currently in LPA but should be? -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
