Re: Autorization Code Question
In 13124718-8ee3-4c31-8feb-bd43bc571...@comcast.net, on 04/28/2014 at 01:48 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said: I think my problem maybe that I am doing a LOAD DE= after the BLDL The DE may not be kosher for APF DE is fine. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Did a explicit load ep= And it didn't abend Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In 13124718-8ee3-4c31-8feb-bd43bc571...@comcast.net, on 04/28/2014 at 01:48 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said: I think my problem maybe that I am doing a LOAD DE= after the BLDL The DE may not be kosher for APF DE is fine. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
As the DE data starts after the BLDL header. On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:18:57 -0500 Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com wrote: :Perhaps you specified the DE information incorrectly? : : Walt : :On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:28:30 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net wrote: : :Did a explicit load ep= : :And it didn't abend : :Sent from my iPhone : : On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: : : In 13124718-8ee3-4c31-8feb-bd43bc571...@comcast.net, on 04/28/2014 : at 01:48 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said: : : I think my problem maybe that I am doing a LOAD DE= after the BLDL : : The DE may not be kosher for APF : : DE is fine. : : -- : Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT : :-- :For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
In 060650a7-d2a2-4313-8191-8f57c9a9b...@comcast.net, on 04/29/2014 at 07:28 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said: Did a explicit load ep= And it didn't abend I'm confused; I thought that you had successfully done a LOAD DE= but that it had an unexpected value in R1. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Load de ended with I believe CSV028I not in APF concatenation Sent from my iPhone On Apr 29, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In 060650a7-d2a2-4313-8191-8f57c9a9b...@comcast.net, on 04/29/2014 at 07:28 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said: Did a explicit load ep= And it didn't abend I'm confused; I thought that you had successfully done a LOAD DE= but that it had an unexpected value in R1. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
No, the module address is in R0. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400 From: hal9...@panix.com Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization Code Question: I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module is loaded and the high byte needs to be part of the address in AMODE31. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
But the AC code is in R1 I am getting a csv028i abend under TESTAUTH that the loaded module didn't come from a APF authorized lib I have 2 load lobs in steplib one is APF from PROGXX the other where the load module comes from is Authorized via setprog I abend after the load Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:42 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote: No, the module address is in R0. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400 From: hal9...@panix.com Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization Code Question: I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module is loaded and the high byte needs to be part of the address in AMODE31. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Yes I did Both libs in the steplib are APF auth One PROGXX one dynamic via setprog double checked the Dsn and vol as I know setprog doesn't do validity checking Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Question: Is this being run under a TSO session? If so, did you logoff and back on again after the SETPROG was done? Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 12:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded from an non-APF authorize data set Apparently this is the problem Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote: Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Hmm, that was my quick thought, the only other one that I could offer up is this, is the data set SMS, but in the PROGxx member it is specified with VOL(xx) or VOLUME(xx)? I think that can get you in trouble even if you specify the volume it is on. Last of all, does the MVS operator command, D PROG,APF show your data set in the list? Both data sets? I know, silly question, but sometimes when you do this and it does not show up, well, something that you thought was supposed to have work, did not. Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Yes I did Both libs in the steplib are APF auth One PROGXX one dynamic via setprog double checked the Dsn and vol as I know setprog doesn't do validity checking Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Question: Is this being run under a TSO session? If so, did you logoff and back on again after the SETPROG was done? Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 12:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded from an non-APF authorize data set Apparently this is the problem Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote: Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
I just had a thought I am running this under TSO does the loaded program have to be in the authcmd/AUTHPGM of IKJTSOxx parmlib Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Hmm, that was my quick thought, the only other one that I could offer up is this, is the data set SMS, but in the PROGxx member it is specified with VOL(xx) or VOLUME(xx)? I think that can get you in trouble even if you specify the volume it is on. Last of all, does the MVS operator command, D PROG,APF show your data set in the list? Both data sets? I know, silly question, but sometimes when you do this and it does not show up, well, something that you thought was supposed to have work, did not. Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Yes I did Both libs in the steplib are APF auth One PROGXX one dynamic via setprog double checked the Dsn and vol as I know setprog doesn't do validity checking Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Question: Is this being run under a TSO session? If so, did you logoff and back on again after the SETPROG was done? Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 12:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded from an non-APF authorize data set Apparently this is the problem Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote: Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Oh, I hate when I make an assumption, because I hate it when others do and it drags things off into a tangent. You are correct, depending on how you want to invoke it, it should be in the TSO AUTHCMD or AUTHPRG tables. Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 10:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question I just had a thought I am running this under TSO does the loaded program have to be in the authcmd/AUTHPGM of IKJTSOxx parmlib Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Hmm, that was my quick thought, the only other one that I could offer up is this, is the data set SMS, but in the PROGxx member it is specified with VOL(xx) or VOLUME(xx)? I think that can get you in trouble even if you specify the volume it is on. Last of all, does the MVS operator command, D PROG,APF show your data set in the list? Both data sets? I know, silly question, but sometimes when you do this and it does not show up, well, something that you thought was supposed to have work, did not. Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Yes I did Both libs in the steplib are APF auth One PROGXX one dynamic via setprog double checked the Dsn and vol as I know setprog doesn't do validity checking Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) ajn...@ufl.edu wrote: Question: Is this being run under a TSO session? If so, did you logoff and back on again after the SETPROG was done? Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 Information Technology University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 12:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded from an non-APF authorize data set Apparently this is the problem Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote: Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
I know. I was responding to Mr. Rosenberg's comment. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:15:40 -0400 From: michealb...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU But the AC code is in R1 I am getting a csv028i abend under TESTAUTH that the loaded module didn't come from a APF authorized lib I have 2 load lobs in steplib one is APF from PROGXX the other where the load module comes from is Authorized via setprog I abend after the load Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:42 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote: No, the module address is in R0. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400 From: hal9...@panix.com Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization Code Question: I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module is loaded and the high byte needs to be part of the address in AMODE31. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
I think my problem maybe that I am doing a LOAD DE= after the BLDL The DE may not be kosher for APF Authorization Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:43 PM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote: I know. I was responding to Mr. Rosenberg's comment. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:15:40 -0400 From: michealb...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU But the AC code is in R1 I am getting a csv028i abend under TESTAUTH that the loaded module didn't come from a APF authorized lib I have 2 load lobs in steplib one is APF from PROGXX the other where the load module comes from is Authorized via setprog I abend after the load Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:42 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote: No, the module address is in R0. === Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400 From: hal9...@panix.com Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization Code Question: I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module is loaded and the high byte needs to be part of the address in AMODE31. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Autorization Code Question
I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization Code Question: I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module is loaded and the high byte needs to be part of the address in AMODE31. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Autorization Code Question
Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded from an non-APF authorize data set Apparently this is the problem Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote: Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized. Jon Perryman. - Original Message - From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01' -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
