Re: (External):Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
Yes, HSM xCDS datasets can be RLS in the CF.  Unfortunately the process only 
sizes for CICS VSAM RLS and not for other VSAM files.  Unless the assumption is 
anything the CFSIZER calculates for RLS for CICS would apply to any other 
application using RLS - like HSM or Catalogs.  So I am working on RLS for these 
functions not the other functions like CRQ or ECS.

I have not checked to see if the new Common Migration Queue coming with z/OS 
V2.2 (I think) has been added yet.

Lizette


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of J O Skip Robinson
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 8:30 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: (External):Re: Coupling facility users
> 
> Lizette, I'm not sure what you're looking for. CF Sizer does calculations for
> 'Enhanced Catalog Sharing' and for 'DFSMShsm Common Recall Queue'. Is there
> some other function you're trying to size?
> 
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 626-302-7535 Office
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Coupling facility users
> 
> I have been waiting on some enhancements for CFSizer.
> It does not calculate for Catalog in CF or HSM Using RLS.
> 
> Lizette
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: (External):Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-19 Thread J O Skip Robinson
Lizette, I'm not sure what you're looking for. CF Sizer does calculations for 
'Enhanced Catalog Sharing' and for 'DFSMShsm Common Recall Queue'. Is there 
some other function you're trying to size?

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Coupling facility users

I have been waiting on some enhancements for CFSizer.
It does not calculate for Catalog in CF or HSM Using RLS.

Lizette


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
> On Behalf Of John Eells
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:37 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Coupling facility users
> 
> Roger Lowe wrote:
> 
> > Have a look at the CF Sizer tool -
> > http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/z/cfsizer/
> 
> 
> Now, why didn't I think of that?  (Too simple and direct, I suppose.)
> 
> Of course, that might well be a resource only for IBM exploiters of 
> the CF, and there are others.
> 
> --
> John Eells
> z/OS Technical Marketing
> IBM Poughkeepsie
> ee...@us.ibm.com
> 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
I have been waiting on some enhancements for CFSizer.
It does not calculate for Catalog in CF or HSM Using RLS.

Lizette


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of John Eells
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:37 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Coupling facility users
> 
> Roger Lowe wrote:
> 
> > Have a look at the CF Sizer tool -
> > http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/z/cfsizer/
> 
> 
> Now, why didn't I think of that?  (Too simple and direct, I suppose.)
> 
> Of course, that might well be a resource only for IBM exploiters of the CF, 
> and there
> are others.
> 
> --
> John Eells
> z/OS Technical Marketing
> IBM Poughkeepsie
> ee...@us.ibm.com
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-19 Thread John Eells

Roger Lowe wrote:


Have a look at the CF Sizer tool - 
http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/z/cfsizer/



Now, why didn't I think of that?  (Too simple and direct, I suppose.)

Of course, that might well be a resource only for IBM exploiters of the 
CF, and there are others.


--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-19 Thread Staller, Allan
Off the top of my head:
JES2 checkpoint
Vtam Generic resources
XCF signaling
GRS  (star vs. ring)
System logger (all functions)
Enhanced Catalog Sharing
VSAM Record Level Sharing

I am sure there are others (exclusive of DB2/MQ) that I have omitted.


HTH,


I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a 
coupling facility available.

I looked for a list, but couldn’t find a current one.
The current environment is:
z/OS v2.1
Basic sysplex – connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC’s One CEC Shared JES2 spool.
VTAM connectivity using same CTC’s used for basic sysplex.
GRS
Currently NO DB2 OR MQ.

What other components would benefit from a coupling facility?

I know of OPERLOG and Enhanced Catalog Sharing.







לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בע"מ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה 
(להלן : "החברה") וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, 
מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או 
שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף 
להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין 
להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי.

Please note that in accordance with Malam and/or its subsidiaries (hereinafter 
: "Malam") regulations and signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or 
representation is binding on the Malam, unless accompanied by a duly signed 
separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the Malam seal.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-18 Thread Timothy Sipples
As one more example, VSAM enjoys a 64-bit buffer pool when you configure a
monoplex or multiplex with a Coupling Facility, even if you're not
otherwise taking advantage of VSAM Record Level Sharing (RLS) features.
With a 64-bit buffer pool you could see VSAM-related performance
improvements even in the "simplest" environment with a single z/OS
instance.

However, to oversimplify slightly, the biggest, broadest category of
business benefits when implementing at least one Coupling Facility (even on
the same physical machine) is that a CF opens up myriad opportunities to
reduce or eliminate both planned and unplanned service interruptions.(*)
Even the most basic CF configuration, a z/OS monoplex with a CF, is enough
to run VSAM RLS and/or Transactional VSAM (DFSMStvs), for example. Those
technologies make it possible for multiple batch and online transactional
programs to access the same VSAM files concurrently, and that means
reducing or eliminating distinctions between "nighttime" and "daytime" so
that online systems can continue processing user requests (from the
Internet, mobile devices, etc.) around the clock instead of just during
"online hours."

Do you need to reduce or eliminate both planned and unplanned service
interruptions? That threshold question should not be considered in
isolation, by the way. I've seen many customers who think the answer is
"no," but then, sometimes even without the IT department's knowledge, they
have elaborate but "clunky" caching, message holding, file holding, and
other workarounds surrounding their core application and information
systems. That's just bad architecture, very expensive, and at least awkward
for the business users.

I should also point out that everybody with a z/OS license should be able
to implement one or more CFs any time they wish without even contacting
IBM. If you're running z/OS you have general purpose processors (CPs), and
CPs can run anything including the Coupling Facility control code provided
with every IBM z System machine at no additional charge. Especially with CF
thin interrupts enabled (recommended), you can forge ahead, now -- and
assuming also you can allocate a bit of memory to a CF LPAR. Your z/OS
license also includes many, many CF exploiters, and I cannot think of any
occasion when IBM's license doesn't include CF exploitation. (A very few
non-IBM software vendors require an additional license for their CF
exploiters.) If the exploitation technically exists, you should be licensed
for it already. However, if your CF workloads are "non-trivial," it is
financially prudent (though not technically required) to invest in one or
more CF engines (ICFs) to run your CF instance(s) instead of using your CP
capacity.

You do not need cabling unless you're adding a physically separate machine.
The connections on the same machine are via IC links. Server Time Protocol
(STP) is optional, though I recommend STP for just about everyone with or
without a CF.

It wouldn't be surprising, Gadi, if you have a score or more of z/OS and
middleware technologies that could exploit a CF. Exactly which ones you
turn on, and why, and in support of which particular business application
services, will vary, of course.

(*) In the recent past there was also often a financial benefit if you
implemented at least one CF. At least one CF was a prerequisite if (a) you
had two or more physical machines, (b) you ran workloads on two or more
machines during normal operations, (c) those machines were physically
located "close enough" to form a Parallel Sysplex, and (d) you wanted to
take advantage of aggregated Sysplex software pricing. However, this year
(2015) IBM introduced Country Multiple Pricing (CMP). The Sysplex
aggregation rules no longer apply if you switch to CMP.


Timothy Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-18 Thread Chris Hoelscher
CA-IDMS will exploit coupling facility features if desired (shared buffers 
between environments, and datasharing groups)

Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect 
Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services

123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
(502) 714-8615
(502) 476-2538

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-18 Thread Roger Lowe
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:25:04 +0300, גדי בן אבי  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a 
>coupling facility available.
>
>I looked for a list, but couldn�t find a current one.
>The current environment is:
>z/OS v2.1
>Basic sysplex � connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC�s
>One CEC
>Shared JES2 spool.
>VTAM connectivity using same CTC�s used for basic sysplex.
>GRS
>Currently NO DB2 OR MQ.
>
>What other components would benefit from a coupling facility?
>
>I know of OPERLOG and Enhanced Catalog Sharing.
>Anything else?
>
>Is there a list somewhere of all of the z/OS fucntions.
>
>Thanks
>
>Gadi
>
Have a look at the CF Sizer tool - 
http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/z/cfsizer/

Roger

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Coupling facility users

2015-10-18 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2015-10-18 o 12:25, גדי בן אבי pisze:

Hi,

I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a 
coupling facility available.

I looked for a list, but couldn’t find a current one.
The current environment is:
z/OS v2.1
Basic sysplex – connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC’s
One CEC
Shared JES2 spool.
VTAM connectivity using same CTC’s used for basic sysplex.
GRS
Currently NO DB2 OR MQ.

What other components would benefit from a coupling facility?

I know of OPERLOG and Enhanced Catalog Sharing.
Anything else?

Is there a list somewhere of all of the z/OS fucntions.


Short answer is PARALLEL SYSPLEX.
Better GRS
VSAM RLS
DB2 buffers
RACF structure (read RACF db in memory)
etc.
etc.

If you are using basic syplex then Parallel Sysplex is obvious 
enhancement. However even single MVS image with CF can have some 
benefits (RLS at least).


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osb trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzib w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorcw KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2015 r. kapita zakadowy mBanku S.A. (w caoci 
wpacony) wynosi 168.840.228 zotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Coupling facility users

2015-10-18 Thread גדי בן אבי
Hi,

I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a 
coupling facility available.

I looked for a list, but couldn’t find a current one.
The current environment is:
z/OS v2.1
Basic sysplex – connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC’s
One CEC
Shared JES2 spool.
VTAM connectivity using same CTC’s used for basic sysplex.
GRS
Currently NO DB2 OR MQ.

What other components would benefit from a coupling facility?

I know of OPERLOG and Enhanced Catalog Sharing.
Anything else?

Is there a list somewhere of all of the z/OS fucntions.

Thanks

Gadi






לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בע"מ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה 
(להלן : "החברה") וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה, 
מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו החברה או 
שמה המודפס ובצירוף חותמת החברה. בהעדר מסמך כאמור (לרבות מסמך סרוק) המצורף 
להודעת דואר אלקטרוני זאת, אין לראות באמור בהודעה אלא משום טיוטה לדיון, ואין 
להסתמך עליה לביצוע פעולה עסקית או משפטית כלשהי.

Please note that in accordance with Malam and/or its subsidiaries (hereinafter 
: "Malam") regulations and signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or 
representation is binding on the Malam, unless accompanied by a duly signed 
separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the Malam seal.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN