Re: FW: FRR Clarification One More Thing I forgot

2017-02-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen 
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:19:24 -0500 Joe Reichman  wrote:

:>* Also a ESATE only covers an RB while a FRR cover a TCB

What does that mean?

The RB cannot change while the FRB is providing protection as that requires an
SVC.

--
Binyamin Dissen 
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

FW: FRR Clarification One More Thing I forgot

2017-02-11 Thread Joe Reichman 
 

 

From: Joe Reichman [mailto:reichman...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:16 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' 
Subject: FRR Clarification 

 

Hi,

 

When trying to cover my code I always choose an FRR If I am in Supervisor
State

 

*   Always get an SDWA

 

*   Would get control before an ESTAE

 

*   Also a ESATE only covers an RB while a FRR cover a TCB

 

 

 

So If I'm In  SRB mode I have no choice in task mode I can code EUT=YES.
However now looking over the Doc "Once a program activates an EUT FRR it
cannot issue an SVC's"  

 

So while SETFRR is providing coverage the program cant issue any SVC's?  

 

  

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN