Re: new version of DAF?

2015-02-27 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
4ee2851a2279b94cb70cd69b17410609fc672...@s1flokydce2kx01.dm0001.info53.com,
on 02/25/2015
   at 03:47 PM, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com said:

** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 11831+ 4,SMF must be numeric in
GFSAUSMF  

Add a comma to the invocation of GFSAUSMF?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: (was) A new version of DAF? No, the Millionth!

2015-02-26 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:

How about the millionth DAF?
Yesterday the millionth DAF truck rolled off the assembly line:
http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/02/25/prime-minister-rutte-unveils-millionth-daf-truck/

Amazing.

Can you drive that DAF (hardware one), over SMF, dasd, etc? ;-D

Or, how many z/OS machines can one DAF carry? ;-D

Ok, I'm trucking away... before the authors of DAF (software) drive over me...

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


new version of DAF?

2015-02-25 Thread Jousma, David
All,

Just brought my z/OS 1.13 system up to current maintenance.  Interestingly, DAF 
now abends with a 0C4.   Tried reassembling it on latest macros, and that fails 
too.  Looks like something changed in macro GFSAUSMF.

  11826+*
DESERV -- mapped by ICHRUTKN  @26A
  11827  AGO   .NODFSMS1
  11828 .NODFSMS1  ANOP
  11829  AIF   ('ST_DFSMS07' NE 
'YES').NODFSMS071 new in DFSMS 1.2
  11830  GFSAUSMF  SMF 
RT 42 ST 7
** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 11831+ 4,SMF must be numeric in GFSAUSMF  
01-GFSAU
  11832+*
  11833+*
 SMF Records
   PAGE  193
  ACTIVE USINGS: NONE
D-LOC  OBJECT CODEADDR1 ADDR2  STMT   SOURCE STATEMENT  
HLASM R6.0  2015/02/25 10.37
  
11834+
  11835+* Header for SMF record type 42 
should be used from  IGWSMF   @02C
  
11836+
  11837+*

_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.
It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this 
e-mail in error,
please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.  If you are not the 
intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information
is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender 
that the 
message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer 
system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: new version of DAF?

2015-02-25 Thread Bob Rutledge

On 2/25/2015 10:47 AM, Jousma, David wrote:

All,

Just brought my z/OS 1.13 system up to current maintenance.  Interestingly, DAF 
now abends with a 0C4.   Tried reassembling it on latest macros, and that fails 
too.  Looks like something changed in macro GFSAUSMF.

   11826+*
DESERV -- mapped by ICHRUTKN  @26A
   11827  AGO   .NODFSMS1
   11828 .NODFSMS1  ANOP
   11829  AIF   ('ST_DFSMS07' NE 
'YES').NODFSMS071 new in DFSMS 1.2
   11830  GFSAUSMF  SMF 
RT 42 ST 7
** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 11831+ 4,SMF must be numeric in GFSAUSMF  
01-GFSAU
   11832+*
   11833+*
  SMF Records   
PAGE  193
   ACTIVE USINGS: NONE
D-LOC  OBJECT CODEADDR1 ADDR2  STMT   SOURCE STATEMENT  
HLASM R6.0  2015/02/25 10.37
   
11834+
   11835+* Header for SMF record type 42 
should be used from  IGWSMF   @02C
   
11836+

   11837+*

OA41861 added parameters to the macro and SMF isn't one of the allowable ones. 
 As was taught to me over 45 years ago, it's a really good idea to code a ',' 
in the absence of operands in assembler statements because you never know who's 
going to change what.  If you do so now to the line generating the error


 GFSAUSMF ,SMF RT 42 ST 7

it looks like it's going to generate the same definitions as it used to.  If 
not, sing out and I'll take a closer look at it.


Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: new version of DAF?

2015-02-25 Thread Jousma, David
Well, that helped, but I think we need Michael to take a look at his code:

0198EA 0700   89802+ CNOP  0,4  
01-CALL
0198EC 47F0 B11C198F4 89803+ B *+8  
 BRANCH AROUND VCON 01-CALL
0198F0    89804+IHB8321B DCV(DAFMB) 
 ENTRY POINT ADDRESS01-CALL
0198F4 4110 AFF800FF8 89809+ LA1,W_WRK  
 LOAD PARAMETER REG 1   03-IHBIN   
0198F8 41E0 B57019D48 89810+ LA14,=C'ITE='
PICKUP PARAMETER  02-IHBOP   
0198FC  0 89811+ LA15,SMF82ITE
PICKUP PARAMETER  02-IHBOP   
** ASMA044E UNDEFINED SYMBOL - SMF82ITE 
   
** ASMA435I RECORD 268 IN SYS1.MACLIB(IHBOPLTX) ON VOLUME: RST01A   
   
019900 4100 00044 89812+ LA0,4
PICKUP PARAMETER  02-IHBOP   
019904 90E0 10000 89813+ STM   14,0,0(1)
 STORE INTO PARAM. LIST 02-IHBOP   
019908 58F0 B118198F0 89814+ L 15,IHB8321B  
 LOAD 15 WITH ENTRY ADR 01-CALL
01990C 05EF   89815+ BALR  14,15
 BRANCH TO ENTRY POINT  01-CALL
  89816  CALL  DAFMB,  Move 
Binary Comment X   
   (=C'IML=',SMF82IML,4), 
Maximum data length  X   

_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MIĀ  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: new version of DAF?

On 2/25/2015 10:47 AM, Jousma, David wrote:
 All,

 Just brought my z/OS 1.13 system up to current maintenance.  Interestingly, 
 DAF now abends with a 0C4.   Tried reassembling it on latest macros, and that 
 fails too.  Looks like something changed in macro GFSAUSMF.

11826+*
 DESERV -- mapped by ICHRUTKN  @26A
11827  AGO   .NODFSMS1
11828 .NODFSMS1  ANOP
11829  AIF   ('ST_DFSMS07' NE 
 'YES').NODFSMS071 new in DFSMS 1.2
11830  GFSAUSMF  
 SMF RT 42 ST 7
 ** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 11831+ 4,SMF must be numeric in 
 GFSAUSMF  01-GFSAU
11832+*
11833+*
   SMF Records 
   PAGE  193
ACTIVE USINGS: NONE
 D-LOC  OBJECT CODEADDR1 ADDR2  STMT   SOURCE STATEMENT
   HLASM R6.0  2015/02/25 10.37

 11834+
11835+* Header for SMF record type 42 
 should be used from  IGWSMF   @02C

 11836+
 
11837+*

OA41861 added parameters to the macro and SMF isn't one of the allowable 
ones. 
  As was taught to me over 45 years ago, it's a really good idea to code a ',' 
in the absence of operands in assembler statements because you never know who's 
going to change what.  If you do so now to the line generating the error

  GFSAUSMF ,SMF RT 42 ST 7

it looks like it's going to generate the same definitions as it used to.  If 
not, sing out and I'll take a closer look at it.

Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply

(was) A new version of DAF? No, the Millionth!

2015-02-25 Thread Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
How about the millionth DAF?
Yesterday the millionth DAF truck rolled off the assembly line:
http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/02/25/prime-minister-rutte-unveils-millionth-daf-truck/

Kees.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jousma, David
Sent: 25 February, 2015 16:48
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: new version of DAF?

All,

Just brought my z/OS 1.13 system up to current maintenance.  Interestingly, DAF 
now abends with a 0C4.   Tried reassembling it on latest macros, and that fails 
too.  Looks like something changed in macro GFSAUSMF.

  11826+*
DESERV -- mapped by ICHRUTKN  @26A
  11827  AGO   .NODFSMS1
  11828 .NODFSMS1  ANOP
  11829  AIF   ('ST_DFSMS07' NE 
'YES').NODFSMS071 new in DFSMS 1.2
  11830  GFSAUSMF  SMF 
RT 42 ST 7
** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 11831+ 4,SMF must be numeric in GFSAUSMF  
01-GFSAU
  11832+*
  11833+*
 SMF Records
   PAGE  193
  ACTIVE USINGS: NONE
D-LOC  OBJECT CODEADDR1 ADDR2  STMT   SOURCE STATEMENT  
HLASM R6.0  2015/02/25 10.37
  
11834+
  11835+* Header for SMF record type 42 
should be used from  IGWSMF   @02C
  
11836+
  11837+*

_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.
It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this 
e-mail in error,
please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.  If you are not the 
intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information
is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender 
that the 
message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer 
system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN