Re: 回复: Does OSA Express2 Ethernet supp ort zVM layer2 mode

2009-09-22 Thread David Boyes
The earlier OSAs had special code to enable IPv6. I (and many others, I’m sure) 
screamed at IBM that having them in the loop of OSA firmware protocol support 
for every possible protocol that someone was going to need was unsustainable, 
which resulted in the layer 2 support.

If you’re doing this long term, then get layer 2 support working.  If you just 
need to throw a IPv6-enabled guest up for testing purposes, you don’t need to 
get layer 2 working for IPv6 if you have up-to-date OSA microcode.

Wrt to dedicated vs VSWITCH, use VSWITCH if you possibly can. Isolates you from 
the weirdnesses of the various OSAs, and the impact of the extra code is 
minimal.


Actually, I was also trying to configure this linux guest using dedicate OSA 
devices in stead of vswitch.  Does it still need layer2?  Thanks!
Anson Y.


Re: 回复: Does OSA Express2 Ethernet supp ort zVM layer2 mode

2009-09-22 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 09/22/2009 at 11:34 EDT, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net 
wrote:
 Wrt to dedicated vs VSWITCH, use VSWITCH if you possibly can. Isolates 
you from 
 the weirdnesses of the various OSAs, and the impact of the extra code is 

 minimal. 

I don't know about weirdness, but in practical terms it eliminates the 
need to run a dynamic routing daemon in each Linux guest simply to handle 
OSA/cable/port/switch failures.  The VSWITCH handles it all without 
bothering the guest.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott