LISTFILE Order

2007-08-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
I have 4 files on a disk. When I enter the command LISTFILE * * D, the
result seems to be out of the expected order.

pipe cms l * * d (noh alldates | sort | cons 
PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:00:00 
PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:18:20 
PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:20:20 
PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:30:20 
 
l * * d 
PMR18561 TRACE2   D1 
PMR18561 TRACE3   D1 
PMR18561 TRACE4   D1 
PMR18561 TRACE1   D1  

l * * d (alldates
FILENAME FILETYPE FM CREATE-DT CREATE-TM  LREF-DT UPDATE-DT UPDATE-TM
PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:18:20 
PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:20:20 
PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:30:20 
PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:00:00



Notice that all have the same filename and each has what should be a
sequence number appended to the word TRACE. Also note that the
timestamps are in the same order as the sequence numbers. The list
sorted by PIPE is in the order I expected from LISTFILE; instead, the
TRACE1 file is moved to the bottom of the heap. 

What is happening here?
Regards, 
Richard Schuh 




Re: LISTFILE Order

2007-08-28 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
You need to reaccess the disk.  The FAT (FST) will be changed then.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:47 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: LISTFILE Order



I have 4 files on a disk. When I enter the command LISTFILE * *
D, the result seems to be out of the expected order.



pipe cms l * * d (noh alldates | sort | cons


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

 

l * * d 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1


PMR18561 TRACE3   D1


PMR18561 TRACE4   D1


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1  

l * * d (alldates


FILENAME FILETYPE FM CREATE-DT CREATE-TM  LREF-DT UPDATE-DT
UPDATE-TM

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00



Notice that all have the same filename and each has what should
be a sequence number appended to the word TRACE. Also note that the
timestamps are in the same order as the sequence numbers. The list
sorted by PIPE is in the order I expected from LISTFILE; instead, the
TRACE1 file is moved to the bottom of the heap. 

What is happening here?

Regards,
Richard Schuh


This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or 
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the 
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, 
this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment 
products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any 
transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable 
law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) 
traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each 
sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, 
supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are 
located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This 
message is subject to terms available at the following link: 
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch you 
consent to the foregoing.



Re: LISTFILE Order

2007-08-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
Thanks. That worked.

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: LISTFILE Order

 

You need to reaccess the disk.  The FAT (FST) will be changed then.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:47 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: LISTFILE Order

I have 4 files on a disk. When I enter the command LISTFILE * *
D, the result seems to be out of the expected order.

pipe cms l * * d (noh alldates | sort | cons


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

 

l * * d 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1


PMR18561 TRACE3   D1


PMR18561 TRACE4   D1


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1  

l * * d (alldates


FILENAME FILETYPE FM CREATE-DT CREATE-TM  LREF-DT UPDATE-DT
UPDATE-TM

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00

Notice that all have the same filename and each has what should
be a sequence number appended to the word TRACE. Also note that the
timestamps are in the same order as the sequence numbers. The list
sorted by PIPE is in the order I expected from LISTFILE; instead, the
TRACE1 file is moved to the bottom of the heap. 

What is happening here?

Regards,
Richard Schuh 



This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically
indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any
investment products or other financial product or service, an official
confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill
Lynch. Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and
retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The
laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of
EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other
than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms
available at the following link:
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill
Lynch you consent to the foregoing.



 



Re: LISTFILE Order

2007-08-28 Thread Kris Buelens
LISTFILE always produces a sorted output for R/O minidisk only.  Your D-disk
must have been R/W.

2007/8/28, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Thanks. That worked.



 Regards,
 Richard Schuh


  --

 *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
 Behalf Of *Stracka, James (GTI)
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:52 AM
 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: LISTFILE Order



 You need to reaccess the disk.  The FAT (FST) will be changed then.

 -Original Message-
 *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
 Behalf Of *Schuh, Richard
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:47 PM
 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 *Subject:* LISTFILE Order

 I have 4 files on a disk. When I enter the command LISTFILE * * D, the
 result seems to be out of the expected order.

 pipe cms l * * d (noh alldates | sort | cons

 PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:00:00

 PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:18:20

 PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:20:20

 PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:30:20



 l * * d

 PMR18561 TRACE2   D1

 PMR18561 TRACE3   D1

 PMR18561 TRACE4   D1

 PMR18561 TRACE1   D1

 l * * d (alldates

 FILENAME FILETYPE FM CREATE-DT CREATE-TM  LREF-DT UPDATE-DT UPDATE-TM

 PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:18:20

 PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:20:20

 PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:30:20

 PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07  18:00:00


 Notice that all have the same filename and each has what should be a
 sequence number appended to the word TRACE. Also note that the timestamps
 are in the same order as the sequence numbers. The list sorted by PIPE is
 in the order I expected from LISTFILE; instead, the TRACE1 file is moved to
 the bottom of the heap.

 What is happening here?

 Regards,
 Richard Schuh

   --

 This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
 proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
 sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated,
 this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment
 products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of
 any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to
 applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain
 e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of
 the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC
 may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country
 in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
 error-free. This message is subject to terms available at the following
 link: http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill
 Lynch you consent to the foregoing.
   --






-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: LISTFILE Order

2007-08-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
Yes, it was. It is a temporary V-disk.. 

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: LISTFILE Order

 

LISTFILE always produces a sorted output for R/O minidisk only.  Your
D-disk must have been R/W.

2007/8/28, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

Thanks. That worked.

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: LISTFILE Order

 

You need to reaccess the disk.  The FAT (FST) will be changed then.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:47 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: LISTFILE Order

I have 4 files on a disk. When I enter the command LISTFILE * *
D, the result seems to be out of the expected order.

pipe cms l * * d (noh alldates | sort | cons


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

 

l * * d 

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1


PMR18561 TRACE3   D1


PMR18561 TRACE4   D1


PMR18561 TRACE1   D1  

l * * d (alldates


FILENAME FILETYPE FM CREATE-DT CREATE-TM  LREF-DT UPDATE-DT
UPDATE-TM

PMR18561 TRACE2   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:18:20 

PMR18561 TRACE3   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:20:20 

PMR18561 TRACE4   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:30:20 

PMR18561 TRACE1   D1- - - 08/28/07
18:00:00

Notice that all have the same filename and each has what should
be a sequence number appended to the word TRACE. Also note that the
timestamps are in the same order as the sequence numbers. The list
sorted by PIPE is in the order I expected from LISTFILE; instead, the
TRACE1 file is moved to the bottom of the heap. 

What is happening here?

Regards,
Richard Schuh 



This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically
indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any
investment products or other financial product or service, an official
confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill
Lynch. Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and
retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The
laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of
EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other
than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms
available at the following link:
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/ . By messaging with Merrill
Lynch you consent to the foregoing.



 




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support