Sunsetting a 9221

2008-02-18 Thread Roland P. Chung
Hello Listers, my customer is sunsetting a 9221-200 with a
bank of 9343's emulating 20 3390's. I can think of 3 ways
to erase the data from the DASDs:

1) using ICKDSF to TRKFMT them with ERASEDATA parameter;
(yeah... very time consuming and CPOWN packs - 4 of them -
will be using standalone ICKDSF...)

2) borrow a very power industrial grade magnet (must
protect the other recording devices in the computer room.
Ummm...);

3) use a 10-LB slug hammer (very quick but messy).

Do you guys have better suggesions?

Thanks a lot in advance.

...Roland


Re: Sunsetting a 9221

2008-02-18 Thread Edward M. Martin
Hello Roland,

If you are going to re-sell them, then 1 is the best.  If you
want to ensure that no one will ever see the data and you are not going
to re-sell them use 2 and 3 and shred them.

Take a look at the archives.  Lots of people have talked about
what needs to be done.

What level are you required?

Ed Martin
330-588-4723
ext 40441

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:18 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Sunsetting a 9221

Hello Listers, my customer is sunsetting a 9221-200 with a
bank of 9343's emulating 20 3390's. I can think of 3 ways
to erase the data from the DASDs:

1) using ICKDSF to TRKFMT them with ERASEDATA parameter;
(yeah... very time consuming and CPOWN packs - 4 of them -
will be using standalone ICKDSF...)

2) borrow a very power industrial grade magnet (must
protect the other recording devices in the computer room.
Ummm...);

3) use a 10-LB slug hammer (very quick but messy).

Do you guys have better suggesions?

Thanks a lot in advance.

...Roland