follow-up Help with verifying a PTF
I installed PTF UM31742 manually and got the same results. i.e, the IOCP utility still says it is Rel./Ver. 1.2 Guess I'll call IBM on Monday. Steve G. Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2006 03:45 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Help with verifying a PTF Yepper, you are correct: APAR Identifier .. VM63921 Last Changed 06/04/28 IOCP NEW FUNCTION Symptom .. NF NFStatus ... CLOSED UR1 Severity ... 4 Date Closed . 06/04/27 Component .. 568411201 Duplicate of Reported Release . 520 Fixed Release 999 Component Name VM CMSSpecial Notice Current Target Date ..06/04/19 Flags SCP ... Platform Status Detail: SHIPMENT - Packaged solution is available for shipment. PE PTF List: PTF List: Release 440 : UM31740 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 510 : UM31741 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 520 : UM31742 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) On 6/9/06 4:36 PM, Steve Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UM31740
Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF
Steve, Whatever process you used ... verify that the *new* IOCP MODULE has been placed on the "S-Disk" ... and that you re-saved CMS after you moved it (and probably other components) to the S-Disk. JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve GentrySent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:10 AMTo: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF I installed PTF UM31742 manually and got the same results. i.e, the IOCP utility still says it is Rel./Ver. 1.2 Guess I'll call IBM on Monday. Steve G. Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2006 03:45 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject: Re: Help with verifying a PTFYepper, you are correct:APAR Identifier .. VM63921 Last Changed 06/04/28IOCP NEW FUNCTIONSymptom .. NF NF Status ... CLOSED UR1Severity ... 4 Date Closed . 06/04/27Component .. 568411201 Duplicate of Reported Release . 520 Fixed Release 999Component Name VM CMS Special NoticeCurrent Target Date ..06/04/19 FlagsSCP ...Platform Status Detail: SHIPMENT - Packaged solution is available for shipment.PE PTF List:PTF List:Release 440 : UM31740 available 06/04/28 (1000 )Release 510 : UM31741 available 06/04/28 (1000 )Release 520 : UM31742 available 06/04/28 (1000 )On 6/9/06 4:36 PM, "Steve Gentry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:UM31740
Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF
I have verified this. I have access to 2 VM 5.2 systems. I installed this fix using SERVICE and PUT2PROD on one VM. On the other, I did it the manual way. Further, there appears to be 6 modules involved. IOCP.MODULE ICPPCNTL.MODULE IOPPCNTL.MODULE IXPPCNTL.MODULE IZPPCNTL.MODULE IYPPCNTL.MODULE I have an EXEC that will take a module and break it down into 72 byte records. When I edit the file I created, I scan for VERS (short for version) and I see 1.2. The other thing is that at the end of the modules is the PTF name/number. In all cases, it is UM31742, which is supposed to be the one for 5.2 I've crossed checked myself about 5 different ways to be sure. Yes, I could have still missed something. The IOCP utility isn't a big deal. My concern is I downloaded about 10 other ptfs that were z9 VM 5.2 related and now I'm a little concerned whether any of those are correct. I hope I've over looked something. Steve Imler, Steven J [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/10/2006 09:37 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF Steve, Whatever process you used ... verify that the *new* IOCP MODULE has been placed on the S-Disk ... and that you re-saved CMS after you moved it (and probably other components) to the S-Disk. JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gentry Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:10 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF I installed PTF UM31742 manually and got the same results. i.e, the IOCP utility still says it is Rel./Ver. 1.2 Guess I'll call IBM on Monday. Steve G. Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2006 03:45 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Help with verifying a PTF Yepper, you are correct: APAR Identifier .. VM63921 Last Changed 06/04/28 IOCP NEW FUNCTION Symptom .. NF NFStatus ... CLOSED UR1 Severity ... 4 Date Closed . 06/04/27 Component .. 568411201 Duplicate of Reported Release . 520 Fixed Release 999 Component Name VM CMSSpecial Notice Current Target Date ..06/04/19 Flags SCP ... Platform Status Detail: SHIPMENT - Packaged solution is available for shipment. PE PTF List: PTF List: Release 440 : UM31740 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 510 : UM31741 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 520 : UM31742 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) On 6/9/06 4:36 PM, Steve Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UM31740
Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF
The z9 box is a(n) m/t 2096. What got this started is when I tried to 'compile' using the IOCP util. shipped version of 5.2, It didn't like the SYSTEM param of 2096. That plus some other things that are either unique to a 2096 or a ds8100. I got a bunch of errors. After installing UM31742, I'm still getting the same errors. Steve Imler, Steven J [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/10/2006 10:17 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF Hmm ... maybe IBM didn't change the Version, Release identifier with the PTF ... only the functionality? I suppose you will have to wait for one of the IBMers to confirm this, but it sounds like you have installed everything correctly; and, have placed the updated components in production. JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gentry Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:59 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF I have verified this. I have access to 2 VM 5.2 systems. I installed this fix using SERVICE and PUT2PROD on one VM. On the other, I did it the manual way. Further, there appears to be 6 modules involved. IOCP.MODULE ICPPCNTL.MODULE IOPPCNTL.MODULE IXPPCNTL.MODULE IZPPCNTL.MODULE IYPPCNTL.MODULE I have an EXEC that will take a module and break it down into 72 byte records. When I edit the file I created, I scan for VERS (short for version) and I see 1.2. The other thing is that at the end of the modules is the PTF name/number. In all cases, it is UM31742, which is supposed to be the one for 5.2 I've crossed checked myself about 5 different ways to be sure. Yes, I could have still missed something. The IOCP utility isn't a big deal. My concern is I downloaded about 10 other ptfs that were z9 VM 5.2 related and now I'm a little concerned whether any of those are correct. I hope I've over looked something. Steve Imler, Steven J [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/10/2006 09:37 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF Steve, Whatever process you used ... verify that the *new* IOCP MODULE has been placed on the S-Disk ... and that you re-saved CMS after you moved it (and probably other components) to the S-Disk. JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gentry Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:10 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: follow-up Help with verifying a PTF I installed PTF UM31742 manually and got the same results. i.e, the IOCP utility still says it is Rel./Ver. 1.2 Guess I'll call IBM on Monday. Steve G. Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2006 03:45 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Help with verifying a PTF Yepper, you are correct: APAR Identifier .. VM63921 Last Changed 06/04/28 IOCP NEW FUNCTION Symptom .. NF NFStatus ... CLOSED UR1 Severity ... 4 Date Closed . 06/04/27 Component .. 568411201 Duplicate of Reported Release . 520 Fixed Release 999 Component Name VM CMSSpecial Notice Current Target Date ..06/04/19 Flags SCP ... Platform Status Detail: SHIPMENT - Packaged solution is available for shipment. PE PTF List: PTF List: Release 440 : UM31740 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 510 : UM31741 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) Release 520 : UM31742 available 06/04/28 (1000 ) On 6/9/06 4:36 PM, Steve Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UM31740
