Re: [id-android] A look back at Samsung's Galaxy S lineup
Mungkin karena sudah beda series. I7500 disebut hanya karena sebagai android pertamanya Samsung...the allfather of galaxy. On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, 07:55 Defriando Riza, wrote: > fyi.. > Too bad, spica not mentioned.. Padahal pada saat itu (10 years ago), > member spica 'bersaing' sama Motorola fans dgn milestone-nya disini > > Ayo.. Tunjuk tangan member spica (spicers) > > Earlier this week, Samsung officially announced the Galaxy S10 (and S10+), > the company's latest and greatest Android flagship. Somewhat obviously, the > S10 is also the tenth-generation Galaxy S, which means it's been ten years > since the very first Galaxy handset. Considering this momentous occasion, > we thought we'd take a look back at the history of the Galaxy S line and > see just how far Samsung has come in the past decade. > > > > Prologue: Samsung Galaxy i7500 > >  > > Before we dive into the Galaxy S series, we need to mention the Samsung > Galaxy i7500, the company's first-ever Android phone (It shipped with > Android 1.5 Cupcake). It debuted ten years ago in 2009, and at that point, > the only other company making Android handsets was HTC, so it didn't really > have a lot of competition. Though it had a 3.2-inch AMOLED display with a > 320 by 480 resolution, 8GB of storage and a 5-megapixel camera (decent > specs for its time), it had a pretty dull and uninspiring design. Just like > a lot of other phones then, it even had physical navigation buttons, > complete with Start Call and End Call keys. Oh, how times have changed. > > Samsung Galaxy S > >  > > The Samsung Galaxy S, introduced in 2010, was a lot more appealing. Gone > was that array of physical keys; now it had just a single home button, > along with a touch-sensitive menu button on the left and a back button on > the right. It's a design motif that it (and a lot of other Android phones) > would return to, time and time again. The Galaxy S had a 4-inch Super > AMOLED screen and a 480 by 800 resolution that plenty of people found > pretty impressive. Oh, and this was also the first Android phone to ship > with TouchWiz, Samsung's proprietary UI. It helped Samsung stand out from > the rest of the Android market, but TouchWiz also added a lot of > unnecessary bloat, which sometimes made the phone sluggish. > > Samsung Galaxy S II > >  > > Buoyed by the success of the Galaxy S, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S II > (Also known as the S2) in 2011. The S II was thinner, lighter and faster > than its predecessor, came in 16GB and 32GB varieties and had an improved > display to boot. The 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus was quite a stunner, and > our review even described it as "nothing short of spectacular." It also had > an upgraded 8-megapixel camera on the back (now with flash!), a 2-megapixel > shooter on the front plus a dual-core 1.2GHz processor. It still had that > TouchWiz interface, but people must not have minded that much, because it > went on to sell millions and millions of units, putting the Galaxy brand on > the proverbial map. > > Samsung Galaxy S III > >  > > Samsung kept up the Roman numeral trend with S III, and it also maintained > much of the design elements of its predecessor. The S III had rounder > corners and a bigger and better 4.8-inch Super AMOLED screen, but a lot of > the other styling remained the same. It even retained the same 8-megapixel > on the back, choosing to ramp up the photo quality through software rather > than hardware. It was available in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB varieties, and > sported a super-speedy (for the time) quad-core 1.4GHz Exynos 4412 CPU. Our > review for the S III praised its "big and beautiful" display but did call > out TouchWiz for feeling tired and also dissed the design for being a > little too samey. > > Samsung Galaxy S4 > >  > > In 2013, Samsung finally decided to drop the Roman numeral convention > (which nobody really used anyway) with the Galaxy S4. At this point, > Samsung was flying high as one of the top-selling smartphone brands in the > world, so it's not much of a surprise that it didn't really take a lot of > chances with the design and style. The S4 did have a larger 5-inch Super > AMOLED display and a more impressive 13-megapixel camera, but it was > otherwise pretty similar to the S III. > > Samsung Galaxy S5 > >  > > The Galaxy S5 was arguably one of Samsung's least successful handsets. > With a look that was very similar to its predecessor, perhaps its stale > design was to blame for the drop in sales. More than that, it probably > reflected a global drop in smartphone sales in general. That doesn't mean > the S5 wasn't a good phone; aside from the usual display and spec upgrades, > it was also IP67-rated for water resistance and we liked its grippier > design. Yet, it wasn't great either. In our review, we found certain > features like the fingerprint scanner and heart rate monitor to be > frustrating and inaccurate. > > Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 edge > >  > > Perhaps learning from the
Re: [id-android] A look back at Samsung's Galaxy S lineup
android pertama saya.. tapi keknya waktu itu juga pake nokia e51 On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 09.41 Yoyong Pakaya wrote: > Hadir omm. > > User spica juga di awal awal kenal android > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, 07:55 Defriando Riza, > wrote: > >> fyi.. >> Too bad, spica not mentioned.. Padahal pada saat itu (10 years ago), >> member spica 'bersaing' sama Motorola fans dgn milestone-nya disini >> >> Ayo.. Tunjuk tangan member spica (spicers) >> >> >> -- | @h4nafi | japri: ya[at]terserah.de | sent from ip8 | -- === Yuk install #MyXL Apps untuk Cek Kuota & Beli Paket XL https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.apps.MyXL -- Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan --- FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT == --- Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian Android Community" dari Google Grup. Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android.
Re: [id-android] A look back at Samsung's Galaxy S lineup
Hadir omm. User spica juga di awal awal kenal android On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, 07:55 Defriando Riza, wrote: > fyi.. > Too bad, spica not mentioned.. Padahal pada saat itu (10 years ago), > member spica 'bersaing' sama Motorola fans dgn milestone-nya disini > > Ayo.. Tunjuk tangan member spica (spicers) > > Earlier this week, Samsung officially announced the Galaxy S10 (and S10+), > the company's latest and greatest Android flagship. Somewhat obviously, the > S10 is also the tenth-generation Galaxy S, which means it's been ten years > since the very first Galaxy handset. Considering this momentous occasion, > we thought we'd take a look back at the history of the Galaxy S line and > see just how far Samsung has come in the past decade. > > > > Prologue: Samsung Galaxy i7500 > >  > > Before we dive into the Galaxy S series, we need to mention the Samsung > Galaxy i7500, the company's first-ever Android phone (It shipped with > Android 1.5 Cupcake). It debuted ten years ago in 2009, and at that point, > the only other company making Android handsets was HTC, so it didn't really > have a lot of competition. Though it had a 3.2-inch AMOLED display with a > 320 by 480 resolution, 8GB of storage and a 5-megapixel camera (decent > specs for its time), it had a pretty dull and uninspiring design. Just like > a lot of other phones then, it even had physical navigation buttons, > complete with Start Call and End Call keys. Oh, how times have changed. > > Samsung Galaxy S > >  > > The Samsung Galaxy S, introduced in 2010, was a lot more appealing. Gone > was that array of physical keys; now it had just a single home button, > along with a touch-sensitive menu button on the left and a back button on > the right. It's a design motif that it (and a lot of other Android phones) > would return to, time and time again. The Galaxy S had a 4-inch Super > AMOLED screen and a 480 by 800 resolution that plenty of people found > pretty impressive. Oh, and this was also the first Android phone to ship > with TouchWiz, Samsung's proprietary UI. It helped Samsung stand out from > the rest of the Android market, but TouchWiz also added a lot of > unnecessary bloat, which sometimes made the phone sluggish. > > Samsung Galaxy S II > >  > > Buoyed by the success of the Galaxy S, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S II > (Also known as the S2) in 2011. The S II was thinner, lighter and faster > than its predecessor, came in 16GB and 32GB varieties and had an improved > display to boot. The 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus was quite a stunner, and > our review even described it as "nothing short of spectacular." It also had > an upgraded 8-megapixel camera on the back (now with flash!), a 2-megapixel > shooter on the front plus a dual-core 1.2GHz processor. It still had that > TouchWiz interface, but people must not have minded that much, because it > went on to sell millions and millions of units, putting the Galaxy brand on > the proverbial map. > > Samsung Galaxy S III > >  > > Samsung kept up the Roman numeral trend with S III, and it also maintained > much of the design elements of its predecessor. The S III had rounder > corners and a bigger and better 4.8-inch Super AMOLED screen, but a lot of > the other styling remained the same. It even retained the same 8-megapixel > on the back, choosing to ramp up the photo quality through software rather > than hardware. It was available in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB varieties, and > sported a super-speedy (for the time) quad-core 1.4GHz Exynos 4412 CPU. Our > review for the S III praised its "big and beautiful" display but did call > out TouchWiz for feeling tired and also dissed the design for being a > little too samey. > > Samsung Galaxy S4 > >  > > In 2013, Samsung finally decided to drop the Roman numeral convention > (which nobody really used anyway) with the Galaxy S4. At this point, > Samsung was flying high as one of the top-selling smartphone brands in the > world, so it's not much of a surprise that it didn't really take a lot of > chances with the design and style. The S4 did have a larger 5-inch Super > AMOLED display and a more impressive 13-megapixel camera, but it was > otherwise pretty similar to the S III. > > Samsung Galaxy S5 > >  > > The Galaxy S5 was arguably one of Samsung's least successful handsets. > With a look that was very similar to its predecessor, perhaps its stale > design was to blame for the drop in sales. More than that, it probably > reflected a global drop in smartphone sales in general. That doesn't mean > the S5 wasn't a good phone; aside from the usual display and spec upgrades, > it was also IP67-rated for water resistance and we liked its grippier > design. Yet, it wasn't great either. In our review, we found certain > features like the fingerprint scanner and heart rate monitor to be > frustrating and inaccurate. > > Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 edge > >  > > Perhaps learning from the lukewarm reaction to the S5, Samsung decided to > shake things up in 2015.
Re: [id-android] A look back at Samsung's Galaxy S lineup
Seru ya om, dulu pas terima spica, blm bisa apa apa tuh.. Langsung root, install bla**market.. Wkwkwkwkwk.. 藍藍 Not lapan On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 09:24 Rizki Aftarianto wrote: > Saya pembeli no.001 Samsung Galaxy Spica saat penjualan perdana di Grand > Indonesia taun 2009 yang lampau. Setelah itu juga ambil Moto Milestone > > Hehehe > > > Salam > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:55 AM Defriando Riza > wrote: > >> fyi.. >> Too bad, spica not mentioned.. Padahal pada saat itu (10 years ago), >> member spica 'bersaing' sama Motorola fans dgn milestone-nya disini >> >> Ayo.. Tunjuk tangan member spica (spicers) >> >> Earlier this week, Samsung officially announced the Galaxy S10 (and >> S10+), the company's latest and greatest Android flagship. Somewhat >> obviously, the S10 is also the tenth-generation Galaxy S, which means it's >> been ten years since the very first Galaxy handset. Considering this >> momentous occasion, we thought we'd take a look back at the history of the >> Galaxy S line and see just how far Samsung has come in the past decade. >> >> >> >> Prologue: Samsung Galaxy i7500 >> >>  >> >> Before we dive into the Galaxy S series, we need to mention the Samsung >> Galaxy i7500, the company's first-ever Android phone (It shipped with >> Android 1.5 Cupcake). It debuted ten years ago in 2009, and at that point, >> the only other company making Android handsets was HTC, so it didn't really >> have a lot of competition. Though it had a 3.2-inch AMOLED display with a >> 320 by 480 resolution, 8GB of storage and a 5-megapixel camera (decent >> specs for its time), it had a pretty dull and uninspiring design. Just like >> a lot of other phones then, it even had physical navigation buttons, >> complete with Start Call and End Call keys. Oh, how times have changed. >> >> Samsung Galaxy S >> >>  >> >> The Samsung Galaxy S, introduced in 2010, was a lot more appealing. Gone >> was that array of physical keys; now it had just a single home button, >> along with a touch-sensitive menu button on the left and a back button on >> the right. It's a design motif that it (and a lot of other Android phones) >> would return to, time and time again. The Galaxy S had a 4-inch Super >> AMOLED screen and a 480 by 800 resolution that plenty of people found >> pretty impressive. Oh, and this was also the first Android phone to ship >> with TouchWiz, Samsung's proprietary UI. It helped Samsung stand out from >> the rest of the Android market, but TouchWiz also added a lot of >> unnecessary bloat, which sometimes made the phone sluggish. >> >> Samsung Galaxy S II >> >>  >> >> Buoyed by the success of the Galaxy S, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S II >> (Also known as the S2) in 2011. The S II was thinner, lighter and faster >> than its predecessor, came in 16GB and 32GB varieties and had an improved >> display to boot. The 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus was quite a stunner, and >> our review even described it as "nothing short of spectacular." It also had >> an upgraded 8-megapixel camera on the back (now with flash!), a 2-megapixel >> shooter on the front plus a dual-core 1.2GHz processor. It still had that >> TouchWiz interface, but people must not have minded that much, because it >> went on to sell millions and millions of units, putting the Galaxy brand on >> the proverbial map. >> >> Samsung Galaxy S III >> >>  >> >> Samsung kept up the Roman numeral trend with S III, and it also >> maintained much of the design elements of its predecessor. The S III had >> rounder corners and a bigger and better 4.8-inch Super AMOLED screen, but a >> lot of the other styling remained the same. It even retained the same >> 8-megapixel on the back, choosing to ramp up the photo quality through >> software rather than hardware. It was available in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB >> varieties, and sported a super-speedy (for the time) quad-core 1.4GHz >> Exynos 4412 CPU. Our review for the S III praised its "big and beautiful" >> display but did call out TouchWiz for feeling tired and also dissed the >> design for being a little too samey. >> >> Samsung Galaxy S4 >> >>  >> >> In 2013, Samsung finally decided to drop the Roman numeral convention >> (which nobody really used anyway) with the Galaxy S4. At this point, >> Samsung was flying high as one of the top-selling smartphone brands in the >> world, so it's not much of a surprise that it didn't really take a lot of >> chances with the design and style. The S4 did have a larger 5-inch Super >> AMOLED display and a more impressive 13-megapixel camera, but it was >> otherwise pretty similar to the S III. >> >> Samsung Galaxy S5 >> >>  >> >> The Galaxy S5 was arguably one of Samsung's least successful handsets. >> With a look that was very similar to its predecessor, perhaps its stale >> design was to blame for the drop in sales. More than that, it probably >> reflected a global drop in smartphone sales in general. That doesn't mean >> the S5 wasn't a good phone; aside from the usual display and
Re: [id-android] A look back at Samsung's Galaxy S lineup
Saya pembeli no.001 Samsung Galaxy Spica saat penjualan perdana di Grand Indonesia taun 2009 yang lampau. Setelah itu juga ambil Moto Milestone Hehehe Salam On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:55 AM Defriando Riza wrote: > fyi.. > Too bad, spica not mentioned.. Padahal pada saat itu (10 years ago), > member spica 'bersaing' sama Motorola fans dgn milestone-nya disini > > Ayo.. Tunjuk tangan member spica (spicers) > > Earlier this week, Samsung officially announced the Galaxy S10 (and S10+), > the company's latest and greatest Android flagship. Somewhat obviously, the > S10 is also the tenth-generation Galaxy S, which means it's been ten years > since the very first Galaxy handset. Considering this momentous occasion, > we thought we'd take a look back at the history of the Galaxy S line and > see just how far Samsung has come in the past decade. > > > > Prologue: Samsung Galaxy i7500 > >  > > Before we dive into the Galaxy S series, we need to mention the Samsung > Galaxy i7500, the company's first-ever Android phone (It shipped with > Android 1.5 Cupcake). It debuted ten years ago in 2009, and at that point, > the only other company making Android handsets was HTC, so it didn't really > have a lot of competition. Though it had a 3.2-inch AMOLED display with a > 320 by 480 resolution, 8GB of storage and a 5-megapixel camera (decent > specs for its time), it had a pretty dull and uninspiring design. Just like > a lot of other phones then, it even had physical navigation buttons, > complete with Start Call and End Call keys. Oh, how times have changed. > > Samsung Galaxy S > >  > > The Samsung Galaxy S, introduced in 2010, was a lot more appealing. Gone > was that array of physical keys; now it had just a single home button, > along with a touch-sensitive menu button on the left and a back button on > the right. It's a design motif that it (and a lot of other Android phones) > would return to, time and time again. The Galaxy S had a 4-inch Super > AMOLED screen and a 480 by 800 resolution that plenty of people found > pretty impressive. Oh, and this was also the first Android phone to ship > with TouchWiz, Samsung's proprietary UI. It helped Samsung stand out from > the rest of the Android market, but TouchWiz also added a lot of > unnecessary bloat, which sometimes made the phone sluggish. > > Samsung Galaxy S II > >  > > Buoyed by the success of the Galaxy S, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S II > (Also known as the S2) in 2011. The S II was thinner, lighter and faster > than its predecessor, came in 16GB and 32GB varieties and had an improved > display to boot. The 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus was quite a stunner, and > our review even described it as "nothing short of spectacular." It also had > an upgraded 8-megapixel camera on the back (now with flash!), a 2-megapixel > shooter on the front plus a dual-core 1.2GHz processor. It still had that > TouchWiz interface, but people must not have minded that much, because it > went on to sell millions and millions of units, putting the Galaxy brand on > the proverbial map. > > Samsung Galaxy S III > >  > > Samsung kept up the Roman numeral trend with S III, and it also maintained > much of the design elements of its predecessor. The S III had rounder > corners and a bigger and better 4.8-inch Super AMOLED screen, but a lot of > the other styling remained the same. It even retained the same 8-megapixel > on the back, choosing to ramp up the photo quality through software rather > than hardware. It was available in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB varieties, and > sported a super-speedy (for the time) quad-core 1.4GHz Exynos 4412 CPU. Our > review for the S III praised its "big and beautiful" display but did call > out TouchWiz for feeling tired and also dissed the design for being a > little too samey. > > Samsung Galaxy S4 > >  > > In 2013, Samsung finally decided to drop the Roman numeral convention > (which nobody really used anyway) with the Galaxy S4. At this point, > Samsung was flying high as one of the top-selling smartphone brands in the > world, so it's not much of a surprise that it didn't really take a lot of > chances with the design and style. The S4 did have a larger 5-inch Super > AMOLED display and a more impressive 13-megapixel camera, but it was > otherwise pretty similar to the S III. > > Samsung Galaxy S5 > >  > > The Galaxy S5 was arguably one of Samsung's least successful handsets. > With a look that was very similar to its predecessor, perhaps its stale > design was to blame for the drop in sales. More than that, it probably > reflected a global drop in smartphone sales in general. That doesn't mean > the S5 wasn't a good phone; aside from the usual display and spec upgrades, > it was also IP67-rated for water resistance and we liked its grippier > design. Yet, it wasn't great either. In our review, we found certain > features like the fingerprint scanner and heart rate monitor to be > frustrating and inaccurate. > > Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 edge > >
