Re: FW: IPS Reflector (IP storage)
At 15:39 21.02.00 -0700, Bradley, Mark wrote: >BTW, the purpose of this reflector is to enable discussions >regarding the charter of a proposed WG and issues w.r.t. >enabling storage over IP. The protocarter discusses 1)the >area of encapsulating storage protocols and 2)another to >address the needs that are unique to storage over IP, including >such issues as latency, reliability, privacy and manageability. How does "storage" differ from "filing", as in "NFSv4"? Harald -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: IPS Reflector (IP storage)
BTW, the purpose of this reflector is to enable discussions regarding the charter of a proposed WG and issues w.r.t. enabling storage over IP. The protocarter discusses 1)the area of encapsulating storage protocols and 2)another to address the needs that are unique to storage over IP, including such issues as latency, reliability, privacy and manageability. -Original Message- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 12:56 PM To: Bradley, Mark Subject: Re: IPS Reflector (IP storage) I can't figure out from this message what this ips mailin glist is about. Donald From: "Bradley, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:53:58 -0700 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the reflector address. > >If you want to add yourself from this mailing list, >you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following >command in the body of your email message: > >subscribe ips > >or from another account, besides [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >subscribe ips yourEmailAddress >
IPS Reflector (IP storage)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the reflector address. If you want to add yourself from this mailing list, you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following command in the body of your email message: subscribe ips or from another account, besides [EMAIL PROTECTED]: subscribe ips yourEmailAddress
Re: Need Clues: procmail configuration for IETF-Announce
Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > I use something like this: > [...] Comrades: thank for all replies that I have received. I still need clues on how to rewrite the email headers so that errors do not bounce to unwanted destinations. The split of the IETF Announce list prototype is now available at http://ittf.vlsm.org/announce.html It is provided "as is" with no liability. regards, -- - Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- VLSM-TJT -- http://rms46.vlsm.org/ - Here we are,poised on the precipice of suicide slope-Calvin 20Feb89
Re: Need Clues: procmail configuration for IETF-Announce
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:57:28 +0800, "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > For the first time in my life, last weekend I read the fine > procmail manual. I need some clues on how to configure procmail > for splitting the IETF-Announce list; especially separating the > I-D ACTION part. If you have one, would you please send me the > procmail part of filtering IETF-Announce? I use something like this: :0 E :ietf-drafts/$LOCKEXT *^(To:|cc:).*ietf-announce *^Subject:.*I-D ACTION: |rcv -exmh -nobeep +ietf-drafts :0 E:ietf-announce/$LOCKEXT *^(To:|cc:).*ietf-announce |rcv -exmh -nobeep +ietf-announce :0 E:ietf-822/$LOCKEXT *^(To:|cc:).*ietf-822 |rcv -exmh -nobeep +ietf-822 :0 E:ietf-smtp/$LOCKEXT *^(To:|cc:).*ietf-smtp |rcv -exmh -nobeep +ietf-smtp :0 E:ietf/$LOCKEXT *^(To:|cc:).*ietf |rcv -exmh -nobeep +ietf Note that you need to filter them off in the right order, most restrictive match first...
