Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))
2005/10/14, David Kessens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [NOTE: > It has come to the attention of the IESG that the original Last Call > message was posted to the IETF announcements mail list while RFC 3683 > specifies that it should have been posted to the general IETF discussion list. > > To correct for this oversight, this Last Call message is reissued with a new > expiry date and posted to the correct mail list as prescribed by RFC 3683.] So, the proscutor/judge AD saw no one was interested. One "yes", one "no". He thinks one month will be too short. So he finds a way to do it again. For how long? If the US law permits this the Internet should not be ran in the USA. They cannot welcome IETF meetings according AVRI's rules. But a friend told me: 1- Go to http://www.google.com 2- Type in "Failure", without the quotes 3- Instead of hitting "Search" hit "I'm feeling Lucky" Then I think the USA should keep running the Internet. And the Google Evangelist head the IETF meetings Eduardo Mendez ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))
On Oct 15, 2005, at 10:51 PM, Eduardo Mendez wrote: 2005/10/14, David Kessens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [NOTE: It has come to the attention of the IESG that the original Last Call message was posted to the IETF announcements mail list while RFC 3683 specifies that it should have been posted to the general IETF discussion list. To correct for this oversight, this Last Call message is reissued with a new expiry date and posted to the correct mail list as prescribed by RFC 3683.] So, the proscutor/judge AD saw no one was interested. One "yes", one "no". He thinks one month will be too short. So he finds a way to do it again. For how long? If the US law permits this the Internet should not be ran in the USA. They cannot welcome IETF meetings according AVRI's rules. But a friend told me: 1- Go to http://www.google.com 2- Type in "Failure", without the quotes 3- Instead of hitting "Search" hit "I'm feeling Lucky" Then I think the USA should keep running the Internet. And the Google Evangelist head the IETF meetings lol , too funny!!! my first hit was http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html amazing thanks Eduardo Mendez marc manthey -- "In a world without walls or fences, who needs Windows and Gates?" Les Enfants Terribles C.V.O. Marc Manthey Hildeboldplatz 1a 50672 Köln - Germany main site: http://www.let.de developer:http://www.cuseeme.de http://www.applehelpers.com my blog:http://brain.let.de AIM ,MSN, MAC= macbroadcast smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Was: Last Call under RFC 3683 [...]
Eduardo Mendez wrote: > If the US law permits this [...] It's an unusual detail in an RfC that was never before used. "US law" doesn't enter the picture - at least not about this now fixed procedural nit. Bye, Frank ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerningDean Anderson (reissued))
"So, the proscutor/judge AD saw no one was interested. One "yes", one "no"" - and you know this how? From the Last Call text: "This message calls for comments on this proposed action from the IETF, which should be sent to iesg@ietf.org (or ietf@ietf.org) by 12 November 2005." Are you sure that iesg@ietf.org has gotten no comments? Spencer ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
