Re: take the train in Chicago
I used the train yesterday, and it worked as advertised. It took 45 minutes, and it was cheap. However, it will be even slower for people arriving this weekend. The train will stop running on a portion of the Blue Line Friday at 11PM (last night) until early Monday morning. A shuttle bus will be used to move people around the closed portion of track. *Blue Line Slow Zone Elimination Project* *Effective 11:00 p.m., Friday, July 20 until 1:00 a.m., Monday, July 23, 2007* Due to Blue Line construction to eliminate slow zones*, Blue Line rail service will be temporarily suspended in both direction*s between the Clark/Lake (accessible) and western/Milwaukee stations. Bus shuttles will operate as a substitute for rail service, making all stops from Jackson (accessible) to Western/Milwaukee. CTA Blue Line trains provide frequent service from _O'Hare Airport_ to downtown in only 45-50 minutes. The Blue Line operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Safe travel, Russ ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:03:00AM -0400, The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 24 lines which said: > - 'The Archived-At Message Header Field ' > as a Proposed Standard I've reviewed the document and I find it OK. I also regard the use cases presented in section 3.3 as realistic and important so I support the idea of such a standard. Two remarks, only details: 1) Section 3.2 suggests, to avoid a DoS if the Message-ID is used to construct the link, to "offer multiple choices in the response". This does not really mitigate the DoS. An attacker could send 1000 messages and the only legitimate one would be quite lost among the 1001 responses. It seems a general case of "you should not let the client control the URI space if this client is unauthenticated". 2) Section 5.2 suggests to register the old experimental header X-Archived-At. I am not sure it is compliant with RFC 3864 to register private-use headers. I notice there is currently not one "X-something" header in the IANA registry. Is this section really necessary? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
