RE: Stepping down as IETF chair in March
Kudos to you Harald! Although I joined a bit late, it has been enjoying and very rewarding as a learning experience watching the great effort by everyone and as you put it, growth of the organization. Thank you! Harsh Verma --- Dr Harsh Verma, Director, R&D, Glocol Inc Past Vice-Chair (Industry) R&D WG, NECCC Ph: +1(916)684-3262 Mobile: +1(650)224-2108 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Tveit Alvestrand Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 1:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stepping down as IETF chair in March Thomas' note reminded me that there are probably some people who haven't heard this yet I'm stepping down as IETF chair in March, and I am not a candidate for reappointment. It's been a great four years, containing lots of learning experience, lots of hard work and lots of joy - but after four years as IETF chair, and ten years total on the IESG/IAB, March seems an appropriate time for me to leave this stage of my life behind. The IETF is a great organization. I will enjoy watching it continue to grow and prosper under new leadership. Thank you! Harald ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
RE: YATS? Re: T-shirts, and some suggestions for future ietf meetings
Collar/Tie pins would be good! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:31 AM To: Hadmut Danisch Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: YATS? Re: T-shirts,and some suggestions for future ietf meetings Hadmut Danisch wrote: > A cap like those LAPD caps? An FBI-like jacket? IETF-suspenders? Cool > sunglasses? Outdoor-Shirts? > > Backpacks? Computer bags? > > Find a hotel with a laaarge swimming pool and give IETF swimsuits? > Baywatch? Netwatch? IETF-Towels? Mugs, pins, belts? Translucent eye-controlled sunshades? > Not YATS (Yet another T-Shirt). Anything not everybody has. Color-changing, invisible T-shirts? Alex ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
RE: Names of standards-track RFCs
Hi, Ok, many of us have set up rules to move the WG emails to the appropriate folders, so I am wondering how these email subject lines do not show the WG name... Request All to include a WG name in the subject line []s like [manet]. (which includes this email too!!) I would think IETF moderator should add that, but which WG?? Thanks, Harsh ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
RE: What exactly is an internet (service) provider?
Yes, with tunnel brokering and the ability to reverse-tunnel "Roaming" 'Internet users should be able find a way to communicate on their own terms', as they move in a "Mobile Environment" switching back-end networks if required, for Mobile VPN. Kudos to Cisco's Mobile Access Router 3200 for being an example for this architecture. Yes, I had the pleasure of "piggyback" riding a WiFi network setup by a neighbor while in a hotelroom in a remote, forsaken place and in the words of Ole, 'as a consumer of paid-for Internet service (that works)', there was no reason for me to care and probably these rules set for user terms will need to be integrated for policy to switch to another network if I really have to pay. Somebody is paying, but there really ain't no free lunch! Regards, Harsh Verma Director, R&D, GLOCOL, Inc Past Vice-Chair (Industry) R&D WG, NECCC Member, Cross Boundary WG Tel: +1(916)684-3262 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.glocol.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 5:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What exactly is an internet (service) provider? On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:03:46 +0100 "Christian de Larrinaga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A traveller cannot change ISP easily so either will just have to > accept some things cannot be done or will find a way. As it happens > one can preplan and setup a proxy service or a tunnel broker etc that > can get round many of these issues. > > Perhaps the IETF would be wiser to give a warning about the futility > of trying to break application transparency. "The Internet user may > always find a way to communicate on their own terms" ... using the following tunnel broker / VPN peer. The neat thing about it is that it uses SSL/TLS over UDP, and you can specify the UDP ports to use. As it uses UDP to encapsulate the IP packets, the outer IP header can be NATted. Also, as it uses UDP, and the ports are selectable, you may be able to "punch" a pipe through a firewall, by using UDP ports #53 a.k.a. DNS, depending on how well the firewall inspects DNS traffic. If that works out, "The Internet user may always find a way to communicate on their own terms", irrespective of NAT. http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Mark. ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
