IETF Journal Volume 9 Issue 1
Hi, The latest issue of the IETF Journal (Volume 9, Issue 1) is available online: http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal Among many others it contains articles on software-defined networking, WebRTC and the Networking History BoF. In addition you will find summary reports of the IETF 86 meeting held in Orlando, regular columns submitted by the IETF, the IAB and the IRTF chairs, summaries of the plenary sessions, and articles on the fellowships to IETF and the Applied Networking Research Prize. You can read this publication online or download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue by subscribing to the IETF Journal as an email edition or have it delivered to your postal address in hardcopy. Many thanks to all our contributors. Please send any comments or suggestions for future issues to ietfjour...@isoc.org. Regards, Mat Mat Ford Managing Editor IETF Journal http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal
Reducing Internet Latency Workshop
Possibly of interest. (Short) Position paper deadline is 23rd June. Regards, Mat Workshop on Reducing Internet Latency = 25 - 26 September 2013 London, England Latency tends to have been sacrificed in favour of headline bandwidth in the way the Internet has been built. This two-day invitation-only workshop aims to galvanise action to fix that. All layers of the stack are in scope. Latency is an increasingly important topic for networking researchers and Internet practitioners alike. Data from Google, Microsoft, Amazon and others indicate that latency increases for interactive Web applications result in less usage and less revenue from sales or advertising income. Whether trying to provide platforms for Web applications, high-frequency stock trading, multi-player online gaming or 'cloud' services of any kind, latency is a critical factor in determining end-user satisfaction and the success of products in the marketplace. Consequently, latency and variation in latency are key performance metrics for services these days. But latency reduction is not just about increasing revenues for big business. Matt Mullenweg of WordPress motivates work on latency reduction well when he says, "My theory here is when an interface is faster, you feel good. And ultimately what that comes down to is you feel in control. The [application] isn’t controlling me, I’m controlling it. Ultimately that feeling of control translates to happiness in everyone. In order to increase the happiness in the world, we all have to keep working on this." Invitations to attend the workshop will depend on receipt of a position paper. In a spirit of co- ordination across the industry, submissions are encouraged from developers and network operators as well as the research and standards communities. A wide range of latency related topics are in scope including, but not limited to: - surveys of latency across all layers - analyses of sources of latency and severity/variability - the cost of latency problems to society and the economy, or the value of fixing it - principles for latency reduction across the stack - solutions to reduce latency, including cross-layer - deployment considerations for latency reducing technology - benchmarking, accreditation, measurement and market comparison practices Submissions --- This is an invitation-only workshop. Prospective participants must submit short (up to 2 pages) position papers outlining their views on a specific aspect of the overall scope. The emphasis here is on relevance and brevity - you do not need to write a lot of text, just demonstrate that you have thought about the problem space and have something interesting to say on the topic. Please send position papers in PDF format to: late...@isoc.org Participant numbers will be limited to focus on discussion and identifying actions rather than slideware. Accepted position papers will be made public. A report on the workshop will be published after participants have agreed the content. Therefore, it will be possible to state views during the workshop without them being publicly attributed. Important Dates --- Position paper submission deadline: 23 June 2013 Paper acceptance notification: 28 June 2013 Workshop dates: 9am, Wednesday 25th – 5pm, Thursday 26th September 2013 Program committee - Mat Ford, Internet Society, co-chair Bob Briscoe, BT, co-chair Gorry Fairhurst, University of Aberdeen Arvind Jain, Google Jason Livingood, Comcast Andrew McGregor, Google Workshop venue and other details Venue: Hilton London Paddington Hotel, 146 Praed Street, LONDON W2 1EE, UK Registration fee: There is no registration fee for the workshop. Recommended accommodation: Hilton London Paddington, registration link will be supplied to accepted participants. The workshop is sponsored by the Internet Society, the RITE project, Simula Research Labs and the TimeIn project. The Internet Society will host a workshop dinner on the Wednesday evening.
Re: ANRP 2013 - please nominate
On 28 Nov 2012, at 15:00, Matthew Ford wrote: > Hi, > > Nominations for the 2013 ANRP awards are due by this Friday 30th November, so > if you've read a great paper this year, please send us the details using the > submission system at: > > http://irtf.org/anrp/2013/ > > or exceptionally, by email to a...@irtf.org. > > Thanks, > Mat And, in case you are unfamiliar with the Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP): About the ANRP -- The Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) is awarded for recent results in applied networking research that are relevant for transitioning into shipping Internet products and related standardization efforts. Researchers with relevant, recent results are encouraged to apply for this prize, which will offer them the opportunity to present and discuss their work with the engineers, network operators, policy makers and scientists that participate in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and its research arm, the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Third-party nominations for this prize are also encouraged. The goal of the Applied Networking Research Prize is to recognize the best new ideas in networking, and bring them to the IETF and IRTF especially in cases where they would not otherwise see much exposure or discussion. The Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) consists of: • cash prize of $500 (USD) • invited talk at the IRTF Open Meeting • travel grant to attend a week-long IETF meeting (airfare, hotel, registration, stipend) • recognition at the IETF plenary • invitation to related social activities • potential for additional travel grants to future IETF meetings, based on community feedback The Applied Networking Research Prize will be awarded once per calendar year. Each year, several winners will be chosen and invited to present their work at one of the three IETF meetings during the year. How to Nominate --- Only a single person can be nominated for the award. The basis of the nomination is a peer-reviewed, original journal, conference or workshop paper they authored, which was recently published or accepted for publication. The nominee must be one of the main authors of the nominated paper. Both self nominations (nominating one’s own paper) and third-party nominations (nominating someone else’s paper) are encouraged. The nominated paper should provide a scientific foundation for possible future IETF engineering work or IRTFresearch and experimentation, analyze the behavior of Internet protocols in operational deployments or realistic testbeds, make an important contribution to the understanding of Internet scalability, performance, reliability, security or capability, or otherwise be of relevance to ongoing or future IETF or IRTF activities. Applicants must briefly describe how the nominated paper relates to these goals, and are encouraged to describe how a presentation of these research results would foster their transition into new IETF engineering or IRTFexperimentation, or otherwise seed new activities that will have an impact on the real-world Internet. The goal of the Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) is to foster the transitioning of research results into real-world benefits for the Internet. Therefore, applicants must indicate that they (or the nominee, in case of third-party nominations) are available to attend at least one of the year’s IETF meetings in person and in its entirety. Nominations must include: • the name and email address of the nominee • a bibliographic reference to the published (or accepted) nominated paper • a PDF copy of the nominated paper • a statement that describes how the nominated paper fulfills the goals of the award • a statement about which of the year’s IETF meetings the nominee would be available to attend in person and in its entirety • a brief biography or CV of the nominee • optionally, any other supporting information (link to nominee’s web site, etc.) Nominations are submitted via the submission site. In exceptional cases, nominations may also be submitted by email to a...@irtf.org. All nominees will be notified by email about the decision regarding their nomination. Nominations for the Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) are not considered to be contributions to the IETF. However, the invited talks at the IRTF Open Meeting are considered to be contributions, and the IRTF “Intellectual Property Rights” statement does apply to them.
ANRP 2013 - please nominate
Hi, Nominations for the 2013 ANRP awards are due by this Friday 30th November, so if you've read a great paper this year, please send us the details using the submission system at: http://irtf.org/anrp/2013/ or exceptionally, by email to a...@irtf.org. Thanks, Mat
IETF Journal - latest issue now available
Hi, The latest issue of the IETF Journal (Volume 8, Issue 2) is available online: http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal Among others it contains articles on the impact of World IPv6 Launch, using JSON in IETF protocols, software-defined networking, and moving toward a censorship-free Internet. In addition you will find summary reports of the IETF 84 meeting held in Vancouver, regular columns submitted by the IETF, the IAB and the IRTF chairs, summaries of the plenary sessions, and articles on the fellowships to IETF. You can read this publication online or download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue by subscribing to the IETF Journal as an email edition or have it delivered to your postal address in hardcopy. Many thanks to all our contributors. Please send any comments or suggestions for future issues to ietfjour...@isoc.org. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Managing Editor IETF Journal http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal
Re: In Memoriam IETF web page
On 22 Oct 2012, at 21:48, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 10/22/2012 03:52 PM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote: >> If we want to keep this in the spirit of long-established (newspaper) >> traditions rather than a web page, we could use the IETF Journal for >> recording the passing of members of the community. > > This sounds like the best suggestion to me so far > if something is to be done. Second best would be > to do nothing. > In the last issue, we briefly noted the passing of Bob Morgan in the online version (http://www.internetsociety.org/articles/implementing-identity-management-solutions) though it was too late for the print issue. In the latest issue we've posted a tribute to Wendy Rickard (http://www.internetsociety.org/articles/remembering-wendy-rickard) both online and in print. I think the IETF Journal is a fine place to publish obituaries or memorials of IETF contributors to recognise their work and I'd encourage anyone moved to write such text to send it to ietfjour...@isoc.org. Mat
IETF Journal - latest issue now available
Hi, The latest issue of the IETF Journal (Volume 8, Issue 1) is now available online at: http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal Among others it contains articles on implementing identity management solutions, IPv6, and problems in low-delay communication. In addition you will find summary reports of the IETF 83 meeting held in Paris, regular columns submitted by the IETF, the IAB and the IRTF chairs, summaries of the plenary sessions, and an article on the fellowship to IETF. You can read this publication online or choose to download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue by subscribing to the IETF Journal as an email edition or have it delivered to your postal address in hardcopy. Many thanks to all our contributors. Please send any comments or suggestions for future issues to ietfjour...@isoc.org. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Managing Editor IETF Journal http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal
IETF Journal v7.3 now available
Hi, The new version of the IETF Journal (Volume 7, Issue 3) is now available online at http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal Among others it contains articles on smart objects, data-centric networking and improvements to WHOIS. In addition to that you will find summary reports of the IETF 82 meeting, held in Taipei, regular columns submitted by the IETF, the IAB and the IRTF chairs, summaries of the plenary sessions, and an article on the fellowship to IETF. You can read this publication online or choose to download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue by subscribing to the IETF Journal as an email edition or have it delivered to your postal address in hardcopy. Alternatively, you can subscribe to the RSS 2.0 news feed to have the latest issue delivered directly to your desktop as soon as it’s published. Please send any comments or suggestions for future issues to ietfjour...@isoc.org. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Managing Editor IETF Journal http://internetsociety.org/ietfjournal
Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF
On 1 Dec 2011, at 17:09, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > Unfortunately, lawyers on the whole tend to > suggest solutions to problems that create additional legal work. … such as, an antitrust policy for the IETF... ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Latest IETF Journal (v6.3) - online now
[Apologies for duplicate emails] Hello, The new version of the IETF Journal (Volume 6, Issue 3) is now available online and for download at http://ietfjournal.isoc.org/ Among others it contains articles on the implications of mobile handheld devices for the Internet, the challenges of IPv4-IPv6 coexistence, and one regional registry's deployment of new routing security technology. In addition to that you will find regular columns submitted by the IETF, IAB and IRTF chairs, and an article on the ISOC Fellowship to IETF 79. You can read this publication online or choose to download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue of the IETF Journal by subscribing to one of our RSS or Atom feeds. If you would like to receive hard copies of the IETF Journal for yourself or other chapter members, please contact us at ietfjour...@isoc.org. You can also send us any comments or suggestions you might have. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Internet Society http://isoc.org/ ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474
On 3 Sep 2010, at 21:13, Richard Bennett wrote: > As Russ is now invoking your message to support his view that payment for > premium service is contrary to the wishes of IETF, that's a problem. > No, it really isn't. That's not what Russ said. Mat ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
IETF Journal Volume 6 Issue 1 - now available
[Apologies for duplicate mails] Hello, The new issue of the IETF Journal - Volume 6, Issue 1 - is now available at http://ietfjournal.isoc.org/ Among others it contains articles on federated authentication, peer-to-peer developments, IPv6 momentum and the business of engineering successful Internet standards. You can read this publication online or choose to download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue of the IETF Journal by subscribing to one of our RSS or Atom feeds. For other comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate to contact us at ietfjour...@isoc.org. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Internet Society http://isoc.org/ ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
On 27 May 2010, at 14:16, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > > Is that the Matt Ford who works for ISOC or somebody else? > The latter. > The person quoted is well-known, so that makes me think this story was > written by someone with a clue. > No comment ;) Mat ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: [77attendees] FW: Looking for jogging trail around the Hilton)
I didn't get out of the hotel and off the treadmill in Anaheim, but I did get ietf-runners at ietf.org established. Sign up today for the inside track on routes around Maastricht! https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-runners Mat Original Message Subject: Re: [77attendees] FW: Looking for jogging trail around the Hilton Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:45:08 -0700 From: Vince Fuller To: Lindqvist Kurt Erik CC: 77attend...@ietf.org <77attend...@ietf.org> > A wider view of Google maps shows that there is a bike trail along the > Santa Ana river that is about 2.5 miles from the Hilton - south on Harbor > then east on Chapman would seem to be the most direct way to get to that > trail. When I asked the Hilton concierge about it, however, she recommended > against going there, saying that there have been many muggings on the trail > and that it isn't safe for running. I ran there Saturday morning and it was full of people running and biking, that was around 8.30. That was actually on recommendation from the Hilton gym... I ran this route this morning: http://connect.garmin.com/activity/27834415 The trail wasn't particularly beautiful (the river is more of a flood control channel than a river) but it didn't seem unsafe and was more pleasant than the roads around here. Not a lot of traffic on it on a weekday morning but I did see a few cyclists and a walker or two. Less pleasant was running on Ball Road, which was wide, busy, and had no sidewalk for a mile or so. I don't recommend running on that road. --Vince ___ 77attendees mailing list 77attend...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Latest IETF Journal available now (Volume 5, Issue 3)
[Apologies for duplicate emails] Hello, The new issue of the IETF Journal - Volume 5, Issue 3 - is now available at http://ietfjournal.isoc.org/ Among others it contains articles on Bandwidth on the Internet, the RFC Editor transition, Congestion Exposure and the Kantara Initiative. You can read this publication online or choose to download the full issue in PDF format. You can also keep up to date with the latest issue of the IETF Journal by subscribing to one of our RSS or Atom feeds. For other comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate to contact us at ietfjour...@isoc.org. Kind Regards, Mat Ford Internet Society http://isoc.org/ ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
On 28/11/08 09:44, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 07:49:13PM +, Matthew Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 13 lines which said: After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significant milestone. That would prove nothing: failures will DNSSEC do not happen every day. Signatures expire, people stop signing without telling the parent zone, keys rolls over, but it may not happen during these few days. You see the actual problems with DNSSEC (which are *not* FUD) when you run it every day, for several months. I said it would be a milestone. I didn't say it was the end of the road. Mat ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74
On 27/11/08 19:36, David Conrad wrote: It's more that no one would notice. After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significant milestone. Mat ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
On 18/11/08 14:27, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo) wrote: Hi everybody, In the IAOC, we have followed the visa situation for different nations closely. It is obviously in the benefit for the IETF to have all the participants that want and need to come to the IETF could also come. Seems like the UK might offer a solution: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7736010.stm "officials were "under pressure" to issue - rather than reject - visas to meet productivity targets." ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
RE: IPv6 in the network, please
So somebody needs to get Airespace's marketroids to slow down a little bit: http://www.airespace.com/news/press_releases/04_1026b.php --Mat P.S. Sincere thanks to the IETF61 NOC for making these efforts to get IPv6 functional on the entire network - I'll try that new config now from Lincoln. On , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Ben Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: November 10, 2004 12:07:08 PM EST >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: IPv6 >> Reply-To: Ben Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Folks, >> >> To expand on Jeff's explanation of the IPv6 status here at IETF61; >> The entire network, both wired and wireless, was designed from the >> get-go as being IPv6 capable. It also had a very real and major >> requirement to be stable in the face of hundreds of clients all at >> 100% transmit power, rogue APs, and all the other problems that have >> plagued previous IETF wireless networks. The good folks at Airespace >> seemed to have a system that met this goal, and as we all can see, >> it indeed works well. >> >> However, when we asked Airespace to join us in this adventure, it >> became clear that the "intelligence" of their system worked through >> tracking IPv4 DHCP requests, and thus wouldn't work with IPv6. This >> lack of IPv6 support was nearly a show stopper, however Airespace >> jumped through some major hoops to design, implement, and deploy code >> that monitors RAs and RSs specifically to handle IPv6 for this >> network. >> >> Like most brand new code, when we deployed it, we encountered >> problems. Problems that lead to instability in ALL wireless network >> access. After several long days and nights of working on this long >> before the first attendees arrived (we've been on site since Tuesday >> 2nd - Election Day ;) we decided to disable the IPv6 support on the >> wireless network, rather than risk the overall network stability. >> Airespace continues to work on the problems, and we believe that we >> have a reasonable interim solution. >> >> We have phased in a new image with limited deployment, which we will >> monitor. If we experience no problems, IPv6 will be back on the >> wireless lan, however we need to maintain the overall stability of >> the wireless network as our highest priority. >> >> For those who need IPv6 on wireless: >> >> SSID: ietf61v6 >> WEP Key: thisisav6wlan >> Hex: 746869736973617636776c616e >> >> Coverage will be available in Georgetown, Lincoln, Jefferson, >> Monroe, Military and Hemisphere. You should not associate with this >> wireless network if you need stable IPv4. This is a dedicated >> network with new AP's and a new controller. >> >> My thanks to our volunteer staff who worked to deploy this network >> in the late hours last night (and very early hours this morning) >> after the social event. >> >> For those that are inconvenienced by the loss of IPv6, I sincerely >> apologize, and remind you that native IPv6 is available at every >> wired port in the terminal room. >> >> Thanks for bearing with us, and have a good meeting! >> >> - Ben Crosby >> Alcatel / IETF61 NOC >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFBklluLWqnmaznXfoRAi/qAJ4nUW48fV51MGYwRdX1IOqh2OAYHQCgvyZT > nuUrX42hGaM8Xg7/fKPj1jc= =t7zw > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > ___ > Ietf mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
RE: [IETF61] no IPv6?
So we bounce around Abilene for a while: > 1 2001:468:c12:128::4 5.709 ms 9.239 ms 7.733 ms > 2 2001:468:c12:1::1 25.958 ms 7.548 ms 8.666 ms > 3 2001:468:ff:185c::1 9.291 ms 6.951 ms 5.917 ms > 4 atlang-washng.abilene.abilene.ucaid.edu 24.813 ms > 30.656 ms 22.389 ms > 5 hstnng-atlang.abilene.ucaid.edu 52.273 ms 44.055 ms * > 6 losang-hstnng.abilene.ucaid.edu 84.828 ms 90.56 ms 74.04 ms take a ride to Japan: > 7 3ffe:8140:101:1::2 177.911 ms 187.557 ms 177.877 ms > 8 hitachi1.otemachi.wide.ad.jp 177.499 ms 178.498 ms 179.06 ms > 9 pc6.otemachi.wide.ad.jp 188.272 ms 188.571 ms 196.552 ms > 10 3ffe:1800::3:2d0:b7ff:fe9a:6233 186.833 ms 187.182 ms 198.085 ms > 11 3ffe:1800::3:230:48ff:fe41:4e95 194.045 ms 186.767 ms 186.333 ms before winding up back where we started: > 12 2001:468:ff:16c1::5 186.615 ms 194.852 ms 187.882 ms So I conclude that IPv6 *is* deployed, but $DEITY help you if you need to use it :) -- Mat > 13 v6-tunnel62-uk6x.ipv6.btexact.com 462.663 ms 458.041 ms 459.95 > ms 14 2001:800:40:2e02::1 517.889 ms 512.469 ms 515.928 ms > 15 2001:800:40:2f02::2 520.688 ms 528.601 ms 513.428 ms > 16 ns1.euro6ix.com 532.845 ms 519.352 ms 524.852 ms > > Which was quite BAD ! > > But now I see: > > Ordenador-de-Jordi-Palet:~ jordi$ traceroute6 www.6power.org connect: > No route to host Ordenador-de-Jordi-Palet:~ jordi$ traceroute6 > www.6power.org connect: No route to host > > >> De: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Fecha: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:36:56 -0500 >> Para: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Asunto: Re: [IETF61] no IPv6? >> >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:41:00AM +0900, >> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> a message of 9 lines which said: >> >>> how come there's no IPv6 on the "IETF61" network? >> >> Apparently, there is: >> >> ~ % ifconfig eth0 >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:B5:49:F8:22 >> inet addr:130.129.67.235 Bcast:130.129.67.255 >> Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::210:b5ff:fe49:f822/64 >> Scope:Link inet6 addr: 2001:468:c12:64:210:b5ff:fe49:f822/64 >> Scope:Global ... >> >> ~ % traceroute6 www.iijlab.net >> traceroute to sh1.iijlab.net > (2001:240:0:200:260:97ff:fe07:69ea) from >> 2001:468:c12:64:210:b5ff:fe49:f822, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets >> 1 2001:468:c12:64::4 (2001:468:c12:64::4) 26.15 ms 0.924 ms >> 0.782 ms 2 2001:468:c12:1::1 (2001:468:c12:1::1) 14.643 ms 6.025 >> ms 5.321 ms 3 2001:468:ff:185c::1 (2001:468:ff:185c::1) 5.803 ms >> 5.494 ms 6.086 ms 4 nycmng-washng.abilene.ucaid.edu >> (2001:468:ff:1518::1) 29.869 ms 10.386 ms >> 37.157 ms >> 5 chinng-nycmng.abilene.ucaid.edu (2001:468:ff:f15::1) 34.169 ms >> 43.274 ms >> 31.786 ms >> ... >> >> >> ___ >> Ietf mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > > > > ** > Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit > Presentations and videos on line at: > http://www.ipv6-es.com > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be > for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of the contents of this information, > including attached files, is prohibited. > > > > > ___ > Ietf mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Network 7
Anyone know whether network 007/8 is 'IANA - Reserved' as IANA state here: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space or 'Allocated' as ARIN state here: ftp://ftp.arin.net/pub/stats/arin/arin.20030601? Mat
RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday
I'm having quite a hard time seeing what the problem is here, but maybe I'm missing something... Based on Harald's analysis the projected annual shortfall is in the region of $350,000 per annum. Assuming ~5,000 attendees per annum, that equates to ~$70 per year per attendee. This equates to an increase in fees of ~$25 per meeting, i.e. ~5.5%. Are there really any regular attendees for whom this increase would constitute a serious problem? Mat.
RE: ietf 55 network
> folks have to tell the noc > about observed > problems, rather than just complaining to your couch > neighbor. ... and the noc has to help instead of telling people to go away. I requested a static IP, was asked why I needed one, 'because DHCP is broken', and was told that this was 'my problem'. Of course the reality is that DHCP is always broken in some way, at some point, during IETF meetings, which is why I always visit the NOC to request a static IP. This is the first time I've been told 'no'. I can't help thinking that the spastic wireless network experienced at IETF55 could have been avoided if lessons learned at previous IETF meetings had not been repeated. Maybe these lessons need to be captured somewhere. I do appreciate the efforts of all the engineers who have been working hard this week to give us the network that we now have, but on this occasion they have left this user way less than satisfied. Mat.
