2 aug 2013 kl. 16:12 skrev Dan York y...@isoc.org:
Olle,
On 8/2/13 12:24 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
In rtcweb we have remote participants that prefer anonymity for a number
of reasons.
The question is how this is handled in regards to note well, when they
want jabber scribes to relay opinions or proposals to the meeting.
Just a note for the future. I think we should allow anonymous listeners,
but should they really be allowed to participate?
We don't allow anonymous comments at the microphone in face-to-face
meetings, requiring all people to clearly state their names and have those
names recorded in the meeting minutes and in the Jabber log.I don't
see why we would change this for remote participants.
In all the years I've been doing Jabber-scribing, I've actually never run
into a case where a remote attendee requested anonymity. I would have
been puzzled like you. Obviously, anyone can be anonymous when joining
a Jabber chat room and can even make all the comments they want in the
chat room, but I think the moment they request a relay to the mic and the
comment goes into the audio record and thereby also the meeting minutes
then the comment needs to have a name attached to it.
(moving to ietf mailing list)
Absolutely.
Now, should we add an automatic message when someone joins the chat rooms, or a
message when meetings begin that all comments made in the chat room is also
participation under the note well?
/O
