Eliot Lear wrote: > Russ, > > >> When IETF lists are housed somewhere other than ietf.org, they are >> supposed to include an archive recipient so that there is an archive >> available at ietf.org (perhaps in addition to the one kept at the >> place where the list is housed). >> >> > > I'll agree with Phill's conclusion on this one. > > I think there is probably convenience value to housing the mailing lists > at the IETF. It allows for a single whitelist, reduction in those > annoying monthly messages that we eventually all filter into the > bitbucket. Also, it probably is easier to effect and audit policy > (such as we have any) in terms of message retention, uniform access, etc. > The other things is when we start DKIM signing (HINT HINT), it will give a single identity for reputation, etc to latch onto.
Mike _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf