Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:07:44PM -0500, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 4 lines which said: > This URL works for me ... Yes, it has been fixed in the mean time. ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
This URL works for me ... At 08:34 AM 12/14/2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
*> *> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 *> Or the RFC Editor web site works: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4390 since the RFC Editor's archive is in fact primary. RFC Editor *> ___ *> Ietf mailing list *> Ietf@ietf.org *> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf *> ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
On Dec 14, 2007 9:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that there is work going on today with the transfer of > services from NSS > to AMS, and I suspect that these errors may be connected to this. It may be, but according to Ray Pelletier (Administrative Director), the DNS changes wouldn't be started until about noon Eastern (1700 UTC). With a 404 error, it sounds like someone may have been doing some cleanup on the server. In any case, it'll be interesting to see how smoothly the transitions go, starting in about an hour and a half. -- Daniel P. Brown [Phone Numbers Go Here!] [They're Hidden From View!] If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you. ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer downloadable? :-) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt Forbidden Syephane - you get the same thing when you go to http://www.ietf.org/rfc.html or any RFC for that matter. I think there is a configuration problem with the server. cheers joe baptista You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80 ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org PublicRoot Consortium The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large. Office: +1 (202) 517-1593 Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084 begin:vcard fn:Joe Baptista n:Baptista;Joe org:PublicRoot Consortium adr:;;963 Ford Street;Peterborough;Ontario;K9J 5V5 ;Canada email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:PublicRoot Representative tel;fax:+1 (509) 479-0084 tel;cell:+1 (416) 912-6551 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.publicroot.org version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
I know that there is work going on today with the transfer of services from NSS to AMS, and I suspect that these errors may be connected to this. (Note that IPv4 and IPv6 are being done somewhat separately, so what works for one version may not for the other.) I would suggest sending any 404 errors, DNS lookup errors, etc., to our IAD. Regards Marshall On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Roy Arends wrote: On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer downloadable? :-) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt Forbidden You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[Inquiry #98454] Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:10:14PM +, Roy Arends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 24 lines which said: > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt > > > >Forbidden ... > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 It works again now (someone probably fixed it). Nothing to do with the URL, both URL were and are fine. ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer downloadable? :-) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt Forbidden You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: > Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy > is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer downloadable? :-) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt Forbidden You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80 ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
