Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Departmentforma lly adopts IPv6)
Michel Py wrote: In DNS you publish: x.y.z.t server1.example.com x.y.z.t server2.example.com x.y.z.t server3.example.com [...] That's were the coolness is; no stinkin' port number. You could publish URLs without port numbers if you could count on the clients recognizing SRV records. -- /=\ |John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com| |Centive |My opinions are my own. | |=| |The Reality Check's in the mail. --L. Peter Deutsch| \=/
Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Departmentforma lly adopts IPv6)
Keith Moore wrote: ] You could publish URLs without port numbers if you could count on the ] cliens recognizing SRV records. use of SRV records for apps that aren't specified to use them is a violation of both those apps' protocols and the SRV specification. Agreed. But it's an option for people who need to build new apps to kludge around NATs. -- /=\ |John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com| |Centive |My opinions are my own. | |=| |*BOOM* Thank you, Beaker. Now we know that is definitely too| |much gunpowder. -- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew | \=/
