RFC 4164 on RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Context Replication for ROHC Profiles
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4164 Title: RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Context Replication for ROHC Profiles Author(s): G. Pelletier Status: Standards Track Date: August 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 21 Characters: 47088 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None I-D Tag:draft-ietf-rohc-context-replication-06.txt URL:ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4164.txt This document defines context replication, a complement to the context initialization procedure found in Robust Header Compression (ROHC), as specified in RFC 3095. Profiles defining support for context replication may use the mechanism described herein to establish a new context based on another already existing context. Context replication is introduced to reduce the overhead of the context establishment procedure. It may be especially useful for the compression of multiple short-lived flows that may be occurring simultaneously or near-simultaneously, such as short-lived TCP flows. This document is a product of the Robust Header Compression Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. ___ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
RFC 4162 on Addition of SEED Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4162 Title: Addition of SEED Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS) Author(s): H.J. Lee, J.H. Yoon, J.I. Lee Status: Standards Track Date: August 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 6 Characters: 10578 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None I-D Tag:draft-lee-tls-seed-01.txt URL:ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4162.txt This document proposes the addition of new cipher suites to the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to support the SEED encryption algorithm as a bulk cipher algorithm. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. ___ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
RFC 4160 on Internet Fax Gateway Requirements
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4160 Title: Internet Fax Gateway Requirements Author(s): K. Mimura, K. Yokoyama, T. Satoh, C. Kanaide, C. Allocchio Status: Informational Date: August 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 13 Characters: 24930 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None I-D Tag:draft-ietf-fax-gateway-protocol-12.txt URL:ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4160.txt To allow connectivity between the General Switched Telephone Network facsimile service (GSTN fax) and the e-mail-based Internet Fax service (i-fax) an "Internet Fax Gateway" is required. This document provides recommendations for the functionality of Internet Fax Gateways. In this context, an "offramp gateway" provides facsimile data transmission from i-fax to GSTN fax; vice versa, an "onramp gateway" provides data transmission form GSTN fax to i-fax. The recommendations in this document apply to the integrated service including Internet Fax terminals, computers with i-fax software on the Internet, and GSTN Fax terminals on the GSTN. This document is a product of the Internet Fax Working Group of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. ___ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
RFC 4161 on Guidelines for Optional Services for Internet Fax Gateways
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4161 Title: Guidelines for Optional Services for Internet Fax Gateways Author(s): K. Mimura, K. Yokoyama, T. Satoh, K. Watanabe, C. Kanaide Status: Informational Date: August 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 12 Characters: 23189 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None I-D Tag:draft-ietf-fax-gateway-options-08.txt URL:ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4161.txt To allow connectivity between the general switched telephone network facsimile service (GSTN fax) and the e-mail-based Internet Fax service (i-fax), an "Internet Fax Gateway" is required. This document provides guidelines for the optional functionality of Internet Fax Gateways. In this context, an "offramp gateway" provides facsimile data transmission from i-fax to GSTN fax; vice versa, an "onramp gateway" provides data transmission from GSTN fax to i-fax. The recommendations in this document apply to the integrated service including Internet Fax terminals, computers with i-fax software on the Internet, and GSTN fax terminals on the GSTN. This document supplements the recommendation for minimal features of an Internet Fax Gateway. In particular, it covers techniques for dropping duplicated fax messages, automatic fax re-transmission, error, return notice, and log handling, and possible authorization methods by DTMF (Dual Tone Multi-Frequency) for onramp gateways. This document is a product of the Internet Fax Working Group of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. ___ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
