STD 69, RFC 5734 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over TCP

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

STD 69
RFC 5734

Title:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport 
over TCP 
Author: S. Hollenbeck
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:shollenb...@verisign.com
Pages:  13
Characters: 27887
Obsoletes:  RFC4934
See Also:   STD0069

I-D Tag:draft-hollenbeck-rfc4934bis-01.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5734.txt

This document describes how an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
session is mapped onto a single Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
connection.  This mapping requires use of the Transport Layer
Security (TLS) protocol to protect information exchanged between an
EPP client and an EPP server.  This document obsoletes RFC 4934. 
[STANDARDS TRACK]

This is now a Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 69, RFC 5733 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Contact Mapping

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

RFC 69
RFC 5733

Title:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Contact 
Mapping 
Author: S. Hollenbeck
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:shollenb...@verisign.com
Pages:  41
Characters: 80698
Obsoletes:  RFC4933
See Also:   RFC0069

I-D Tag:draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5733.txt

This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
mapping for the provisioning and management of individual or
organizational social information identifiers (known as "contacts")
stored in a shared central repository.  Specified in Extensible
Markup Language (XML), the mapping defines EPP command syntax and
semantics as applied to contacts.  This document obsoletes RFC 4933.  
[STANDARDS TRACK]

This is now a Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


STD 69, RFC 5732 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Host Mapping

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

STD 69
RFC 5732

Title:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Host 
Mapping 
Author: S. Hollenbeck
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:shollenb...@verisign.com
Pages:  29
Characters: 56219
Obsoletes:  RFC4932
See Also:   STD0069

I-D Tag:draft-hollenbeck-rfc4932bis-01.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5732.txt

This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
mapping for the provisioning and management of Internet host names
stored in a shared central repository.  Specified in XML, the mapping
defines EPP command syntax and semantics as applied to host names.
This document obsoletes RFC 4932.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This is now a Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


STD 69, RFC 5731 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

STD 69
RFC 5731

Title:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain 
Name Mapping 
Author: S. Hollenbeck
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:shollenb...@verisign.com
Pages:  44
Characters: 87764
Obsoletes:  RFC4931
See Also:   STD0069

I-D Tag:draft-hollenbeck-rfc4931bis-01.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5731.txt

This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
mapping for the provisioning and management of Internet domain names
stored in a shared central repository.  Specified in XML, the mapping
defines EPP command syntax and semantics as applied to domain names.
This document obsoletes RFC 4931.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This is now a Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


STD 69, RFC 5730 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

STD 69
RFC 5730

Title:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) 
Author: S. Hollenbeck
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:shollenb...@verisign.com
Pages:  67
Characters: 134464
Obsoletes:  RFC4930
See Also:   STD0069

I-D Tag:draft-hollenbeck-rfc4930bis-02.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5730.txt

This document describes an application-layer client-server protocol
for the provisioning and management of objects stored in a shared
central repository.  Specified in XML, the protocol defines generic
object management operations and an extensible framework that maps
protocol operations to objects.  This document includes a protocol
specification, an object mapping template, and an XML media type
registration.  This document obsoletes RFC 4930.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This is now a Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5647 on AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5647

Title:  AES Galois Counter Mode for 
the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol 
Author: K. Igoe, J. Solinas
Status: Informational
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:kmi...@nsa.gov, 
jaso...@orion.ncsc.mil
Pages:  10
Characters: 20990
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-03.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5647.txt

Secure shell (SSH) is a secure remote-login protocol.  SSH
provides for algorithms that provide authentication, key agreement,
confidentiality, and data-integrity services.  The purpose of this
document is to show how the AES Galois Counter Mode can be used to
provide both confidentiality and data integrity to the SSH Transport
Layer Protocol.  This memo provides information for the Internet 
community.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5643 on Management Information Base for OSPFv3

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5643

Title:  Management Information Base for OSPFv3 
Author: D. Joyal, Ed.,
V. Manral, Ed.
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:djo...@nortel.com, 
vish...@ipinfusion.com
Pages:  95
Characters: 192945
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-15.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5643.txt

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in IPv6-based internets.  In
particular, it defines objects for managing the Open Shortest Path
First (OSPF) Routing Protocol for IPv6, otherwise known as OSPF
version 3 (OSPFv3).  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This document is a product of the Open Shortest Path First IGP Working Group of 
the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5641 on Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) Extended Circuit Status Values

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5641

Title:  Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 
3 (L2TPv3) Extended Circuit Status Values 
Author: N. McGill, C. Pignataro
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:nmcg...@cisco.com, 
cpign...@cisco.com
Pages:  11
Characters: 23133
Updates:RFC3931, RFC4349, RFC4454, RFC4591, RFC4719

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-l2tpext-circuit-status-extensions-05.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5641.txt

This document defines additional Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3
(L2TPv3) bit values to be used within the "Circuit Status" Attribute
Value Pair (AVP) to communicate finer-grained error states for
Attachment Circuits (ACs) and pseudowires (PWs).  It also generalizes
the Active bit and deprecates the use of the New bit in the Circuit
Status AVP, updating RFC 3931, RFC 4349, RFC 4454, RFC 4591, and RFC
4719.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This document is a product of the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions 
Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5640 on Load-Balancing for Mesh Softwires

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5640

Title:  Load-Balancing for Mesh Softwires 
Author: C. Filsfils, P. Mohapatra,
C. Pignataro
Status: Standards Track
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:cfils...@cisco.com, 
pmoha...@cisco.com, 
cpign...@cisco.com
Pages:  6
Characters: 12250
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-softwire-lb-03.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5640.txt

Payloads transported over a Softwire mesh service (as defined by BGP
Encapsulation Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI) information
exchange) often carry a number of identifiable, distinct flows.  It
can, in some circumstances, be desirable to distribute these flows
over the equal cost multiple paths (ECMPs) that exist in the packet
switched network.  Currently, the payload of a packet entering the
Softwire can only be interpreted by the ingress and egress routers.
Thus, the load-balancing decision of a core router is only based on
the encapsulating header, presenting much less entropy than available
in the payload or the encapsulated header since the Softwire
encapsulation acts in a tunneling fashion.  This document describes a
method for achieving comparable load-balancing efficiency in a
network carrying Softwire mesh service over Layer Two Tunneling
Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3) over IP or Generic Routing
Encapsulation (GRE) encapsulation to what would be achieved without
such encapsulation.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5616 on Streaming Internet Messaging Attachments

2009-08-31 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5616

Title:  Streaming Internet Messaging Attachments 
Author: N. Cook
Status: Informational
Date:   August 2009
Mailbox:neil.c...@noware.co.uk
Pages:  28
Characters: 65579
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-13.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5616.txt

This document describes a method for streaming multimedia attachments
received by a resource- and/or network-constrained device from an
IMAP server.  It allows such clients, which often have limits in
storage space and bandwidth, to play video and audio email content.

The document describes a profile for making use of the URLAUTH-
authorized IMAP URLs (RFC 5092), the Network Announcement SIP Media
Service (RFC 4240), and the Media Server Control Markup Language (RFC
5022).  This memo provides information for the Internet community.

This document is a product of the Enhancements to Internet email to support 
diverse service environments Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Nomcom 2009-10: Reminder Call for Nominations, Local Office hours, Nominee Questionnaires available

2009-08-31 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all,

This email covers 3 topics:
1) Reminder: Call for Nominations
2) New: Local Office Hours
3) New: Questionnaires available for nominees 

Best Regards, 
Mary Barnes
nomcom-ch...@ietf.org
mary.h.bar...@gmail.com
mary.bar...@nortel.com


===
1) Call for Nominations

The nomination period ends in less than 3 weeks on Sept. 18th, 2009. We
appreciate the folks that have taken the time to make nominations thus
far. But, we do need more nominations. Please use the online tool to
nominate - it's easy and secure:
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/09/nominate

Details on the open positions, as well as other details and options for
making nominations are available on the Nomcom homepage:
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/09/

Please consider that the sooner you make the nominations, the more time
your nominee(s) will have to complete the necessary questionnaire (item 3
below).  As well, please consider nominating more than one person for a
particular position. You will have the opportunity to provide additional
feedback later and it's important to consider that not all nominees will
be able to accept the nomination. 


2) Local office hours
---

In order to facilitate additional feedback, the Nomcom is planning to
make themselves available for office areas at various geographic locations
for 3 weeks in September, starting on the 8th. 

Below please find the list of locations where Nomcom members will be
available for these f2f meetings . Unless dates are identified below, the
Nomcom member is generally available for part of the day during the weeks
of Sept 8-11, Sept 14-18 and Sept 21-25. Also, languages other than
English in which the Nomcom member is fluent are identfied.  

Please contact a Nomcom member in a specific geographic location to
arrange a convenient meeting time and place. Most Nomcom members are
flexible as to meeting locations - i.e., we can travel to your office,
meet at our offices or somewhere in between.  

As a reminder folks can always contact any Nomcom member to provide
feedback at anytime - i.e., you don't need to participate in these f2f
sessions to provide feedback. 


Belgium: 
 Dimitri Papadimitriou - dimitri.papadimitr...@alcatel-lucent.be (Sept
21-25) (Languages: French) 

Boston, Mass, USA:  
 Stephen Kent - k...@bbn.com  (Sept 16-18) 

Boulder, CO, USA: 
 Wassim Haddad - wmhad...@gmail.com (Sept 14-18)

Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX, USA:  
 Mary Barnes  - mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 
 Lucy Yong - lucyy...@huawei.com  (Languages: Chinese) 

Helsinki, Finland: 
  Simo Veikkolainen - simo.veikkolai...@nokia.com (Languages: Finnish)
 

Ithaca, NY, USA: 
  Scott Brim - scott.b...@gmail.com

Montevideo, Uruguay: 
  Roque Gagliano - ro...@lacnic.net (Sept 14-18, 21-25) (Languages:
Spanish, Portuguese) 

Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
 Wassim Haddad - wmhad...@gmail.com (Sept 8-11)
 -- Can also be available in Ottawa if folks are interested 

Paris, France: 
  Dimitri Papadimitriou - dimitri.papadimitr...@alcatel-lucent.be
(Sept 15-18)  (Languages: French)

San Diego, CA, USA: 
  Randall Gellens - rg+i...@qualcomm.com   
  Dave Crocker - dcroc...@bbiw.net  (Sept 16-18)

Silicon Valley/SF Bay,  CA, USA: 
  Dave Crocker - dcroc...@bbiw.net  (Sept 8-11, Sept 14-15, Sept
21-25)   
  Dorothy Gellert - dorothy.gell...@gmail.com

3) Questionnaires available for nominees: 

For folks that have been notified that they have been nominated for any
of the positions, the questionnaires are now available on the Nomcom09
tools website:
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/09/iab-questionnaire
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/09/iaoc-questionnaire
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/09/iesg-questionnaire

If you have any questions, please let me know. I will be contacting
everyone individually, as well as sending reminders before the deadline. 


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


IETF 76 - Registration Now Open

2009-08-31 Thread Alexa Morris

76th IETF Meeting
Hiroshima, Japan
November 8-13, 2009
Host: WIDE

Registration is now open! Note: while we stated earlier that we would  
be moving to a new registration system, we have postponed that  
transition to IETF 77. If you have attended a recent IETF meeting, the  
IETF 76 registration system will be quite familiar.


Register online at: http://www.ietf.org/meetings/76/

1.  Registration Categories
2.  RFID Tagging Experiment
3.  Visas and Letters of Invitation
4.  Accommodations & Breakfast Information

Changes from daylight savings to standard time are noted below.

1) Registration Categories

A. Early-Bird Registration - USD 635.00
	Register and pay before Friday, 30 October 2009 at 17:00 PDT (24:00  
UTC/GMT) for Early-Bird rate.


B. After Early-Bird cutoff - USD 785.00

C. Full-time Student Registrations - USD 150.00
	Full-time students with proper ID are eligible to receive a special  
USD 150.00 student rate. Student rate is not subject to any late-fees.  
Students will also be able to register on-site at the special student  
rate. Failure to provide valid student ID on-site will revoke the  
special student status.


D. NEW: One Day Pass Registration - USD 200.00
	For IETF 76 we are also experimenting with a one-day pass for $200.  
Benefits are:


	1. Attend all sessions during any one day of the Meeting, and partake  
of the food and beverage during the breaks

2. You select which day to attend when you show up onsite to check-in
3. Payments may be made onsite without a late fee
	4. Pass can be upgraded to a full Meeting Registration, however, late  
fee may apply if initial one-day payment not 	made before Early Bird  
deadline

5. Attend Sunday Tutorials at no additional charge
6. Attend Sunday Welcome Reception at no additional charge
7. Attend Wednesday and Thursday Plenaries at no additional charge
	8. If available, you may purchase a ticket between 4-5pm on Tuesday  
to attend the Host's social event that 	evening


CANCELLATION
The cut-off for registration cancellation is Monday, 2 November 2009  
at 17:00 PST (01:00 Tuesday, November 3 UTC/GMT). Cancellations are  
subject to a 10% (ten percent) cancellation fee if requested by that  
date and time.


Online Registration ends: Friday, 6 November, 2009 at 17:00 local  
Hiroshima time (00:00 Pacific, 08:00 UTC/GMT).


On-site Registration
You can register onsite at the meeting in Hiroshima, Japan starting  
Sunday, 8 November at 12:00 noon PST (local Hiroshima time).


Meeting Schedule: Start Monday morning and run through Friday at 15:15  
local Hiroshima time.  Most training sessions will take place on  
Sunday afternoon 13 November 2009. Participants should plan their  
travel accordingly.


2) RFID Tagging Experiment
	The hosts for IETF 76 are organizing an RFID tag experiment for the  
meeting. The tag will be affixed to the underside of your meeting  
badge, as a sticker, and will contain only your full name and any  
listed affiliation. The experiment will allow us to explore the  
possibility of electronic blue sheets (though we are still using paper  
blue sheets as the official blue sheets of record for this meeting).  
We also hope that the RFID tag will improve the experience for remote  
participants, since speakers will be identified through the RFID tags.  
While you will be given the option to "opt out" of this experiment  
when you register for the meeting, we sincerely hope you will  
participate.  More information is available here: http://www.ietf.org/EbluesheetInformation.html


3) Visas and Letters of Invitation
	Please check the Japanese MOFA site (http://www.mofa.go.jp/j_info/visit/visa/02.html 
) for list of countries with visa exemptions. If you travel on a  
passport issued by a country NOT on this list, you will require  
documents issued in Japanese by the local host. An English language  
letter of invitation from the IETF Secretariat WILL NOT suffice to  
obtain a visa.


We recommend at least one month to complete the visa process.

To begin the process: 1) please complete Meeting registration and  
payment of registration fees, 2) reserve accommodation, 3) complete  
and return the visa information form, which are available in either  
xls or PDF format on the host site here: http://www.ietf76.jp/


In addition, if you would also like to receive the official IETF  
letter of invitation, you will be given the option of requesting one  
after you have completed your meeting registration. Please note that  
this letter will not assist with the visa process.


4) Accommodations & Breakfast Information
	Information on IETF 76 accommodations can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/76/hotel.html 
. Please note that breakfast will NOT be provided as part of the on- 
site meeting services. If you reserve a sleeping room at the ANA Crown  
Plaza Hotel or at any of the IETF overflow properties, breakfast is  
included with your room. If you choose to 

Document Action: 'Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use in Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks' to Informational RFC

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use 
   in Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks '
as an Informational RFC


This document is the product of the Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Jari Arkko and Ralph Droms.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-aero-reqs-04.txt

Technical Summary

   This document describes the requirements and desired properties of
   Network Mobility (NEMO) Route Optimization techniques for use in
   global networked communications systems for aeronautics and space
   exploration.

Working Group Summary

   This is product of the MEXT WG.

Document Quality

   Substantial input to these requirements was given by aeronautical
   communications experts outside the IETF, including members of the
   International Civil Aviation Orgnanization (ICAO) and other
   aeronautical communications standards bodies.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd is Marcelo Braun, and the responsible
   Area Director is Jari Arkko.

RFC Editor Note

  Please change the following:

  OLD:
  (e.g. the Gatelink system)
  NEW:
  (e.g. local networks available while on a gate)

  OLD:
  (currently on the surface when connected to a wired Gatelink system)
  NEW:
  (currently on the surface when connected to a wired link at a gate)

  OLD:
  (link technologies and acronyms are briefly defined in Appendix A.
  NEW:
  (link technologies and acronyms are briefly defined in Appendix A).

  OLD:
  rouge
  NEW
  rogue

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Extended MKCOL for WebDAV' to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Extended MKCOL for WebDAV '
as a Proposed Standard


This document is the product of the vCard and CardDAV Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Alexey Melnikov and Lisa Dusseault.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-06.txt

Technical Summary
  This specification extends the Web Distributed Authoring and
  Versioning (WebDAV) MKCOL method to allow collections of
  arbitrary resourcetype to be created and to allow properties
  to be set at the same time. It avoids minting new MK* methods
  (such as MKCALENDAR) for each new type of collection.
   
Working Group Summary
  Process was smooth; the only early disagreement was about the
  scope of this document (whether it should apply to
  non-collection resources as well, and whether it should also
  setting ACLs). In the end, the WG converged on the minimal
  functionality needed to resolve the issue.

Document Quality
  This protocol extension defined in this document is used
  by the VCARDDAV protocol (another deliverable of the Working
  Group), for which several vendors have announced support
  (for instance, Apple, and Viagenie).

Personnel
  The Document Shepherd for this document was Julian Reschke,
  and the responsible Area Director is Alexey Melnikov.

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Elliptic-Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure Shell Transport Layer' to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Elliptic-Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure Shell Transport 
   Layer '
as a Proposed Standard

This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group. 

The IESG contact person is Tim Polk.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-green-secsh-ecc-09.txt

Technical Summary

This document describes algorithms based on Elliptic Curve
Cryptography (ECC) for use within the Secure Shell (SSH) transport
protocol.  In particular, it specifies: Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman
(ECDH) key agreement, Elliptic Curve Menezes-Qu-Vanstone (ECMQV) key
agreement and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for
use in the SSH Transport Layer protocol.

Working Group Summary

This document is the result an individual submission by members of
the community interested in seeing support for use of ECC algorithms
in the SSH protocol.  While there is no active working group behind
this work, it was extensively reviewed and discussed on the ietf-ssh
mailing list, which was the home of the Secure Shell Working Group
before that group concluded and still counts many of the participants
of that working group among its members.

Document Quality

While there are no existing implementations of this protocol, there
has been indication of interest from SSH implementors.

Personnel

The document shepherd for this document is Jeffrey Hutzelman
The responsible Area Director is Tim Polk.

RFC Editor Note

Section 12.1

Please remove the URL from the reference [FIPS-180-3].
 
Section 12.2

Please remove the URLs from references [NIST-800-57] and [NIST-CURVES].

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Alarms in SYSLOG' to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Alarms in SYSLOG '
as a Proposed Standard


This document is the product of the Operations and Management Area Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Dan Romascanu and Ron Bonica.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-alarm-02.txt

Technical Summary

   This document describes how to send alarm information in syslog.  It
   includes the mapping of ITU perceived severities onto syslog message
   fields and a number of alarm-specific SD-PARAM definitions from X.733
   and the IETF Alarm MIB.

Working Group Summary

   The document was revised based on WG feedback & the result meets
   the issues that were raised.

Document Quality

   SYSLOG is widely implemented and deployed, and the ITU severities are

   used by a number of protocols and alarm models including the IETF 
   Alarm MIB. 

Personnel

   Scott Bradner is the Document Shepherd for this document.  Dan 
   Romascanu is the Responsible Area Director.

RFC Editor Note

Please insert the following edits in the published version: 

1. In section 1, 

Old:Alarm related terminology is defined in [RFC3877].


New:Alarm related terminology is defined in [RFC3877].

SD-ID, SD-PARM and other syslog related terms are defined in [RFC5424] 


2. In section 3

Old: the SD-PARARMS are mandatory.

New: the SD-PARAMS are mandatory.

 

3. In section 3.6

Old: [RFC1738] and its updates.  In the case of an SNMP resource, the

New: [RFC3986] and its updates.  In the case of an SNMP resource, the

 

4. In section 4

Old: In this example, extended from [Syslog], the VERSION is 1 and the
New: In this example, extended from [RFC5424], the VERSION is 1 and the

OLD: 'APP-NAME is "su"'
NEW: 'APP-NAME is "evntslog"'

OLD: 'examples...@0' 
NEW: 'examples...@32473'

OLD: 'resourceURI =' 
NEW: 'resourceURI='

5. In section 6

Old: IANA is requested to register the SD-IDs

New: IANA is requested to register the syslog Structured Data ID Values

6. In section 8.1

Old:[RFC1738]  Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill,
"Uniform
  Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.

New:[RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and Masinter, L.,
"Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC RFC3986, January
2005.

7. In Section 3.1: 

OLD:  If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "resource" SD-PARAM MUST be
   supported. 

NEW:  If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "resource" SD-PARAM MUST be
   included. 

8. In Section 3.2: 

OLD: If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "probableCause" SD-PARAM MUST


   be supported.

NEW: If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "probableCause" SD-PARAM MUST
   be included.

9. In Section 3.3: 

OLD: If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "perceivedSeverity" SD-PARAM
   MUST be supported.

NEW: If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "perceivedSeverity" SD-PARAM
   MUST be included.

10. In Section 3.4:

OLD: If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "eventType" SD-PARAM SHOULD
be supported. 

NEW: If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "eventType" SD-PARAM SHOULD be
included. 

11. In Section 3.5: 

OLD: If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "trendIndication" SD-PARAM
   SHOULD be supported. 

NEW: If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "trendIndication" SD-PARAM
   SHOULD be included. 

12. In Section 3.6: 

OLD: If the "alarm" SD-ID is supported, the "resourceURI" SD-PARAM SHOULD


   be supported.

NEW: If the "alarm" SD-ID is included, the "resourceURI" SD-PARAM SHOULD
   be included.

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis (iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)) to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Calendaring and Scheduling 
Standards Simplification WG (calsify) to consider the following document:

- 'iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) '
as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-14. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis-09.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=13952&rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Mapping Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications to SYSLOG Messages' to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Mapping Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications to 
   SYSLOG Messages '
as a Proposed Standard


This document is the product of the Operations and Management Area Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Dan Romascanu and Ron Bonica.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-snmp-05.txt

Technical Summary

   This memo defines a mapping from Simple Network Management Protocol
   (SNMP) notifications to SYSLOG messages.

Working Group Summary

   There was consensus in the working group to publish this document.

Document Quality

   SYSLOG and SNMP are widely implemented and deployed. The document was
   reviewed in the Working Group and by the MIB DOctors. 

Personnel

   Scott Bradner is the Document Shepherd. Dan Romascanu is the 
   Responsible Area Director.

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications' to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple 
   Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications '
as a Proposed Standard


This document is the product of the Operations and Management Area Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Dan Romascanu and Ron Bonica.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-msg-mib-06.txt

Technical Summary

   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
   In particular, it defines a mapping of SYSLOG messages to Simple
   Network Management Protocol (SNMP) notifications.

Working Group Summary

   There was consensus in the working group to publish these documents.

Document Quality

   SNMP and SYSLOG are widely used and deployed. The document was 
   reviewed in the Working Group and by MIB DOctors. 

Personnel

   Scott Bradner is the Document Shepherd. Dan Romascanu is the 
   Responsible Area Director.

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption (IKEv2 Session Resumption) to Proposed Standard

2009-08-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the IP Security Maintenance and 
Extensions WG (ipsecme) to consider the following document:

- 'IKEv2 Session Resumption '
as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-14. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-07.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17990&rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce