On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:57 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Thu 05/Jan/2023 22:26:32 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 1/5/2023 9:20 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> How about "replay-resistant protocol"? > > > > btw, it isn't clear that 'protocol' is what a solution will be. might > be. > > might not. might be purely operational conventions, for example. > > That's right. "Replay-resistant solution"? > The current charter text says "replay-resistant mechanisms", which avoids constraining us only to protocol solutions. I'm not seeing any other proposed changes to the charter; the milestones are negotiable in flight so they don't need to be perfect out of the starting gate, but suggestions there are welcome. Absent any other proposed changes to the charter's text, I'll release this for the next phase of review ("External Review", i.e., the whole IETF) in the next few days. -MSK, ART AD
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim